Comments 1 - 26 of 26        Search these comments

3   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Mar 23, 5:40pm  

tovarichpeter says
George Will


@Tovarichpeter, pretty much everybody who supports Trump thinks George Will is a Bow-tie wearing Swamp Dweller whose job it is to put up fake resistance to the Globalist Left.

Quoting his disapproval is actually an endorsement.
4   bob2356   2018 Mar 23, 6:30pm  

TwoScoopsPlissken says
pretty much everybody who supports Trump


are enamored with small dick draft dodger war hawks. There I finished the sentence for you so it is correct now.
5   Strategist   2018 Mar 23, 7:26pm  

John Bolton believes we need a preemptive strike against North Korea and Iran. I agree.
6   Strategist   2018 Mar 23, 9:07pm  

Iran has condemned Trump's choice of John Bolton.
If Iran condemns it, it must be a good choice.
7   Ceffer   2018 Mar 23, 11:20pm  

He does bear a family resemblance to Slim Pickens.

8   bob2356   2018 Mar 24, 3:11am  

Ceffer says
He does bear a family resemblance to Slim Pickens.


You would think he earned enough to pay a decent barber. Maybe trump can make a recommendation.
9   anonymous   2018 Mar 24, 9:23am  

And Ronald McTrump is Foghorn Leghorn
10   Ceffer   2018 Mar 24, 12:50pm  

If you did DNA testing of his mustache, would you find Stormy Daniels in there?
11   bob2356   2018 Mar 24, 10:08pm  

Strategist says
John Bolton believes we need a preemptive strike against North Korea and Iran. I agree.


I'm assuming that the super hawks have their children currently serving to take part in this preemptive strike and subsequent war. . I would hate to think there are more turmp/bush/bolton chickenhawks out there that passed up their opportunity to show how it is done and only have big balls when other peoples children are at risk. After all Donald Junior will be joining up to do his part.
12   bob2356   2018 Mar 24, 10:16pm  

TwoScoopsPlissken says
Bill Kristol


The Iraq war will be over in 2 months Kristol? What a schmuck. At least Frum finally admitted supporting the Iraq war was dumb.
13   Strategist   2018 Mar 25, 9:41am  

bob2356 says
Strategist says
John Bolton believes we need a preemptive strike against North Korea and Iran. I agree.


I'm assuming that the super hawks have their children currently serving to take part in this preemptive strike and subsequent war. . I would hate to think there are more turmp/bush/bolton chickenhawks out there that passed up their opportunity to show how it is done and only have big balls when other peoples children are at risk. After all Donald Junior will be joining up to do his part.


Lousy comeback.
14   bob2356   2018 Mar 25, 10:18am  

Strategist says
Lousy comeback.


Only for people who want other people and other peoples children to do what they didn't have the balls or patriotism to do themselves. I'm from third generation career military with numerous family members who served and fought the last 75 years. If I hadn't developed heart arrhythmia in the ROTC I would have been career military also. The chickenhawk macho man crowd itching to go to war but who did everything to avoid service themselves are just despicable.
15   Strategist   2018 Mar 25, 12:57pm  

bob2356 says
Strategist says
Lousy comeback.


Only for people who want other people and other peoples children to do what they didn't have the balls or patriotism to do themselves. I'm from third generation career military with numerous family members who served and fought the last 75 years. If I hadn't developed heart arrhythmia in the ROTC I would have been career military also. The chickenhawk macho man crowd itching to go to war but who did everything to avoid service themselves are just despicable.


Another lousy comeback.
16   bob2356   2018 Mar 25, 4:59pm  

APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
Bolton is almost as effeminate as TRUMPLIGULA!


Trump has better hair.
17   bob2356   2018 Mar 25, 5:01pm  

Strategist says
Another lousy comeback.


So you are saying your kids WILL be fighting in operation invade Iran that you support so heartily? I'm sure Donald Jr. is signing up soon.
18   Strategist   2018 Mar 25, 8:35pm  

bob2356 says
Strategist says
Another lousy comeback.


So you are saying your kids WILL be fighting in operation invade Iran that you support so heartily? I'm sure Donald Jr. is signing up soon.


Those who want to join the military will, and those who don't want to, won't. What matters is, we eliminate a threat before it's too late.
If you had any real arguments against preemptive strikes against N Korea and Iran, you would have used them by now.
19   bob2356   2018 Mar 26, 6:38am  

Strategist says
Those who want to join the military will, and those who don't want to, won't. What matters is, we eliminate a threat before it's too late.
If you had any real arguments against preemptive strikes against N Korea and Iran, you would have used them by now.


I don't have any problem with pre emptive strikes. I have a problem with who is calling for pre emptive strikes and why. Like needle dick turmp//bolton chickenhawks stroking their own inferiority complex. The people with the balls and patriotism to have been there and done that are not calling for pre emptive strikes. They understand the responsibilities and consequences involved. .
20   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Mar 26, 9:27am  

2018: Today on the Daily Standard Podcast, editor at large Bill Kristol discusses why he's a little nervous about John Bolton as National Security Advisor, what the next two months will mean for U.S. foreign policy with a new secretary of state and NSA, and his most recent column on why he is still a Republican.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/john-bolton-and-the-uncertain-future-of-u.s.-foreign-policy/article/2012072#.WrVE-WqUVQs.twitter

2005: John Bolton is an exceptional choice to be our next U.N. ambassador. By William Kristol
http://www.weeklystandard.com/article/6677

We've always been at war with East Asia!
21   RWSGFY   2018 Mar 26, 10:23am  

bob2356 says
The people with the balls and patriotism to have been there and done that are not calling for pre emptive strikes.


Never? Does this mean that either Israeli leaders don't have balls and patriotism and hasn't really "been there" or preemptive strikes on Iraqi and Syrian nuclear reactors didn't happen. It can't be both, if I read you correctly.
22   Strategist   2018 Mar 26, 10:50am  

bob2356 says
Strategist says
Those who want to join the military will, and those who don't want to, won't. What matters is, we eliminate a threat before it's too late.
If you had any real arguments against preemptive strikes against N Korea and Iran, you would have used them by now.


I don't have any problem with pre emptive strikes. I have a problem with who is calling for pre emptive strikes and why. Like needle dick turmp//bolton chickenhawks stroking their own inferiority complex. The people with the balls and patriotism to have been there and done that are not calling for pre emptive strikes. They understand the responsibilities and consequences involved. .


So you have no problem with preemptive strikes, but are more concerned with who is calling for them and why. LOL. The ones calling for a strike believe we should stop a Hitler before he gets nukes, not after. It's as simple as that.
23   Strategist   2018 Mar 26, 10:54am  

Satoshi_Nakamoto says
bob2356 says
The people with the balls and patriotism to have been there and done that are not calling for pre emptive strikes.


Never? Does this mean that either Israeli leaders don't have balls and patriotism and hasn't really "been there" or preemptive strikes on Iraqi and Syrian nuclear reactors didn't happen. It can't be both, if I read you correctly.


Israel will never ever let Iran acquire nukes, especially as Iran keeps threatening to wipe them out. Why should Israel take a chance? They will use nukes to destroy Iran's nuclear installations if need be. I agree with and support Israel.
25   bob2356   2018 Mar 26, 1:40pm  

Satoshi_Nakamoto says
Never? Does this mean that either Israeli leaders don't have balls and patriotism and hasn't really "been there" or preemptive strikes on Iraqi and Syrian nuclear reactors didn't happen. It can't be both, if I read you correctly.


You have got to be shitting me. What does a raid in 1981 in Iraq or 2007 in Syria have to do with the situation today in Iran? Which leaders in Israel are calling for pre emptive strikes? Go ahead, post all of the threats of pre emptive strikes from Isreal's leaders today. They are saying the exact same thing as they have the last 20 years . The time for a strike would have been 5 years ago, yet nothing. Netanyahu is working with Putin, like their meeting in socchi, to try to defuse the situation for christ sakes. .

Because they have been there and done that. If and when Isreal's leaders should decide to strike they will have formed very clear plans, goals, and objectives in coordination with military leaders including very careful consideration as to the consequences. Trump can't form clear plans, goals, and objectives for his breakfast.
26   RWSGFY   2018 Mar 26, 1:49pm  

bob2356 says
Satoshi_Nakamoto says
Never? Does this mean that either Israeli leaders don't have balls and patriotism and hasn't really "been there" or preemptive strikes on Iraqi and Syrian nuclear reactors didn't happen. It can't be both, if I read you correctly.


You have got to be shitting me. What does a raid in 1981 in Iraq or 2007 in Syria have to do with the situation today in Iran?


What does situation today in Iran has to do with your premise that preemptive strikes are never ordered by war veterans but always by "chickenhawks" who "hasn't been there"? Nothing, except lame attempt at changing the subject.

Israel and their preemptive strikes on Iraq and Syria are perfect counter-example which ruins that flawed theory of yours. Because everybody and his dog knows that the guys who ordered these strikes "has been there" and more than once. That's it.

So who's shitting who here?

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions