California to require Patrick to change his Forum. We will have to submit our posts to him, so he can forward it to the official ministry of "Snopes", for approval to post.
« prev   random   next »

8
0

California to require Patrick to change his Forum. We will have to submit our posts to him, so he can forward it to the official ministry of "Snopes", for approval to post.

By Tenpoundbass following x   2018 Apr 10, 6:33am 796 views   24 comments   watch   sfw   quote     share    


http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/04/it-begins-california-senator-introduces-bill-to-kill-free-speech-requires-state-sanctioned-fact-checkers-to-approve-online-content/


SB1424 is brief. Read it:

This bill would require any person who operates a social media, as defined, Internet Web site with a physical presence in California to develop a strategic plan to verify news stories shared on its Web site. The bill would require the plan to include, among other things, a plan to mitigate the spread of false information through news stories, the utilization of fact-checkers to verify news stories, providing outreach to social media users, and placing a warning on a news story containing false information.

(a) Any person who operates a social media Internet Web site with physical presence in California shall develop a strategic plan to verify news stories shared on its Internet Web site.

(b) The strategic plan shall include, but is not limited to, all of the following:

(1) A plan to mitigate the spread of false information through news stories.

(2) The utilization of fact-checkers to verify news stories.

(3) Providing outreach to social media users regarding news stories containing false information.

(4) Placing a warning on a news story containing false information.

(c) As used in this section, “social media” means an electronic service or account, or electronic content, including, but not limited to, videos, still photographs, blogs, video blogs, podcasts, instant and text messages, email, online services or accounts, or Internet Web site profiles or locations.
1   Tenpoundbass   ignore (8)   2018 Apr 10, 6:34am   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

The good news is between everyone making an Exodus out of California, and the illegal voters about to be expunged from everything.
After the 2020 elections California might lose 2 to 3 ECV's
2   WookieMan   ignore (0)   2018 Apr 10, 6:44am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

Tenpoundbass says
(a) Any person who operates a social media Internet Web site with physical presence in California shall develop a strategic plan to verify news stories shared on its Internet Web site.


Given the costs of real estate (I'm sure commercial or land for server buildings is high as well like residential) in CA being so high, are there that many web sites "physically" sitting in CA on a server? This seems kind of like a stupid plan given the relative ease in moving a web sites information to another physical location. Businesses will just move the "site" to another state in order not have to deal with one of the dumbest laws/regulations I maybe have seen in a while.

Look to short REIT's that are heavy in tech/server commercial property in CA if this goes through. I don't know of any, but I'm sure there's a special REIT out there for that type of thing.
3   komputodo   ignore (0)   2018 Apr 10, 6:59am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

Just use a disclaimer that the post isn't a "NEWS" story.
4   zzyzzx   ignore (1)   2018 Apr 10, 7:09am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

WookieMan says
Given the costs of real estate (I'm sure commercial or land for server buildings is high as well like residential) in CA being so high, are there that many web sites "physically" sitting in CA on a server? This seems kind of like a stupid plan given the relative ease in moving a web sites information to another physical location. Businesses will just move the "site" to another state in order not have to deal with one of the dumbest laws/regulations I maybe have seen in a while.


We really don't even know if this website is hosted in CA.
5   WookieMan   ignore (0)   2018 Apr 10, 7:12am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

zzyzzx says
We really don't even know if this website is hosted in CA.


It's either San Fran or New York based on the hosting info. So 50/50 shot or so I believe. Either way, switching to servers in a different state is pretty trivial. A lot easier then having to comply with some dumbass regulation.
6   FortWayne   ignore (1)   2018 Apr 10, 8:06am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

There goes first amendment.

I hope no one thought liberals are only after the second amendment.

I’m pretty sure a class action lawsuit would nullify this if it passes.
7   mell   ignore (1)   2018 Apr 10, 9:25am   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

What an idiotic bill, but it's never going to pass.
8   WookieMan   ignore (0)   2018 Apr 10, 9:30am   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

mell says
but it's never going to pass.


I'm not in CA, but have heard some pretty dumbass stuff coming out of there. Never say never.
9   Patrick   ignore (0)   2018 Apr 10, 9:33am   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

I don't see how that bill could possibly stand, since it would be a clear violation of the first amendment:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


This would totally be an abridgement of freedom of speech and of the press.

The important thing is that everyone in the Sacramento area vote against CA state senator Richard Pan from now on.
10   Ceffer   ignore (1)   2018 Apr 10, 11:18am   ↑ like (8)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

As long as the "fact checkers" are immense hirsute lesbians, gays, transgendered, university diversity gatekeepers, feminists and their puling cucks, minorities seeking reparations, public service union reps, anti-gun weepers and Hollywood Royals, I have absolutely no problem with these policies. I know they will only reflect the fairest of fair speech.
11   Goran_K   ignore (0)   2018 Apr 10, 11:22am   ↑ like (4)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

Patrick says
I don't see how that bill could possibly stand, since it would be a clear violation of the first amendment:


Have you seen what California democrats have done to the 2nd amendment?

This is what us libertarians (and some conservatives) have been saying for years. First they come for the 2nd, then they go for the 1st. Socialist are very predictable.

Democrat leftist do not respect or care for the Constitution, it's a barrier to their type of rule.
13   ForcedTQ   ignore (0)   2018 Apr 11, 9:35am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

This is what the Constitution was made for. This proposed legislation would have the government limit free speech. That is unconstitutional based on the limitations placed on the government under the first amendment. The people now see how much contempt Richard Pan has for the Constitution, it is time to RECALL HIS ASS! He is trying to subvert the constitution, we cannot let him do this.
14   WookieMan   ignore (0)   2018 Apr 11, 9:43am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

Patrick says
I still can't believe that this is real, but it is


It's bad. I'm still hung up on "physical presence." What does that even mean? If your corporate HQ is in CA you have to do this? Or is it literally the physical location of your severs and the data? What about sites that are hobbies that there's no revenue generated and it's not even a business? It does say "person" in there.

I don't know this politician, but this is so poorly written it's alarming that they got elected. Or if he has staff they're incompetent.
15   Goran_K   ignore (0)   2018 Apr 11, 9:45am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

Voting Democrat has consequences.
16   CovfefeButDeadly   ignore (3)   2018 Apr 11, 10:08am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

Goran_K says
Voting Democrat has consequences.


I'm not even sure if its the Senator that's worse or the Democrat sheeple that voted this ignorant mouth breather into office.
17   CovfefeButDeadly   ignore (3)   2018 Apr 11, 10:16am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

HEYYOU says
HEYYOU's federal tax proves that there is no tax cut.
A tax is just an example of Republican Redistribution Socialism that steals from those that create their personal wealth.
Fucking Rep/Con theives! Why do they punish the Free Market?


You don't get a federal tax cut when you are on Social Security disability and don't actually pay federal taxes.
18   Patrick   ignore (0)   2018 Apr 11, 4:38pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

Good point from a friend:

all joking aside, it's unbelievable (maybe it's not) such a law could even be proposed

It seems unenforceable just from a practical level

I mean, what are the criteria for proving "truth", say of a particular interpretation of certain events. What would be the criteria to determine "truth" or "falsity" of some interpretation of the RFK assassination? If someone suggested the CIA was behind it thru Palestian agents it controlled, would that be sanctionable under the law if the site that hosted such comments did not "examine" it and post appropriate warnings?

It really seems that the whole purpose of the law is to further burden the expression of free speech, forcing it into channels acceptable to the powers that be. Or just to chill the expression of speaking generally other than in official and corporate channels.


Yes, looks like our corporate owners want to reserve the definition of "truth" for themselves and prosecute truth that they don't want to hear. No other opinions allowed.
19   Tenpoundbass   ignore (8)   2018 Apr 11, 4:41pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

Patrick says
I still can't believe that this is real, but it is:


I don't post fake news.
21   FortWayne   ignore (1)   2018 Apr 11, 5:32pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

This is comedy gold, thanks Ceffer

Ceffer says
As long as the "fact checkers" are immense hirsute lesbians, gays, transgendered, university diversity gatekeepers, feminists and their puling cucks, minorities seeking reparations, public service union reps, anti-gun weepers and Hollywood Royals, I have absolutely no problem with these policies. I know they will only reflect the fairest of fair speech.
22   HEYYOU   ignore (9)   2018 Apr 11, 5:46pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

CovfefeButDeadly says
HEYYOU says
HEYYOU's federal tax proves that there is no tax cut.
A tax is just an example of Republican Redistribution Socialism that steals from those that create their personal wealth.
Fucking Rep/Con theives! Why do they punish the Free Market?


You don't get a federal tax cut when you are on Social Security disability and don't actually pay federal taxes.


May I help you remove you foot from your mouth.
How about releasing my tax return & my social security records?

Expert trolls always prepare for unsupported comments by taking the simplest points.
Why do Republicans tax the majority of Americans with a Federal TAX?
How many times is this TAX paid thru a purchase,of other retail items?
Sellers always eat the cost of energy.

United States Federal Excise Tax on gasoline.
Those that wish to add to the list of taxes that Trump/Rep/Cons are taking from your wallet,Go For It!

A tax is a tax!
23   lostand confused   ignore (0)   2018 Apr 11, 7:17pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

Oh great, next will be jails for people with wrong thoughts.
24   BlueSardine   ignore (2)   2018 Apr 11, 7:53pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

Iwog does...

zzyzzx says
We really don't even know if this website is hosted in CA.




The Housing Trap
You're being set up to spend your life paying off a debt you don't need to take on, for a house that costs far more than it should. The conspirators are all around you, smiling to lure you in, carefully choosing their words and watching your reactions as they push your buttons, anxiously waiting for the moment when you sign the papers that will trap you and guarantee their payoff. Don't be just another victim of the housing market. Use this book to defend your freedom and defeat their schemes. You can win the game, but first you have to learn how to play it.
115 pages, $12.50

Kindle version available


about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions