0
0

"Damn You all to Hell!" , Caputos tells Senate Intel Committee. They Destroyed his life and FOR WHAT? They lost an election?


 invite response                
2018 May 2, 6:32pm   2,630 views  12 comments

by Tenpoundbass   ➕follow (7)   💰tip   ignore  

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/fb-5682671/TRUMP-AIDE-MICHAEL-CAPUTOS-SHOCKING-STATEMENT-SENATE-INTEL-COMMITTEE.html#ixzz5EObPiXHN

'In 2009, my wife and I moved to my hometown of East Aurora, New York to have a family. Making far less money back home, we had a far better quality of life. That is, until the Trump-Russia narrative took off. Today, I can’t possibly pay the attendant legal costs and live near my aging father, raising my kids where I grew up.

'Your investigation and others into the allegations of Trump campaign collusion with Russia are costing my family a great deal of money – more than $125,000 - and making a visceral impact on my children.

'Now I must to move back to Washington, New York City, Miami or elsewhere, just so I can make enough money to pay off these legal bills. And I know I have you to thank for that.

'Here’s how I know: how many of you know Daniel Jones, former Senate Intelligence staffer for Senator Dianne Feinstein? Great guy, right? Most of you worked with him. One of you probably just talked to him this morning.

'Of course, very few of us in flyover country knew Daniel until recently. Now we know that he quit his job with your Senate committee not long ago to raise $50 million from ten rich Democrats to finance more work on the FusionGPS Russian dossier. The one the FBI used to get a FISA warrant and intimidate President Donald Trump, without anyone admitting -- until months after it was deployed -- that it was paid for by Hillary Clinton.

'In fact, good old Dan has been raising and spending millions to confirm the unconfirmable – and, of course, to keep all his old intel colleagues up-to-speed on what FusionGPS and British and Russian spies have found. Got to keep that Russia story in the news.

'Of course Dan’s in touch with you guys. We know from the news that he’s been briefing Senator Mark Warner, vice chairman of this committee. Which one of you works for Senator Warner? Please give Danny my best.

'I saw some of his handiwork just last month. Remember this lede paragraph, from McClatchy on April 13?

'The Justice Department special counsel has evidence that Donald Trump’s personal lawyer and confidant, Michael Cohen, secretly made a late-summer trip to Prague during the 2016 presidential campaign, according to two sources familiar with the matter.

'That’s your pal Dan, isn’t it? He came up with some kind of hollow proof that Michael Cohen was in Prague meeting with Russians when he wasn’t. He tried to sell that to reporters, and they didn’t buy it because it doesn’t check out. So, to get a reporter to write up his line of bull, he gave the documents to the Office of Special Counsel.

'We know that’s likely, because he’s told people he’s briefing investigators.

'So, technically, the special counsel’s office has evidence. Your pal Dan gave them more of the Democrats’ dossier, funded by more Democrats, provided again by Russian and British spies. Information no reporter would write up, but now there’s an angle: the Special Counsel has it. Now it’s a story.

'It’s a clever but effective ruse. That’s a story, just like when reporter Michael Isikoff of Yahoo News wrote this gem on September 16, 2016:

'“…U.S. officials have since received intelligence reports that during that same three-day trip, Page met with Igor Sechin, a longtime Putin associate … a well-placed Western intelligence source tells Yahoo News. That meeting, if confirmed, is viewed as especially problematic by U.S. officials…”

'Dozens of stories were written from the Isikoff piece, doing real damage to the Trump campaign. Of course, now we know Isikoff’s reference to “intelligence reports” was just him renaming a dossier funded by Democrats and dug up by his longtime pal Glenn Simpson and some foreign spies. Once Simpson gave his Clinton campaign opposition research to the feds, it was news.

'This was especially true after Isikoff intentionally labeled the campaign materials as intelligence – just like McClatchy called Dan’s information “evidence.”

'But who is McClatchy’s second source? It couldn’t be Dan; he was the first source. It couldn’t be Simpson; he works for Dan. It can’t be the Mueller investigation; they kicked the McClatchy story to the curb with aplomb. So who could it be – perhaps one of his former Senate Intelligence colleagues? I mean, you’re all in this together. You’re the swamp.

'What America needs is an investigation of the investigators. I want to know who is paying for the spies’ work and coordinating this attack on President Donald Trump? I want to know who Dan Jones is talking to across the investigations – from the FBI, to the Southern District of New York, to the OSC, to the Department of Justice, to Congress.

'Forget about all the death threats against my family. I want to know who cost us so much money, who crushed our kids, who forced us out of our home, all because you lost an election.

'I want to know because God Damn you to Hell.'

Comments 1 - 12 of 12        Search these comments

1   bob2356   2018 May 2, 8:05pm  

Tenpoundbass says
In 2009, my wife and I moved to my hometown of East Aurora, New York to have a family. Making far less money back home, we had a far better quality of life.


How is it that someone quietly living in east aurora ny minding their own business ended up in the mueller investigation? You lay down with dogs you come up with fleas.

Some one who has been a big time political operative since reagan was elected can't afford a lawyer? WTF. Next time tell me about snow white or cinderella or some other more believable fairy tale.
2   Strategist   2018 May 2, 8:34pm  

bob2356 says
You lay down with dogs you come up with fleas.


Ha ha ha. I love that phrase. Thanks.
3   Ceffer   2018 May 2, 8:52pm  

What is he complaining about. The perfect legal solution is for the client to be held hostage as long as necessary by some spurious legal process in which nothing or barely nothing happens but all their money is drained in fees. Sounds like the legal system is working damn near perfect in his case.
4   bob2356   2018 May 2, 9:03pm  

Ceffer says
What is he complaining about. The perfect legal solution is for the client to be held hostage as long as necessary by some spurious legal process in which nothing or barely nothing happens but all their money is drained in fees.


Why would some one need to pay legal fees if they did nothing wrong and had nothing to hide. There is no requirement to bring a lawyer to testify before congress or a special prosecutor.
5   Strategist   2018 May 2, 9:09pm  

bob2356 says
Ceffer says
What is he complaining about. The perfect legal solution is for the client to be held hostage as long as necessary by some spurious legal process in which nothing or barely nothing happens but all their money is drained in fees.


Why would some one need to pay legal fees if they did nothing wrong and had nothing to hide. There is no requirement to bring a lawyer to testify before congress or a special prosecutor.


It's the fucked up system.
6   Y   2018 May 3, 5:43am  

Four liberal american lives, and a shitload of butthurt come election time...

HEYYOU says
Benghazi! Cost how much?
7   bob2356   2018 May 3, 6:54am  

Strategist says
It's the fucked up system.


ROFLOL. Perfect. The mooney like mantra from the right since nixon was in office is that police, courts, fbi, justice are all of the highest integrity and people who have done nothing wrong have nothing to worry about. Now the same people don't like how things are working out for them (with a bunch of right wingers doing the investigation no less) all of a sudden it's a fucked up system and witch hunt.

You can't make this shit up.
8   socal2   2018 May 3, 8:55am  

bob2356 says
Ceffer says
What is he complaining about. The perfect legal solution is for the client to be held hostage as long as necessary by some spurious legal process in which nothing or barely nothing happens but all their money is drained in fees.


Why would some one need to pay legal fees if they did nothing wrong and had nothing to hide. There is no requirement to bring a lawyer to testify before congress or a special prosecutor.


It is my understanding that the dude is just a WITNESS. Every time they call him down to DC for interviews, he loses a week of wages and has to pay his own airfare and hotels.

And for what? Investigating the giant fraud that somehow the Russians would prefer a pro-military, pro-oil, pro-tariff and nationalistic Trump and Republican party?

In what universe are we to believe Russians would prefer Republicans in office as opposed to the Nancy-boy Democrats who gave Putin 8 years of free runway to get a foothold in the Middle East and re-occupy parts of Eastern Europe?
9   Tenpoundbass   2018 May 3, 9:14am  

bob2356 says
Why would some one need to pay legal fees if they did nothing wrong and had nothing to hide. There is no requirement to bring a lawyer to testify before congress or a special prosecutor.


You didn't see Diamond and Silk grilled by Congress like they were trying to set them up for lying, by mincing their words and taking events out of chronological order and misstating the impetus of an airline ticket.

Everyone else saw what happened.
10   bob2356   2018 May 5, 5:04am  

socal2 says
And for what? Investigating the giant fraud that somehow the Russians would prefer a pro-military, pro-oil, pro-tariff and nationalistic Trump and Republican party?


Are we talking about the same sucking putins nut sack trump here?
11   marcus   2018 May 5, 8:04am  

bob2356 says
socal2 says
And for what? Investigating the giant fraud that somehow the Russians would prefer a pro-military, pro-oil, pro-tariff and nationalistic Trump and Republican party?


I don't think anyone is denying that Russia has involved itself in the U.S. social media and fake news marketplace to disrupt and influence our political our processes. And yes, we know Putin hated Hillary and yes he was probably smart enough to know the degree to which Trump would screw us over, and set back our reputation in the world.
12   Shaman   2018 May 5, 8:23am  

marcus says
don't think anyone is denying that Russia has involved itself in the U.S. social media and fake news marketplace to disrupt and influence our political our processes.


What is deniable is whether Russian social media presence had any effect on the election, and whether we can blame Democrats for colluding with the Russians to protest and create havoc and try to ruin our country in the wake of their election loss. Because most of the Russian propaganda was directed at them, to incite civil disorder, riots, and unrest. And the Democrats ate that shit up with a spoon and asked for seconds!

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions