Comments 1 - 15 of 15        Search these comments

1   Shaman   2018 May 6, 7:28am  

You can try to educate people wrongly so that they vote your way, but it’s slow, and prone to failure when they join the real world and learn the truth. As Mark Twain said: “It isn’t what we don’t know that hurts us, it’s all that we know that simply isn’t so!”
2   Malcolm   2018 May 6, 8:58am  

Being that I identify as white, and that I perceive overt reverse discrimination, prejudice and yes, some white privilege in specific circumstances, this course would actually be interesting to me. I think a nationwide discussion is healthy.
3   Tenpoundbass   2018 May 6, 9:20am  

This race baiting course has been around for at least 10 years or more. My Sister In Law threatened to sue a local College on making her complete a Whitie is bad, and are the fault of all bad things that happens to the Latin population. Of course she is Cuban 1st generation and not one sorry cock sucker at her school telling her she had to take the course was of Latin decent themselves. They actually scrapped the course mid semester because she threatened to sue them. I wish like hell she did follow through. But as you can imagine there were no SJW lawyers lined up to take her case probono because she wasn't a useful Idiot victim.
4   Ceffer   2018 May 6, 10:26am  

The course will be taught in grunts, moans and sign language while squatting and chewing roots so as not to taint the purity of it's message.
5   Bd6r   2018 May 6, 11:41am  

Malcolm says
this course would actually be interesting to me.

It could be interesting in theory, but in practice all you will hear is how Fucking White males oppress womyn, minorities, and everyone else.
6   marcus   2018 May 6, 1:00pm  

Tenpoundbass says
My Sister In Law threatened to sue a local College on making her complete a Whitie is bad, and are the fault of all bad things that happens to the Latin population.


This is something like Latino studies, or latin American studies. I had to take such a course. IT's mostly about understanding the Latin American's experience, and far less about liberal agendas with retrospect to affirmative action and subtle forms of oppression. ALthough they do sometimes go there, and the teachers are often from that point of view. I disagreed with some of it, but much of it was about honoring that cultural heritage etc., not nearly always political.

You're only about 80% wrong on this one.
7   Malcolm   2018 May 6, 1:46pm  

drB6 says

It could be interesting in theory, but in practice all you will hear is how Fucking White males oppress womyn, minorities, and everyone else.


Yes, but if it allows debate, it could be a positive way to dispel misconceptions. I would bring in examples of Appalachian whites who are actually the poorest people in the country.

I would use my real world examples of losing jobs and opportunities blatantly because of my race. If I were allowed a forum in such a lecture, I would probably sway some opinions.
8   Bd6r   2018 May 6, 3:00pm  

Malcolm says
Yes, but if it allows debate

It will not. I can tell you that as someone who works at University. If you express opinion contrary to that of local Communist party, you will be removed from the class. I understand your point though. An honest debate is always good, but in this case one type of opinion will be censored.
9   lostand confused   2018 May 6, 4:08pm  

Malcolm says
Yes, but if it allows debate, it could be a positive way to dispel misconceptions. I would bring in examples of Appalachian whites who are actually the poorest people in the country.

I would use my real world examples of losing jobs and opportunities blatantly because of my race. If I were allowed a forum in such a lecture, I would probably sway some opinions

Have you seen what happens in berkely and other liberal places when people like Milo etc turn up to speak. There is no speech -any speech opposed to the liberal viewpoint si deemed hate speech and the speaker is branded Nazi, scum, racist, bigot, deplorable.

If it were honest debate, I would welcome it. People like Jay Z screaming white privilege, while he is worth 1 billion+. Kanye is a black person-look at the backlash he faces. The left scares me in this country. My parents moved here from what used to be a leftist hellhole and the signs are the same. Thought is always suppressed and only one form of thought is allowed-then the atrocities begin.

I don't know what the solution is except more Trumps in every area of life.
10   Patrick   2018 May 6, 4:35pm  

According to the head of Facebook advertising, there was no collusion of Russia with the Donald, but Russia did in fact place many ads after the election specifically to sow political and racial discord.

And it was very successful! In order to weaken the US, they simply have to weaken our unity as a county by supporting radical leftists in their assertion that race is a huge issue, when in reality it is not.

The left will never forgive Facebook for exposing the collusion story as a hoax, and for exposing the deliberate attempt to inflame racial tension.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/sep/30/blacktivist-facebook-account-russia-us-election
11   RWSGFY   2018 May 6, 4:46pm  

Patrick says
Russia did in fact place many ads after the election specifically to sow political and racial discord.


We can't let this slide.
12   marcus   2018 May 6, 5:33pm  

Patrick says
The left will never forgive Facebook for exposing the collusion story as a hoax, and for exposing the deliberate attempt to inflame racial tension.


Why ? The truth is the truth, that is if it really is true. THe left isn't the side of our politics that has had the most trouble with honesty and what's true. (can you say trickle down?)

But, due process should occur regardless of what facebook says. Becasue, for facebook to have accepted those ads after the election is far less bad (perception wise) than accepting them during the campaign. The latter would have them almost committing treason. That is, they may have motive for lying about this, and it may be a very small number of people at facebook that even now what's true. If the Russian's had multiple accounts and significantly hid their identities. Who knows ? Perhaps facebook oesn't even want to get to the bottom of this.
13   Patrick   2018 May 6, 7:41pm  

http://dailycaller.com/2018/02/17/russia-ads-facebook-rob-goldman/

Facebook vice president of advertising Rob Goldman slammed the media for what he said was misleading coverage of Russia’s meddling in American politics.

“Very excited to see the Mueller indictment today. We shared Russian ads with Congress, Mueller and the American people to help the public understand how the Russians abused our system. Still, there are keys facts about the Russian actions that are still not well understood,” Goldman wrote in a series of tweets on Friday.

“Most of the coverage of Russian meddling involves their attempt to effect the outcome of the 2016 US election. I have seen all of the Russian ads and I can say very definitively that swaying the election was NOT the main goal,” Goldman said.

“The majority of the Russian ad spend happened AFTER the election. We shared that fact, but very few outlets have covered it because it doesn’t align with the main media narrative of Trump and the election,” he continued.

“The main goal of the Russian propaganda and misinformation effort is to divide America by using our institutions, like free speech and social media, against us. It has stoked fear and hatred amongst Americans. It is working incredibly well. We are quite divided as a nation.”
14   CBOEtrader   2018 May 6, 10:05pm  

drB6 says
Malcolm says
Yes, but if it allows debate

It will not.


Yeah if you debate the narrative you fail in university. This is brainwashing, not education
15   RWSGFY   2018 May 6, 10:17pm  

#fuckstanford

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions