Comments 1 - 12 of 12 Search these comments
Even in the article she seems bent on deceiving and views everything myopically. Did she seriously think in a court of law (as opposed to a Title IX Hearing) only her facts would matter? 'I don't remember' is the stereotypical testifier trying to weasel out of a lie. She expected the attorney of the party she accused to be on her side? She did have the Crown behind her. What a whacked out and kinky broad.
Women are children. They can't be held responsible for their own actions. Men need to care for women like they would for a child: i.e. do not listen what the child is saying but instead judge themselves the best interest of the child is.
How would men know what women want or need is a mystery. But obviously not based on what women are saying.
Women should also be able to drink and not be responsible for their resulting actions. It's the fault of men if they let them drink, and their resulting lack of inhibition is also to be blame on men.
Night after the "rape": "I want you to lick my ass."
What rape victim doesn't want her assailant to lick her anus less than 24 hours after the "rape".
The comments section is also comedy gold. Guardian, retrying the not guilty verdict in the newspaper for the hidden truth of Great Justice in the fight against the Patriarchy, of course.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/25/jian-ghomeshi-trial-lucy-de-coutere-interview