patrick.net

Quigley says

Maybe Bigfoot is to blame!

Here you go edvard! A lefty fact checker site Snopes confirms the “extremist right wing website bullshit” is actually 100% true!

Btw I had to ditch Google and use DuckDuckGo in order to find this result. Big data doesn’t want you to know they are losing Leftist support!

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/cnn-and-msnbc-ratings/

You have missed out Edvard. It’s been well documented here at Pat.net via many postings during the past 2 years that CNN actually lies via direct lie or via intentional omission.

So it has been proven, regardless of if you have read such proof.

As you might have gathered from my previous response I really don't give a shit about CNN. But I'm sorry, Even that compared to Fox is laughable. Fox isn't news. Its political satire all wrapped up in a gaudy bow. Its unfettered, unflinching horse shit hosted by some of the most repugnant hosts and its also undeniably one-sided with regards to the right, Trump, and even some of the more extreme elements of the far right.

So CNN is losing ratings.... So. Fucking. What.
Like I said- I and most liberals don't get news from cable network news sources as they are all jokes

This is more evidence of Trump Bashing Fatigue.

Even formerly funny man Kimmel admits Trump Bashing is stale.

Corner Turning! Just in time for the midterms. 128D chess.

edvard says

As you might have gathered from my previous response I really don't give a shit about CNN

Nobody does. Hence the collapsing ratings.

edvard says

As you might have gathered from my previous response I really don't give a shit about CNN. But I'm sorry, Even that compared to Fox is laughable. Fox isn't news. Its political satire all wrapped up in a gaudy bow. Its unfettered, unflinching horse shit hosted by some of the most repugnant hosts and its also undeniably one-sided with regards to the right, Trump, and even some of the more extreme elements of the far right.

So CNN is losing ratings.... So. Fucking. What.
Like I said- I and most liberals don't get news from cable network news sources as they are all jokes

What are you views on MSNBC such as Rachel Maddow ?

What are your sources of news ? The Hill ? Bloomberg ? BBC America ?

These news channels pretty much come down to Fox news toting the pro trump line and catering to his followers, and the rest toting the anti-Trump message and catering to the Trump-hating crowd. Fox always wins, because they are the only major channel on one side competing against the others. It would be interesting to see the ratings of Fox versus CNN + MSNBC. I think that CNN is just losing viewers to MSNBC, which is even more anti-Trump.
https://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/2017-ratings-msnbc-wins-cable-tvs-most-improved-award/353149

The NYT and WaPo readership is up.

As for Maddow, she's quite popular and her popularity has increased in the Trump world. So, there is clearly a large market for what she's selling. While it's clear that her reporting is one-sided, I'd trust her reporting much more so than Hannity's or whatever comes out of Trump's mouth. You just have to know that she's only reporting one side of a story. Most of the thing's she's actually reporting (rather than openly speculating on) are also being reported elsewhere.

Morning Joe is also doing very well by selling an anti-Trump message. He's clobbering CNN.
https://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/q1-2018-ratings-msnbc-posted-a-record-breaking-quarter/360851

“Morning Joe” at 6am continued to dominate CNN in both total viewers and A25-54. In total viewers, “Morning Joe” bested CNN for the 12th quarter in a row, averaging 1,073,000 and posting the most cable news growth in the time period (+35% vs. FOX News’ -6% and CNN’s +5%). “Morning Joe” hit new highs with an average of 249,000 viewers A25-54, beating CNN for the 3rd straight quarter and growing more than the competition (+37% vs. FOX News’ -8% and CNN’s +6%).

Breitbart scans the news for factoids that they can publish with misleading headlines to make Trump supporters feel good without the least bit of analysis. It doesn't take much work for an average brain to see what is really going on.

Same thing happened with Reagan. He went from media zero to hero over the course of his administration.

Yes they all have their slant. Probably the most balanced source I’ve noted is The Hill. But since they all have their slant, you sort of have to mix and match to get the real news. Stuff that’s left out of one source may get reported in another with a different slant, and putting them together will give a more complete picture.
I’ve found more honesty in Brietbart news reporting than in any other major media source, although it’s definitely got a slant; and occasionally gets something wrong because of that. Still, they cover stories the mainstream media including Fox won’t touch until the story gets too big to ignore.
Why do you think that might be? Surely it couldn’t be because the same six billionaires own all mainstream media sources!??!?!?

I can hardly wait. The CNN talking heads hog tied, with cucumbers up their asses, while the FOX broadcasters stride valiantly onto their sound stages waving flaming microphones!

Solid on the ground reporting. What more could you ask for?

www.youtube.com/embed/7ClR5yHBfks

@edvard Please keep your points about ideas and arguments, and not about the other users.

Democrats announce their dream ticket!