2
0

So, the FBI did spy on Trump, but uh...


 invite response                
2018 May 18, 7:37pm   2,972 views  22 comments

by MisdemeanorRebel   ➕follow (12)   💰tip   ignore  

...it was to protect him, yeah... That's the ticket.


www.youtube.com/embed/pkYNBwCEeH4

Comments 1 - 22 of 22        Search these comments

1   FNWGMOBDVZXDNW   2018 May 18, 7:56pm  

By spying on, you mean that an FBI informant contacted some people and had conversations with them? That should definitely be illegal without a warrant. Fucking hell. He called me and had coffee with me. I feel raped!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You realize that the FBI was interested in Carter page before Trump announced his campaign, right? Either the FBI are clairvoyant, or Trump just picked a bunch of suspected traitors to run his campaign. Trump is now complaining that the FBI was spying on said suspected traitors. How fucking dumb does he think people are?

And the doing it to protect Trump rational has been part of the reason all along. They were protecting Trump and America when the told Trump that Flynn could have been compromised. It's their fucking job to watch for these things. Since Trump is such a Magoo, the FBI had better be working extra hard. Hopefully, they have 'infiltrated' Jared's company, too. Magoo needs some protecting on that front.
2   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 May 18, 8:06pm  

FNWGMOBDVZXDNW says
By spying on, you mean that an FBI informant contacted some people and had conversations with them? That should definitely be illegal without a warrant. Fucking hell. He called me and had coffee with me. I feel raped!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


In a Presidential campaign, while under an Opposition executive, since it's alleged it's before the Mueller Investigation.

But now "Senior (Unnamed) Intelligence Official" is saying naming the informant could risk National Security. Uh huh.

If this was a Republican did this to the Democratic Front Runner, the ACLU would be screaming Revolution!
3   marcus   2018 May 18, 8:08pm  

FNWGMOBDVZXDNW says
or Trump just picked a bunch of suspected traitors to run his campaign. Trump is now complaining that the FBI was spying on said suspected traitors. How fucking dumb does he think people are?


Uhhmm, I think you might be asking the wrong person.
4   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 May 18, 8:09pm  

New: Mr. Kill Social Security But Keep Federal Worker Pensions says:

"Congress shouldn't have oversight over the DOJ/FBI"



Wow, we now have Democrats fighting against Congressional oversight of Federal Agencies.

The real question is: What are they afraid of?
5   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 May 18, 8:52pm  

Stefan Halper? Sanford, Oxford, Cambridge, Big HW Bush Buddy, son in law of Ray Cline, CIA bigwig during Cuban missile crisis.
6   FortWayne   2018 May 18, 9:08pm  

Isn't that the excuse they use in North Korea when they spy on people? We are not spying on you all, we are only here to protect you so we can make sure you do what we think is best.

This deep state conspiracy stuff wasn't so far fetched after all.
7   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 May 18, 9:09pm  

Winter 2016-2017:
"Deep States gonna get Trumpler, Deep State's gonna get Trumpler, he's gonna be removed and there's nothing you can do abooooouuut it, nyah nyah"
Spring 2018:
"Who tried to use the Deep State to get the Trump-a-ler? Not me, couldn't be!"
8   marcus   2018 May 18, 9:21pm  

TwoScoopsOfDragonEnergy says
we now have Democrats fighting against Congressional oversight of Federal Agencies.

The real question is: What are they afraid of?


Probably this kind of bullshit.

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/2/1/16956290/nunes-memo-release-the-memo-fbi-russia
9   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 May 18, 11:59pm  

Now the NYT is running a story admitting there was FBI/DOJ directed spying on the Trump Campaign, but it was for Muh Russia.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/18/us/politics/trump-fbi-informant-russia-investigation.html

Note that Halper (if it's him) was MOST interested in finding out if Trump had the Hillary Emails.

Notice also how quick the NYT and WaPo have been on defending and "explaining" the FBI's "Interest". Amazing how much they learned in just a few hours, heh.
10   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 May 19, 12:20am  

PS Asha Rangappa, the author of the WaPo "Justification" article in the OP... former Special Agent of the FBI, specifically counter-intelligence, now teaches at Yale.

The "Protection" idea is laughable... especially in light of what we know now about what the Establishment/Deep State thought of him. They'd have loved for him to be caught colluding with Russia. If they really wanted to "Protect" (GAG me), why not go to Trump himself or his inner circle with a warning?

Stzrok (remember, deputy director of Counter-intelligence for the entire FBI), Page, and company with their 1000s and 1000s of derogatory, anti-Trump texts were just trying to protect Trump by leaking any derogatory information they could find to the press like a sieve. Now they want us to believe they used this academic to interview the 'Poulos and Carter Page to help defend Trump from Russian Dirty Tricks? You have to be an imbecile to buy that.
11   lostand confused   2018 May 19, 2:40am  

This is a coup plain and simple perpetraded by that pig constitutional scholar-shame on him. He is worse than Carter. SEssions the goat-has to go.
12   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 May 19, 12:03pm  

This is a roller coaster.

First, don't you dare assault the FBI.
Then, there was a little incompetence, no big deal
And yet, we have Dems insisting there be LESS oversight by Congress of the FBI for the first time in History.
Now it's, don't reveal the name of those who interfered in a Political Campaign, because National Security.

All Halper was worried about was Hillary's Emails, Emails, Emails. Note, the FBI never read the "lost" Hillary Emails just before the election, they were just scrambling to find a legal reason to pass over it. In the few days when the Emails were rediscovered, they were working on "process" excuses as Stzronk's Emails make clear.
13   marcus   2018 May 19, 12:35pm  

TwoScoopsOfDragonEnergy says
Now the NYT is running a story admitting there was FBI/DOJ directed spying on the Trump Campaign, but it was for Muh Russia.


Look, Trump had me convinced long ago that he's an idiot. If Trump didn't want everyone including law enforcement people to think he was as stupid as he portrayed himself to be, then he shouldn't have behaved so stupidly.

His convincing TPB, Sean Hannity et all to be gaga over him, hasn't helped his image with me.

www.youtube.com/embed/gNa2B5zHfbQ
14   anonymous   2018 May 19, 12:43pm  

marcus says
Look, Trump had me convinced long ago that he's an idiot. If Trump didn't want everyone including law enforcement people to think he was as stupid as he portrayed himself to be, then he shouldn't have behaved so stupidly.
So let's commit federal crimes because we think he's stupid? Fucking brilliant.
15   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 May 19, 2:22pm  

PrivilegedtobeWhite says
So let's commit federal crimes because we think he's stupid? Fucking brilliant.


I love the 1984 references the Left uses on Trump, when it's clear the 2016 Obama Regime was abusing it's powers to find dirt on the Opposition Candidate.

AND the MSM bragged, positively bragged, about the Deep State making Trump's life hell and possibly finding dirt either stop the inauguration or impeach him soon after. Now the same Legacy Media wants the public to believe, after months and months of the former, that the Deep State was just trying to "Protect" his Candidacy - as more and more evidence comes to light about their interference and surveillance.


Nothing says Trust than Powerful Surveillance Institutions spying on a Candidate.

Thank God for Admiral Rogers, I think Clapper tried to can him twice, being unsure (correctly) of his "Loyalty" (to the Deep State).

It's actually more funny than scary.
16   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 May 19, 2:26pm  

marcus says
Look, Trump had me convinced long ago that he's an idiot. If Trump didn't want everyone including law enforcement people to think he was as stupid as he portrayed himself to be, then he shouldn't have behaved so stupidly.


And yet he beat a world famous Democrat, a former Sec of State and Senator, who raised almost double the money he did. And despite 24-7-365 attacks since November 9th, 2016, has a 50% approval rating among Likely Voters. Whereas the Golden Negro got nothing but unctuous praise from the vast majority of Media outlets, and even an unmerited Nobel Prize.
20   CBOEtrader   2018 May 20, 11:27pm  

FortWayne says
We are not spying on you all, we are only here to protect you so we can make sure you do what we think is best.


Yeah its amazing watching the "liberals" justify this double speak behavior. Its amazing what good propaganda can do to an average mind.
21   CBOEtrader   2018 May 20, 11:32pm  

marcus says
as stupid as he portrayed himself to be


I was unaware that stupid de-legitimizes an election and/or necessitates NSA/CIA surveillance. I'm totes sure that's what the founding fathers envisioned within the constitution
22   CBOEtrader   2018 May 20, 11:36pm  

marcus says
FNWGMOBDVZXDNW says
or Trump just picked a bunch of suspected traitors to run his campaign. Trump is now complaining that the FBI was spying on said suspected traitors. How fucking dumb does he think people are?


Uhhmm, I think you might be asking the wrong person.


OR Trump is a DC outsider who wouldn't know the suspected traitors vs legit influencers would be. Perhaps these "suspected traitors" were planted into his campaign to support the political spying agenda. So far there is FAR more evidence to support my theory than the Trump/Russia collusion.

Perhaps that is why Trump has been cleared of any collusion wrongdoing, while Obama/HRC investigations are just warming up.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions