6
0

Samantha Bee husband is anti choice racist


 invite response                
2018 Jun 1, 11:51am   2,266 views  21 comments

by MisdemeanorRebel   ➕follow (12)   💰tip   ignore  

Jason Jones is not only a former "correspondent" for the left-wing Daily Show, he is also husband to Samantha Bee, one of the leftist leaders of the so-called Resistance Movement against President Trump. Oh, and Jones doesn’t want the city of New York to move his children's school to a location that would make it more accessible to poor, black kids.

Both Samantha Bee and Jason Jones are wealthy and very white.

...

Slate reports that one of the reasons for this is that in the Upper West Side of Manhattan, the most left-wing part of this left-wing state, there is never-ending resistance — if you'll pardon the use of that word — to opening up predominantly-white schools to under-privileged, minority students.

In other words: these rich, white left-wingers want their schools to remain rich and white.

The current Upper West Side focus is on P.S. 452, which, according to Slate, "has a lopsided enrollment, with a population that’s three-quarters white and Asian, with only 13% of kids qualifying for free lunch, in a district that’s 43% white and Asian and 48% low-income."

https://www.dailywire.com/news/15927/samantha-bees-husband-fights-keep-poor-black-kids-john-nolte?amp&__twitter_impression=true

This is absolutely true re : upper west side.

Comments 1 - 21 of 21        Search these comments

1   mell   2018 Jun 1, 12:02pm  

Seriously you can't make this shit up. But explains why leftoids fight so heavily to throw everyone else under the bus so that they don't have to do that sort of inclusion in their posh nimby hoods. Quite evil.
2   clambo   2018 Jun 1, 7:26pm  

They're both foreigners, of course I don't care what they think about our politics.

Jim Carrey is another annoying Canadian I don't want to hear from.

They should have to go back in live in frigid boring Toronto for the rest of time.
3   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Jun 2, 8:51am  

Epic Anti-Canuckistani Rant

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1002769894000087040.html

Canada has a Totalitarian Attitude with a "Human Rights" commission that investigates Racial Remarks. No solid rules, 100% Conviction Rate, the very definition of a Court of Star Chamber.
4   Patrick   2018 Jun 2, 9:51am  

TwoScoopsOfDragonEnergy says
In other words: these rich, white left-wingers want their schools to remain rich and white.


To find a way out of feeling bad, they simply project their own racism on the very poor white people who are suffering from their globalist policies.

Psychological projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against their own unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others.[1] For example, a person who is habitually intolerant may constantly accuse other people of being intolerant. It incorporates blame shifting.

According to some research, the projection of one's unconscious qualities onto others is a common process in everyday life.[2]


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection
5   MisterLefty   2018 Jun 2, 10:27am  

TwoScoopsOfDragonEnergy says
This is absolutely true re : upper west side.
Yes, but who is bringing race into this? As long as you are wealthy enough to live in the Bee's neighborhood, no one is denying your kids the right to attend the area's schools. Unless folks are proposing that wealthy black, native Indian and Indians from south of the border's kids who live there are excluded.
6   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Jun 2, 10:29am  

MisterLefty says
Yes, but who is bringing race into this? As long as you are wealthy enough to live in the Bee's neighborhood, no one is denying your kids the right to attend the area's schools. Unless folks are proposing that wealthy black, native Indian and Indians from south of the border's kids who live there are excluded.



From the article:
The current Upper West Side focus is on P.S. 452, which, according to Slate, "has a lopsided enrollment, with a population that’s three-quarters white and Asian, with only 13% of kids qualifying for free lunch, in a district that’s 43% white and Asian and 48% low-income."


See Patrick's post about Projection.
7   LeonDurham   2018 Jun 2, 10:35am  

Yes, because it's so outrageous that someone wouldn't want his kid's school to move.

God forbid he want to keep the school from moving. That MUST mean he's a closet racist!!

And even more--he wants his kids to go to a high performing school too? What a hypocrite. If you want to end racism, you HAVE to send your kids to the worst performing school in the worst neighborhood in NYC.
8   Shaman   2018 Jun 2, 10:36am  

Patrick says
According to some research, the projection of one's unconscious qualities onto others is a common process in everyday life.[2]


I’ve noticed Leftists are the absolute WORST about this! They are always projecting, especially when “enraged” about some social issue or racial matter. This is why I consider Leftists to be the same level of morality as skinhead neoNazis.
9   FuckTheMainstreamMedia   2018 Jun 2, 12:44pm  

LeonDurham says
Yes, because it's so outrageous that someone wouldn't want his kid's school to move.

God forbid he want to keep the school from moving. That MUST mean he's a closet racist!!

And even more--he wants his kids to go to a high performing school too? What a hypocrite. If you want to end racism, you HAVE to send your kids to the worst performing school in the worst neighborhood in NYC.


I don't know if you are being disingenuous or you really don't get it.

The rich telling people what they must do, while not willingly doing it themselves, is the height of hypocrisy.

If you think the right/libertarians support this, you are free to find a posting where one of us advocates on behalf, of say the Kochs.
10   mell   2018 Jun 2, 1:13pm  

LeonDurham says
Yes, because it's so outrageous that someone wouldn't want his kid's school to move.

God forbid he want to keep the school from moving. That MUST mean he's a closet racist!!

And even more--he wants his kids to go to a high performing school too? What a hypocrite. If you want to end racism, you HAVE to send your kids to the worst performing school in the worst neighborhood in NYC.


That's exactly what leftists are demanding from everyone else. Rich effete leftoids who send their kids to private school in SF voted for and instantiated a lottery system where the worker families may have to bus their kids miles away into one of the worst crime ridden neighborhood schools via a "diversity" lottery system instead of having them go to the closest school in the hood they settled in. NY is not different. And the worst thing about it is the dishonesty, denying and vilifying of basic human instincts which are not only good but necessary for a society to function, such as families who want them and their kids associate with like minded people in their hoods to form a cohesive community and working nuclear family units.
11   Shaman   2018 Jun 2, 1:56pm  

mell says
form a cohesive community and working nuclear family units.


Cohesive communities? Reserved for the elite Left!
Stable nuclear families? So unfashionable, and probably akin to child abuse if the kids aren’t transitioning gender while being mugged by hood rats on their way to third period.

Those kinds of things take away from the power of the State! Since the Left is ultimately Totalitarian in nature, the State must not lose any power. MOAR POWER TO THE STATE!
12   LeonDurham   2018 Jun 2, 2:39pm  

CovfefeButDeadly says
I don't know if you are being disingenuous or you really don't get it.

The rich telling people what they must do, while not willingly doing it themselves, is the height of hypocrisy.

If you think the right/libertarians support this, you are free to find a posting where one of us advocates on behalf, of say the Kochs.


So what Rich exactly is telling exactly whom what to do in your world?
13   MisterLefty   2018 Jun 2, 2:50pm  

TwoScoopsOfDragonEnergy says
See Patrick's post about Projection
Not sure I understand your point. The school in question is white and Asian, likely due to economics and not race. No one is keeping black students with straight A's out of college, either. But folks who are too lazy or not smart enough to work hard or compete, can easily ask for the same benefits if they make a racial or ethnic issue around it. But how do Asians succeed in this racist, white privilege country?
14   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Jun 2, 7:25pm  

MisterLefty says
Not sure I understand your point. The school in question is white and Asian, likely due to economics and not race. No one is keeping black students with straight A's out of college, either. But folks who are too lazy or not smart enough to work hard or compete, can easily ask for the same benefits if they make a racial or ethnic issue around it. But how do Asians succeed in this racist, white privilege country?


The SCHOOL is mostly White and Asian likely thanks to precisely drawn boundaries decades ago. If the school moves, even just a block away, the school could become 52% Non-White/Asian with a substantially higher percentage of impoverished kids when the old boundary disappears and the "collection radius" resets.

But Upper West Side Liberals are determined to keep out as many Yucky Undesireables as possible - all the while accusing middle America of harboring the same feelings they're actually expressing through actual governance of their neighborhood schools.

I wouldn't be surprised if they have a Federal or State Judge advising the Parent's Committee on how to stop the move.
15   MisterLefty   2018 Jun 2, 7:46pm  

TwoScoopsOfDragonEnergy says
But Upper West Side Liberals
Are wealthy people who are not white or Asian being prevented from living on the Upper West Side? Are wealthy conservatives who are not white or Asian being prevented from living there? Are conservatives of any race or ethnicity being prevented from living there? I don't see this as an issue of race or ethnicity but one of income, i.e., we let income and wealth do the talking, and let the cards fall where they may. Unless other races are being prevented from buying or renting there, even if they are upper income, which I don't think anyone is claiming, I fail to see how this has anything to do with race or ethnicity, but more to do with class.
16   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Jun 2, 7:55pm  

They're moving the school and the parents are fighting it - not because of the location, but because of the changing mix. Did you read the article? Sam Bee's husband is talking about a Code of Silence for parents involved.

This is Liberal Hypocrisy at it's finest. Remember these are the people that used to force kids to get buses an hour across the county from white working class neighborhoods to the Ghetto in the interest of social engineering. Here it is just a school moving literally a few blocks away.

Upper East Side residents and their children should enjoy the diversity. If it's good for everybody else, it's good for them.
17   MisterLefty   2018 Jun 2, 8:13pm  

TwoScoopsOfDragonEnergy says
Upper East Side residents and their children should enjoy the diversity. If it's good for everybody else, it's good for them.
The story itself makes the point that kids will wind up going to a school closer to where they live.

"At this location, the school, which is currently one of the best public schools in the city, would be near a number of large housing projects. The move, then, could result in the end of the segregation many of these parents so desire. A lot more poor, black students might start attending."

The fact that there are more housing projects at the proposed new location than the current location, tells you it is about class, unless of course, you believe blacks prefer to live in housing projects at the proposed new location, instead of living in high priced brownstones near the current location. Imagine if it were the Bowery Boys living in the projects versus the sons and daughters of Wall Street at the current location of the school. You'd likely have heard the same objections.

I don't think it reflects any better on the Bees from a hypocrisy POV, but I don't think it means racism, either.
18   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Jun 2, 9:36pm  

MisterLefty says
The fact that there are more housing projects at the proposed new location than the current location, tells you it is about class, unless of course, you believe blacks prefer to live in housing projects at the proposed new location, instead of living in high priced brownstones near the current location. Imagine if it were the Bowery Boys living in the projects versus the sons and daughters of Wall Street at the current location of the school. You'd likely have heard the same objections.


You realize the school is a whopping 16 blocks from the old one, yes?

I'm all for kids going to local schools. The Upper West Side schmucks have been all in favor of forced busing, but are whinging about going a few streets over for their own kids. Of course, if that school was full of Upper West Side Snobs like themselves, they'd hardly bitch at all.

As the article states, it makes Economic sense as well as spatial sense (current school is overcrowded and shares the same space with other overcrowded schools).

If you choose to live in New York City, embrace the lovely diversity!
19   Shaman   2018 Jun 2, 11:05pm  

TwoScoopsOfDragonEnergy says
If you choose to live in New York City, embrace the lovely diversity!


Because people pay millions to live on the Upper West Side for all the diversity present at that location...
somehow i doubt that diversity factors into such calculations, unless it’s a desire to get away from it!
20   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Jun 2, 11:44pm  

They want diversity of restaurants, not diversity in their kids' schoolmates.
21   MisterLefty   2018 Jun 3, 6:33am  

Not a very detailed story, but my concern is that this becomes the usual liberal fall-back, i.e., muss be racism, but in this case, risking to devour their own (hee...hee).

The story points out that Asians and whites are disproportionately represented in the Upper West Side school, which may be due to several reasons:

1.) Performance based admissions criteria where academic achievement is used as an admissions criteria.
2.) Helicopter white and Asian parents.
3.) Two parent, stable families more common amongst white and Asian families.
4.) Increased likelihood of college educated parents amongst whites and Asians.
5.) Devious racist admissions committee composed of white bigots who lust after teen Asian girls.
6.) Wrong school colors keeps black and Spanish Indian gangbangers away.

Where is the proof or racism, I dare ask?

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions