follow CBOEtrader following
follow CBOEtrader 2018 Jun 29, 4:06pm
3,960 views 81 comments
« First « Previous Comments 2 - 81 of 81 Last »
I'm not gonna bother.
I'd like someone to point to his lies for me, because I dont see them. I am enjoying reading this site though. TDS is flowing strong through washpo
Pentagon: White House did not request plan to withdraw Germany troopsThe Pentagon said on Friday that the White House had not requested any plans for pulling U.S. troops from Germany following a media report that it is analyzing the possibility.The Washington Post reported that the military is assessing the cost of a large-scale withdrawal or transfer of forces stationed there after President Trump expressed interest.The report comes amid rising trade tensions between Trump and German Chancellor Angela Merkel and an upcoming trip to Europe by the president where he intends to press NATO allies on their military spending.
Lack of nuance
( i can provide you a list with 2K+)
find his words misinterpreted by WashPo,
There's one quick "lie" (as they claimed) in the list recounted 97 times.So, in reality, there might be maybe 50
This is total idiocy. Amazing, unfiltered stupidity.
“The corrupt Mainstream Media is working overtime not to mention the infiltration of people, Spies (Informants), into my campaign! Surveillance much?”
You're really going to deny that Trump constantly lies ?
Speaking of Trump lies and Trump's campaign. This is still a very informative little video on so many levels. Stay classy Trump !
journalists were somehow aware (even though none of them are reporting it !!) of spies in Trump's campaign
In 2000, Trump issued a statement that he was no longer considering a run for President with the backing of the Reform Party, partly because it “now includes a Klansman, Mr. Duke.”
This is your example of a Trump lie?
Yes, he's lying "I don't know who David Duke is ?" White supremacy ? I don't even know what that's about, I would have to look in to it
Maybe you need to go back to 5th grade ?
“The corrupt Mainstream Media is working overtime not to mention the infiltration of people, Spies (Informants), into my campaign! Surveillance much?” -TrumpWashpo spin: "It has been reported that an FBI informant in Europe, a professor named Stefan Halper, met with at least three people working on the Trump campaign in Europe. So far, there has been nothing to indicate whether there was a political agenda or a “spy” mandate as part of Halper's assistance for the FBI, which started after the agency opened a counterintelligence probe. There is no evidence he was paid a "fortune." Trump appears to be referring to payments made for an unrelated project for the Defense Department, which started before Trump announced his campaign for
What they called a lie is a statement that the MSM is working overtime no to report something.
No, this is what YOU are calling a lie.
Washpo doesnt mention media reporting at all
“The corrupt Mainstream Media is working overtime not to mention the infiltration of people, Spies (Informants), into my campaign! Surveillance much?” -Trump
THey don't need to mention it, becasue it's so obvious.
I was trying to get you to look at the statement. What's the subject, what's the direct object ?
Seeing what you want or expect to see is the definition of confirmation bias.
This is what happens when you combine confirmation bias w the leftist cultural superiority complex. Trump's statement is a valid observation. It is not clear to any unbiased reader why washpo would call this a lie.
In case you missed it. This is just 2017. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-s-biggest-whoppers-2017-n830746
Trump is the one who was bizarrely obsessed about the crowd sizes at his inauguration
(and repeatedly lying about that)
Okay, so you chose what is arguably the smallest of NBCs list big lies from 2017
I'm the one that agrees with all the educated literate types that believe Trump lies all the time.
I gave you a lis
Go find the lie and show us.
Sure, that's a credible source (NOT).
You want to imply that the lies I gave you
You want to imply that the lies I gave you, ones people identified as his biggest lies don't stand up to scrutiny,
I did a google search (or perhaps it was bing) of Patrick.net, and two highlighted member lists of posts were those of Rin and Sniper.
This site has gone to hell.
This Trump=liar meme has no credibility. This is proof propaganda works
Where's comments 3,4 ,8,9,10,11,12,13,14?
Maybe pick a neutral site, that might have some credibility with others here, otherwise it's just more TDS.
They're not called "sheep" for no reason.
@Marcus that's the 3rd time you've gone to ad hom instead of discuss the topic.
Exactly as the forum expected.
Try it on bing
The one owned by the Left wing, radical, Lefty, newspaper, The Tampa Bay Times?
Very few right wingers here. Mostly libertarians.
Everyone of the links you posted above are known for their regular Hit Pieces on Trump and lean heavily to the radical left.
Apparently neither can anyone who thinks Trump is a liar
YOu can call the Washington post or the NYT liberal rags that write hit pieces on Trump, becasue they focus on his lies.
CBOEtrader saysExactly as the forum expected.That someone from the Drumpf camp
Sniper saysThe one owned by the Left wing, radical, Lefty, newspaper, The Tampa Bay Times?Back up the allegations with something substantial....other than offering a personal assesment
Any examples of those regular "hit pieces" ?
What is the "radical left" ? Any examples ?
This is a fun game isn't it ?
This is a fun game isn't it ? Someone is challenged
Nah, they just write hit pieces because they're a liberal rag that hates Trump. Why not call it like it is?
The forum is waiting.
No. It's sad that the people who scream Trump is a liar, can't get behind one lie. Not one single lie? Use your words and post one quote you feel is a huge Trump lie our of 3200 in the list I gave you? (this is actually a statement and does not require a question mark)The forum is waiting.
Go to each of those links, why must I spell this out for the Liberals?
Like this?Damn, those Pesky facts again....
See - this is a fun game.
Lets reboot - refute beyond a shawdow of a doubt the False 183 (32%) and Pants on Fire 84 (15%) statements/lies from Poltifact source or is that too much to ask.
Not how it works. Those making the assertion - that somebody is guilty of lying - are responsible for providing evidence.
(that were totally 100% lies).
There is plenty of evidence given with each pants on fire level lie.
Then you should have no problem choosing one and discussing it.
Trump estimating his inauguration had the largest audience in history is legit
Even if the one photo is a little early or something. The other from the other perspective is quite clear. Trumps wasn't the biggest.
Twitter had a bigger news feed for the 2017 inauguration live streaming than the 2009 one ?
The disagreement was about the crowd size, not the audience.
Spicer very clearly goes over the online stats when responding to the "total audience" question. Spicer "I didnt say in-person. I said BOTH IN PERSON AND AROUND THE GLOBE." He answered the question with no uncertain terms that day.
CBOEtrader saysSpicer very clearly goes over the online stats when responding to the "total audience" question. Spicer "I didnt say in-person. I said BOTH IN PERSON AND AROUND THE GLOBE." He answered the question with no uncertain terms that day.Wtf ?What do you think both in person and around the globe means ?That means he had the biggest audience in person, and that he also had the biggest audience around the globe (whatever that means).
« First « Previous Comments 2 - 81 of 81 Last »