Jihadi Beaver Shot: when you get hit in the face with it after the vest bomb goes off.

FortWayne says

They wanted us dead. And they lost, because our army steamrolled their shit.

They didn't lose. They are winning. You kill a few here and there, but they reproduce much faster and they are perfectly happy to die.

How China deals with Muslims:

U.N. says it has credible reports that China holds million Uighurs in secret camps

"Gay McDougall, a member of the U.N. Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, cited estimates that 2 million Uighurs and Muslim minorities were forced into “political camps for indoctrination” in the western Xinjiang autonomous region. "

FortWayne says

It’s mind boggling there are stupid people today who support those who want us all dead.

I don't support people who want us all dead weather the be Christian or Muslim. Killing is wrong no matter who does it.

FortWayne says

You want to die in the name of some weird interpretation of equality, feel free. It’s a free country. But don’t you dare put the rest of us into that stupid position.

Can you please explain to me the difference between you wanting all of them dead and them wanting all of you dead? Which side is right? I say both sides are wrong.

If someone tries to kill you, you kill them right back. End of story.

FPBT says

FortWayne says

You want to die in the name of some weird interpretation of equality, feel free. It’s a free country. But don’t you dare put the rest of us into that stupid position.

Can you please explain to me the difference between you wanting all of them dead and them wanting all of you dead? Which side is right? I say both sides are wrong.

FPBT says

Being the gateway pundit the more likely answer is Fake News.

http://www.fox9.com/news/193132614-story

Your link provided verification rather than refutation of the incestuous union. A simple statement by the accused in no way resembles negative proof. And the statement by others later in the article cast serious doubt on her statement. The existence of proof of her marriage to a brother lends further credibility to the charge. At the very least, she is guilty of immigration fraud. A fine quality in a Congress critter. But what more could be expected from a Somali pirate?
Truly the greatest culpability lies with the traitors in our own government who allowed Somalis to immigrate to the USA. That was the first mistake.

Quigley says

Your link provided verification rather than refutation

Ahhh no it does not. What verification? Someone's accusations? How does that verify anything? A simple statement by an accuser offers no more proof than does her denial of the accusation.
Please point out what proof that Ahmed Nur Said Elmi is her brother. There is no more proof that they are siblings than we are siblings. Just because I say you are my brother doesn't make it so.

FortWayne says

If someone tries to kill you, you kill them right back. End of story.

2 wrongs don't make a right. What happened to thou shall not kill? I guess that is why I'm not a fan of Christians they can be such big hippocrates

What happened to defending yourself?
Christian doesn’t mean victim

FPBT says

FortWayne says

If someone tries to kill you, you kill them right back. End of story.

2 wrongs don't make a right. What happened to thou shall not kill? I guess that is why I'm not a fan of Christians they can be such big hippocrates

Quigley says

Your link provided verification rather than refutation

Here is another link

https://medium.com/@dbrauer/a-few-thoughts-on-the-ilhan-omar-marriage-story-cc70c4f96c29

I like the quote from Bannon, I guess it was written when he still was with Breitbart

Now you are just trolling

FPBT says

your belifes do not constitute facts

Neither do yours. Worse, when people post actual facts, you persist in counterfactual beliefs. (Please note the correct spelling of beliefs.)

FPBT says

big hippocrates

If you are referring to Hippocrates of Kos, he died 2,400 years ago, at a time when humans were generally shorter than they are now. I have never heard him called "Hippocrates the Big," but I suppose "big" can seem relative, depending on the size of the observer.

FPBT says

anti-muslime

Are you calling Muslims slime? Perhaps you should be reported for racist wrongspeak.

FortWayne says

just trolling

FP used to post similarly trollish comments, but could at least spell.

FPBT, if FPBT=FP, then I hope you're ok. Loss of spelling can be a bad sign. Maybe a stroke?

FortWayne says

Now you are just trolling

How so? Did you bother to see if there actually was a qoute?

From the link.

There’s an excellent Bloomberg BusinessWeek piece that’s just resurfaced on Donald Trump’s new campaign CEO, Steve Bannon. Bannon runs Breitbart News, but amid all the bigotry and misogyny, he deploys researchers who dig up actual documents and facts. He then passes them on to mainstream sites like the New York Times, understanding that, say, a Hillary Clinton hit is more effective coming from the Times than Breitbart — even filtered through the Times’ MSM standards.

Bannon’s money quote:

“’What you realize hanging out with investigative reporters is that, while they may be personally liberal, they don’t let that get in the way of a good story. And if you bring them a real story built on facts, they’re f — -ing badasses, and they’re fair.’”

FortWayne says

What happened to defending yourself?

Which commandment is that?

Furthermore if she did actually marry her brother wouldn't there be more on this than way back in 2016.

curious2 says

FPBT says

your belifes do not constitute facts

Neither do yours. Worse, when people post actual facts, you persist in counterfactual beliefs. (Please note the correct spelling of beliefs.)

When did I say my beliefs did? When did I dispute actual facts? Sorry if my speeling doesn't meat you're stanedirds, i culd giv a phuck.

Here is some more from the above link

Today, Omar’s supporters are touting her latest response, and lacerating media racism. Omar IS judged differently. The bigots are more likely to provoke, and more likely to find takers in a majority-culture ignorant of how the Muslim faith works. (This also constrains us from evaluating claims based on faith.) Some is pure circumstance: Omar is from a culture of relatively recent immigrants.

But there are other media-training lessons here. Ad hominem attacks on bigots’ motives — however valid — won’t sway good reporters. Calling a source an Islamphobe or Donald Trump, Jr. may be excellent politics, but it doesn’t suffice as a response. I don’t care who gives me the tip, though I’ll try to characterize my source honestly in my story — if it runs.

Second Amendment in the Constitution. You know, that document that liberals despise.

FPBT says

FortWayne says

What happened to defending yourself?

Which commandment is that?

911 showed us exactly how their faith works. Actions speak louder than words.

And this nice gem few years back
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_San_Bernardino_attack


FPBT says

Here is some more from the above link

Today, Omar’s supporters are touting her latest response, and lacerating media racism. Omar IS judged differently. The bigots are more likely to provoke, and more likely to find takers in a majority-culture ignorant of how the Muslim faith works. (This also constrains us from evaluating claims based on faith.) Some is pure circumstance: Omar is from a culture of relatively recent immigrants.

But there are other media-training lessons here. Ad hominem attacks on bigots’ motives — however valid — won’t sway good reporters. Calling a source an Islamphobe or Donald Trump, Jr. may be excellent politics, but it doesn’t suffice as a response. I don’t care who gives me the tip, though I’ll try to characterize my source honestly in my story — if it runs.

FortWayne says

911 showed us exactly how their faith works. Actions speak louder than words.

For example, in the Crusades (circa. 1095 to 1270 C. E), Christians killed Muslims in the name of Jesus and Muslims killed Christians in the name of Allah. Is it not a contradiction to Christianity for a Christian to say, in effect, to a Muslim, "I love Jesus but I will kill you"? Similarly, is it not a contradiction to Islam to say, in effect, to a Christian, I love Allah but I will kill you"?

What shocks outsiders of Christianity and Islam, especially atheists and agnostics, is how could men who were dedicated to Jesus and Allah kill each other for religious purposes? No matter what moral and religious justifications may be offered for such killings, they are clearly wrong and deserve categorical and unequivocal condemnation by believers and non-believers alike.

FPBT says

[i]s it not a contradiction to Islam to say, in effect, to a Christian, I love Allah but I will kill you"?

If you had read the Koran, you would know the answer to your question is no, it is no contradiction at all. Time and again, Islam commands Muslims to kill disbelievers and blasphemers. As an atheist, you are both a disbeliever and a blasphemer, because you assert Islam is false.

FPBT says

When did I dispute actual facts?

It is an actual fact that if you state your atheist beliefs in an officially Islamic country, e.g. KSA or the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, you risk being legally executed for blasphemy. Even in an ostensibly secular country such as Bangladesh, it is an actual fact that you risk being murdered by Muslims volunteering in a vigilante Sharia patrol, killing blasphemers as per Islam. Even here, you could wind up on an Islamic State kill list, so the Muslims you want to import would be commanded to kill you. You persist in denying those facts, and denying the threat that Islam poses to you, because in your ivory tower the only Muslims you interact with are constrained by their need for your approval. Try spending some time in one of their countries, and you might learn, or literally lose your head.

Way to compare 1200s to 2000+.

800 years of human progress, yet Muslims still live like it’s fucking dark ages bombing America any chance they get.

You must be related to Dan, he had exact same comparisons. Dates wasn’t something he comprehended.

FPBT says

FortWayne says

911 showed us exactly how their faith works. Actions speak louder than words.

For example, in the Crusades (circa. 1095 to 1270 C. E), Christians killed Muslims in the name of Jesus and Muslims killed Christians in the name of Allah. Is it not a contradiction to Christianity for a Christian to say, in effect, to a Muslim, "I love Jesus but I will kill you"? Similarly, is it not a contradiction to Islam to say, in effect, to a Christian, I love Allah but I will kill you"?

What shocks outsiders of Christianity and Islam, especially atheists and agnostics, is how could men who were dedicated to Jesus and Allah kill each other for religious purposes? No matter what moral and religious justifications may be offered for such killings, they are clearly wrong and deserve categorical and unequivocal condemnation by believers and non-believers alike.

FortWayne says

Dan

I miss Dan, who did acknowledge honestly the current differences in behavior between different religions.

FP/FPBT does not.

Also, Dan could spell, unlike FPBT:

FPBT says

a qoute?

FP could spell too, which makes me wonder what has happened.

curious2 says

FortWayne says

Dan

I miss Dan, who did acknowledge honestly the current differences in behavior between different religions.

FP/FPBT does not.

Also, Dan could spell, unlike FPBT:

FPBT says

a qoute?

FP could spell too, which makes me wonder what has happened.

Maybe there are others who don't fault all for the actions of some

curious2 says

FortWayne says

Dan

I miss Dan, who did acknowledge honestly the current differences in behavior between different religions.

FP/FPBT does not.

Also, Dan could spell, unlike FPBT:

FPBT says

a qoute?

FP could spell too, which makes me wonder what has happened.

I see you must default to personal attacks.

curious2 says

I miss Dan, who did acknowledge honestly the current differences in behavior between different religions.

How many American soldiers pray to God before they go into battle? How is every Iraqi killed in Iraq not killed in God we trust?

Unfortunately, religious terrorism has been a reality throughout many part of the world. Catholics and Protestants have killed each other in Northern Ireland. Israeli Jews and Palestinian Muslims continue to kill each other in the Holy Land. Orthodox Serbian Christians have fought Catholic Croatians and Bosnian Muslims in Yugoslavia. Hindu Sikhs have fought with Muslims in India. Muslim extremists have killed in the name of Allah in Africa and the Middle East. In short, religion can be used to justify intolerance and murder.

For example, radical Christians who gun-down abortion doctors are religious terrorists. They also commit terroristic acts in bombing abortion clinics. Such Christians "fight" for the unborn child’s right to life but they deprive the doctor of his or her right to life. They believe that all human life is sacred but they attack the doctor’s sacredness of life. However, in doing so, Christian extremists are murdering doctors.

Another example is radical Muslims, such as suicide bombers, believe that they are dying for Allah or God and will be rewarded by him. They believe that what they are doing is right. However, believing something does not make it so. In other words, belief does not create reality. No matter how sincere the suicide bombers’ belief (the subjective factor of the moral act) that they will be rewarded by God, their sincerity does not make the act of killing innocent human beings (the objective factor of the moral act) right. In fact, it is murder!

A criticism of Right-Wing or radical Muslim terrorists should not be construed as a criticism of Islam per se, the religion to which the terrorist belongs. Of course, not all Muslims are terrorists. However, there are Muslims who justify their own beliefs by "proof-texting," that is, wrenching a religious text from its context as a pretext or cover-up to justify terrorism.

Likewise, a criticism of Right-Wing Christians should not be construed as a criticism of Christianity per se. Not all Christians are, theologically and politically, on the far Right. In the words of John Warwick Montgomery, a scholar of international law, "[I]t is hardly fair to attribute to the Christian religion acts or opinions that in fact are in direct opposition to Christ’s own teachings."

Just as men and women in positions of government can be morally corrupt, so can members of churches, synagogues and mosques. When that happens, their respective communities need to be purified or corrected, with a change in moral philosophy and leadership. Therefore, religion should not be the major cause of the world’s problems. Rather, it should contribute to peace on earth and good-will toward human beings (cf. Luke 2:14b).

FortWayne says

Dates wasn’t something he comprehended.

When 75% of Americans identify with Christianity and Americans drop bombs on Muslim in 2000's that is not in the past. The Muslims think their killing is justified just like you feel our killing is justified. Me I think killing is wrong, just like Jesus Christ does. Heck maybe I'm more Christian than you.

Look. Human culture is like an operating system for a people to achieve harmony/civilization. Religion is a piece of that culture, but by no means the entirety of it. Case in point: atheists usually function within society with a high level of cohesion and productivity.

The only fair way to evaluate operating systems of any sort is by their effectiveness at achieving th objective: civilization.

I think it’s pretty clear that Islam is a major part of any culture it infests, and that there’s a strong correlation between majority Islam religion in a culture and backwards ineffective culture and weak civilization. The proof is in the results.

How many Indonesians do we see blowing shit up? They idetify 87% as Muslim. I'm not saying Islam is a great religion what I'm saying is that all Muslims aren't bad.

When I was growing up I remember shit getting blown up in Ireland. Was that Muslims? No it wasn't. It was Catholics against Protestants. Does that mean all Catholics or all Protestants are bad?

I find it ironic when a religions states that it is wrong to kill yet people go around killing in the name of their religion weather it be Islam or Christianity.

When you figure a difference you let us know. Use that brain of yours.

FPBT says

curious2 says

I miss Dan, who did acknowledge honestly the current differences in behavior between different religions.

How many American soldiers pray to God before they go into battle? How is every Iraqi killed in Iraq not killed in God we trust?

FortWayne says

When you figure a difference you let us know. Use that brain of yours.

There is no difference when one uses a religion to justify killing. It also doesn't mean all in that religion are bad because of the actions of some. Use that brain of yours.

FPBT says

For example, radical Christians who gun-down abortion doctors are religious terrorists. They also commit terroristic acts in bombing abortion clinics. Such Christians "fight" for the unborn child’s right to life but they deprive the doctor of his or her right to life. They believe that all human life is sacred but they attack the doctor’s sacredness of life. However, in doing so, Christian extremists are murdering doctors.

FPBT says

Another example is radical Muslims, such as suicide bombers, believe that they are dying for Allah or God and will be rewarded by him. They believe that what they are doing is right. However, believing something does not make it so. In other words, belief does not create reality. No matter how sincere the suicide bombers’ belief (the subjective factor of the moral act) that they will be rewarded by God, their sincerity does not make the act of killing innocent human beings (the objective factor of the moral act) right. In fact, it is murder!

FPBT says

A criticism of Right-Wing or radical Muslim terrorists should not be construed as a criticism of Islam per se, the religion to which the terrorist belongs. Of course, not all Muslims are terrorists. However, there are Muslims who justify their own beliefs by "proof-texting," that is, wrenching a religious text from its context as a pretext or cover-up to justify terrorism.

Likewise, a criticism of Right-Wing Christians should not be construed as a criticism of Christianity per se. Not all Christians are, theologically and politically, on the far Right. In the words of John Warwick Montgomery, a scholar of international law, "[I]t is hardly fair to attribute to the Christian religion acts or opinions that in fact are in direct opposition to Christ’s own teachings."

Is she ok if her husband marries 3 other wives?

@TrumpCuck Sorry I had to delete a comment marked personal, because it really was personal, but have to quote this for posterity because I couldn't help laughing out loud:

If he has a Christian bone in his body, it belongs to his priest :)

FPBT says

How many Indonesians do we see

Hmm, just from recent memory, we saw whole Muslim families, including children, commit suicide for the sole purpose of murdering Christians, and before that there were multiple Bali bombings, probably more that I can't think of at the moment. Also, former Governor Ahok was imprisoned for blasphemy amid the rise of Islamic identity politics in Indonesia. If you are serious about equating Islam and other doctrines, you should really bring that to a Muslim country, and see what happens to you: even equating Islam with other religions is in itself blasphemy according to Islam.

Your comments comparing current Islam to other doctrines in the dark ages merely illustrate the point: Islam traps people in the dark ages.

Your comments sound like a tobacco company apologist claiming most smokers don't die from smoking. Smoking remains terrible. Here you are rooting for another smoker to get sworn into Congress, maybe protect tobacco companies from liability or even subsidize tobacco.

FPBT says

Christianity just isn't doing it for me anymore I'm going for the underdog.

If you want to become a Muslm/Nazi/smoker, I can't stop you. Maybe there is some gap that only Islamic/Nazi hatred or nicotine and tar can fill.