2
0

“Diversity offices” accumulate power via witch hunts


 invite response                
2018 Aug 11, 10:25am   3,921 views  15 comments

by cali   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2018/08/09/is-there-enough-of-america-left-to-be-saved/

The newly invented rights and the speech codes are used as weapons against heterosexual white males and to transfer authority from white male professors and managers to university and corporate “diversity offices” acting in behalf of “oppressed minorities” (women, non-white races except apparently Asians, homosexuals, transgendered). ...

The same thing happened to a graduate student at an English University who was one Friday afternoon sitting talking with three secretaries who were describing the evening out they had planned. He said: “sounds like a fun girls’ night out.” The expression “girls night out” is an old one widely used by women themselves, but the secretaries took offense at the word “girls,” complained, and the graduate student was subjected to sensitivity training.

Any member of an “oppressed minority” can make a complaint against a white male on any basis, and it is in the vested interest of the diversity office, whether university or corporate—remember the Google case—to regard the complaint both as true and as an offense. https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/08/08/google-committed-suppression-free-speech/ ...

It would be interesting to know if white males are permitted to file complaints against radical feminists who dismiss all white heterosexual males as rapists and black professors who describe whites as “ice people,” racists, and imperial/colonial exploiters.

The question is: are white heterosexual males protected by speech codes? I would suspect that if a white male filed a complaint against a man-hating feminist, the diversity office would take the complaint as proof that the white male is a misogynist, and if a white male filed a complaint against a black it would be interpreted as proof of the white male’s racism.

Comments 1 - 15 of 15        Search these comments

1   MisterLefty   2018 Aug 11, 1:09pm  

White debils!
2   Ceffer   2018 Aug 11, 1:37pm  

Calling them 'witch hunts' is sexist. They are properly referred to as 'honkey ass lies cleansings'.
3   FortWayne   2018 Aug 11, 1:50pm  

Liberals have managed to undermine educational institutions pretty hard. I don’t know how they got there, but this sounds like we got really stupid people running them.
4   Shaman   2018 Aug 11, 2:25pm  

The radical Left has taken over universities, and since they are intolerant of other viewpoints, they hire only professed Leftists whenever possible. Sometimes a moderate sneaks in if they are a minority or something, but it’s rare and they don’t advertise it. Nope, if you’re anything but a Leftist and you’re in higher ed, you’d better stay off social media and/or never post or comment on anything political. And you have to attend 1947373 diversity seminars taught by feminists who sweat man repellent.
5   rocketjoe79   2018 Aug 11, 11:47pm  

Anything with the word "social" is the new liberal mantra: socialism, socialist, sociology (not real science), social media. etc. If you don't embrace it all, you get backlash.
6   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Aug 12, 1:09am  

rocketjoe79 says
sociology (not real science)


Used to be a real Soft Science, nowadays they don't teach the Columbia Study (Quality of Teachers don't matter much, but Parents Expectations Matter the Most, followed by Peers) or the City Minority Study (over 15% leads to increased mistrust and crime, including in and among the Majority itself). All of which were repeated and found to be true over and over again, worldwide.

Now they teach intersectionality.
7   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Aug 12, 1:10am  

cali says
It would be interesting to know if white males are permitted to file complaints against radical feminists who dismiss all white heterosexual males as rapists and black professors who describe whites as “ice people,” racists, and imperial/colonial exploiters.


No, because insensitivity = power+Privilege.
8   MisterLefty   2018 Aug 12, 5:39am  

Why does Howard University deny their students the benefits of diversity?
9   🎂 Tenpoundbass   2018 Aug 12, 5:54am  

Diversity hires is just code for Useless Shits that don't have the sense God gave Goat Shit.
The only thing more pathetic than them is the people how do the hiring.
10   NDrLoR   2018 Aug 12, 7:44am  

cali says
secretaries
I'm surprised that doesn't cause conniptions.
11   Shaman   2018 Aug 12, 11:02am  

MisterLefty says
Why does Howard University deny their students the benefits of diversity?


Because it’s a traditionally black school, just like the Ivy League denies people of color because they are traditionally white schools.
Oh wait, that’s not true!
12   rocketjoe79   2018 Aug 12, 12:11pm  

TwoScoopsOfWompWomp says
rocketjoe79 says
sociology (not real science)


Used to be a real Soft Science, nowadays they don't teach the Columbia Study (Quality of Teachers don't matter much, but Parents Expectations Matter the Most, followed by Peers) or the City Minority Study (over 15% leads to increased mistrust and crime, including in and among the Majority itself). All of which were repeated and found to be true over and over again, worldwide.

Now they teach intersectionality.


Name one provable hypothesis that can be accomplished with sociology or "social science" as some refer to it. It's mostly data analysis masquerading as science. Much of the analysis is flawed to prove biased assumptions or reach expected outcomes. When the outcomes aren't proven in their favor, "the data are flawed." In other words, people with an agenda, "proving" they are right. Very similar to climate data being manipulated to "prove" Anthropogenic Global Warming.
13   Patrick   2018 Aug 12, 12:26pm  

TwoScoopsOfWompWomp says
City Minority Study (over 15% leads to increased mistrust and crime, including in and among the Majority itself)


@TwoScoopsOfWompWomp do you have a link for that? I can't find it, but then of course I would expect it to be censored search indexes because it does not fit The Narrative, the same way they censor Alex Jones.

Believing that what we are allowed to see is being censored is no longer paranoia, but provable fact.
14   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Aug 13, 2:19am  

@Patrick I will search for it. The Teacher one was named the Columbia Study, I don't know what the Rise of Minority Proportion of Population to increased distrust, crime was called.
15   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Aug 13, 2:42am  

This is from the "Bowling Alone" Guy, a Harvard Professor, further illustration that diverse communities are worse in the civic participation and trust department, but it's not the Classic Study I have in mind. I would have heard about this first in the mid 90s in college, this didn't come out until the 2000s.

Discussion of Putnam:
http://archive.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/05/the_downside_of_diversity/

Paper:
https://web.archive.org/web/20150221143809/http://www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/data_access/data/datasets/social_capital_community_survey.html#.UDTTcnCUpME

Naturally the Neoliberal Globalist Press hated this finding and did everything possible to discredit it.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions