0
0

Chatham House Rule


 invite response                
2018 Aug 14, 5:07pm   711 views  1 comment

by Patrick   ➕follow (55)   💰tip   ignore  

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chatham_House_Rule

When a meeting, or part thereof, is held under the Chatham House Rule, participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other participant, may be revealed.


Sounds like a good rule. Too bad that they don't have some other rule for judging the civility of comments.

Comments 1 - 1 of 1        Search these comments

1   Patrick   2018 Aug 14, 5:25pm  

I appreciated your suggestion and I did try making all commentary completely anonymous for a while, but it was disturbing, like having a conversation in a dark room, where everyone has the same voice. Hard to keep things straight in your head. At least at first, and then after a while you can kinda tell just from spelling and comment content who is probably who.

And there is some pleasure in being able to connect a comment with a history, even if it's the history of an anonymous person on the internet. It feels like more of a community with user names.

I am working on a base level kind of automated moderation, using a pattern recognition system which can classify comments into spam, personal attacks, and acceptable. Not sure it will really work though, since machines are generally not as smart as people, yet.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions