0
0

Bubbles the Bobble headed Ape loses his Security clearance and the Celebs are mad.


 invite response                
2018 Aug 15, 4:54pm   1,641 views  8 comments

by Tenpoundbass   ➕follow (7)   💰tip   ignore  

Thiso ought to put Trump on Meathead's shit list.

https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/08/15/trump-revokes-john-brennans-security-clearance/


As the head of the Executive Branch and Commander in Chief, I have a unique constitutional responsibility to protect the nation’s classified information. Including by controlling access to it. Today, in fulfilling that responsibility, I have decided to revoke the security clearance of John Brennan, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency.

Historically, former heads of intelligence and law enforcement agencies have been allowed to retain access to classified information after their government service so that they can consult with their successors regarding matters about which they may have special insights and as a professional courtesy. Neither of these justifications supports Mr. Brennan’s continued access to classified information.

First, at this point in my administration, any benefits that senior officials might glean from consultations with Mr. Brennan, are not outweighed by the risks posed by his erratic conduct and behavior. Second, that conduct and behavior has tested and far exceeded the limits of any professional courtesy that may have been due to him.

Mr. Brennan has a history that calls in to question his objectivity and credibility. In 2014, for example, he denied to Congress that CIA officials under his supervision had improperly accessed the computer files of congressional staffers. He told the Council on Foreign Relations that the CIA would never do such a thing. The CIA’s Inspector General however contradicted Mr. Brennan directly, concluding unequivocally that agency officials had indeed improperly accessed congressional staffers files. More recently, Mr. Brennan told Congress that the intelligence community did not make use of the so-called Steele dossier in an assessment regarding the 2016 election, an assertion contradicted by at least two other senior officials in the intelligence community, and all of the facts.

Additionally, Mr. Brennan has recently leveraged his status as a former high ranking official with access to highly sensitive information to make a series of unfounded and outrageous allegations, wild outbursts on the internet and television about this administration. Mr. Brennan’s lying and recent conduct, characterized by increasingly frenzied commentary is wholly inconsistent with access to the nation’s most closely held secrets and facilities, the very aim of our adversaries which is to sow division and chaos.

More broadly, the issue of Mr. Brennan’s security clearance raises larger questions about the practice of former officials maintaining access to our nation’s most sensitive secrets long after their time in government has ended. Such access is particularly inappropriate when former officials have transitioned into highly partisan positions and seek to use real or perceived access to sensitive information to validate their political attacks. Any access granted to our nation’s secrets should be in furtherance of national, not personal interest.

For this reason I have begun to review the more general question of the access to classified information by government officials. As part of this review I am evaluating action with respect to the following individuals: James Clapper, James Comey, Michael Hayden, Sally Yates, Susan Rice, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, and Bruce Ohr. Security clearances for those who still have them may be revoked and those who have already lost their security clearance may not be able to have it reinstated. It is for the forgoing reasons that I have exercised my constitutional authority to deny Mr. Brennan access to classified information and I will direct appropriate staff of the National Security Council to make the necessary arrangements with the appropriate agencies to implement this determination.

Comments 1 - 8 of 8        Search these comments

1   Evan F.   2018 Aug 15, 5:24pm  

Yeah, unfortunately, regardless of whether Brennan deserved the revocation or not, Trump is setting a precedent for lots of crappy tit-for-tat behavior down the line.
2   Patrick   2018 Aug 15, 5:29pm  

Seems quite reasonable to me that former officials should no longer have access to state secrets.
3   MrMagic   2018 Aug 15, 5:34pm  

Patrick says
Seems quite reasonable to me that former officials should no longer have access to state secrets.


Exactly, there's zero reason to have clearance if you're NOT employed by the government anymore.

I just turned on Anderson Cooper on CNN, once again, they're out of their minds with TDS on this story... such miserable people.
5   Tenpoundbass   2018 Aug 16, 8:37am  

Here he is after losing his security clearance

6   Tenpoundbass   2018 Aug 16, 9:06am  

REVOKE HER SECURITY CLEARANCE - She and her self claimed "RESISTANCE" have co-conspired to rig/overthrow our 2016 free election

7   clambo   2018 Aug 16, 3:25pm  

There are about 1 million Americans who have a top secret security clearance. This is a few too many.

Brennan is an evil bastard. He was the guy who would see people in a drone image and say "Kill them, unleash the hellfire missile."

I would love to see him water boarded.

I think Trump in 7 years should also cancel his rich pension. Let him find a job somewhere.
8   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Aug 16, 3:31pm  

You gotta love a guy who used his influence as a intel office holder to attack the President at every turn, whose dire predictions about the Iran Deal, DPRK, etc. have failed to come to pass, and otherwise undermines the Foreign Policy of the Administration at every turn, say that revoking his security clearance is "unfair".

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions