« prev   random   next »

2
4

Flynn sentencing hearing delayed - AGAIN, for the FOURTH Time

By MrMagic following x   2018 Aug 21, 11:54am 1,080 views   7 comments   watch   nsfw   quote     share    


Didn't the Democrats say this was a Slam-Dunk Case?

Special counsel Robert Mueller has again delayed scheduling a sentencing hearing for former national security adviser Michael Flynn.

“Due to the status of its investigation, the Special Counsel’s Office does not believe that this matter is ready to be scheduled for a sentencing hearing at this time,” read a joint status report released Tuesday.

Tuesday’s delay is the fourth time prosecutors have asked to delay Flynn’s sentencing.


http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/402861-flynn-sentencing-hearing-delayed
1   Tenpoundbass   ignore (14)   2018 Aug 21, 12:02pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

He looks like he Shits in a box full of Buckwheat husks.
2   MrMagic   ignore (11)   2018 Dec 4, 7:55pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Well, talk about backtracking... I thought this was a slam-dunk, proven Russian collusion arrest. Gee, maybe Mueller really DOESN'T have shit..

Citing 'substantial assistance' to probe, Mueller recommends no prison time for former Trump adviser Michael Flynn.

Special counsel Robert Mueller is recommending no prison time for retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, citing the former national security adviser’s “substantial assistance” in his ongoing investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

“Given the defendant’s substantial assistance and other considerations set forth,” the special counsel wrote, “a sentence at the low end of the guideline range—including a sentence that does not impose a term of incarceration—is appropriate and warranted.”

(Translation, we didn't get shit from him that warrants incarceration or proves collusion, and instead, we're going to get reamed for it)

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/mueller-files-key-sentencing-recommendation-trump-adviser-michael/story?id=59597161
3   AD   ignore (0)   2018 Dec 4, 11:02pm   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Mueller trying to save face. He can't substantially nail General Flynn so he issues this Bill Clinton style spin or bluff about Flynn helping his investigation.

Look at how Mueller handled the Dr Hatfill investigation as well as the Supreme Court publicly rebuking the integrity of Mueller's assistant Andrew Weismann.
4   AD   ignore (0)   2018 Dec 4, 11:10pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

The same goes for how the Obama admin targeted Carter Page. Now they are saying Trump took bribes from Russia during his campaign (ie, Trump Tower in Moscow), the problem is that the US Code states that the bribe has to be made to an appointed or nominated official. Trump was not in that category and especially he never expected to win. Trump looked as shocked as Hilary and her supporters on election night. Also he never proceeded with the tower plan later on in his campaign.
5   Evan F.   ignore (0)   2018 Dec 4, 11:50pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Or, the information provided could have been so significant as to merit some sort of quid pro quo.

To paraphrase, you know nothing, John Snow. And neither does anybody else. Literally everything you've suggested is pure speculation at this point.
6   MrMagic   ignore (11)   2018 Dec 5, 7:36am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

adarmiento says
Now they are saying Trump took bribes from Russia during his campaign (ie, Trump Tower in Moscow), the problem is that the US Code states that the bribe has to be made to an appointed or nominated official.


That's the part that's so laughable, and the CNN, WaPo and MSNBC followers are so breathlessly waiting for impeachment, because Trump was looking a real estate deals in Russia. Trump was doing in January 2016 the same thing as all the other 15+ candidates (Senators, Governors, Businessman) that were running. Attending to his business, as he had no idea if he was going to be the winning candidate at that time, and if he didn't win, he would have just gone back to his regular job, just like all the other candidates did when they lost.
7   Quigley   ignore (0)   2018 Dec 5, 9:27am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Evan F. says
To paraphrase, you know nothing, John Snow. And neither does anybody else.


#triggered!

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions