3
0

Radical open-access plan could spell end to scientific journal subscriptions


 invite response                
2018 Sep 6, 7:21am   1,073 views  5 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (55)   💰tip   ignore  

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06178-7


Research funders from France, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and eight other European nations have unveiled a radical open-access initiative that could change the face of science publishing in two years — and which has instantly provoked protest from publishers.

The 11 agencies, who together spend €7.6 billion (US$8.8 billion) in research grants annually, say they will mandate that, from 2020, the scientists they fund must make resulting papers free to read immediately on publication (see ‘Plan S players’). The papers would have a liberal publishing licence that would allow anyone else to download, translate or otherwise reuse the work. “No science should be locked behind paywalls!” says a preamble document that accompanies the pledge, called Plan S, released on 4 September.

“It is a very powerful declaration. It will be contentious and stir up strong feelings,” says Stephen Curry, a structural biologist and open-access advocate at Imperial College London. The policy, he says, appears to mark a “significant shift” in the open-access publishing movement, which has seen slow progress in its bid to make scientific literature freely available online.


This is very promising. Most scientific research is done with government funding, and yet the research is not available to the public without paying.

Comments 1 - 5 of 5        Search these comments

1   Bd6r   2018 Sep 6, 8:05am  

National Institutes of Health in USA mandate open access for many years. Anything done with their support can be downloaded FREE on https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/. Sadly, NSF and DOE have folded and/or been bribed by publishers and research funded by them is not free.

In general, it is hard to understand why science journals are so expensive. Government or private company provides research funds, researchers perform research, write up articles, other researchers review them, and publishing company gets all profit.
2   Patrick   2018 Sep 6, 8:44am  

It's a good example of non-productive rent-seeking.

Benefits no one except the publishing companies.
3   tovarichpeter   2018 Sep 6, 10:29am  

This could greatly speed up scientific progress
4   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Sep 6, 11:04am  

Patrick says
It's a good example of non-productive rent-seeking.

Benefits no one except the publishing companies.


Yep, and the cost of hosting PDFs of a typical paper doesn't come anywhere near $49.00 a download, either Especially since many papers are only accessed a handful of times.

So the "Muh Distribution Costs" doesn't work here.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions