follow Goran_K following
follow Goran_K 2018 Sep 17, 3:05pm
2,502 views 61 comments
« First « Previous Comments 22 - 61 of 61 Last »
You referring to Russian collusion I assume.
If any such evidence arises, CNN will, of course, cover it
What speaks volumes is the Trump cultists continued belief in FISA abuse despite ZERO evidence. If any such evidence arises, CNN will, of course, cover it
If there is "ZERO evidence" of wrong doing by the investigators, why has there been something like 25 senior FBI and DOJ officials who have been fired, demoted or resigned since this investigation begun?
What speaks volumes is the Trump cultists continued belief in FISA abuse despite ZERO evidence.
It's as if Ohr, Strzok, Page, McCabe, etc. etc. never existed.
Let's start with an easy one: Strzok and Lisa Page worked for the Special Counsel's office. Are they still employed there? Why not?Is McCabe still employed? Why was he fired?https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/378826-sessions-fires-mccabe-from-fbi
No evidence of collusion still after over 2 years, plus a mountain of evidence showing political bias.Keep sticking your head in the sand if you like Leon. This house of cards is falling before our eyes
Did Bush use the powers of the State to coordinate a coup against Obama's electoral success and to spy on the Obama campaign, so as to put in Bush's party's chosen candidate after stealing the primary elections and blasting $1 billion of negative propaganda through the complicit MSM as well?
The brainwashing is real.
That's why Mueller was appointed--to find out
No mueller was not appointed to look for trump collusion. That's just made up by the trumptards. He was appointed to ensure a full investigation into Russian interference into the election. Read the appointment letter some time
No mueller was not appointed to look for trump collusion.
Is there evidence you were planning on presenting? So far nothing is very persuasive.
Kind of a big deal with the lead FBI investigators are caught red handed with their texts hating on Trump and openly talking about how they were going to stop him.
The text messages show a couple FBI agents thought (rightly it appears) that Trump was a moron and shouldn't be President. Pretty sure that's not against the law.
But it is against the rules
There is also evidence of leaking which is against the law. We will know alot more in the coming days with the un-redacted FISA warrants and other communications.
Why else are the Democrats going ape-shit?
OK so no evidence yet, but maybe there is some coming?
FBI rules."FBI fires Peter Strzok, agent who sent anti-Trump text messages"https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/08/13/fbi-fired-peter-strzok-anti-trump-texts/976052002/
"Inspector general recommends criminal investigation of Andrew McCabe"
Ah!! So, an Inspector General recommending criminal investigation = evidence now? Is that how it works?
Is the same true when the Attorney General recommends a Special Counsel?
So Trump was colluding with the Russians. Occam's razor for sure.
No mueller was not appointed to look for trump collusion. That's just made up by the trumptards. He was appointed to ensure a full investigation into Russian interference into the election. Read the appointment letter some time.
WASHINGTON — The Justice Department appointed Robert S. Mueller III, a former F.B.I. director, as special counsel on Wednesday to oversee the investigation into ties between President Trump’s campaign and Russian officials, dramatically raising the legal and political stakes in an affair that has threatened to engulf Mr. Trump’s four-month-old presidency.
The Department of Justice has appointed the former FBI director Robert Mueller as special counsel to investigate alleged ties between the 2016 presidential campaign of Donald Trump and Russian operatives. Mueller will also investigate questions of Russian intervention in the election generally.
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein has appointed former FBI Director Robert Mueller to serve as special counsel to oversee the previously confirmed FBI investigation of Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential election and related matters."I have determined that a Special Counsel is necessary in order for the American people to have full confidence in the outcome," Rosenstein said in a statement. The letter announcing the appointment says that Mueller is authorized to investigate "any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump; and...any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation."
Yeah dude. When the FBI fires you, and then recommends a criminal investigation against you on top of the sacking............it might point to some "evidence" of wrong doing.
I asked you some questions. If Strzok and Page and McCabe dindu nuttin' wrong, why aren't they employed at their old jobs?
Mueller sure as shit was: May 17th, 2017.
And, please, don't try to argue that the Trump Campaign doesn't include Trump, and note that "any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation" are authorized to be investigated, which would certainly include Russian "collusion" personally by Trump.
Read the first paragraph, that's the appointment of the scope of the investigation. Where is the word collusion in the letter? It's not..
Why is that? Collusion don't have any legal meaning in a campaign. The only place collusion has any legal meaning is in anti trust law. So collusion is just made up shit. Coordination isn't a crime either.
Is today the day it gets "real"??!!?I'm on the edge of my seat!!!!
I don't think anybody is going to be convinced that "coordination" and "collusion" have radically different meanings. Is it misleading to write "Franco and Ciparelli coordinated a bank robbery", instead of "Franco and Ciparelli colluded in a bank robbery"?
Yet Mueller is pointedly directed to investigate it. You can report on something that isn't a crime, yes?
What has the Left been masturbating to for over a year now? Proof of "Russian Collusion", that's what. The Media has been breathless in it's reporting of any and every potential meeting. Every few weeks they revisit the Trump Tower meeting.
« First « Previous Comments 22 - 61 of 61 Last »