patrick.net

That fucker is at the root of this whole mess. He needs a good firing.

I predict he’s gone after midterms. Along with Jeff Sessions.
“You’re fired!”

There’s that deep state.

Is this when it gets real????!!!???

LeonDurham says

Is this when it gets real????!!!???

I wonder if it will be the BOMBSHELL that the Mueller Investigation was.

I used to work for a guy that was an Employee of the Company of the Namesake that was his Doing business as moniker.

Not the real names.
So Ray Seltzer, worked for Rob Rogers. Ray Seltzer was doing business as Rob Rogers.

It was a trip listening to him close deals as each of those entities. He would even tell the callers...
"Here I'm going to pass you back to Rob" or back to Ray.
People would call up Rob Rogers, and if there was a question on pricing he would tell them he will get Ray to call them back shortly.

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says

I wonder if it will be the BOMBSHELL that the Mueller Investigation was.

Was??

Last I checked, the investigation is still going. Talking with Cohen I believe.

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says

Rosenstein reportedly made the comments to then-acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe,

Reportedly. Did you miss that part? Hilllary reported ran a pedophile sex ring from a pizza parlor. I'll wait to see the gun camera film. BTW when will we have proof about hillaries sex ring also?

bob2356 says

Reportedly. Did you miss that part? Hilllary reported ran a pedophile sex ring from a pizza parlor. I'll wait to see the gun camera film. BTW when will we have proof about hillaries sex ring also?

Rosenstein was being jocular/sarcastic.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/rosenstein-joked-about-secretly-recording-trump-say-sources-n911981

See?

The Leak is Real (Wear a Wire) --- but the News is Fake (meant sarcastically, not in deadly earnest as was implied by the NYT, the reporter is sticking to his story)
https://www.mediaite.com/tv/ny-times-reporter-stands-by-rod-rosenstein-bombshell-this-wasnt-a-flippant-remark/

LeonDurham says

Last I checked, the investigation is still going. Talking with Cohen I believe.

Cohen doesn't have shit on the Trump Tower Meeting, or probably anything else. Sorry, this is old news!

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says

Cohen doesn't have shit on the Trump Tower Meeting, or probably anything else. Sorry, this is old news!

lol--who knew pat.netters were such experts on the Mueller investigation. Were you at the Trump tower meeting too?

LeonDurham says

lol--who knew pat.netters were such experts on the Mueller investigation. Were you at the Trump tower meeting too?

LOL! I know it's hard to keep up with all the BOMBSHELLS! that are gonna get Trump This Time!
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/lanny-davis-says-he-was-wrong-about-trump-tower-meeting-n904521

Lanny Davis says he was wrong about Trump Tower meeting and Cohen
Michael Cohen's lawyer says he shouldn't have confirmed a report Cohen was willing to testify Trump knew about the Trump Tower meeting with Russians in advance.

Is Lanny Davis a pat.netter?

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says

Cohen doesn't have shit on the Trump Tower Meeting, or probably anything else. Sorry, this is old news!

And just fyi-the man himself seems to disagree with you.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/former-trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-114533648.html

"Michael Cohen, Donald Trump‘s former personal lawyer, has said he is providing “critical information” as part of the federal investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election and possible coordination between the Kremlin and the Trump campaign."


I have no idea if he is telling Mueller anything or not... But neither do you.

BOMBSHELL

We'll get that Trump this time. This won't be yet another Nothingburger, you'll see!

hahahaha

LeonDurham says

Last I checked, the investigation is still going.

So are investigations into FISA corruption and HRC emails, at a minimum.

While Muellers investigation resulted in no ramifications for anyone relevant, the FBI/DOJ portion of the deep state is being routed. https://www.theepochtimes.com/strzok-joins-list-of-25-top-fbi-doj-officials-who-have-been-recently-fired-demoted-or-resigned_2624607.html

CBOEtrader says

While Muellers investigation resulted in no ramifications for anyone relevant, the FBI/DOJ portion of the deep state is being routed

lol-- Flynn isn't relevant? Manafort isn't relevant? Page isn't relevant?

Trump's former campaign manager is now a nobody? His former National Security Advisor is not relevant?

LeonDurham says

And just fyi-the man himself seems to disagree with you.

The story in your link confirms TwoScoops story, not yours. All it adds is that Cohen is giving up some sort of information, not about the Trump tower meeting.

Quigley says

The story in your link confirms TwoScoops story, not yours. All it adds is that Cohen is giving up some sort of information, not about the Trump tower meeting.

lol--read it again. I'll help you:

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says

Cohen doesn't have shit on the Trump Tower Meeting, or probably anything else.

"Michael Cohen, Donald Trump‘s former personal lawyer, has said he is providing “critical information” as part of the federal investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election and possible coordination between the Kremlin and the Trump campaign."

Sure seems like he is providing information on "anything else" to me.

LeonDurham says

"Michael Cohen, Donald Trump‘s former personal lawyer, has said he is providing “critical information” as part of the federal investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election and possible coordination between the Kremlin and the Trump campaign."

Possible. Sounds like Lanny Davis is just teasing here and has nothing, he would certainly know as Cohen's lawyer. Similar to his assertion about the Trump Tower meeting he flat out had to retract/deny on TV. We've been hearing for almost two years the endless refrain:
www.youtube.com/embed/lw2BVI9OhC4

Without a shred of evidence.

Note the above video was made last summer

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says

Without a shred of evidence.

What's your definition of evidence?

LeonDurham says

What's your definition of evidence?

You know, facts supporting the charge. Two years and none of those have been discovered linking Trump to Russian Collusion. But plenty of that evidence has been found linking Democrats to Russian Collusion.
This makes perfect sense when you review the Democrats history of projection.

Quigley says

You know, facts supporting the charge. Two years and none of those have been discovered linking Trump to Russian Collusion. But plenty of that evidence has been found linking Democrats to Russian Collusion.
This makes perfect sense when you review the Democrats history of projection.

Like say facts showing a meeting in Trump tower between top Trump campaign leaders and a Russian agent that is very close to Putin?

Like those kinds of facts?

Rocketmanjoe says

Quigley says

But plenty of that evidence has been found linking Democrats to Russian Collusion.

Lol, what's your definition of evidence? Got any evidence or just more hearsay?

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

Rod Roachclip to either resign or getting fired today.
I still say there's a 50/50 chance Trump says "Nah it's all good I'm not firing Rod and I don't accept his resignation."

Trump really wants to wrap this up on its own so he can bust everyone's ass including Rod.