follow Patrick following
follow Patrick 2018 Sep 27, 8:26pm
2,331 views 29 comments
On Tuesday Gab.com flew a plane over Silicon Valley for several hours with a message: Trump: Investigate Twitter! Join Gab.com. We hope to send a message to Big Tech: interfering in the electoral process by selectively censoring, suspending, and shadowbanning users is not going to stand. Big Tech is now the enemy of The People and of freedom.
Yes, it was also advertising for gab.ai, but they have a valid point: Our democracy is being corrupted daily by our largest tech companies. They interfere with what we are allowed to find and read, for explicitly political reasons.They have become a far greater threat to our country than Russia.
They have become a far greater threat to our country than Russia.
These companies are NOT biased.
Oh man, going to laugh for days about that one. I live here, I know this shit. They are as biased as it is possible to be. Off the freaking charts. Like intergalactic-level biased both within the company and in what they display to the public.
If you think that tech companies in the Silicon Valley are not off the rails biased, you are blind, disingenuous, or you haven’t spent enough time here.
I live here, I know this shit.
putting party, race and religion over the country and joining force with the enemy.
Tim Aurora saysputting party, race and religion over the country and joining force with the enemy.That is precisely what Democrats did in 2016 by nominating Hillary Clinton, whose long service to her Saudi clients at American expense showed what KSA had bought with their investment in her and her family and their foundation. Hillary's War in Libya, which she expanded into Syria, drove millions of Sunnis into NATO, and she campaigned on making Americans pay to import many thousands more to the USA. Facebook reportedly collaborated with the Islamic Republic of Pakistan to put FB users on death row for blasphemy against Islam, because the hapless FB users had identified themselves as atheist (thus denying This is just some blabbering and Whataboutism . If you want to discuss Hillary, start a new thread about Hillary
Where the evidence show
Some of us have supported those points with links.
Tim Aurora saysblabbering
This is just some blabbering and Whataboutism . If you want to discuss Hillary, start a new thread about Hillary
"Evidence" isn't a bunch of random unrelated stream of conscientious my dad's uncles nephews girlfriends ex husbands cousin said this moments flung at the wall like a plate of spaghetti. HaHaHaHaHa. Got to love when someone links their opinion back to their own opinion as "evidence".
Your links are to your owns posts ( or guy with pro Republican posts). That is called circular logic
You were taking about Hillary issues and that is "Whataboutism" and "Blabbering". As I said this is not related to the current debate.
Tim Aurora saysincomprehensibleTim Aurora saysblabberingblabber = "talk foolishly, mindlessly, or excessively."Your comment reminds me of a recent Colbert episode. Someone had made a valid point criticizing Christine Blasey Ford; Colbert responded with a string of ad hominem invective, and his audience cheered. In this thread, users (including me) have made valid points about FB, GOOG, and TWTR. Some of us have supported those points with links. You reply calling these comments incomprehensible blabber. I suspect something about partisanship and TDS causes some people to become completely unable to comprehend opposing facts and arguments. Where the evidence shows one or more valid points, the partisan sees only incomprehensib...
For example one says that FB complied with the law to remove content they requested which was blasphemous. Is this enabling execution?
"Pakistan Sentences Man To Death For 'Blasphemy' On [Facebook]***The death sentence comes as the government pushes a campaign against blasphemy on social media.***Saroop Ijaz, a lawyer with Human Rights Watch in Pakistan, told the Guardian that "the casual manner in which death sentences are handed in blasphemy cases coupled with the lack of orientation of Pakistani courts with technology makes this a very dangerous situation."In March, according to The Washington Post, the government "asked Twitter and Facebook to report potentially troublesome posts to authorities.""
document anti-Muslim activities in America https://www.newamerica.org/in-depth/anti-muslim-activity/. This according you you ties into enabling Islam nut-jobs to build their kill-lists.
TWTR and FB platforms were used by people to send messages by anti-blasphemers. Is having a social platform that people post on, enabling in your view?
I am trying to understand the process of partisan hallucination. Do you get triggered by something you can disagree with, and then fail to see everything else?
exec invested in Islamic terrorism
ThreeBays saysexec invested in Islamic terrorismThat is your phrase, not mine. Please quote. Did you hallucinate that phrase somewhere, as if you had seen it?
BTW, he was the CEO, and many GOOG employees were also involved in other aspects of the "resistance" including especially the fight to bring more Muslims into the USA.
As for irrational conspiracy theories, Pakistan is a terrorist state and is proudly leading dozens of Muslim countries in a "Muslim world plan against blasphemous content," as per Islam.
"FB, GOOG, and TWTR are enabling the Islamic execution of blasphemers"
your conspiracy theory about the tech companies?
Jesus, we have memos and even video of the Google Founders talking about how they could have done more to stop Trump, complete with executives tearing up.http://fortune.com/2018/09/13/google-leaked-video-trump/ At this point, to maintain that Social Media isn't biased, is laughable.
"Google employees debated ways to alter search results to direct users to pro-immigration organizations and to contact lawmakers and government agencies after President Donald Trump's immigration travel ban against predominantly Muslim countries."
Any half decent person or company opposed it.
I saw the article. Nowhere it says that the google product should be made biased.
These companies are NOT biased.
Not only does it reveal the product should be biased