« prev   random   next »


Full text of Soros-funded plan to subvert a democratically elected US president

By Patrick following x   2018 Oct 6, 3:28pm 2,568 views   31 comments   watch   nsfw   quote     share    


Full text of "David Brock - Confidential Memo on Fighting Trump"

Strategic Plan for Action






Share blue

The progressive infrastructure groups we've built together were started long before
Hillary Clinton ran for president. They were always intended to be the first line of defense—
and offense — when we are under siege.

If we keep fighting, our groups will last, we will continue to build for the future — and we
will win again.

We have the mandate.

Together, we won the popular vote and Democrats picked up seats in the Senate and
the House.

Trump is the least popular incoming president in modern history and the outgoing president
and popular vote winner are again the most admired man and woman in the nation.

The country did not vote for Trump-style change.

Trump has the legal authority, but we have the moral authority— and the moral responsibility —
to oppose him.

We will fight, every day.

We are going to fight for the things in which we believe, and we are going to fight against
any attempt to erode the cornerstone work and values of the progressive movement and this
pluralistic nation.

We are going to resist the normalization of Donald Trump. His every conflict of interest,
his every bit of cronyism, his every move toward authoritarianism, his every subversion
of our democratic systems and principles, his every radical departure from foreign and
domestic policy norms.

We are going to contest every effort, at every level of government, to limit rights, rescind
protections, entrench inequality, redistribute wealth upwards, or in any other way
fundamentally undermine the tenets of egalitarianism that must serve as the bedrock
of our democracy.

Introduction 1

We will apply lessons learned.

Generally speaking and simply put, Democrats got clobbered in the digital space.

Digital programs— both tactical and messaging— failed to actively listen to and engage the
online grassroots universe.

The Trump camp spoke effectively to the grassroots and relied on online channels to
disseminate information and misinformation and influence the media, even getting fake stories
onto cable TV.

And the right colonized Facebook, which has established a virtual monopoly on information

Our digital efforts were largely focused on changing the narrative with the traditional
media versus voters. This worked to a point but wasn't enough in the face of a news media
incentivized by profit and access and fearful of intimidation and bullying by the Trump forces.

We will fully adapt to the new reality, and we will win.

Here's how:

In the next four years, Media Matters will continue its core mission of disarming right-
wing misinformation, while leading the fight against the next generation of conservative
disinformation: The proliferation of fake news and propaganda now threatening the country's
information ecosystem. Here's what success will look like:

■ Serial misinformers and right-wing propagandists inhabiting everything from social media
to the highest levels of government will be exposed, discredited.

■ Internet and social media platforms, like Google and Facebook, will no longer uncritically
and without consequence host and enrich fake news sites and propagandists.

■ Toxic alt-right social media-fueled harassment campaigns that silence dissent and poison
our national discourse will be punished and halted.

American Bridge will cement itself as the standard-bearer of opposition research, build on
its role as a progressive clearinghouse for information that drives the narrative on Republican
officeholders and candidates, and be at the epicenter of Democrats' work to regain power-
starting in 2017 and building to 2020. Here's what success will look like:

■ Trump will be defeated either through impeachment or at the ballot box in 2020.

■ The balance of power will shift back to Democrats. We will measurably impact US Senate,
gubernatorial, and state legislative races.

■ We will free ourselves from solely relying on the press. Our robust digital program will reach
voters directly online.

2 [ Private & Confidential

CREW will be the leading nonpartisan ethics watchdog group in a period of crisis with a
president and administration that present possible conflicts of interest and ethical problems
on an unprecedented scale. CREW will demand ethical conduct from the administration
and all parts of government, expose improper influence from powerful interests, and ensure
accountability when the administration and others shirk ethical standards, rules, and laws.
Here's what success will look like:

■ Trump will be afflicted by a steady flow of damaging information, new revelations, and an
inability to avoid conflicts issues.

■ The Trump administration will be forced to defend illegal conduct in court.

■ Powerful industries and interest groups will see their influence wane.

■ Dark money will be a political liability in key states.

Shareblue will take back social media for Democrats. We will delegitimize Donald Trump's
presidency by emboldening the opposition and empowering the majority of Americans who
oppose him. Shareblue will be the dynamic nucleus of a multi-platform media company that
informs, engages, and arms Americans to fight. Here's what success will look like:

■ Shareblue will become the de facto news outlet for opposition leaders and the grassroots.

■ Trump allies will be forced to step down or change course due to news pushed by Shareblue.

■ Under pressure from Shareblue, Democrats will take more aggressive positions
against Trump.

■ Shareblue will achieve financial sustainability while diversifying content offerings
and platforms.

■ Top editorial and writing talent will leave competitors to join Shareblue.

Right now, our institutions are among the critical few that stand between the America we love
and the abyss. We must protect and defend our democratic values.

We will not back down. We will only move forward.

We hope you'll fight with us.

Introduction 3



Media Matters will continue our core mission of disarming right-
wing misinformation, while leading the fight against the next
generation of conservative disinformation: The proliferation of fake
news and propaganda now threatening the country's information
ecosystem. Utilizing our unique capacity as the nation's premier
progressive media watchdog and rapid-response research center.
Media Matters will further increase our visibility in the ecosystem,
strengthen the ability of our supporters and partners to influence
it, and improve the infrastructure on which it rests.


The onslaught of well-funded right-wing media manipulation brings with it significant challenges.

The conservative Media Research Center, with an annual operating budget of $18 million, works closely
with establishment right-wing media to reinforce the myth of a liberally biased media, push journalism
to the right, and propel misinformation into the mainstream.

Breitbart, which has received millions in funding from extremist billionaires close to the Trump
administration, provides a nexus point for the so-called alt-right (the newest branding for American
white nationalism, anti-Semitism, and misogyny) to exploit vulnerabilities throughout
the media landscape. With a powerful ally in the White House (former chief executive Steve Bannon
will be Trump's chief strategist), Breitbart plans to export its brand of anti-establishment racism on a
global scale.

Meanwhile, the right has spent millions building and maintaining a next generation conservative news
infrastructure, which it effectively weaponized through social media and affiliated sites during the 2016
presidential campaign.

The relationship is symbiotic.

Donald Trump uses his Twitter account to manipulate news cycles with lies; attack press outlets that
produce critical stories about him; and share stories from fake news purveyors, conspiracy websites,
and right-wing news outlets.

"Trump TV" (the streaming news upstart Right Side Broadcasting) gives him a platform to bypass
other news media and distribute programming directly to his supporters. (Trump TV will reportedly
be present at White House press briefings even without traditional press credentials.)

In a hyper-fragmented media environment, the right is aggressively exploiting vulnerabilities and
finding new ways to poison the information ecosystem with lies.

Media Matters is ready to stop them.

Media Matters for America 2020 Plan [ 5


In our last four-year strategic plan, we described the media landscape ahead as being "sandwiched
between two realities." We foresaw a landscape where, on the one hand, legacy outlets would
ostensibly remain at the forefront, but their power and relevancy would wane as they made abrupt
shifts to respond to changing economic realities. On the other hand, fragmentation among audiences
would create an explosion in new digital outlets yielding increases in confirmation bias, trap
information consumers in the filter bubble isolating them from contrary views, and foment extremism.

We are no longer sandwiched between two realities. The new reality is the one of fragmentation—
and all that comes with it. Specifically, Media Matters must respond to three distinct challenges:

■ The decay of journalism.

■ The rise of fake news, disinformation, and active propaganda efforts.

■ An information ecosystem that furthers extremism and cultivates a climate of harassment.

To stop right-wing media manipulation in this environment, we must further increase our visibility in
the ecosystem, strengthen the ability of our partners and supporters to influence it, and improve the
infrastructure on which it rests.


Over the next four years, Media Matters will focus on achieving the following outcomes:

Serial misinformers and right-wing propagandists inhabiting everything from social media to the
highest levels of government will be exposed.

Internet and social media platforms, like Google and Facebook, will no longer uncritically and
without consequence host and enrich fake news sites and propagandists.

Toxic alt-right social media-fueled harassment campaigns that silence dissent and poison our
national discourse will be punished and halted.

Media Matters was the first to call out national cable broadcast networks for allowing Trump
to phone in to their shows instead of forcing him to appear via satellite or in studio. Because
of this unprecedented privilege, Trump could appear on more shows (he conducted 69 phone
interviews in the first 69 days of 2016 alone), and he could avoid being confronted by images
and interviewers showing his lies for what they are. As a result of our campaign urging major
networks to correct course, CBS News and NBC News publicly stated they'd discontinue
Trump's phone privileges. Eventually others followed suit and Trump's ability to control the
news cycle from the comfort of his home was greatly reduced.

6 | Private & Confidential


Media Matters will push back on conservative misinformation across all media channels in the
information ecosystem and specifically neutralize the effects and infrastructure of the newly
empowered alt-right.

We will focus our efforts into the following three areas:

■ Leverage our authority to encourage good journalism.

■ Develop technologies to serve as an early warning system for fake news and inoculate
social media platforms from exploitation and abuse.

■ Implement a robust omnichannel communications strategy and mobilize a massive
grassroots advocacy effort.


Traditional news outlets are dying.

Their business models have been decimated over the last 20 years as
their audiences have fallen, competitors have grown, and advertising
revenue has plummeted.

Journalists face an increasingly precarious personal financial position as news outlets lay off reporters
or fold altogether.

This position of weakness, combined with journalists' institutional tendency to portray political
problems as equally the fault of both Democrats/progressives and Republicans/conservatives
regardless of the facts, suggests that the press will continue to normalize Donald Trump and his allies.

Journalists who confront the extreme reality of a Trump administration experience personal
harassment. Media outlets that hold him accountable may be subject to boycotts, enflamed by the
president himself. Both risk access to government information and officials.

Media Matters must grapple with the effects of decaying journalism and ensure that truth triumphs in
the information ecosystem — not only as a means to combat misinformation but because it s necessary
for our embattled democracy to survive.

Here's how we’ll do it:


Even our fiercest detractors acknowledge the veracity our research. Recognizing that Media Matters'
strength comes from its research products, we will elevate and promote their branding and use.

In early December 2016, Media Matters restructured our research department to improve our ability
to engage in deep dive research studies and opposition research while simultaneously supporting rapid
response that bolsters the progressive movement.

In 2017, we will revamp the Media Matters website to make this vital and often evergreen information
significantly more accessible. Every day, Media Matters receives requests from members of the news
media and progressive partners that can be satisfied by simply pointing them to previously published
research content. Developing a research portal will capitalize on this demand.

Media Matters for America 2020 Plan [ 7

Along these lines, when it comes to ultimately moving the needle and shaping coverage, few products
rival a Media Matters quantitative study that puts hard numbers on the amount and type of coverage
a topic has received, and the people and organizations sought to discuss it. We know this based on
feedback from journalists as well as the impact these studies have generated. Increasing the number
of quantitative studies we publish will strengthen Media Matters' overall brand while increasing our
credibility with activists, media, and our movement partners.

Additionally, Media Matters' core media monitoring and research teams, which focus on the news of
the day, are bolstered by five issue-specific teams led by experts who study how media cover the key
progressive topics of our time, even when they do not lead the news. Media Matters' issue teams are
focused on correcting misinformation on: gun violence and public safety, LGBT equality, reproductive
health and gender equality, climate and energy, and economic policy. Our issue teams teams work daily
with movement partners specializing on these issues to amplify our work and change the narrative on
how these issues are covered in the media.


Media Matters will be vigilant in holding news media accountable for even
the slightest bit of normalization of Trump. We will encourage journalists
to defend standard practices, like the protective press pool and media
credentialing, and strive for higher standards against this new threat.

When Breitbart applied for Permanent Senate Gallery Press Credentials,
Media Matters was quick to act by advising the credentialing committee
of the myriad ways that Breitbart violated their requirements. Additionally,
Media Matters did something that the committee was unable to do:

A deep dive study of Breitbart content, reviewing thousands of their
stories to demonstrate that they do not meet the credentialing
requirement for original reporting.

Media Matters also first sounded the alarm about Breitbart's international
expansion and began working with journalists in the United States and
abroad to educate them on Breitbart's model as well as the larger universe
of alt-right activity for which Breitbart is the nexus. Most significantly,
we helped journalists understand the symbiotic relationship between
Breitbart and opposition political parties so that they can accurately report
on the danger that is spreading across western democracies.

Supporting journalism means just that: Helping news media navigate the complicated alt-right
landscape, defending them against harassment and abuse from alt-right pockets, while simultaneously
ensuring that they do the work that is so vitally needed.


What happens when the most dangerous source of misinformation is no longer right-wing radio hosts
or Fox News, but the federal government itself? Misinformation coming out of government agencies
can have devastating consequences. Look no further than government-fueled misinformation amplified
by an uncritical news media that led the country to war with Iraq in 2003.

The notion that the United States government under Donald Trump could become a source of
misinformation is not far-fetched— and in fact seems all but inevitable. Trump himself has repeatedly
pushed lies on his social media accounts. And several of his top officials have promoted fake news
stories, including the person that he has put in charge of the official White House social media
accounts, who has also used social media to harass detractors.

8 [ Private & Confidential

“Over the years ,
Media Matters has
won or assisted in a
number of tangible
victories , from
getting Glenn Beck
off cable news to
holding 60 Minutes
accountable for its
faulty Benghazi

—The Notion

Bottom line: Media Matters must be fully prepared to identify
misinformation coming from government and fight it at every

turn— both directly and indirectly by prodding journalists to scrutinize federal claims.

As part of our research department restructuring, we have added a dedicated team of media analysts
that will use new technologies to help track government disinformation. Media Matters is prepared to
confront the United States government under a proven and dangerous dissembler.


Facebook's virtual monopoly on information distribution has supercharged the fragmented landscape.

Almost two-thirds of Americans (200 million) consume news on social media. By contrast, less than
half of adults watch local news, less than a third watch cable news or nightly network news, a quarter
listen to radio, and only one in five read newspapers.

In 2016, a full two-thirds of Facebook users used the platform to get news. Facebook's algorithm fuels
confirmation bias by feeding content from outlets that tell the users what they want to hear. Fake news
purveyors exploited this vulnerability for profit and political influence.

Fake news was so profitable during the 2016 election that teenagers in Macedonia began publishing
pro-Trump propaganda for the sole purpose of making money. In instances where fake news can be
funded by political operations or even foreign governments, Facebook's algorithm is the only barrier
to mass access.

We are already experts in monitoring the way information moves through the media landscape;
we understand where and how a lie is manufactured and how it proliferates.

Now is the time to build on our expertise and unique audio and video archive to develop the
technologies necessary to combat this new onslaught of misinformation.

Here's how we'll do it:


Media monitoring enables us to identify pernicious misinformation and develop strategies for
combating it. Historically, this has meant monitoring conservative media, television news, and newspapers.

But relying on human media monitors is no longer sustainable. Fake news and alt-right communities
are multiplying exponentially.

In October 2013, CBS aired a 60 Minutes report that purported to raise further questions about the Obama
administration's response to the Benghazi attack based on an interview with a so-called "eyewitness." Our
relentless research and pressure provoked reporting that proved the account to be a total fabrication. The network
was forced to issue a correction and apology, and the publisher pulled the "eyewitness's" book (published by CBS's
corporate cousin) from the shelves. After the network launched an internal investigation— for which we were the
first to call— into the origins of its faulty reporting, the reporter and producer responsible were forced to take a
leave of absence, and the show's executive producer promised to make changes to reduce the chance of repeating
the error. Slate credited Media Matters, writing, "the fast torpedoing of CBS's Benghazi story shows how far the
liberal attack machine [Media Matters] has come."

Media Matters for America 2020 Plan | 9

Media Matters has already secured access to raw data from Facebook,
Twitter, and other social media sites. We have also put in place the
technology necessary to automatically mine white nationalist message
boards and alt-right communities for our archive.

We will now develop technologies and processes to systematically monitor
and analyze this unfiltered data.

The earlier we identify a fake news story, the more effectively we can quash it. With this new technology
at their fingertips, researchers monitoring news in real time will be able to identify the origins of a lie with
mathematical precision, creating an early warning system for fake news and disinformation.


Bringing this data analysis to scale will also allow Media Matters to identify which individuals and
outlets are the most destructive forces driving fake news, misinformation, and harassment.

Cutting-edge advances in cloud computing and machine learning will enable us to identify patterns
and connections that would otherwise go under the radar. We will be able to assess where and how
misinformation is likely to move, who will be affected by it, and what needs to be done to neutralize it.

But predictive technologies are only as good as the data that goes into them. The more data the system
has to analyze, the richer its insights. Media Matters' already extensive 12-year archive gives this new
system a big jump-start.


Outlets that push fake news are completely dependent on Facebook to spread their lies, and ad
networks like Google to fund them.

Media Matters has unique insight to help fix problems in this part of the media landscape.

After Facebook responded to our campaign by acknowledging the problem of fake news and agreeing
to do something about it, we began a dialogue. It became clear from these conversations that Facebook
needed our help in fully understanding the problem and identifying concrete solutions. Further, it also
became clear that we had information and insight that they didn’t have that was helpful in educating
them on the full scope of the problem. For example, Media Matters had a detailed map of the
constellation of right-wing Facebook pages that had been the biggest purveyors of fake news— as well
as insight into the food chain of fake news and how it was moving through the Facebook ecosystem.

Similarly, after Google revised their terms of service in order to prohibit so-called fake news sites from
using their advertising network, it was Media Matters that had the information necessary to identify
40 of the worst fake news sites to which this policy applied.

10 | Private & Confidential

Social media platforms need help in identifying vulnerabilities and

crafting solutions. To this end, Media Matters will serve as their partner,

speaking to them in their language of big data and encouraging changes based on what we see

happening in the landscape.

By applying our expertise-driven technologies and enhanced credibility, we will earn and maintain
our seat at the table and improve the structures of the media landscape.


At the Republican National Convention, Stephen Bannon bragged that Breitbart News had built "the
platform for the alt-right." Weeks later, Trump appointed Bannon the head of his campaign, and now
Bannon will follow Trump into the White House. The alt-right specializes in harassment and abuse and
distinguishes itself from traditional right-wing media by its ability to self-organize.

But it has several key vulnerabilities.

They are largely dependent upon social media behemoths that tolerate their abusive activity.

(Facebook, Reddit, YouTube, and Twitter have permitted the alt-right's presence, with some rare but
notable exceptions.) They operate on the edge of the law. Their efforts are largely financed on thin
profit margins. And their membership consists of weak individuals, often recruited into the movement
because they fear or resent women and/or harbor racial animosity.

Both fake news and the alt-right rely on being able to operate in the shadows. They assume that no one
will detect their harassment and propaganda until the damage has already been done.

To stop them, we need to become bigger and louder. Only through mass engagement can we halt their
harassment and lies.

Here's how well do it:


Media Matters will not just manage the effects of media fragmentation; we will leverage it to advance
our mission.

To this end, Media Matters will enhance our existing digital program by establishing an omnichannel
communications command center to communicate with audiences in ways that are optimized for the
platform on which they are already most engaged.

Put another way, we won't force information consumers to come to us for a one-size-fits-all piece
of content. Instead, we will go to them with content that is tailored to their individualized way of
interacting. In practice, this means that the way we present a specific issue on Facebook will be
different than the way that we present it on Tumblr or Twitter— and some in our audience may not even

“I’ve gotten some tough treatment [from Media Matters]
and there were times you guys were right and I internalized
that and said e that is a lesson learned. 9 ”

—Major Garrett, CBS News White House Correspondent
(formerly a Fox News correspondent)

MediaMatters for America 2020 Plan ( 11

get information on social, but instead
have it delivered directly to their phone
via text messages.

Our award-winning digital team has incorporated elements of this strategy into our communications for
the past few years, resulting in a 970% increase in engagement and a comparable increase in growth.

Now, Media Matters will fully incorporate this approach by overhauling our social media strategy,
adding additional staff to our social media team, and initiating a comprehensive audience targeting
and segmentation program.

We will also bring on board an expert to construct turnkey rapid-response plans so that Media Matters
can squash burgeoning online harassment campaigns and fake news or saturate the landscape with
truth, bypassing the news media entirely if need be.

With this capacity, Media Matters will dramatically increase our audience and engagement and
effectively quash fake news and misinformation before it spreads far and wide.


Wider reach alone won't be sufficient. We need our audience to persistently engage in the fight against
the alt-right and fake news— routinely and within their own social networks.

Too many Facebook users sit silent as extremism and misinformation fill their news feeds. Progressives
in particular are significantly less likely to challenge content that pops up in their feeds compared to
their conservative counterparts. Silence allows misinformation to fester.

This can't go on.

We will train hundreds of thousands of individuals on how to identify fake news and alt-right smears in
their social media networks and equip them with the tools to fight them on their own.

In December 2016, with fake news at the forefront of public attention, we added 40,000 new
participants to our action list. We expect this growth to continue, and will provide trainings, resource
materials, and urgent action alerts to keep participants actively engaged.

A deeper grassroots bench also means that Media Matters will be better positioned to win corporate
pressure campaigns, proven to eliminate perverse incentives that reward this horrific behavior.


Media Matters will constantly monitor the following indicators to know if we're on track toward our
top outcomes.

Serial misinformers and right-wing propagandists inhabiting everything from social media to the
highest levels of government will be exposed. Journalists, activists, allies, politicians, and the general
public will routinely utilize and weaponize our research products to understand and take action against
the changing media ecosystem and the extremists seeking to manipulate it. We will continue to break
engagement records and dramatically expand and diversify our reach by presenting our research in
multiple formats on a variety of platforms. Key right-wing targets will see their influence diminish as
a result of our work.

Internet and social media platforms, like Google and Facebook, will no longer uncritically and
without consequence host and enrich fake news sites and propagandists. Social media companies
will engage with us over their promotion of the fake news industry. Facebook will adjust its model

“It’s often easy to trace Media Matters’
influence on a major news story,”

—National Journal

12 [ Private & Confidential

to stem the flow of damaging fake news on its platform's pages. Google will cut off these pages'
accompanying sites' access to revenue by pulling their access to Google's ad platform.

Toxic alt-right social media-fueled harassment campaigns that silence dissent and poison our
national discourse will be punished and halted. Hundreds of thousands of activists will join our
campaigns to push back on alt-right harassment. Key alt-right figures will lose credibility and influence
in response to our research and pressure.


Media Matters' core budget for 2017 is $13.4 million, which covers a staff of 81.

This budget allows us to create a 34-person research department engaged in media monitoring,
research, deep dive analysis, and rapid response. In addition, this supports five issue-specific teams
housing experts that provide broad support to the progressive movement on topics key progressive
issues like gun violence and public safety, LGBT equality, reproductive health and gender equality,
climate and energy, and economic policy.

This budget also allows us to invest in technological innovations like the creation of an early warning
system to identify the proliferation of fake news more efficiently and to create cutting-edge predictive
technology that allows us to identify patterns and connections in order to asses how misinformation
will move and how we can neutralize it. We will also build out our digital and video teams to a staff of a
nine to create a robust omnichannel communications command center and mobilize a grassroots truth
squad; and increase the number and impact of actions and advocacy initiatives we undertake to drive
change and accountability across the media landscape.


Angelo Carusone, President. Angelo was named President of Media Matters in December 2016.
Previously, he was the organization's Executive Vice President. In that role, Angelo helped run day-to-
day operations, expanded the organization's online footprint, and managed accountability initiatives.

In 2016, he took a leave of absence to serve as the Deputy CEO for Finance & Administration of the
2016 Democratic National Convention. In 2009, as a law student, Angelo founded the StopBeck effort,
which organized participants via social media to successfully convince sponsors to cease advertising
on Beck's show. In late 2010, Angelo joined Media Matters as Campaign Director and worked on its

Media Matters succeeded in pressuring CNN, MSNBC, and even Fox News to stop booking
Roger Stone, a regular guest and longtime Trump ally. Stone has a decades-long history of
employing political dirty tricks and regularly spouting violent, racist, and sexist rhetoric, and
used his various platforms during the 2016 campaign to advance fringe conspiracy theories and
promote fake news. In late 2015 and early 2016, we aggressively educated network producers
(who had been providing Stone an uncritical platform) about Stone's background. In response
to our pressure, CNN and MSNBC confirmed that Stone will no longer appear on their airwaves
because of his bigotry, and Stone himself reported that he had been blacklisted by Fox News.

Media Matters for America 2020 Plan | 13

DropFox initiative; he later went on to serve as Director of Online Strategy & Campaigns. He organized
the StopRush effort, which convinced thousands of advertisers to refuse to sponsor Limbaugh's
program. And he launched the viral DumpTrump campaign in 2012 that was responsible for convincing
many of Donald Trump's business partners to sever their relationships with Trump. He holds a B.A. in
American Studies from Fordham University and a J.D. from the University of Wisconsin Law School.

Julie Millican, Vice President. Julie has been with the organization collectively for over eight years
in various capacities since she first joined as a researcher in 2006. During her time, she has been a
Researcher, Assistant Research Director, Advisor, Deputy Research Director, and also Chief of Staff. She
has written extensively about the 2008 election and was routinely cited by the nation's leading papers.
Over the years, Julie has been responsible for managing all Research Department resources, involved
in organization-wide strategy, overseeing the hiring process, executing restructuring, and overseeing
organizational operations. She holds a B.S. in Sociology from Appalachian State University and a M.A.
in Clinical Psychology.

Sam Zegas, Senior Advisor. Sam is responsible for spearheading Media Matters' technological
innovations, organizational planning, and operations. Sam is a recognized authority in linguistics and
multi-lingual project manager with experience in international affairs. Prior to joining Media Matters,

Sam was a management consultant at Accenture. There he spent several years helping the Department
of State to modernize its international supply chain and asset management systems. He then
transitioned to Boston Children's Hospital, where he served as the Acting Director of the International
Health Services department— the world’s largest international patient program at a pediatric hospital.

He has full proficiency and professional experience in German, French, Spanish, and Slovenian, and is
also able to translate Russian and Italian. He holds a B.A. in linguistics and anthropology from Harvard
University. He is currently on deferment from a joint MBA/MPP program from Harvard Business School
and The Kennedy School of Government.

As soon as Rupert Murdoch's 21 st Century Fox announced its bid to acquire Time Warner in July of 2014,
Media Matters kicked into high gear with a coordinated multi-level pressure campaign urging Time Warner
to not be swayed by the right-wing media mogul. Murdoch's attempts to grow his influence in the media
landscape have always been cause for concern, and we made it a part of our mission to keep his newest
power grab in check, cautioning against a future where Fox News-like networks monopolize the free and
diverse flow of information in our news. If successful, this merger would have given Murdoch control of
40% of the US cable market and 30% of the movie market. After reports that Murdoch had pulled his
offer, the New York Times , Politico, Broadcasting & Cable, and other prominent outlets highlighted the
influence of our campaign.

14 | Private & Confidential



American Bridge will cement itself as the standard-bearer
of opposition research, build on its role as a progressive
clearinghouse for information that drives the narrative
on Republican officeholders and candidates, and be at the
epicenter of Democrats' work to regain power— starting

in 2017 and building to 2020


Defeating Donald Trump requires preparation and focus.

No other progressive organization has the resources and assets that American Bridge has amassed
over the past several election cycles to hold Trump, his administration, and the politicians who support
him accountable.

Only Bridge stands ready with staff already hired, Trump's web of business ties mapped out, and a
massive video archive at our fingertips.

There will be a need for progressive policy alternatives, but our focus at Bridge will be on real time
political accountability. In this media environment, content is king and that’s where the focus of
Bridge remains.

A look at the analogous entities on the right further reinforces the need for our work. America Rising,
which was modeled after Bridge, has become the unofficial research arm of the Republican Party.

The group's 501(c)(4) arm. Rising Squared, has already begun promoting Trump's Cabinet picks.

Trump's campaign allies have also made public their plans to create a new nonprofit dedicated
to enacting Trump's agenda. Trump campaign digital director Brad Parscale, who was reportedly
empowered by Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner to take charge, will head the entity.

The right will bolster Trump aggressively and deceptively. The campaign to stop him must be nonstop.
At American Bridge, it has already begun.


As we move into our fourth election cycle, the vision of Bridge as permanent progressive infrastructure
is coming to fruition. We are beginning to see the full value of our investment in researching and
tracking candidates over multiple cycles.

With 20,000 hours of video, 289 candidate research books, and the largest available archive of Trump
research in the Democratic Party, we are uniquely prepared to take on the Trump administration, defeat
Republicans who enable it, and rebuild progressive power in the states.

Our new Trump War Room, launched within weeks of the election, is already scrutinizing the presidential
transition and will vigilantly watchdog the personnel, policies, and practices of the administration.

Our purpose is to keep Trump unpopular and make it more difficult for candidates who support him to
get elected in 2018.

American Bridge 2020 Plan

“On the left , the dominant player is American Bridge." —Time Magazine

The mid-term map appears difficult for Democrats; damaging Trump in the next two years could
change that.

Republicans running in 2018 (and 2020) will be plagued by what we are best known for: opposition
research, video tracking, and rapid response. We will be involved in every competitive Senate race
in 2018.

But we must expand beyond federal races; Democrats must build power at the state level. We have
lost ground and our once-in-a-decade chance to redraw district maps is around the corner. That's why
Bridge will continue to engage in gubernatorial races. And for the first time, we will participate in state
legislature races.

Nearly 80 entities already use our content. Over the next four years, party committees, candidate
campaigns, and additional in-state allies will use it, too.

But to fully realize the value of our content, we must dramatically expand its reach. A new, robust
digital program will bring our content directly to voters, starting with those who voted twice for
Obama, but switched in 2016 to Trump. We must win these voters back in 2020.

As we expand the scope and reach of our research, we must also improve the efficiency with which
we do it. We will continue to develop campaign technologies that have made us an industry leader.
And we will continue to reduce duplication and improve the quality of political research as we move
to the local level.

We are in a state of emergency.

Our initial response has been swift and forceful. We expect results to follow suit.


In the next four years, American Bridge is focused on achieving the following outcomes:

Defeat Trump either through impeachment or at the ballot box in 2020.

Change the balance of power by measurably impacting US Senate, gubernatorial, and state
legislative races.

Free ourselves from solely relying on the press. Our robust digital program will reach voters
directly online.

While the dynamics of the election overcame Trump's sky-high negatives, the groundwork we laid will be
critical to delegitimizing Trump as president. Bridge drove 673 stories throughout the campaign exposing
Trump's unstable temperament, scam-filled business record, history of sexual abuse and misogyny, and
racist behavior. As he enters office, he is the most unpopular president-elect in modern history.

16 | Private & Confidential


American Bridge is the Democratic epicenter of opposition research and rapid response in presidential
and Senate elections. In the Trump era, there must be no "off years." American Bridge will sustain a
nonstop campaign against Trump, his administration, and Republicans who enable him.

This is how we will do it:


With 20,000 hours of video and audio footage at our fingertips (including nearly 2,000 hours of
Trump material) and massive, fully searchable databases of investigative knowledge on Trump's
business dealings and lawsuits involving him, our war room is already putting these assets to work
in the following ways:


American Bridge has already set up a world-class vetting operation, the largest in the Democratic
Party, to investigate the records of potential Trump nominees. More than 1,200 positions require
confirmation by the US Senate. We will home in on the 100 most important positions, focusing on
those who stand to have the greatest impact on our progressive values in areas of women's health
and reproductive freedom, workers' rights, climate change, and the treatment of immigrants and
people of color.

While Democrats' position in the minority makes blocking nominees difficult, we believe some of his
nominees are so extreme that there will be the opportunity to do so. Where we cannot block nominees,
we will use the process to highlight their most egregious past statements and professional dealings
to make their confirmation process as difficult as possible and further erode Trump's credibility.

The same holds for Trump's appointees to the Supreme Court. Republicans set the tone for Supreme
Court obstruction through their treatment of Merrick Garland. Bridge will expose their extreme issue
positions, records, and backgrounds and equip Democrats in Congress, progressive partners, and the
press with our research in real time.


Donald Trump enters the White House with significant
conflicts of interest, unprecedented both in number
and extent compared to any other president-elect in
our history.

The US intelligence community has confirmed that Russia
intervened in the election to help Trump win and the
president-elect has already appointed individuals with strong ties to Russia and Putin to some of the
most powerful positions in the US government. Meanwhile, Putin-tied Trump campaign staffers Carter
Page and Paul Manafort appear poised to continue to leverage their connections to Trump as he takes
power. American Bridge has, and will continue to, help uncover details of Trump's affection for Russia
and Putin (which appears to be driven at least in part by Trump's business interests), including video
of his Secretary of State pick Rex Tillerson receiving the "Russian Order of Friendship" medal from
Putin in 2013.

American Bridge 2020 Plan 17

We are tracking Trump's foreign and domestic business partners, existing construction projects in
foreign countries, and potential negotiations on future projects that he could use to put personal profit
ahead of our national security.

Trump's massive corporate and personal debts take on new meaning when he's in charge of regulating
financial markets. He owes debt to banks he will regulate, including Deutsche Bank, Ladder Capital
Finance, Amboy Bank, and nearly a dozen others. There is also strong evidence that he broke the Cuban
embargo at a time when it was a serious federal crime.

With so many opportunities for foreign governments and corporations to gain influence over
Trump, American Bridge will use every means at its disposal to hold Trump and his administration
accountable— including FOI A requests, lawsuits, and regulatory complaints. As the progressive
movement's political research clearinghouse, we will arm our allies to join us in taking on the
administration through paid advertising, earned media, grassroots efforts, and legal recourse.


Often the most problematic scandals for any administration begin within the agencies. Trump's early
nomination picks demonstrate that he will appoint people to run these agencies who are grossly
unqualified. That, paired with the fact that he is considering gutting the bureaucratic staff, will make
agency watchdogging even more important for this administration. American Bridge will have a
dedicated team to monitor the activities of the executive branch for conflicts of interest, malfeasance,
and incompetence. We will assign individual researchers to specific executive branch agencies,
including the IRS, Justice Department, HUD (given its interactions with Trump's real estate empire),
Defense, State, and others. Specific interest will be given to the various federal incentives and grant
programs and the dissemination of government contracts.


American Bridge's Trump War Room will also have a team dedicated to monitoring Trump's issue
agenda and its potential negative impacts, especially on working families, women, the environment,
immigrants, and people of color. As the Trump administration attempts to privatize Medicaid, revoke
protections for immigrant families, give massive tax breaks to the very wealthy, eliminate Obamacare,
defund Planned Parenthood, and let oil companies wreak havoc on our environment, American Bridge
will be there to shine a light on the real-world impacts on regular people. We will curate information
from policy think tanks, news reports, and our own original research and disseminate easily accessible
fact sheets to progressive partners, the press, and voters themselves.


Much of the paid communication this cycle centered on criticism of Trump and his temperament.

But one underutilized tactic was sharing testimonials of people who have experienced Trump first-
hand. Trump and his ilk successfully intimidated and silenced many of these critics. American Bridge
will give them a place to turn. We film those who want to tell their stories on camera, and provide a
space for those who fear going public to tell their stories in a confidential manner. We will use some
of these stories in real time— and catalogue all for use in paid communication for 2020.

a . American Bridge has a mission for 2017: Hold Donald Trump accountable

—McClatchy, December 6, 2016

18 [ Private & Confidential


American Bridge will make running as a Republican
candidate in the next four years painful. We will not
only damage Trump, but also the candidates who
enable and support him. American Bridge will use
its full research, video tracking, and rapid response
capabilities to drive messages about Republican
candidates that will change the narrative in their
races and help secure victories for Democratic candidates.


We plan to be involved in every competitive and potentially competitive Senate race in the coming
cycle. Democrats are expected to have 23 seats up for election, along with two independent Senators
who caucus with Democrats. Republicans are expected to have eight seats up for election. Taking into
account seats that will likely be safe for one party or the other, we project that American Bridge will
work in 16-20 races.

Democratic incumbents are on the ballot in nine states that Trump won including five that Republicans
also won in 2012: Indiana, Missouri, Montana, North Dakota, West Virginia. Others include Florida,
Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. The Virginia Senate race may also be competitive with Tim Kaine
up for reelection. In these races, it will be critical to define the Republican candidates early so they are
unable to capitalize on a political landscape that is favorable to their party.

Bridge has already begun research on known Republican Senate targets like Josh Mandel in Ohio
and Dean Heller in Nevada. We have moved 10 trackers into key Senate states and will increase our
tracking reach across the country beginning in April 2017.

We are also maintaining a presence and beginning research and tracking in states that may provide
greater opportunity for Democrats this cycle than they have in the past, like Arizona where Republican
Jeff Flake is on the ballot in 2018.

American Bridge exposed Rudy Giuliani's business record and transnational conflicts of
■ interest in news outlets like the New York Times (front page), the Washington Post and CNN.

The New York Times subsequently reported that "the headlines about Mr. Giuliani's business
interests bothered Mr. Trump." Giuliani later withdrew his name from consideration.

American Bridge 2020 Plan 19


Electing governors in 2018 is the first concrete step

Democrats can take toward having a bigger say in the next redistricting process, and opportunities
for pickups are widespread. As Politico recently reported:

"Twenty-seven of the 38 governorships up in 2017 and 2018 are Republican-held, including
many seats that will be open after eight years of GOP control. That means widespread
opportunities for Democratic gains, as well as a critical chance for new ideas and new blood
to emerge as the party seeks to identify its next generation of leaders."

In 2017, Bridge will produce research and tracking for the Virginia and New Jersey gubernatorial races.
We are already ahead of the game in Virginia since we produced a research book on Republican
Virginia gubernatorial candidate Ed Gillespie when he ran for US Senate in 2014. We have also
begun research on Prince William County Supervisor Corey Stewart and State Senator Frank Wagner.
We have moved a tracker into New Jersey for the gubernatorial race and have begun research on
Assemblyman Jack Ciattarelli, Lt. Gov. Kim Guadagno, and Assembly Minority Leader Jon Bramnick.

In 2018, Republican governors like Scott Walker, Charlie Baker, and Bruce Rauner are among our
targets. We will also engage in the Florida gubernatorial race, a critical state for Democrats in this
cycle and future elections, as well as the Nevada and New Mexico races, which represent promising
opportunities for Democrats this cycle.

Due to the overlay of targeted Senate and gubernatorial states, Bridge will track in many gubernatorial
races even in those where we may not be as heavily invested in the race.


Progressives have long discussed the importance of state legislative races because of their impact
on state legislative agendas as well as redistricting for 2020. However, with redistricting just four
years away, these discussions have led to little in the way of concrete plans or action. Now these
state legislative battles are even more critical. Due to poor performances in 2014 and 2016,
we must rebuild our bench for state and federal races for 2018 and 2020.

Over the next cycle, American Bridge will leverage its infrastructure and expertise into the arena
of state legislative races. We will create pilot programs in key states where we can engage in our core
competencies— research, tracking, and rapid response— and impact the outcomes of races. Bridge will
choose to operate in states where a) Democrats are in the minority by a narrow margin in the state
legislative chambers, b) redistricting is critical, and c) our progressive partners are most engaged.

American Bridge led the way for Democrats to fight the Koch brothers' influence and money.
Working with Senator Harry Reid and partners airing TV ads, we created a war room that
leveled sustained attacks on the Koch brothers, making their negative ratings spike and
turning their advocacy into a liability for candidates they supported.

20 | Private & Confidential


Our impact increases with every partnership. Candidates, party committees, and progressive allies
put our content to work in paid and earned media, polling, and grassroots campaigns.

At the center of the resistance, we expect our partnerships to grow significantly particularly as we
engage at the state level.

In its earliest days, Bridge provided research exclusively on the "independent-expenditure"
side to Priorities USA, Senate Majority PAC, EMILY's List, NextGen Climate Action, the AFL-CIO,
SEIU, AFSCME, Planned Parenthood, League of Conservation Voters, and others. That research
was used as the foundation for polling and paid media efforts in presidential and Senate races.

In 2016, Bridge took its role as a research clearinghouse to the next level by expanding the content
we provide to "coordinated side" campaigns and political parties, further maximizing efficiency and
reducing duplication of work by Democratic groups.

As we look to 2018 and 2020, we will further increase our impact by building new partnerships
with state parties, local candidate campaigns, and state allies.


We know that voters are consuming information in a drastically different way than they have
in the past and that they often distrust the traditional news media as sources for information.

For most Americans, Facebook is their source for news. In 2017, we will invest in a new, robust
digital program to bypass the press as gatekeepers and deliver our original research directly
to voters.

We will initially focus on Obama-Trump voters in swing states. (Trump won more than 200 counties
that Obama won twice.) By targeting these voters and testing their reaction to our content with a
sophisticated public opinion research program, we can pave the way for Democrats' strategy to win
these voters back in 2020.

Our content will include visual guides to knock down Trump's daily narrative, comprehensive
research reports on Trump's policy positions or key appointees, and video testimonials from Trump
voters who face the worst impacts of a Trump presidency.

The right's digital capabilities currently outpace our own. We will leapfrog Republicans, as we have
before, by being smarter, faster, and more agile.

e \ American Bridge has become one of the left’s
most innovative and successful ventures

—Newsweek, May 16, 2014

American Bridge 2020 Plan j 21


American Bridge places a premium on bringing technological innovation and creativity to opposition
research and campaign communications. Over the past five years, we have developed:

■ Live stream technology as part of our tracking program— allowing our DC-based staff to watch
events we are tracking across the country in realtime and disseminate information to the press
and public in a matter of minutes.

■ Our "Vault"— a 16-terabyte, fully-searchable video archive (created in conjunction with a
firm that recently commercialized a Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)
development), built from monitoring candidate media appearances on national and local
television and radio, as well as tracking public events.

■ The "Vault" features a revolutionary "sound search" that allows audio and video searches
without any pre-existing transcript. This technology indexes audio-visual materials by
phonetic sounds, allowing us to find useful tidbits of information buried within our video
collection. Because the Vault is our sharing mechanism for groups that access our video
database, progressive organizations also have access to this powerful search technology.

■ An industry-first software system for managing the scheduling and record-keeping for our video
tracking program.

■ A first-of-its-kind customized database for creating and tracking public records requests that
saves hundreds of researcher-hours each year.

■ Top-of-class database of federal legislative history that makes generating lawmakers' voting
records simpler and more efficient.

As we move forward into a new era of government and political campaigns, Bridge staffers are already
busy homing in on the next innovative step we can take to stay ahead of the competition. We are
expanding our ability to live stream local events, monitor and record radio programming, and tap into
podcasts that host Republican candidates and other tracking targets.

©iprafig; srcsira (©tog ©pspoMf ora ora^oAraAn

By delivering a major research hit against popular incumbent Senator Richard Lugar (he had
not lived in the state for 35 years and had improperly charged taxpayers for hotel stays).
Bridge helped to open the door for outspoken extremist Richard Mourdock to defeat Lugar
in the GOP primary. Mourdock was as extreme as expected during the general election,
most notably claiming pregnancy from rape was "something that God intended." The rest is
history. Democrats won a seat that few would have considered a possibility a year earlier.

22 | Private & Confidential


American Bridge will constantly monitor the following indicators to know if we're on track toward our
top outcomes.

Defeat Trump either through impeachment or at the ballot box in 2020. The number of stories and the
value of TV time for anti-Trump media coverage we generate will break all internal records. Multiple
Trump nominations will become a drag on his administration due to the research we unearth. Trump's
approval ratings will remain historically low.

Change the balance of power by measurably impacting US Senate, gubernatorial, and state legislative races.

Republicans will spend precious resources defending stories generated by Bridge in competitive races.
Republicans will be forced to spend money in races that wouldn't otherwise be competitive due to
Bridge's work putting them in play.

Free ourselves from relying solely on the press. Our robust digital program will reach voters directly
online. Millions of people will see our content through someone they know (a friend or contact) online.
Our own public opinion research will allow us to measure change in opinion among targeted voters
who consume our content.


American Bridge's core budget is $14.7 million in 2017. This budget represents both the work of
American Bridge's 501(c)(4) and its Super PAC and covers a total of 146 staff.

The 501(c)(4) is creating a 47-person war room to take on Donald Trump with a staff of 25 researchers,
a communications team of 16 which is feeding our work to the press and doing rapid-response, and a
team of six media monitors. Bridge will also build out a robust digital program to deliver our content
directly to voters. The total cost of the Bridge war room will be $7.8 million in 2017.

The Super PAC will do research in 16-20 of the most competitive Senate races in the 2018 cycle with
two Senate research teams of five people each. We will also do research in the seven most competitive
gubernatorial races with two research teams comprising of nine people total. We will also hire 33 video
trackers to be out in the states providing constant video tracking in all 20 Senate races, along with
16 total gubernatorial races. To enhance this tracking effort further and bring the information to voters
and the press in real time, we also plan to invest to expand our use of live stream technology, and
we plan to make new technological advances in our work, including radio and podcast monitoring.
Lastly, we will also launch pilot programs to leverage our research and tracking infrastructure and
expertise into selective state legislature races. The total cost of the work in the SuperPAC will be
$6.9 million for 2017.

American Bridge 2020 Plan | 23


Bradley Beychok, Executive Chief of Staff to the Chairman. Bradley has over a decade of experience
managing political campaigns and progressive advocacy organizations. From 2012-2016, he served as
President of Media Matters for America, the nation's leading progressive media watchdog, overseeing
its $11 million annual budget and team of over 70 people. Prior to that, Bradley served as Campaign
Director and co-founder of American Bridge 21 st Century PAC, the largest opposition, video tracking,
and rapid response organization in Democratic politics. In 2012, Campaigns and Elections magazine
named Bradley a "Rising Star," a select group of operatives who the magazine deems will have a lasting
effect on the campaign world. A native of Baton Rouge, LA, Bradley began his political career working
for the famed political consultant James Carville.

Jessica Mackler, President. Prior to joining American Bridge, Jessica spent nearly a decade working
on the ground on campaigns across the country, including managing the 2012 Senate race in Nevada
and serving as a top adviser to US Senator Mary Landrieu during her 2008 reelection campaign.

In Louisiana, Jessica directed research and rapid response communications to help overcome a
Democratic exodus from the state following Hurricane Katrina, a trend of GOP statewide wins, and
a competitive opponent with statewide name recognition to win. Fittingly, Jessica got her start as a
researcher at EMILY's List, rising through the ranks to become the Deputy Director of Research. She
left EMILY's List to co-found what was then one of the only women-run opposition research groups,
where she worked with a number of clients who helped Democrats regain majorities in Congress and
governors' offices in the 2006 elections. For their efforts, Jessica's firm was named the "Rookie of the
Year" by the American Association of Political Clients.

Eddie Vale, Vice President. Eddie is a veteran of Democratic and progressive politics and currently
serves as Vice President of American Bridge. He most recently served as Communications Director
for the AFL-CIO's Super PAC Workers' Voice and the health care organization Protect Your Care.

He has also previously worked for the AFL-CIO, Progressive Media USA, John Edwards for President,
Ned Lamont for Senate, and Spitzer for Governor, as well as multiple congressional races.

It was an American Bridge tracker who first identified Akin's "legitimate rape"
comments, after the interviewer missed its significance. Drawing on our massive video
archive, and innovative talking mailers sent to Missouri voters, we showed that Akin's
extremism was not limited to a one-time gaffe.

24 | Private & Confidential


in a period of crisis with a President and administration that
present possible conflicts of interest and ethical problems on an
unprecedented scale. CREW will demand ethical conduct from
the administration and all parts of government, expose improper
influence from powerful interests, and ensure accountability
when the administration and others shirk ethical standards,
rules, and laws.


The nonpartisan coalition that has driven good government reform for decades now finds itself outgunned.

Judicial Watch, the most frequently cited conservative watchdog organization, has a $30 million
annual budget. It consistently caused problems for President Obama and Secretary Clinton through
aggressive Freedom of Information Act litigation and other lawsuits and a steady stream of reports and
press outreach.

Donald Trump presents conflicts of interest and possible ethical problems on an unprecedented scale,
and special interests are pushing to influence both parties in Congress. Yet Judicial Watch and similar
groups (like Cause of Action and the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust (FACT)) have been
conspicuously quiet.

Responding to this crisis requires an ethics watchdog with the credibility, resources, and willingness to
hold Trump and his administration accountable.

Bolstered by bipartisan board leadership and a winning record even in the face of partisan gridlock,
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) is positioned for this fight.

Now is the time to scale.


CREW knows how to use litigation, legal complaints, research, and press outreach to get results.

We must significantly ramp up to fill the gap in serious ethics analysis and legal accountability for the
new president and the rest of the government.

Donald Trump brings with him massive global conflicts of interest and an apparent disregard for the
traditions and rules aimed at protecting the government from improper influence.

To combat this coming ethics crisis, CREW will significantly enhance our capabilities to monitor
conflicts of interest and executive branch ethics, use FOIA to effectively keep tabs on the activities of
the administration and federal agencies, and take legal action including active litigation to bring about
accountability when the law is broken.

CREW is not aiming to imitate Judicial Watch, but rather will establish itself as a credible but
aggressive nonpartisan watchdog seeking accountability for ethical lapses and improper influence
in the new administration. We welcome groups like Judicial Watch to join us in holding this
administration accountable.

CREW 2020 Plan | 25


If CREW is successful in causing Trump to behave ethically, it will help protect the country from scandal
and disastrous policy choices. If Trump does not bow to this pressure, CREW will hold him accountable.

In the next four years, CREW is focused on achieving the following outcomes:

Trump will be afflicted by a steady flow of damaging information, new revelations, and an inability
to avoid conflicts issues. For as long as Trump maintains the ethically untenable position of keeping
his business empire in the family while serving as president, CREW will relentlessly probe his global
conflicts of interest and administration ethics problems through aggressive use of research, open
records requests, legal action, and FOIA litigation.

The Trump administration will be forced to defend illegal
conduct in court. CREW will bring about legal accountability for
executive branch ethical and legal violations through complaints
and litigation. We will bring significant pressure on investigative
agencies and Congress to investigate violations of law and the
constitution, which appear likely to begin on day one of the
Trump administration, and we will litigate wrongdoing aggressively,
forcing the administration to defend civil lawsuits, FOIA litigation,
and whistleblower suits.

Powerful industries and interest groups will see their influence
wane. CREW will expose and curb the improper influence of
powerful industries and interest groups on the administration and
on both parties in Congress with successful legal complaints and
litigation to rein in dark money, reckless campaign finance abuses,
and the misuse of nonprofits by Trump and others.

Dark money will be a political liability in key states. CREW will
make the use of dark money, campaign finance violations, and ethics abuses at the state level a major
issue in key states that will be the focus of massive spending and attention in the lead up to 2018 and
2020 elections.

CREW's initial IRS complaint against the Donald J. Trump Foundation for its $25,000
gift in 2013 to a political organization associated with Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi
was the first to connect the dots and expose a major Trump scandal. The money
had been directed from Trump personally and illegally given from the foundation's
funds. Our complaint generated investigations and stories by the Washington Post,
New York Times, every major paper in Florida, and the Wall Street Journal, and still
reverberates today.

26 | Private & Confidential


CREW has been successful for more than a dozen years using legal complaints and litigation, in-depth
research and Freedom of Information Act requests, and aggressive communications to shine a light on
unethical conduct and improper influence. CREW was founded in part to fill the void in accountability
and ethics enforcement as figures like Tom DeLay and Jack Abramoff ran amok in the early 2000s.

In the ensuing years, CREW amassed successes both in exposing and curbing ethics abuses by both
parties and in pushing to highlight and limit the corrupting influence of money in politics.

We now face a likely ethics crisis in the incoming Trump administration that is far greater in scale.

CREW must scale accordingly.

Here's how we'll do it:


CREW will quadruple the size of our research staff and more than double the size of our legal team to
expand our capacity in the following key areas:


CREW has already been featured in coverage of Trump's conflicts of interest in every major national
media outlet, and we worked extensively with the New York Times editorial board to condemn the
utterly inadequate solutions Trump has proposed. New CREW Governing Board Chair Ambassador
Norm Eisen and Vice Chair Richard Painter have been the faces of bipartisan outrage over this ethics
crisis, appearing hundreds of times in major media outlets since the election.

Going forward, we will comprehensively monitor both the Trump businesses and the actions of
the administration in order to detect and highlight all of the conflicts of interest that arise between
Trump's massive global business interests and his actions as president.

Already, Trump's Cabinet picks and top advisers present more conflicts of interest and greater potential
for special interest influence than those of any previous administration. We will monitor and highlight
conflicts of interest and ethical violations by Cabinet officers, senior White House officials, and other
senior appointees and influential advisors, including the Trump family members who appear poised to
take on prominent roles.


CREW will comprehensively monitor the secret influence of powerful special interests on the
Trump administration, including the heavy presence of executives from powerful industries, as well
as lobbyists and other representatives of special interests in key administration positions.

“[ T]he leading contender to assume the role of a liberal
Judicial Watch is Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in
Washington, an organization founded in 2003 with an announced
goal of rooting out government corruption

— Politico December 16, 2016

CREW 2020 Plan j 27

CREW “could set its own template for forcing lax federal regulators to crack
down on campaign finance violations by the types of outside groups that have
been awash in money since the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizen’s United ruling.”

— Mother Jones

We will shine a light on the use of money by powerful groups to impact key issues. Our repeated
complaints in 2015 and 2016 against the National Rifle Association, which consistently hid its political
spending, and the Center for Medical Progress, a group that lied to the IRS about its agenda to attack
Planned Parenthood, helped to define the public understanding of those powerful interest groups and
ensure that their efforts to influence issues and policy were out in the open.

CREW will diligently monitor FEC and IRS filings of political organizations and campaigns; personal
financial disclosures required for executive branch officials; responses to our many open records
requests; and lobbying disclosure reports to shed light on ethics and campaign finance problems
wherever they occur in the government and the political system.


CREW will keep highlighting congressional ethics violations, like our repeated complaints against Rep.
Duncan Hunter for personal use of campaign funds, and exposing the influence of powerful interests
on members. In 2016 we produced an extensive report on special interest funding of new members of
Congress from both parties. In 2017 and beyond, we will expand on this type of research and ensure
that congressional influence and corruption remain issues of great public concern.


The 2018 elections, particularly at the state level, will be hugely important as a potential response
to and check on the Trump administration. CREW will play a significant role in monitoring campaign
finance, special interest influence, and ethics in the coming state campaigns.

CREW will highlight the influence of special interests including the Koch brothers, ALEC, corporate
interests, and others at the state level in order to inform voters of the forces attempting to influence them.

CREW will also continue to effectively expose and attack money in politics abuses including by
exposing misuse of nonprofits for politics, such as the Trump Foundation's illegal political contribution
and campaign activity; obtaining accountability for dark money abuses, such as the FEC fines CREW
obtained for three Koch brothers-backed dark money groups; and pushing for enforcement of dark
money rules including in our litigation to get the FEC to enforce the rules against several
conservative nonprofits.

CREW filed Federal Election Commission (FEC) complaints following the 2010 election cycle against the
American Action Network and Americans for Job Security, two nonprofit organizations with combined spending
of more than $175 million since 2009. They had spent millions of dollars on campaign-related ads, but failed to
register as political organizations or disclose their donors as required by law. While the FEC's Office of General
Counsel recommended an investigation, the commission deadlocked, and CREW sued the FEC for failing to take
action. Our lawsuit made national news when a federal district judge ruled in CREW's favor in September 2016,
directing the FEC to reconsider the case using a much broader definition for what constitutes a political ad. This
decision will make it much harder for dark money groups to use technicalities to escape disclosing their donors
and already appears to have reduced the number of sham issue ads run close to elections.

28 I Private & Confidential


CREW's expanded research and legal teams will dramatically increase its use of Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) requests, a powerful tool to uncover information behind secret processes
and investigations. We will submit FOIA requests to uncover:

■ Conflicts of interest and ethical and legal violations.

■ Improper influence by lobbyists and special interests.

■ Problematic secrecy in policymaking and enforcement (including inappropriate mixing of
business interests and political considerations in decision-making).

A steady stream of open records requests will keep constant attention on Trump's unprecedented
conflicts of interest, and we will press aggressively for investigation by Congress and law enforcement.
When our requests are stonewalled, we will use comprehensive and frequent litigation to compel
openness and responsiveness.


CREW uses cutting-edge litigation to push for accountability. We will use our expanded legal team to
file complaints and lawsuits in the following areas:

■ Violations of the law and the US Constitution, potentially
including improper conflicts of interest, "emoluments,"
foreign corrupt practices, and other violations;

■ Campaign finance violations as they will likely continue
to emerge in connection with last year's presidential
election and coming congressional and presidential

■ Ethics abuses in Congress and in congressional races in
key states, where dark money will play a record-setting

■ Misuse of nonprofits for politics, such as the Donald J.

Trump Foundation and the foundation's illegal political

In every case, we will highlight abuses to press for investigations, encourage accountability, and take
out wrongdoers.


We will enlist an army of pro bono lawyers to help CREW take legal action to hold the new
administration and others accountable for conflicts of interest, ethics abuses, and violations of law.

Already, top law firms and talented lawyers across the country, with specialties including civil litigation
and FOIA, are volunteering to help with this effort.

CREW will organize this enthusiastic and capable cadre of lawyers to enable us to obtain more
information about conflicts of interest, influence, and secret government action and to advance more
legal theories and litigation approaches to ensure accountability for wrongdoing and violations of law
and the constitution.

CREW 2020 Plan | 29


CREW's communications team has worked effectively to expose ethical violations and money in
politics abuses, sparking regular stories in the Washington Post, the New York Times, and the Wall
Street Journal, among many others, and partnering with top reporters to move major stories forward.

In 2017 CREW will triple the size of our communications team, ramping up to spread the word about
the incoming administration's unprecedented ethics crisis further and wider. We will build on our
strong print media relations, and expand to become a regular source of information on broadcast and
cable news and online.

Additional CREW staff will build a dynamic social media presence and dramatically increase traffic to
our recently overhauled website.

We will also significantly expand our outreach to local media, ensuring that our work to shine a bright
light on improper influence and unethical government reaches people where they live and where they
get their news.


CREW will constantly monitor the following indicators to know if we're on track toward our top

Trump will be afflicted by a steady flow of damaging information, new revelations, and an inability to avoid
conflicts issues. The press coverage we drive (both quantity and quality) of Trump's conflicts of interest
and other ethics violations will break internal records.

The Trump administration will be forced to defend illegal conduct in court. The legal and administrative
complaints CREW brings and the litigation we initiate and join to bring about accountability for
administration conflicts of interest and ethical violations will result in: voluntary changes in behavior,
government agency action to enforce the law or require compliance, court-ordered consequences for
violations, and orders to disclose government information to the public.

Powerful industries and interest groups will see their influence wane. Our legal complaints and litigation
will lead to fines and enforcement, abandonment of improper forms of influence and campaign finance
abuses, court decisions enforcing the law on money in politics, and increased oversight and better rules
from agencies and Congress.

Dark money will be a political liability in key states. CREW will generate state and local media coverage of
ethics abuses and improper influence in selected states. Our legal complaints and lawsuits responding
to state abuses will produce concrete results. And key local officials and groups will draw attention to
ethics and influence issues.

“Congrats, @CREWcrew! Americans deserve light
shed on the dark money polluting our democracy

—Senator Sheldon Whitehouse on our successful efforts to have the FEC levy fines
against three Koch brothers-backed dark money groups

30 | Private & Confidential


CREW is a nonpartisan 501(c)(3) organization. CREW's 2017 budget is $5.8 million which will double
its size from 2016. The reason for this expansion is the enormous demands that will be placed on this
organization this year. Judicial Watch which is CREW's analog in the Conservative movement has been
spending an average of almost $20 million a year since 2012 when President Obama was re-elected.

In 2017 CREW is planning to expand to a staff of at least 38. We will more than double the size of
our legal team, and add to our research and communications shop (including web and social media).
We will also expand our administrative and paralegal capabilities. The increased budget will also
cover outside legal services, web and social media services, and research and investigative resources.
Our expanded staff will allow for a comprehensive Freedom of Information Act team with litigators,
researchers, a coordinator and a paralegal; an executive branch ethics team with dedicated lawyers,
a business researcher, and an executive branch researcher; a state team with a dedicated counsel
and specialized researchers; as well as expanded capacity in all aspects of the office, crucially
including litigation.


Noah Bookbinder, Executive Director. Following an extensive national search, CREW hired Noah
as Executive Director in March of 2015. Noah formerly served as a federal prosecutor in the Justice
Department's Public Integrity Section and as Chief Counsel for Criminal Justice of the US Senate
Judiciary Committee. Before joining CREW in 2015, he served as Director of the US Sentencing
Commission's Office of Legislative and Public Affairs, where he helped guide the commission on
important policy decisions including its 2014 reduction of federal drug sentences. In his position
as Chief Counsel for Criminal Justice of the Senate Judiciary Committee, he advised Chairman
Patrick Leahy on a range of criminal justice issues including violent crime prevention, fraud, public
corruption, and criminal justice reform, and helped manage communications during the confirmation
hearings of US Supreme Court Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. He has also served as
a Special Assistant United States Attorney in Washington, DC, and as an adjunct professor at both
Howard University and George Washington University Law Schools. Noah is a graduate of
Yale University and Stanford Law School.

In July 2016, the usually deadlocked Federal Election Commission acted on our complaint
and imposed substantial fines on three organizations— the 60 Plus Association, the American
Future Fund, and Americans for Job Security— for illegally failing to disclose the source of money
earmarked for specific campaign advertisements. The money in fact came from an organization
that was central to the Koch network at the time. The FEC's fine of $233,000 was the largest of
the post-Citizens United era, and represented 40% of the fines imposed by the FEC in 2016 (and
almost all of the fines generated by complaints from outside organizations). Given that the FEC
is an agency characterized by partisan gridlock and an inability to enforce campaign finance law,
this was a breakthrough and a testament that CREW's groundbreaking research and legal work
can push even the least functional government agencies to act.

CREW 2020 Plan 31

Adam Rappaport, Chief Counsel and Assistant Director. Adam has worked at CREW since 2009 and
recently was promoted to Chief Counsel and Assistant Director. Prior to joining CREW, Adam practiced
law at Levine, Sullivan, Koch & Schulz, L.L.P., where he represented members of the news media in
seeking access to government records and proceedings and defended them in defamation cases.

Before that, Adam served as a law clerk to Judge David G. Trager
of the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

Adam covered Congress for National Journal's CongressDaily and
the States News Service before attending law school. He received
his J.D. with honors from the University of Chicago and his B.A.
from Wesleyan University.

Jennifer Ahearn, Policy Counsel. Jennifer has been CREW's Policy
Counsel since 2015. Prior to joining CREW, Jennifer worked in
the Office of General Counsel of the United States Sentencing
Commission, where she led teams of lawyers and researchers
advising the bipartisan Commission on issues like drug policy and
human rights abuses, and advised the Commission's federal judges
and judicial employees on complying with the Code of Judicial
Conduct. Before that, Jennifer served as a law clerk to Judge Thomas B. Russell of the US District Court
for the Western District of Kentucky. Jennifer received her J.D. and LL.M. degrees from Duke Law and
her B.A. from the University of Pennsylvania.

Matt Corley, Research Director. Matt is the Research Director at CREW, where he has worked since
2012. Before joining the CREW team, Matt worked as an Assistant Editor at the Center for American
Progress, where he wrote for ThinkProgress and The Progress Report. Matt received his B.A. from
Ithaca College and earned an M.A. in Political Science from George Washington University.

Jordan Libowitz, Communications Director. Jordan has served as CREW's Communications Director
since 2015. A native of Philadelphia, Jordan previously worked on campaigns from Pennsylvania to
Alaska. Prior to joining CREW, he ran a communications consulting firm specializing in nonprofits.
Jordan received his B.A. from the Johns Hopkins University.

Stuart McPhail, Litigation Counsel. Stuart has served as CREW's Litigation Counsel since 2015.

Prior to joining CREW, Stuart worked as a litigation associate with Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher LLP
and, before that, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton and Garrison LLP. Stuart clerked with Judge Fortunato
Benavides of the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and with Judge Maxine Chesney of the US
District Court for the Northern District of California. Stuart received his J.D. from Columbia Law and his
B.A. and B.S. from the University of Maryland.

In February 2016, CREW brought a complaint against Coalition for Progress, a New Jersey Democratic super
PAC backing Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop for his widely expected gubernatorial run, when a mysterious
shell company funneled $1 million into the super PAC the day after it formed. That money could not have so
quickly constituted legitimate earnings by the company. This complaint became a major local story, covered
by Politico New Jersey, the Bergen Record, and NJ.com, among others, and led to the secret donor revealing
himself publicly in the summer of 2016. Ultimately, Fulop abandoned his gubernatorial run.

32 | Private & Confidential


est. 2016

Shareblue will take back social media for Democrats.

We will delegitimize Donald Trump's presidency by
emboldening the opposition and empowering the majority
of Americans who oppose him. Shareblue will be the
dynamic nucleus of a multi-platform media company
that informs, engages, and arms Americans to fight.


Progressive media platforms are not positioned for this fight. They influence mainstream media and
political elites, but do not reach people where they are. They advocate for progressive issues, but avoid
partisan combat.

The Trump campaign spoke directly to voters — and not just through Donald Trump s Twitter feed.

It used Facebook, and racist and misogynistic (often fake) news sites with massive followings, to take
both his vitriol and his lies straight to the people.

Emboldened by Trump's victory, this messaging apparatus, led by Breitbart, will only become more
dangerous in the next four years.

Progressives need a media outlet with the power, influence, and reach to combat Trump and the media
ecosystem he has emboldened.

Shareblue will become that outlet by differentiating itself in four key ways:

Willingness to engage in partisan combat. We are not waiting to see what Trump does in office.

We do not give him the benefit of the doubt. He has told us what he wants to do to our country and
we believe him. We dedicate every day to calling out Trump and all who cooperate with him (including
Democrats who capitulate to this administration), and bolstering those who most effectively oppose
him (including Republicans who rebel against his rule). We are bold, full throated, and we are not
backing down. Authoritarianism, kleptocracy, cooptation by Russia, and white supremacy are well
within our sights, and we must fight back.

Connection to grassroots. Shareblue does not rely on mainstream journalists to advance our message.
We take it straight to our more than one million followers, who share it widely with their networks.
Some groups created during the 2016 campaign appeared inauthentic and were avoided by grassroots
users. In contrast, engagement with Shareblue content soared, and our following continues to grow.

Facebook native. Shareblue is a Facebook community first and foremost. We do not need to adapt to
a new environment; we're already where we need to be. Our team, and our audience, lives on social
media. With some of the highest interaction rates of any mainstream or progressive political media
site on Facebook and Twitter, we know what works on social and what doesn't.

Emotionally resonant. Messaging based solely on facts doesn't resonate with a broad audience.
Connection and engagement on a personal and emotional level — specifically hope, happiness, or
anger — drive success. Depression is a disincentive to shares and anything milquetoast is toxic to
our position. Shareblue creates fact-based content that connects with our audience on a visceral,
emotional level.

Shareblue 2020 Plan 33


Shareblue is a digital attacker.

In year one, we've begun to take back social media for Democrats by creating some of the most widely
shared content of the election cycle.

Going forward, we'll take share from like-minded but combat-averse digital competitors. Our relentless
coverage of Trump models how to put him and his collaborators on the defensive, and keep his popularity
low. By rewarding the fighters and nourishing the grassroots, Shareblue galvanizes the resistance to
Trump and bolsters the morale of the majority of Americans who didn't vote for him. And we won't
hesitate to call out Democrats who equivocate on Trump's dangerous policies or surrender to his
bullying tactics.

Further, we'll take share from corporate media, who are— in the short time since the election— more
concerned about losing access to Trump than covering him aggressively. If the mainstream media fails
to hold Trump to account, increasingly frustrated Americans will turn elsewhere for news and opinion.

To compete with Breitbart and the right-wing media infrastructure that will do Trump's bidding,
Shareblue must scale up from a Facebook native news site to a diversified media company, operating
across platforms with varied and ever-growing content offerings and products.

Shareblue's aggressive strategy is to grow our audience, maximize impact, and scale to reach our
potential as a profitable media company.


Every data point demonstrates that Shareblue is growing its audience. Since July 1, there were
162 million unique viewers of our content, a 50% increase from the first six months of 2016.

Daily average impressions have doubled since the first half of 2016.


Every moment that we are not optimizing our audience behavior or building our databases is a loss
that's greatly compounded over time. Like a 401K, the earlier we contribute to it, the greater the returns.

Our team has created at least 14 hashtags that trended nationally on Twitter— a clear
demonstration of our capacity to reach millions and shape the national conversation.
#WeWontBeErased and #HerelAmWithHer drew attention to the commitment, joy, and
enthusiasm of Clinton supporters; #TrumpCouldSay and #JustlmagineHillary spotlighted
the false equivalency in media coverage between Trump's multitude of outrageous actions
and statements, and Clinton's emails; #lnterrogateTrump called on the Secret Service to
investigate Trump's incitements of violence against Clinton.

34 Private & Confidential

Building on our highly engaged core, Shareblue will hyper-target active Democratic voters and Trump
opponents who are likely to share our content and engage others. To reach the largest and most influential
audience as quickly as possible, we will employ predictive analytics— a capacity we have in-house.

Reaching our potential audience, however, will require expanding beyond Facebook. While our
Facebook presence is our greatest strength, it is also a vulnerability: We should not be wholly
dependent on a third party platform. If Facebook makes changes to its algorithm, Shareblue's
audience could drop precipitously.

Shareblue must arm itself against the whims of Facebook's algorithm by building our presence on other
social platforms, and developing destination traffic for the site. We'll do this by expanding our content
offerings to drive habitual viewing, superserving our most engaged users, and maximizing earned media
to build the Shareblue brand.


In the 2016 campaign, American Bridge and Correct the Record relied on the mainstream media to
get messaging and opposition research out, instead of going to the grassroots directly. Once they
debunked a major story or hit (e.g., Clinton Cash, the New York Times bestseller that baselessly attacked
the Clinton Foundation's donations and finances), they weren't able to disseminate information to
the grassroots.

Shareblue is positioned to frame opposition research from American Bridge and other progressive groups,
as well as leaks and intel from Democrats on House and Senate committees, in our signature punchy,
emotive style— and disseminate it directly to our followers in a daily online persuasion campaign.

The right has done this effectively (though deceptively) for years. They have brought down progressive
organizations and damaged Democrats. In addition, there has been an influx of Republican campaigns
and candidates citing bogus news stories from online smear merchants such as the Washington Free
Beacon or Breitbart in political ads and communication.

Now, we can use our own social media platform to both
weaponize oppo research and perfect its delivery system to
expose Trump allies and collaborators, and to damage Trump.

We will aim to have our factual news stories repeated in
Democratic communications and paid political ads.

Shareblue's leadership team has spent the last decade working
to build various parts of the national progressive infrastructure.

We have worked with the White House and Capitol Hill,
on presidential campaigns and with virtually every major
progressive advocacy group. We will leverage unprecedented access to decision-makers at every level
of the Democratic establishment and progressive movement to break news and tangibly damage the
Trump administration.


Shareblue occupies a unique place in the media landscape. As this primary platform grows in audience
and impact, we'll leverage these assets appropriately to establish a powerful brand, generate revenue,
and drive to financial sustainability. Reaching these goals is critical for talent recruitment.

Shareblue 2020 Plan 35

We'll burnish the Shareblue brand by expanding our presence on TV, increasing earned media, and with
greater and more targeted outreach to influencers in media and politics.

We'll diversify content products to include email newsletters, podcasts, and discrete editorial and video
verticals, all of which can be sponsored by strategic partners.

We'll expand on mobile platforms via apps.

“A necessary voice in a world teeming with conservative radio,
television and internet outlets that fire up the Republican base ”

—Nick Merrill, in New York Times profile of Shareblue


Young enterprising media outlets historically thrive when in the opposition (think Talking Points
Memo and Daily Kos in the George W. Bush years). Now is the time to build Shareblue's audience
and influence.

In the next four years, Shareblue is focused on achieving the following outcomes:

Shareblue becomes the go-to news outlet for grassroots Trump opponents.

Shareblue becomes the de facto news outlet for opposition leaders.

Trump allies are forced to step down or change course due to news we push.

Under pressure from Shareblue, Democrats take more aggressive positions against Trump.
Achieve financial sustainability while diversifying content offerings and platforms.

Top editorial and writing talent leave competitors to join Shareblue.

Our most successful post of 2016, "Hillary Clinton is one of the most ethical (and most
lied about) political leaders in America," was shared over 800,000 times— almost double
the New York Times editorial endorsing her. Additional articles were shared hundreds of
thousands of times, including: "I was one of the most ardent Hillary haters on the planet...
until I read her emails," and "I published this photo of Hillary Clinton and the response
was overwhelming."

36 | Private & Confidential


In its first year, Shareblue proved it could engage millions of people with its content, impact
the national conversation, and be a credible and valuable platform for Democratic allies and the
progressive grassroots.

But at such an urgent, alarming time in our national politics, being good isn't enough. We must become
the antidote to Breitbart.

Going forward, and to drive to our top outcomes, Shareblue must expand its editorial capacity;
broaden and deepen its outreach to allies; upgrade our technology; and get on the path to
sustainability as a business.

This is how we'll do it:



Shareblue content is highly successful: Articles are often shared more than 10,000 times, and our
average daily impressions are 2.1 million. Coming into 2017, we are publishing more content, more
often, and under more bylines than at any point in our brief history. With an increase in production,
our audience is growing: Users saw Shareblue posts 323 million times since July 1, a 50% increase
from the first six months of 2016.

We must expand our editorial capacity, and recruit more full-time writers,
beat reporters, and editors who create, deliver, and promote content up to
our high standards and in Shareblue's signature style.

Across a noisy, disorienting, and fractured digital landscape, Shareblue's
steady, resolute voice is urgently needed.


■ Calling out all signs of authoritarianism and kleptocracy. Championing voices who have been
right to warn us.

■ Nonstop coverage of the influence of Vladimir Putin and Russia on Trump and his

■ Exposing Trump as a weak, think-skinned "loser" vulnerable to goading.

■ Relentlessly beating the drum that he has no mandate, lost the popular vote, and is the
least popular president-elect in modern American history.

■ Exposing the insidious role of Mike Pence, who is replicating the right-wing governance
ideology he inflicted on Indiana.

■ Demystifying Trump's "conflicts of interest" and calling them what they are:

Subversions of the nation's interests.

Shareblue 2020 Plan 37

■ Spotlighting the Trump administration's vast ties to white nationalists and the ways in which
they explicitly empower white supremacy.

■ Tracking and fighting back against odious GOP legislation in Congress.

■ Following SCOTUS nominations/appointments/major cases.

■ Morale-boosting coverage of the grassroots opposition and resistance efforts outside
the Beltway.

■ Positive coverage of Democrats who boldly call out Trump and aggressively work against him.
Pressure on Democrats who consider giving him cover.

■ Media criticism exposing mainstream journalists who normalize Trump, and championing
those who hold him accountable.

■ Fighting outrage fatigue.


With increased editorial capacity, Shareblue will expand our daily production by aggregating content.
We will do this in two ways:

■ An aggregation editor will look for content from across the internet, which informs and inspires
our readers, and tracks with our editorial priorities.

■ Build a proprietary algorithm that is specifically designed to amplify negative content for Trump
and deliver positive content to bolster the resistance. Further, by pulling the most widely shared
progressive content from the top 1,000 social media accounts, Shareblue's algorithm will not
only aggregate, but drive news and opinion.


While traditional 30-second TV spots were important in the
2016 campaigns, online videos regularly garnered attention and
airtime from media outlets, and were shared across millions of
screens in social networks. Trump's web videos were not highly
produced, but were easily shared across Trump's social media
platforms, which garnered large numbers of views and allowed
him to target specific groups.

Shareblue's anti-Trump videos, optimized for mobile viewing
and sharing, were viewed over 20 million times during the
2016 campaign. Democrats often struggle to convey facts in
ways that can be easily understood. Shareblue specializes in
simplifying stories, facts, and data through videos, memes, and other highly shareable visual content.

In addition to our own rapid response videos (pairing TV clips with a strong message), Shareblue
will also amplify grassroots, authentic video content (e.g., Pantsuit Flash Mobs that first appeared in
New York during the campaign). These videos boost opposition morale, are widely shared, and garner
positive media coverage. Through partnerships and joint ventures with grassroots organizations,
Shareblue will ramp up its video production to maximize impact and grow our audience.

As we expand across social platforms, our approach to visual content will be tailored to each.

For example, on Instagram Shareblue will produce a daily image— a chart, graph, photograph or gif —
which tells a specific story that aligns with our editorial focus.

38 | Private & Confidential


The Trump administration needs to be investigated. Since 2006, The American Independent has
shined a national spotlight on important stories— or offered rebuttals of accepted narratives— that the
corporate news media leave in the shadows. The American Independent searches for and exposes the
underreported activities of conservatives, arming the public with the truths needed to hold individuals
and groups responsible for actions or policies that run counter to the progressive agenda.

With the election of Trump and its implications for a free press, The American Independent's work
is more important than ever. In 2017, working with Shareblue, The American Independent will award
grants to top investigative journalists to cover, expose, and damage the Trump administration and
its allies.

A few examples of The American Independent's victories exposing the conservative nexus of power
in Washington include:

■ "Company Town", a documentary film that tells the story of Crossett, Arkansas, pop.

5,500, a town literally poisoned by the greed of paper-processing company Georgia-
Pacific, a Koch Industries subsidiary. "Company Town" premiered on June 7, 2016 at the
Los Angeles Film Festival to a sold out crowd and was one of a few select films invited for
a second screening. Huffington Post called it an "important film" that "exposes the horrific
environmental impact that Georgia-Pacific, a Koch Industries-owned company, has had
on the tightly-knit Arkansas community."

■ A 2014 Rolling Stone profile of the rise of Larry Pratt, Executive Director of Gun Owners of
America, which earned 570,000 unique visitors and three million page views and led to follow-
up articles in the New York Daily News ("Gun Owners of America director would be 'kind of
glad' if lawmakers feared violence from his organization") and Roll Call ("Maloney Calls for
Investigation Into Threats From Pro-Gun Leader Larry Pratt").

■ Delegitimizing Mark Regnerus's 2012 study accusing same-sex parents of being inferior to
their straight counterparts. Subsequent attempts to use Regnerus's study in the Supreme Court
and in state battles failed— because The American Independent's reporting had destroyed

its credibility.


People don't answer polls anymore. Response rates are down to 15% or less. That damages the
quality of polls and we saw the results in 2016. As polling faces a response bias crisis, models that
use alternative inputs will become more important in future elections.

In the beginning of the campaign, Shareblue was the only Democratic political site to
regularly call out sexism in the presidential race. Conservatives, the corporate press, and
even some progressives fiercely attacked us for it. But by the final weeks of the campaign,
both mainstream and progressive journalists could be found commenting on the pivotal
role sexism played in the race.

Shareblue SOSO Plan | 39

Benchmark Politics is the only predictive model to include county-level demographic, economic, and
polling data to make accurate predictions about elections. This local-level focus will make it possible
for Benchmark to not only predict 2018 Senate races, but also House races. As Democrats work
aggressively to pick up seats in the mid-terms and defeat Trump in 2020, Shareblue will become the
most accurate and trustworthy destination for polling and predictive modeling.

Heralded as the "next Nate Silver," Anthony Reed is the founder of Benchmark Politics and Shareblue's
exclusive polling and predictive modeling expert. Notably, Benchmark Politics was the most accurate
election forecaster in the Democratic primaries— beating even Nate Silver.

Shareblue will utilize this data and modeling expertise to ensure maximum impact of our editorial
mission. With these added capacities, we will be able to test which messages and content are most
effective. Trump was deftly able to change the conversation when it wasn't favorable to his terms.
Therefore, we must be able to test in real time what is most damaging to him and his administration
and then relentlessly pursue those angles and storylines.


Shareblue's allies know that our content gets shared widely, and they know that there is no other
resource like us in the progressive infrastructure. The more Democratic and progressive organizations
get to know us, and see our results, the more often they come to Shareblue with quality story ideas and
exclusive content, and the more they share it with their networks.

But there's much more work to do. To become the de facto news outlet of the opposition in the Trump
era, we must invest significantly in marketing ourselves to the infrastructure and movement we exist
to champion.

Shareblue will widen its outreach by developing strategic partnerships with Democratic allies, influencers,
and progressive groups; we will be the go-to platform to amplify their campaigns and initiatives.

Shareblue will expand our reach on the Hill to solidify our relationships and influence within the
Democratic Party. Looking to 2018, Shareblue's social media platform will be increasingly critical to
party messaging.

As Shareblue becomes the leading source of news of the opposition, we'll regularly recruit Democratic
officials, progressive leaders, and grassroots organizers to write op-eds for the site.

Shareblue editors and writers will do more appearances on TV and radio. Strengthening Shareblue's
brand in the media is essential to our growth strategy.

Shareblue was the first to call Trump's full pivot to white nationalism, which we did
several days before he hired Breitbart's Steve Bannon. While some journalists noted
that white nationalists seemed to be emboldened by Trump, we aggressively called
out Trump's explicit strategy: To foment a white nationalist awakening.

40 | Private & Confidential


As a digital media company, Shareblue needs to be in the vanguard of new technology for both its
operations and in how we deliver our content to our audience.

In 2017, Shareblue will explore a move to Medium, which would reduce costs, eliminate the need for
server space, and shift responsibility to dealing with DDoS attacks elsewhere. Medium also provides
a new and powerful channel for promoting our daily content.

It is well documented that the Trump campaign's digital team outperformed Democrats at every level.
We must comprehensively understand the behavior of our audience, and use that data to hyper-target
and expand it.

We'll do this in several ways:

■ We'll start with our Facebook audience. Once we
understand the behavior of our most valuable users
(within and beyond Facebook) in greater detail, we can
develop online look-alike models.

■ Analyze the site: With regression models we can look at
traffic sources; a social media analysis will reveal how
well certain types of articles do when posted in various
media sources; releasing particular articles in a controlled
fashion will test time of day engagement levels, social
media source, and topic.

■ We will be able to learn which platforms and ad types are most effective at building
membership, driving views on content, driving amplifiers to share content, etc.

■ With a clearer sense of who our users are, we'll make better strategic decisions on
monetizing options, the tools to do so, and build the foundation for a potentially valuable
and marketable dataset.


Impact and monetization are not mutually exclusive at Shareblue.

In the second half of 2017 we will move the focus to monetization with the goal of bringing in revenue in
Q2 of 2018. Our strategies stem from our core competency: The ability to market content effectively in
social media channels.

Sponsored content. Sponsored content is fueling the explosive growth of digital media platforms. These
articles would be specifically written to promote businesses and organizations that fit our audience.
This would primarily be a lead generation business paid through a CPA model. And we'll
go beyond articles, and partner with progressive allies like EMILY'S List to produce video content.

Sponsored verticals. Shareblue can create verticals that can be sold to businesses and organizations
that align with our editorial priorities, e.g., labor, environmental organizations, anti-corruption advocates.

Shareblue Premium. Subscribers pay for exclusive content, daily newsletter or other product.

Think TPM Prime or Slate Plus.

Marketable dataset. Once we know our audience better, we will have the option of marketing this data
to allies to help them grow their audience and impact as well. Shareblue will always safeguard the
privacy of its readers.

Shareblue 2020 Plan 41

Proprietary technology/premium experience. Subscribers pay a fee to participate in a Twitter-like
environment for the opposition, free from conservative trolls and harassment. A powerful way of
merging our connection to the grassroots with our platform.

Email leads. Monetizing traffic through sponsored actions, whereby a third party pays to place a petition
on our site and then pays per email ($1.00-$2.00) for the output. We get to add these email lists to our
database as well. Since Change.org shifted from only serving the left, there is a gap in the progressive
landscape for email list generation.

Progressive products. In an increasingly high tech world, people seek things they can touch and feel. We
could market products that align with our editorial mission and capture the emotion of the resistance.
All potential products could be market-tested through our Facebook community.

Event marketing. As Shareblue's reach and impact increase, so too will the opportunity to
extend the power of our brand. We'll develop event programming in major markets that features
Shareblue editors, writers, and contributors, and generate revenue from paid sponsorships and/or
consumer sales.


Shareblue will constantly monitor the following indicators to know if we're on track toward our
top outcomes.

Shareblue becomes the go-to news outlet for grassroots Trump opponents. Facebook engagement with
our content doubles each year. Shareblue.com traffic also doubles each year. Twitter following increases
25% per year.

Shareblue becomes the de facto news outlet for opposition leaders. Democratic offices, campaigns, and
progressive organizations will routinely pitch us stories, funnel us information, and share our content,
and we'll measure ally engagement. Shareblue content will be used in paid political ads in television
and digital mediums.

Trump allies are forced to step down or change course due to news we push. Intel and oppo given to us
exclusively will become higher quality, with higher potential for impact, as our credibility and footprint

Under pressure from Shareblue, Democrats take more aggressive positions against Trump. Democrats will
echo the aggressive, emotive messaging Shareblue models and take action accordingly.

Achieve financial sustainability while diversifying content offerings and platforms. Set and meet revenue
targets each fiscal year as editorial and reach expand. Find capital investors in Shareblue's new and
expanding business.

Top editorial and writing talent leave competitors to join Shareblue. High quality, seasoned editors and
writers at competing outlets increasingly follow Shareblue social media accounts, share our content,
and repeat our messaging— until they realize Shareblue would make a better home.

42 [ Private & Confidential


Shareblue is an LLC which has a 2017 budget currently set at $2 million, which covers 18 total staff,
including six full-time content producers.

Our top priority is expanding editorial capacity, and, accordingly, Shareblue's budget is biased towards
content creation. This year, we'll bring on an executive editor, two writers/reporters, a production
editor, and increase our freelance writers budget by 50%. Alongside our editorial expansion, we'll
begin to re-build our video content program with a part-time producer, and optimize our social media
presence with a digital manager.

With an increase in the budget to $3 million, Shareblue will be able to make necessary investments in
2017. An expanded technology team allows for a digital director to develop and execute social media
and web growth strategies, along with a full-time developer and a designer.

We'll continue to expand our editorial capacity with two dedicated reporters (one for the progressive
beat, and one for ethics/legal), and a full-time video department of two. And we'll be able to compete
for top editorial talent. A product marketing manager will drive revenue through content sponsorships,
email list monetization, and subscriber-model experimentation.


Shareblue operates with a small but dedicated team, each of whom believes progressive values are
worth fighting for every day. We're passionate about producing the highest quality content to inform,
engage, and fire up our audience. And like our audience, we live on social media.

On the content creation side of Shareblue, the editor-in-chief works closely with her deputy editor, two
senior writers, our exclusive polling and data strategist, and oversees a group of five freelance writers.

A director of outreach and IT manager round out the operations team.


Will Lippincott, Chief Operating Officer. Will began his media career in 1994 at The New Yorker,
where he worked in advertising sales. From 1998 to early 2001 Will was publisher of The New Republic
and led its re-launch before becoming publisher and business development director of BoozAllen’s
strategy+business quarterly. At both brands, Will was responsible for business operations, including
advertising sales and consumer marketing, and for the development and execution of online content
and revenue strategies. In 2004, Will co-founded Lippincott Massie McQuilkin (LMQ), a full-service

Drawing on polling data showing Clinton's supporters were more enthusiastic
than her opponents', reports from the field, and inspiring photos of her
passionate supporters, Shareblue relentlessly busted the pervasive myth that
there was no enthusiasm for the first woman to be nominated for president
by a major party.

Shareblue 2020 Plan 43

literary agency that now represents more than 300 authors and estates. As an agent and talent
manager, he developed a rigorous approach to securing publishing deals for prize-winning journalists
and thought leaders whose ideas are catalysts for change in culture, politics, and business. Will has
been a board member of Media Matters for America since its founding in 2004, and has served on
the boards of American Bridge 21 st Century and The American Independent.

Katie Paris, Senior Executive Adviser. Katie is a veteran of progressive infrastructure organizations
and Democratic campaigns. She has worked with Shareblue since David Brock took it over in late 2015.
Katie also serves as an adviser to Media Matters, which she helped launch as its first Research Director
in 2004. Katie also helped launch Faith in Public Life, a DC-based strategy center that advances faith as
a powerful force for progressive causes. When she's not doing politics, she helps inspire social sector
leaders to build great organizations for greater impact through the Leap of Reason initiative.

Melissa McEwan, Editor-in-Chief. Melissa is a leading feminist writer who has spent more than a
decade in progressive advocacy, having founded the political and cultural blog Shakesville in 2004.

She has been with Shareblue since February of 2016. Melissa's work has appeared in a number of
publications, ranging from Geez Magazine to The Guardian. She has long valued building relationships
with other writers in the social justice sphere, and loves to mentor fledgling feminist writers, from
building an audience to navigating the challenges of social media.

Anthony Reed, Polling and Data Strategist. Heralded as the "next Nate Silver," Anthony is
Shareblue's exclusive polling and predictive modeling expert. He is the founder of Benchmark
Politics, which was the most accurate election forecaster in the Democratic primaries (beating
even Nate Silver). The Benchmark model uses advanced statistical techniques based on county-level
data Anthony developed to successfully lower the murder rate in Baton Rouge, reduce mass incarceration
in Louisiana, and improve student success in public universities.

Tommy Christopher, Senior Political Writer. Tommy is a liberal commentator and journalist with
an extensive reporting background. He began his journalism career covering the 2008 presidential
campaign for AOL, then went on to cover the White House for six years with PoliticsDaily, Mediaite,
and The Daily Banter. Before entering journalism, Christopher was a health insurance consultant with
extensive expertise in the field.

44 Private & Confidential
1   CovfefeButDeadly   ignore (5)   2018 Oct 6, 3:35pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Lol. Yeah, the Democrats really give a rats ass about you and me.
2   Patrick   ignore (1)   2018 Oct 6, 3:45pm   ↑ like (6)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        


That's why the Democratic Party should be disbanded and replaced with a Labor Party which has the integrity to stick to labor issues.
4   LeonDurham   ignore (0)   2018 Oct 6, 4:21pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

lol--typical Trump supporter deceit in the headline.

Please point out any section in the manifesto that you posted that is the least bit offensive or nefarious. It talks about fighting fake news and holding Republicans accountable for their lies. You think those are bad ideas?
5   LeonDurham   ignore (0)   2018 Oct 6, 4:21pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

And my lord. Are you going to censor me forever?
6   Patrick   ignore (1)   2018 Oct 6, 4:58pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Uh, do you have any example of something you said that was censored?
7   mell   ignore (2)   2018 Oct 6, 5:06pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Patrick says
Uh, do you have any example of something you said that was censored?

The messages get flagged by default until somebody approves them.
8   CovfefeButDeadly   ignore (5)   2018 Oct 6, 5:28pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

LeonDurham says
lol--typical Trump supporter deceit in the headline.

Please point out any section in the manifesto that you posted that is the least bit offensive or nefarious. It talks about fighting fake news and holding Republicans accountable for their lies. You think those are bad ideas?

Took me about 5 seconds Tat/joey/Leon et al....

Breitbart, which has received millions in funding from extremist billionaires close to the Trump
administration, provides a nexus point for the so-called alt-right (the newest branding for American
white nationalism, anti-Semitism, and misogyny) to exploit vulnerabilities throughout
the media landscape. With a powerful ally in the White House (former chief executive Steve Bannon
will be Trump's chief strategist), Breitbart plans to export its brand of anti-establishment racism on a
global scale.
9   Patrick   ignore (1)   2018 Oct 6, 7:48pm   ↑ like (4)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

CovfefeButDeadly says
white nationalism, anti-Semitism, and misogyny ... racism

Jeez, have the Democrats really got nothing other than baseless accusations all the time? It gets tiring.

Where to even start? How about here: Breitbart himself was Jewish. Do they think he was a Jewish Nazi?
10   HonkpilledMaster   ignore (5)   2018 Oct 6, 8:06pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Patrick says
Under pressure from Shareblue, Democrats take more aggressive positions against Trump. Democrats will
echo the aggressive, emotive messaging Shareblue models and take action accordingly.

That doesn't seem to be a winning strategy. heh
11   HonkpilledMaster   ignore (5)   2018 Oct 6, 8:12pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Patrick says
That's why the Democratic Party should be disbanded and replaced with a Labor Party which has the integrity to stick to labor issues.

Your lips to God's Ears, but look at the Labour Party UK. It's basically the party of Welfare and Islam, now. Replacing the Neoliberals with Old Social Justice Reds made it more batshit crazy.

I think it's great the Neoliberal Globalists and Social Justice Warriors are together in the Democratic Party. The danger is that the Neoliberals leave for the Republican party and get us back on the Globalist Track, while the SJWs take over the Dems and make them even more extreme.

Let them stay together another 10-20 years and let us fix America, THEN they can be the Labor Side of the equation again after the SJWs and Neoliberals are gone.
12   FortWayneIndiana   ignore (4)   2018 Oct 6, 9:49pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

That's Gestapo tactics, only it's by the left today. Kind of matches what I've witnessed. Anyone says anything positive by the left, instant punishment.
13   bob2356   ignore (4)   2018 Oct 7, 9:10am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Seems odd the lack of outrage about the Koch bro's plan to subvert a democratically elected president for 8 years. I guess it's different when it's right wing subversion.Or perhaps patnet's far right wing honestly believes that the 500 of the countries richest most politically active libertarians (many who are now in trump's cabinet) get together for a week twice a year to swap cake recipes and talk about their grandchildren. Denial ins't just a river in Egypt.
14   LeonDurham   ignore (0)   2018 Oct 7, 9:53am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Patrick says
Uh, do you have any example of something you said that was censored?

Every one of my posts. They all go to Big Brother before anyone can see them. By the time they get "approval", the thread has 10 more posts after it, and it's useless. But maybe that's the point.
15   LeonDurham   ignore (0)   2018 Oct 7, 9:54am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

CovfefeButDeadly says

Took me about 5 seconds Tat/joey/Leon et al....

Breitbart, which has received millions in funding from extremist billionaires close to the Trump
administration, provides a nexus point for the so-called alt-right (the newest branding for American
white nationalism, anti-Semitism, and misogyny) to exploit vulnerabilities throughout
the media landscape. With a powerful ally in the White House (former chief executive Steve Bannon
will be Trump's chief strategist), Breitbart plans to export its brand of anti-establishment racism on a
global scale.

I fail to see anything nefarious here. Perhaps the truth hurts?
16   LeonDurham   ignore (0)   2018 Oct 7, 9:57am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

Patrick says

Jeez, have the Democrats really got nothing other than baseless accusations all the time? It gets tiring.

Where to even start? How about here: Breitbart himself was Jewish. Do they think he was a Jewish Nazi?

No, they are always based. It's just sad that fake news and propaganda works so well on Trump supporters. This is a FACT that has been proven time and again.

Trump supporters are like 10 times more likely to believe fake news stories than non Trump supporters.
19   LeonDurham   ignore (0)   2018 Oct 7, 12:19pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

CovfefeButDeadly says

This is why people make fun of you.

lol--I guess the truth does hurt as you have nothing to respond but insults.

(I believe this is against the rules, btw)
20   marcus   ignore (8)   2018 Oct 7, 12:19pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

LeonDurham says
typical Trump supporter deceit in the headline.

Please point out any section in the manifesto that you posted that is the least bit offensive or nefarious. It talks about fighting fake news and holding Republicans accountable for their lies. You think those are bad ideas?

Exactly my thoughts.
22   LeonDurham   ignore (0)   2018 Oct 7, 2:41pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

lol--I'm sure Sowell feels the same about Martin Luther King.
23   HonkpilledMaster   ignore (5)   2018 Oct 7, 4:30pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

bob2356 says
Seems odd the lack of outrage about the Koch bro's plan to subvert a democratically elected president for 8 years

What? Plenty of people have been mocking the Koch Brother's swing to the Neoliberal Democrats and deny Trump 8 years in the White House.
24   FortWayneIndiana   ignore (4)   2018 Oct 7, 8:14pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

LeonDurham says
lol--I'm sure Sowell feels the same about Martin Luther King.

I wouldn't compare MLK to the pussy hatters on the left. MLK was a man who dealt with injustice. Left today wants hand outs from everyone else for "ekwality".
25   bob2356   ignore (4)   2018 Oct 8, 5:41am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says
bob2356 says
Seems odd the lack of outrage about the Koch bro's plan to subvert a democratically elected president for 8 years

What? Plenty of people have been mocking the Koch Brother's swing to the Neoliberal Democrats and deny Trump 8 years in the White House

Someone needs to read the question more carefully before posting an irrelevant and meaningless straw man argument. . But let's play your silly game. Want to show all the outraged posts on patnet and the right wing echo chamber about the koch bro's network funding and planning against the Obama admin. I'll be waiting. Probably until the sun goes supernova.

But hey since you brought it up out of nowhere feel free to go ahead and show all the funding for the democratic party from the koch bro's network in the trump era. Especially since trumps cabinet is essentially a koch bro's alumni meeting and trump got the ultra rich libertarians of the koch bro's network the greatest christmas present in their lives with the tax cut. . I'm sure they really really want congress to turn back democrat and start sniping at the tax cut. . ROFLOL. Will I see this before or after the info on outrage? Say the twelfth of never or so. HaHaHaHaHa.
26   Goran_K   ignore (2)   2018 Oct 8, 8:30am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

LeonDurham says
lol--I'm sure Sowell feels the same about Martin Luther King.

This is why Democrats keep losing. They actually think they are comparable to MLK in their actions, moral philosophy, and intent.

All wrong, completely and utterly wrong.
28   HonkpilledMaster   ignore (5)   2018 Oct 8, 10:15am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

bob2356 says
Someone needs to read the question more carefully before posting an irrelevant and meaningless straw man argument. . But let's play your silly game. Want to show all the outraged posts on patnet and the right wing echo chamber about the koch bro's network funding and planning against the Obama admin. I'll be waiting. Probably until the sun goes supernova.

I reject your framing. I'd rather fight on ground on my own choosing and post the Koch Brothers plans to stop Trump's America First Agenda.

Attempt to take over Time Magazine.

Attempt to stop reciprocal tariffs to China, Asia

Koch Bros Aggravated Trump is the lead Republican Candidate

Koch History

And that's just one quick search on Pat.net

How about Breitbart? First few DuckDuckGo search results, and all recent, from this year:

Koch Bros launch Open Borders PAC

Koch Bros attempt to re-launch DACA Amnesty

Koch Bros threaten to support Democrats

Koch Bros immigration restrictions are "Unacceptable"

Here's a few that appeared right in the first few hits:

Koch prepared to back Democrats.

And here's Steve Bannon warning the Koch Brothers off:

And finally, Conservapedia entry for the Koch Brothers, accusing them of putting up Fake Pro-Life Candidates as fronts to Support Mass Immigration (Cruz):
29   Heraclitusstudent   ignore (2)   2018 Oct 8, 10:47am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Is US billionaires financing their pet political agendas the same as Russian meddling?

In other words: is the word "subvert" justified here, or is this agenda and the Koch's agenda legitimate US political projects?
30   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (38)   2018 Oct 8, 11:51am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

This is exactly like the protocols of the Elders of Zion. Just swap out the words Elders of Zion with Libby cunts and you can see that it is exactly the same thing. Libby cunts, they can't even make up their own conspiracies. This is why they are doomed to be slaves and to be turned into dog food for Real Americans' patriot dogs.
31   LeonDurham   ignore (0)   2018 Oct 8, 5:21pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Goran_K says
This is why Democrats keep losing. They actually think they are comparable to MLK in their actions, moral philosophy, and intent.

All wrong, completely and utterly wrong.

And this is why people continue to make fun of Trump supporters. The quote talks about activists. Not Democrats.

Are you implying Dr. King wasn't an activist?


about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions