« prev   random   next »
1   HEYYOU   ignore (21)   2018 Oct 19, 6:48pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (6)   quote   flag        

The only good Republican nigger is a....
2   Automan Empire   ignore (2)   2018 Oct 19, 7:27pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

I'm imagining them all doing that choking Eddie Murphy laugh every time they lift their signs.
3   Goran_K   ignore (1)   2018 Oct 19, 8:20pm   ↑ like (6)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

I haven’t seen Democrats so snarky since Republicans freed their slaves.
4   Strategist   ignore (2)   2018 Oct 19, 8:25pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Goran_K says
I haven’t seen Democrats so snarky since Republicans freed their slaves.


Well, how would you feel if you had your slaves taken away from you without compensation? It's legal theft plain and simple.
5   Goran_K   ignore (1)   2018 Oct 19, 8:41pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Strategist says
Goran_K says
I haven’t seen Democrats so snarky since Republicans freed their slaves.


Well, how would you feel if you had your slaves taken away from you without compensation? It's legal theft plain and simple.


True. But let’s be honest the democrat controlled inner cities resemble slave plantations in many ways; poor housing conditions, breakup of the nuclear family, population dependent on support... looks like Democrats got their slaves back anyway.
6   lostand confused   ignore (0)   2018 Oct 19, 9:19pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

HEYYOU says
The only good Republican nigger is a....


wow, just wow.
7   Goran_K   ignore (1)   2018 Oct 19, 9:26pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

lostand confused says
wow, just wow.


Right?

But it's independents and conservatives who are racists...
8   Automan Empire   ignore (2)   2018 Oct 19, 9:37pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Stop with the "Democrats are the real slave holders" bullshit. People can see right through it.
9   Goran_K   ignore (1)   2018 Oct 19, 9:51pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Automan Empire says
Stop with the "Democrats are the real slave holders" bullshit.


Often the truth hurts. But facts are facts.
10   CovfefeButDeadly   ignore (4)   2018 Oct 19, 10:14pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Automan Empire says
Stop with the "Democrats are the real slave holders" bullshit. People can see right through it.


Why do you hate truth?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_United_States_Democratic_Party

The crisis for the Democratic Party came in the late 1850s as Democrats increasingly rejected national policies demanded by the Southern Democrats. The demands were to support slavery outside the South. Southerners insisted that full equality for their region required the government to acknowledge the legitimacy of slavery outside the South. The Southern demands included a fugitive slave law to recapture runaway slaves; opening Kansas to slavery; forcing a pro-slavery constitution on Kansas; acquire Cuba (where slavery already existed); accepting the Dred Scott decision of the Supreme Court; and adopting a federal slave code to protect slavery in the territories. President Buchanan went along with these demands, but Douglas refused and proved a much better politician than Buchanan, though the bitter battle lasted for years and permanently alienated the Northern and Southern wings.[21]

When the new Republican Party formed in 1854 on the basis of refusing to tolerate the expansion of slavery into the territories, many northern Democrats (especially Free Soilers from 1848) joined it. The Republicans in 1854 now had a majority in most, but not all of the Northern states and it had practically no support South of the Mason–Dixon line. The formation of the new short-lived Know-Nothing Party allowed the Democrats to win the presidential election of 1856.[20] Buchanan, a Northern "Doughface" (his base of support was in the pro-slavery South), split the party on the issue of slavery in Kansas when he attempted to pass a federal slave code as demanded by the South. Most Democrats in the North rallied to Senator Douglas, who preached "Popular Sovereignty" and believed that a Federal slave code would be undemocratic.[22]

The Democratic Party was unable to compete with the Republican Party, which controlled nearly all northern states by 1860, bringing a solid majority in the Electoral College. The Republicans claimed that the Northern Democrats, including Doughfaces such as Pierce and Buchanan, as well as advocates of popular sovereignty such as Stephen A. Douglas and Lewis Cass, were all accomplices to Slave Power. The Republicans argued that slaveholders (all of them Democrats) had seized control of the federal government and were blocking the progress of liberty.[23]


To vote for Stephen A. Douglas in Virginia, a man deposited the ticket issued by the party in the official ballot box
In 1860, the Democrats were unable to stop the election of Republican Abraham Lincoln, even as they feared his election would lead to civil war. The Democrats split over the choice of a successor to President Buchanan along Northern and Southern lines: factions of the party provided two separate candidacies for President in the election of 1860, in which the Republican Party gained ascendancy.[24]

Some Southern Democratic delegates followed the lead of the Fire-Eaters by walking out of the Democratic National Convention at Charleston's Institute Hall in April 1860 and were later joined by those who, once again led by the Fire-Eaters, left the Baltimore Convention the following June when the convention rejected a resolution supporting extending slavery into territories whose voters did not want it. The Southern Democrats nominated the pro-slavery incumbent Vice President, John C. Breckinridge of Kentucky, for President and General Joseph Lane, former governor of Oregon, for Vice President.[25]

The Northern Democrats proceeded to nominate Douglas of Illinois for President and former Governor of Georgia Herschel Vespasian Johnson for Vice President, while some southern Democrats joined the Constitutional Union Party, backing its nominees (who had both been prominent Whig leaders), former Senator John Bell of Tennessee for President and the politician Edward Everett of Massachusetts for Vice President. This fracturing of the Democrats left them powerless. Republican Abraham Lincoln was elected the 16th President of the United States. Douglas campaigned across the country calling for unity and came in second in the popular vote, but carried only Missouri and New Jersey. Breckinridge carried 11 slave states, coming in second in the Electoral vote, but third in the popular vote.[25]
11   Goran_K   ignore (1)   2018 Oct 19, 10:18pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

CovfefeButDeadly says
Why do you hate truth?


The truth from DemocratEditPedia? No thanks. The article even says it's missing information, so please "expand" those sections. lol

Here's the truth. You won't find a SINGLE registry where a Republican owned a SINGLE slave. This challenge was opened by Dinesh D'Souza back in 2009 to all academic circles, and NO ONE has yet to find a single historical record of a Republican owning a slave.

A Harvard Professor thought he had found ONE slave owned by a Republican, he had found a record of Ulysses S. Grant owning ONE slave brought into community property through marriage.

But at the time Grant was still a Democrat. :)
12   Ceffer   ignore (1)   2018 Oct 20, 12:01am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Blacks are getting tired of the thirteenth amendment. They want slaves, too.
13   APHAman   ignore (8)   2018 Oct 20, 6:16am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

All three of them?
14   Goran_K   ignore (1)   2018 Oct 20, 10:13am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Aphroman says
All three of them?


RCP thinks Trump could win 20% of the black vote by 2020.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2018/10/18/could_trump_win_20_percent_of_the_african-american_vote_in_2020_138385.html

This would literally be devastating for the DNC since they rely upon 90%+ of the black vote to keep the offices they have.

It kind of makes sense though that they would move away from the party that enslaved them.
15   TrumpingTits   ignore (0)   2018 Oct 20, 10:43am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Goran_K says
This would literally be devastating for the DNC since they rely upon 90%+ of the black vote to keep the offices they have.


Yup. And they can't take a reduced figure of say, just 75% and make it up with other votes, either. Because of how the geographic distribution of black vote vis a vis the other voters they would be trying to make up for.




The Housing Trap
You're being set up to spend your life paying off a debt you don't need to take on, for a house that costs far more than it should. The conspirators are all around you, smiling to lure you in, carefully choosing their words and watching your reactions as they push your buttons, anxiously waiting for the moment when you sign the papers that will trap you and guarantee their payoff. Don't be just another victim of the housing market. Use this book to defend your freedom and defeat their schemes. You can win the game, but first you have to learn how to play it.
115 pages, $12.50

Kindle version available


about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions