1
0

Trump received most negative press of any president


 invite response                
2018 Oct 22, 7:50am   1,482 views  5 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (55)   💰tip   ignore  

https://www.studentnewsdaily.com/example-of-media-bias/harvard-study-reveals-media-bias/

Trump’s coverage during his first 100 days set a new standard for negativity. Findings include:

President Trump has received unsparing coverage for most weeks of his presidency, without a single major topic where coverage, on balance, was more positive than negative, setting a new standard for unfavorable press coverage of a president.
Every news outlet in the study was negative more often than positive.
Fox was the only news outlet that came close to giving Trump positive coverage overall – though they did not – 52% of news reports on Fox were negative towards President Trump. Only 48% were positive. (There was variation in the tone of Fox’s coverage depending on the topic. Trade and terrorism were news categories where Fox’s coverage was starkly different from that of the other outlets. Whereas their coverage in these areas tipped strongly in the negative direction, Fox’s coverage tipped strongly positive. This just shows that those are two areas where Fox executives agree with Trump’s position. Thus the positive coverage.)

The study also divided news items across topics. On immigration, healthcare, and Russia, more than 85% of reports were negative. (Consider the fact that on illegal immigration, President Trump has broad public support in his effort to crack down on sanctuary cities.)

On the economy, news reports were still negative, but less negative than other topics – 54% negative to 46% positive. It should be difficult to publish negative stories about the economy when it is improving.

Comments 1 - 5 of 5        Search these comments

1   Tenpoundbass   2018 Oct 22, 8:17am  

If you call MSM Press.
He actually got plenty of Press from real Journalists that actually report news and not the latest Partisan Feelz.
2   bob2356   2018 Oct 22, 10:31am  

I'm sure it had nothing at all to do with trump's own actions. No not a thing. If you tell everyone they are assholes then they usually don't have nice things to say. DUH.
3   FuckTheMainstreamMedia   2018 Oct 22, 12:05pm  

bob2356 says
I'm sure it had nothing at all to do with trump's own actions. No not a thing. If you tell everyone they are assholes then they usually don't have nice things to say. DUH.


If it did there would have been a plethora of stories about how the tax cuts helped middle class families, about how powerful the appointments of Gorsuch and Kavanaugh were, about the change in direction of the war in Syria due to aggressive US military actions, about how much better the situation is for Israel in the Middle East, and about pending historic arms reduction by the North Koreans. Oh, and about how on fire the economy is. That would be daily front page news if a Democrat was President.

I don’t see how anyone can claim the msm was anywhere near fair in reporting on President Trump(say it with me...President Trump. President of the United States Donald J. Trump)
4   Shaman   2018 Oct 22, 1:30pm  

CovfefeButDeadly says
I don’t see how anyone can claim the msm was anywhere near fair in reporting on President Trump


All it takes is extreme levels of dishonesty and a name that rhymes with “rob.”
5   socal2   2018 Oct 22, 2:48pm  

Quigley says
It's not like Fred Rogers was elected president and suddenly every journalist in the world started inventing bizarre baseless theses of Roger's lifelong cannibalism and wanton necrobestiality.


It's not like Trump voters didn't know they were voting for a Billionaire, New York City playboy that banged porn stars and ran his mouth on Twitter.

Yet the Media still spent the better part of the last 2 years obsessing over Stormy Daniels and Trump's tweets.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions