« prev   random   next »

« First    « Previous    Comments 41 - 80 of 80    Last »

41   Ceffer   ignore (1)   2018 Nov 8, 12:10pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Hope she doesn't have an organ doner permission card. She could wind up whacking a few donees yet. They'd wake up from anesthesia demanding $2000.00 an hour, then die screaming of cancer.
42   DASKAA   ignore (3)   2018 Nov 8, 12:10pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says
MegaForce says

...tell that to the batshit crazy left. Even their own 'experts' are so ignorant of constitutional basics they say crazy shit like this:

Joy Behar said Democrats lost key senate races because of gerrymandering in a segment on ABC’s ‘The View’ Wednesday morning.


I think Ocascio the Neiman Marcus Socialist made a stupid comment about her stopping appointments when she's in the House, too.




"Remember, when you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It is only painful for others.
The same applies when you are stupid."
-- Ricky Gervais
43   Goran_K   ignore (1)   2018 Nov 8, 12:12pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says
Goran_K says
Getting rid of McCain and Flake were huge for Trump.


Those were D votes whenever it counted. Remember the ACA vote!


Of course I remember. Mccain and Flake were the douchiest never Trumpers alive (RIP John).

But now with a solid senate majority, I wonder what Democrats will pull when Ginsburg leaves the bench (by her will or not). I would bet on there being multiple false flag type events happening in a short span.
44   Evan F.   ignore (0)   2018 Nov 8, 12:20pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Goran_K says
Scalia would have lasted longer had he not been murdered by Soros.

Hey TPB, it's not cool to hack Goran's account like that
45   Booger   ignore (1)   2018 Nov 8, 12:51pm   ↑ like (5)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

I'm so glad that this happened after the election!
46   MegaForce   ignore (0)   2018 Nov 8, 1:47pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says
Firing Sessions is a Constitutional Crisis, for some reason, as if the President doesn't have the power to fire from his own Cabinet..


Actually, we had a constitutional crisis over just that. The first POTUS to get impeached was because he fired a cabinet officer Congress forbade him to. Seriously.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Andrew_Johnson
47   MegaForce   ignore (0)   2018 Nov 8, 1:48pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says
I think Ocascio the Neiman Marcus Socialist made a stupid comment about her stopping appointments when she's in the House, too.


49   Ceffer   ignore (1)   2018 Nov 8, 2:34pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Nothing instructs an imbecile better than bribery. Ocascio has a bright future.
50   Quigley   ignore (0)   2018 Nov 8, 2:56pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

MegaForce says
Actually, we had a constitutional crisis over just that. The first POTUS to get impeached was because he fired a cabinet officer Congress forbade him to. Seriously.


From the Wikipedia article you linked:
In 1887, the Tenure of Office Act was repealed by Congress, and subsequent rulings by the United States Supreme Court seemed to support Johnson's position that he was entitled to fire Stanton without Congressional approval. The Supreme Court's ruling on a similar piece of later legislation in the 1926 Myers v. United States affirmed the ability of the president to remove a postmaster without Congressional approval, and stated in its majority opinion "that the Tenure of Office Act of 1867 ... was invalid".[47]

So the very act of law for the violation of which Andrew Johnson was impeached, was both repealed and deemed unconstitutional.
This means that going forward we can firmly discount all arguments that begin with the presupposition that the POTUS can’t fire someone from his cabinet. He can and he has and he will. There’s not even an unconstitutional act in force to oppose him.
51   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 Nov 8, 3:10pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

MegaForce says
Actually, we had a constitutional crisis over just that. The first POTUS to get impeached was because he fired a cabinet officer Congress forbade him to. Seriously.


Everybody in the executive branch serves at the President's pleasure. Congress can't forbid him to fire anybody, nor claim it's a high crime or misdemeanor for him to do so.
52   dr6B   ignore (1)   2018 Nov 8, 3:13pm   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Quigley says
This means that going forward we can firmly discount all arguments that begin with the presupposition that the POTUS can’t fire someone from his cabinet. He can and he has and he will. There’s not even an unconstitutional act in force to oppose him.

You forget that ORANGE MAN BAD, ORANGE MAN EVIL, ANYTHING HE DOES IS WRONG. WHEN HE HIRED SESSIONS, HE WAS WRONG; HE WAS WRONG WHEN HE FIRED SESSIONS BECAUSE ORANGE MAN.
53   MegaForce   ignore (0)   2018 Nov 8, 3:26pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says
Congress can't forbid him to fire anybody, nor claim it's a high crime or misdemeanor for him to do so.


Yet that is exactly what they did for poor Andrew Johnson.

On a practical level, Congress can impeach a constitutional officer pretty much for whatever it damn well likes.
54   curious2   ignore (0)   2018 Nov 8, 3:36pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

MegaForce says
can impeach


I suspect we might see 2 years of hearings and impeachment theater, and the Senate won't remove, so it would replay 1996. Many Democrats feel motivated by 'revenge', 'vengeance', OrangeManBad, whatever, so they will resort to self-destructive behavior rather than trying to make deals with someone they consider the devil.

Also, the House has no role in judicial confirmations. Democrats could try to use House control as leverage in negotiations over judicial nominations, but that would require dealing with the "devil" OrangeManBad. I doubt that Democrats would really prioritize judicial nominations in that way, or make the necessary deals, and besides Republican Senators might prefer partisan appointees.

The election result was predicted by polls but remains disappointing IMO: Democrats got the wrong house of Congress. If Democrats had won the Senate but not the House, then they could not impeach, but they could insist on nonpartisan judicial appointments. Instead, we have the opposite.
55   Ceffer   ignore (1)   2018 Nov 8, 3:57pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Shrill, screaming torrents of raging, tearful psychotic abuse, echoing through the halls of Congress in an incessant flood lasting years, honoring every fake news meme generated about OrangeManBad, in so-called hearings, keeping the HATE alive!
57   Heraclitusstudent   ignore (2)   2018 Nov 8, 5:07pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says
It's time, Ginsberg has to go.

To cling on so with all these health problems is ridiculous at this point. She's 85.


"to go": I hope you meant "to retire".
58   Heraclitusstudent   ignore (2)   2018 Nov 8, 5:12pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Folks, If the SCOTUS is seen as partisan and rubber-stamping policies that are seen as unconstitutional by half the country, then we have a constitutional crisis.
It means half the country no longer respects the institutions overall.
No citizen should want that to happen.
59   CBOEtrader   ignore (2)   2018 Nov 8, 5:17pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Heraclitusstudent says
It means half the country no longer respects the institutions overall.


Ummm..... you are waiting? Though this happened 105years ago in liberal America
60   NoYes   ignore (2)   2018 Nov 8, 5:31pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Prop her UP........Prop her UP!
61   HEYYOU   ignore (20)   2018 Nov 8, 5:50pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

What's more fun than Trump nominating a new Justice?
Republicans' children dying in mass shootings.

Heraclitusstudent says
Folks, If the SCOTUS is seen as partisan and rubber-stamping policies that are seen as unconstitutional by half the country, then we have a constitutional crisis.
It means half the country no longer respects the institutions overall.
No citizen should want that to happen.

Is that the sort of thing that leads to revolution & Republicans' children dying in the streets.

Dumb Democrats appointed 2 Rep/Con Justices,maybe one or 2 more.
I thought Hillary was going to win.
Here something you D.D. need to learn about.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Electoral_College
How does it feel to fuck yourselves?

Independents are winners!
62   socal2   ignore (0)   2018 Nov 8, 6:23pm   ↑ like (4)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Heraclitusstudent says
Folks, If the SCOTUS is seen as partisan and rubber-stamping policies that are seen as unconstitutional by half the country, then we have a constitutional crisis.


What else is new? I've heard Left wingers complaining about the Constitution, electoral college and State's representation as long as I can remember. Especially this week in terms of the Senate. "Why does Montana get 2 Senators the same as California!!!"

Every time Liberals lose at the ballot box it's a "crisis".
63   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 Nov 8, 6:35pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Heraclitusstudent says
"to go": I hope you meant "to retire".


Think it's pretty clear from the context. It's "time" to "go" retire when you have a lot of health problems and you're 85.

Hanging on is just partisan stubbornness at this point. She really should have resigned years ago during her other health crises.

If Trump gets another nomination, that's the Dems fault for thinking they would have a permanent Majority because of the 20% Foreign Born + Native Minorities forever.
65   Quigley   ignore (0)   2018 Nov 8, 7:00pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Heraclitusstudent says
Folks, If the SCOTUS is seen as partisan and rubber-stamping policies that are seen as unconstitutional by half the country, then we have a constitutional crisis.


You really think we’d be better off with 9 Elena Kagens and Sotomayors? Talk about partisan decisions! Obama rammed those two through without any consideration for bipartisanship and they’ve proceeded to vote the Democrat party line.

In contrast, both of Trump’s appointees were widely respected fairly non partisan judges with extensive legal experience and tenure. So far, Gorsuch has stuck to the law even when the result gives a win for the Left.

I can’t say the same for Ginsburg. She’s gone off the rails Left.
66   FortWayneIndiana   ignore (0)   2018 Nov 8, 7:21pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Heraclitusstudent says
Folks, If the SCOTUS is seen as partisan and rubber-stamping policies that are seen as unconstitutional by half the country, then we have a constitutional crisis.
It means half the country no longer respects the institutions overall.
No citizen should want that to happen.


It's always been that way. Obamas court rubber stamped everything he did when it mattered to Obama. All those bullshit impeachments are partisan bullshit at best. Yet half the country supports it. Blame stupid America on the left for that shit show, they are the last once to do it.
67   CovfefeButDeadly   ignore (4)   2018 Nov 8, 7:25pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

socal2 says
Heraclitusstudent says
Folks, If the SCOTUS is seen as partisan and rubber-stamping policies that are seen as unconstitutional by half the country, then we have a constitutional crisis.


What else is new? I've heard Left wingers complaining about the Constitution, electoral college and State's representation as long as I can remember. Especially this week in terms of the Senate. "Why does Montana get 2 Senators the same as California!!!"

Every time Liberals lose at the ballot box it's a "crisis".


Like I’ve said many times, the left creates a continual cycle of hysteria.
68   rocketjoe79   ignore (0)   2018 Nov 8, 7:29pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

rdm says
Quigley says
r the results of Tuesday’s massacre!


Hmm. I thought you were predicting a gain in the House for the republicans? Is my memory wrong? And Trump is scared shitless IMO


Trump isn't really scared. The Senate votes on impeachment, and unless Mueller finds something serious, he will remain POTUS. There will be some antics by the Dems, but nothing serious. At least Pelosi recognizes that fighting Trump isn't the answer. Dems need to pivot quickly to field an actual candidate that could get elected President in 2020. There will be plenty of money, but with DNC leadership as is, I think they won't be able to do it.
69   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 Nov 8, 7:37pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

The Problem is the Dem Base is a bunch of braying vampire moonbats, ravening for blood.

Dems (esp. Obama) think they can turn ID Politics on and off like a lightswitch, dispensing of it when it's not necessary but using it aggressively during elections or confirmations.

Skeletor may not be able to just forget all the impeachment promises and work with Trump.

The Dems played with fire and they've come back to camp to find it's jumped the rock circle the dry grass is smoldering in many places.
70   marcus   ignore (3)   2018 Nov 8, 8:20pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says
Those were D votes whenever it counted. Remember the ACA vote!


Yeah !

Fuck republicans with a conscience or integrity.

Damn RInos !
71   curious2   ignore (0)   2018 Nov 8, 8:28pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Quigley says
Elena Kagens and Sotomayors? Talk about partisan decisions! Obama rammed those two through without any consideration for bipartisanship....


Sotomayor got 68 votes in the Senate, including 9 Republicans. In addition, Ted Kennedy had supported her but was away due to health reasons and so he could not vote.

Kagan got 63 votes in the Senate, including 5 Republicans.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg got 96 votes in the Senate.
72   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (34)   2018 Nov 8, 8:31pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Ted Nugent should show up at the hospital and beat Ginsburg to death with a Stratocaster and dismember her with a hunting knife and eat her heart and accept Trump's appointment to the Supreme Court.
73   curious2   ignore (0)   2018 Nov 8, 8:34pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
Ted Nugent


I'm waiting for the Muslims in the House to detonate during a joint session. We'll need to hose down the building and elect a whole new House and Senate. Whoever wins that Senate election will decide the judicial confirmations.
74   Ceffer   ignore (1)   2018 Nov 8, 8:55pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

You'd think it'd just be easier to sneak child porn onto their computers since the Dem base has so much of it.
Booger says

75   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 Nov 8, 9:14pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

marcus says
Fuck republicans with a conscience or integrity.


You mean well paid by the Insurance Industry.
76   CovfefeButDeadly   ignore (4)   2018 Nov 8, 9:28pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

curious2 says
APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
Ted Nugent


I'm waiting for the Muslims in the House to detonate during a joint session. We'll need to hose down the building and elect a whole new House and Senate. Whoever wins that Senate election will decide the judicial confirmations.


I really like a few Senators. I like a lot of congressmen.

Still this doesn't sound like an absolutely horrible idea.

Someone warn Rand Paul ahead of time.
79   dr6B   ignore (1)   2018 Nov 9, 2:42pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Quigley says

She’s like the Energizer bunny!

An android!
80   Booger   ignore (1)   2018 Nov 9, 3:29pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
Ted Nugent should show up at the hospital and beat Ginsburg to death with a Stratocaster and dismember her with a hunting knife and eat her heart and accept Trump's appointment to the Supreme Court.


Why bother. She's going to die soon anyway.

« First    « Previous    Comments 41 - 80 of 80    Last »





The Housing Trap
You're being set up to spend your life paying off a debt you don't need to take on, for a house that costs far more than it should. The conspirators are all around you, smiling to lure you in, carefully choosing their words and watching your reactions as they push your buttons, anxiously waiting for the moment when you sign the papers that will trap you and guarantee their payoff. Don't be just another victim of the housing market. Use this book to defend your freedom and defeat their schemes. You can win the game, but first you have to learn how to play it.
115 pages, $12.50

Kindle version available


about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions