Differing Reports: Al Jazeera reporting more fact-based and balanced than CNN
The U.S. Federal Government Seeks to Destroy Julian Assange and Wikileaks
The Sexual Assault Case Against Assange
Stating Opinion as Fact: The Russians' Hacked the DNC
Health Problems
The Espionage Act of 1917
How many Journalists Have Been Tried and Convicted Under the Espionage Act?
What Does This Mean for Free Speech?
According to Wikipedia: Critics have accused Al Jazeera of being a propaganda outlet for the Qatari government. The network is sometimes perceived to have mainly Islamist perspectives, promoting the Muslim Brotherhood, and having a pro-Sunni and an anti-Shia bias in its reporting of regional issues
While that may be true, when reporting on Wikileaks and Julian Assange, I think Al Jazeera is more trust worthy than Wikipedia, and especially CNN. I did the research and factually checked out everything in the report. There are links available to western outlets confirming everything in this Al Jazeera story. The story didn't lie, but was the publication trying to spread a certain narrative that was anti-Washington D.C. establishment. Yes, definitely. Still, the truth speaks for itself and and the article showed both sides of the issue, which is more than I can say for CNN.
RT and Al Jazeera can afford to be objective about Amerika. Their oligarchs have different priorities and objectives. I like watching both in YouTube vignettes from time to time, until I feel like poisoning somebody with polonium or cutting off somebody's head.
Differing Reports: Al Jazeera reporting more fact-based and balanced than CNN
The U.S. Federal Government Seeks to Destroy Julian Assange and Wikileaks
The Sexual Assault Case Against Assange
Stating Opinion as Fact: The Russians' Hacked the DNC
Health Problems
The Espionage Act of 1917
How many Journalists Have Been Tried and Convicted Under the Espionage Act?
What Does This Mean for Free Speech?
According to Wikipedia:
Critics have accused Al Jazeera of being a propaganda outlet for the Qatari
government. The network is sometimes perceived to have mainly Islamist
perspectives, promoting the Muslim Brotherhood, and having a pro-Sunni and an
anti-Shia bias in its reporting of regional issues
While that may be true, when reporting on Wikileaks and Julian Assange, I think Al Jazeera is more trust worthy than Wikipedia, and especially CNN. I did the research and factually checked out everything in the report. There are links available to western outlets confirming everything in this Al Jazeera story. The story didn't lie, but was the publication trying to spread a certain narrative that was anti-Washington D.C. establishment. Yes, definitely. Still, the truth speaks for itself and and the article showed both sides of the issue, which is more than I can say for CNN.
FULL ARTICLE AT: https://mojomorning.blogspot.com/2018/12/why-al-jazeera-on-julian-assange.html
Will Powers