patrick.net

Patrick says

some drugs are really really bad for the continuation of national life. (heroin, fentanyl, meth)

It should be up to individuals, and not state, to decide what they want to put in their bodies. Next soda sizes will be limited - sugar kills a lot of people!

Patrick says

"We do not discriminate based upon race or sexual orientation/preference." comment because I think homosexuality has always been a very strong sign of civilizational decline.

Again, none of my (or governments) fucking business what or whom adults fuck. And, Ancient Greeks were fairly accepting of homos even during their heyday. Our Western civilization originates in Greece.

Our store has been banned by Shopify, Stripe, Authorize.Net, and EVO. We are currently in the process of applying for a new payment processor.

"There is NO Silicon Valley discrimination,guise. So Paranoid, Drumpfers!"

For what?!

Wikieditors are cunts:

(cur | prev) 23:42, 13 December 2018‎ SamHiggle (talk | contribs)‎ . . (41,118 bytes) -145‎ . . (Undid revision 873598611 by Tsumikiria (talk). Men's "club" and "organization" are in sources. I only made the genocide view clearer. Feel free to remove it altogether, but do not leave the previous, unclear version.) Tag: Undo
(cur | prev) 23:16, 13 December 2018‎ Tsumikiria (talk | contribs)‎ . . (41,263 bytes) +145‎ . . (Undid revision 873596842 by SamHiggle (talk) These changes in wording do make unwarranted diffrences. "men's group" implies a fraternity when sources does not raise it. All three sources note the org's white genocide narrative and no we're not going to help promote "violent left" lies) Tag: Undo
(cur | prev) 23:06, 13 December 2018‎ SamHiggle (talk | contribs)‎ . . (41,118 bytes) -145‎ . . (Undid revision 873594398 by Tsumikiria (talk). There is no OR. Nothing is added that is not directly in the only source cited for each piece of info. Please read sources before reverting. This preserves NPOV by including important details.) Tag: Undo
(cur | prev) 22:54, 13 December 2018‎ Tsumikiria (talk | contribs)‎ . . (41,263 bytes) +145‎ . . (Reverted to revision 873576234 by Beyond My Ken (talk): Rv ref removal, WP:OR, and undue weight in lead. Can be added to body if necessary. (TW)) Tag: Undo
(cur | prev) 22:00, 13 December 2018‎ SamHiggle (talk | contribs)‎ . . (41,118 bytes) +63‎ . . (clarified misleading bit about "white genocide" view – it helps to say the one whose it is and not suggest there is more when that is not in the source)
(cur | prev) 21:51, 13 December 2018‎ SamHiggle (talk | contribs)‎ . . (41,055 bytes) +343‎ . . (clarified bit about Whites under "assault" from reference – not naming supposed assailants gives impression of exaggerating conflict between races or non-Western culture)
(cur | prev) 21:37, 13 December 2018‎ SamHiggle (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (40,712 bytes) -24‎ . . (fixed ref)
(cur | prev) 21:28, 13 December 2018‎ SamHiggle (talk | contribs)‎ . . (40,736 bytes) -32‎ . . (Undid revision 873576234 by Beyond My Ken (talk). The POV is more neutral, as it does not emphasize exclusion, which was too verbose, less true because of the women's wing, and unfair, as men's groups like Freemason aren't described like that on Wikipedia.) Tag: Undo
(cur | prev) 21:24, 13 December 2018‎ SamHiggle (talk | contribs)‎ . . (40,768 bytes) -495‎ . . (removed unreliable opinion-piece reference that does not state any of the preceding content)
(cur | prev) 21:18, 13 December 2018‎ Beyond My Ken (talk | contribs)‎ . . (41,263 bytes) +32‎ . . (Undid revision 873572625 by SamHiggle (talk) POV edit) Tag: Undo
(cur | prev) 21:03, 13 December 2018‎ SamHiggle (talk | contribs)‎ . . (41,231 bytes) -32‎ . . (fixed verbose, misleading, unfair intro – there is a female wing called Proud Boys' Girls)

The Proud Boys are, quite literally, a joke. It's pretty funny to read a left wing rags take on their "cereal beatings" required to be a Proud Boy in the second degree. I also recommend the comments section on the YouTube video for "Proud of Your Boy" for a dissonant culture clash. At any rate, by the fall of 2018 it was pretty clear that they were very effective at getting antifa to exhibit mobbing behavior, so they needed to be stopped as Jobs Not Mobs was gaining steam with the Congressional election around the corner. The result is the hysterical over reaction in NYC by Cuomo and others.

Patrick says

Proud Boys: Who Are They?

Don't know, but the name sounds pretty gay.

Not that there's anything wrong with being gay. I mean it's 2018, almost 2019. But proud Boys ? Wtf ?

I wonder if a lot of them happen to be in to log cabins ?

Proud of Your Boy
www.youtube.com/embed/DX4YR3ItBsw

SFO gay parade affectionadios...
Patrick says

Proud Boys: Who Are They?

marcus says

Don't know, but the name sounds pretty gay.

BlueSardine says

SFO gay parade affectionadios...

Homophobes

No one is afraid of fags. It isn’t phobia.
People just really dislike those sexually confused creeps.

Onvacation says

marcus says

Don't know, but the name sounds pretty gay.

BlueSardine says

SFO gay parade affectionadios...

Homophobes

I dunno. I'd need to find out if the hazing initiation requires open ass chaps.

That you can see in Hollywood.
Leftists walk like that daily.

The hazing process is walking into Berkeley gender studies wearing a MAGA hat.

Ceffer says

I dunno. I'd need to find out if the hazing initiation requires open ass chaps.

“Let’s not bullshit,” Brian Brathovd, aka Caeralus Rex, told his co-hosts on the antisemitic The Daily Shoah — one of the most popular alt-right podcasts. If the Proud Boys “were pressed on the issue, I guarantee you that like 90% of them would tell you something along the lines of ‘Hitler was right. Gas the Jews.’”

Sounds fucking great, Patrick! Join up! And make sure you tell your gay coworkers your feelings about homosexuality, I'm sure they'd love to hear it.

I do believe people have the right to mess up their own lives however they want. I just don't want them to force the normalization of clearly pathological behavior on the rest of us.

Marriage, for example, exists to protect women with children from abandonment by the father of those children. That is its purpose. What then is the purpose of gay marriage?

My mother used to work at a hospital and told me about how slews of gay guys had to have surgery for extreme anal warts. Look it up, it's epidemic among gays. Not healthy. Sure, you can get other diseases via heterosexual promiscuity, but it's harder to get them, and heterosexual people are not nearly as promiscuous to begin with.

Similarly for hard drugs. OK, fuck up your own life, but don't make it all that easy for younger people to follow you into hell. And it is hell, I see addicts almost every day in SF and they're not happy people.

FortWayneIndiana says

he hazing process is walking into Berkeley gender studies wearing a MAGA hat.

You mean being ripped limb from limb by sumo grade, incensed Immense Hirsute Lesbians? I think I prefer the open ass chaps.

Patrick says

Marriage, for example, exists to protect women with children from abandonment by the father of those children. That is its purpose.

Sure, in like the 19th century. Are you seriously defining marriage as a 'protection from abandonment' when divorce takes like 3 mouse clicks on Legalzoom?

Aaaand I'm unsure as how to respond to extreme anal warts. Are you saying that extreme anal warts are leading to the downfall of our civilization?

Patrick says

Marriage, for example, exists to protect women with children from abandonment by the father of those children.

"exists to use the legal system to husk out men into empty, rattling, shattered resource poor shells of their former selves" There, fixed it for you.

Evan F. says

Patrick says

Marriage, for example, exists to protect women with children from abandonment by the father of those children. That is its purpose.

Sure, in like the 19th century. Are you seriously defining marriage as a 'protection from abandonment' when divorce takes like 3 mouse clicks on Legalzoom?

Aaaand I'm unsure as how to respond to extreme anal warts. Are you saying that extreme anal warts are leading to the downfall of our civilization?

Yeah 3 mouse clicks to divorce rape the man and in addition go on the government role. You think this isn't abandonment? The kids are abandoned by their mother as she forces paternal abandonment on them. Look no further for those future shooters.

Those 3 clicks will cost you 50% of everything you have and will have.

Homos are ruining CA just like rest of liberals. Total garbage.

Evan F. says

Patrick says

Marriage, for example, exists to protect women with children from abandonment by the father of those children. That is its purpose.

Sure, in like the 19th century. Are you seriously defining marriage as a 'protection from abandonment' when divorce takes like 3 mouse clicks on Legalzoom?

Aaaand I'm unsure as how to respond to extreme anal warts. Are you saying that extreme anal warts are leading to the downfall of our civilization?

FortWayneIndiana says

Those 3 clicks will cost you 50% of everything you have and will have.

Homos are ruining CA just like rest of liberals. Total garbage.

Evan F. says

Patrick says

Marriage, for example, exists to protect women with children from abandonment by the father of those children. That is its purpose.

Sure, in like the 19th century. Are you seriously defining marriage as a 'protection from abandonment' when divorce takes like 3 mouse clicks on Legalzoom?

Aaaand I'm unsure as how to respond to extreme anal warts. Are you saying that extreme anal warts are leading to the downfall of our civilization?

Not only this they also ruin the nuclear family that could have been. Having laws like these is detrimental to society.

FortWayneIndiana says

Those 3 clicks will cost you 50% of everything you have and will have.

Homos are ruining CA just like rest of liberals. Total garbage.

Da fuck are you talking about. You're conflating divorce law with gay marriage law.
mell says

Yeah 3 mouse clicks to divorce rape the man and in addition go on the government role.

You're just whinging about divorce law too. Protip: don't like it, don't get married.
mell says

Not only this they also ruin the nuclear family that could have been. Having laws like these is detrimental to society.

Yes because when a gay man forces himself to marry a woman, that's totally going to be a win for the nuclear family. No marriage instability there!
FortWayneIndiana says

Homos are ruining CA just like rest of liberals. Total garbage.

Nah, comments like this are what's total garbage. If you don't like CA, then move back to Fort Wayne. Just stay away from other parts of Indiana, I own a house there.

Wow, this thread sure took some weird twists and turns. My bad (for this first one).

marcus says

sounds pretty gay

Patrick says

gay marriage?

Patrick says

extreme anal warts

Evan F. says

divorce takes like 3 mouse clicks on Legalzoom?

Ceffer says

husk out men into empty, rattling, shattered resource poor shells of their former selves

FortWayneIndiana says

Homos are ruining CA

And I still don't even want to know who the proud boys are.

Without marriage (with skin in the game for everyone) the nuclear family, society and country falls. Affects everybody. Gay marriage is just a symptom not the problem.

mell says

Without marriage (with skin in the game for everyone) the nuclear family, society and country falls. Affects everybody. Gay marriage is just a symptom not the problem.

One of the few things I learned from my college sociology class was that all successful cultures have 3 things in common: family, religion and warfare. Cultures that have abandoned these 3 things end up in the ashbin of history.

Sure, they get replaced my more cohesive, traditional, and expansionist cultures.

I like to bring up Ibn Khaldun's book The Muqaddimah in such discussions, because I think he got it exactly right back in 1377 AD:

The concept of "ʿasabiyyah" (Arabic: "tribalism, clanism, communitarism", or in a modern context, "nationalism") is one of the best known aspects of the Muqaddimah. Ibn Khaldun uses the term ʿasabiyyah to describe the bond of cohesion among humans in a group forming community. The bond, ʿasabiyyah, exists at any level of civilization, from nomadic society to states and empires.[13] ʿAsabiyyah is most strong in the nomadic phase, and decreases as civilization advances.[13] As this ʿasabiyyah declines, another more compelling ʿasabiyyah may take its place; thus, civilizations rise and fall, and history describes these cycles of ʿasabiyyah as they play out.[13]

Ibn Khaldun argues that each dynasty has within itself the seeds of its own downfall. He explains that ruling houses tend to emerge on the peripheries of great empires and use the unity presented by those areas to their advantage in order to bring about a change in leadership. As the new rulers establish themselves at the center of their empire, they become increasingly lax and more concerned with maintaining their lifestyles. Thus, a new dynasty can emerge at the periphery of their control and effect a change in leadership, beginning the cycle anew.

Onvacation says

marcus says

Don't know, but the name sounds pretty gay.

BlueSardine says

SFO gay parade affectionadios...

Homophobes

WORSE THAN HITLER! JUST LIKE ORANGE HOMOPHOBIC HITLER!

Evan F. says

FortWayneIndiana says

Those 3 clicks will cost you 50% of everything you have and will have.

Homos are ruining CA just like rest of liberals. Total garbage.

Da fuck are you talking about. You're conflating divorce law with gay marriage law.
mell says

Yeah 3 mouse clicks to divorce rape the man and in addition go on the government role.

You're just whinging about divorce law too. Protip: don't like it, don't get married.
mell says

Not only this they also ruin the nuclear family that could have been. Having laws like these is detrimental to society.

Yes because when a gay man forces himself to marry a woman, that's totally going to be a win for the nuclear family. No marriage instability there!

Which one of you fairy's are gonna go toe to toe?

Evan F. says

because when a gay man forces himself to marry a woman

Woah, you're assuming that gays are born and not made. (And, let me guess, you also assume the opposite thing at the same time: gender behavior differences are learned and not innate.)

Couple of studies cast doubt on the idea that being gay is something innate. Identical twins are not at all identically gay. So it's clearly not entirely genetic.

Also, boys who grow up near gays are more likely to become gay themselves.

Patrick says

Woah, you're assuming that gays are born and not made. (And, let me guess, you also assume the opposite thing at the same time: gender behavior differences are learned and not innate.)

You literally CANNOT help the mentally dysphoric.