Comments 1 - 20 of 20 Search these comments
Not sure I agree with his prediction of extreme financial turmoil, but the rest seems pretty spot-on.
My view is that Mr. Mueller has run a colossal cover-your-ass operation for the many documented misdeeds among the FBI and DOJ in cooking up this mess starting in the spring of 2016.
Mr. Trump defied the conventional State Department wisdom by meeting face-to-face with Kim.
republicans can't accept science
Sadly, Trump is not an effective leader. Probably only highly toxic and or dysfunctional people can tolerate, let alone appreciate anything about his character or personality.
We'll see. Maybe Russia wasn't a force in the election, and maybe Trump didn't really try to make them a force in in the election. But if he did, that's treasonous behavior.
Lol, the way that Democrats cannot admit there are easily distinguishable races both visually and genetically, or exactly two sexes like everyone's two parents, or that the two sexes have distinct thought patterns?
and maybe Trump didn't really try to make them a force in in the election. But if he did, that's treasonous behavior.
I get it Patrick. Once you voted for Trump, no matter how bad he is, you will try to rationalize and defend it, until the bloody end.
Patrick saysMy view is that Mr. Mueller has run a colossal cover-your-ass operation for the many documented misdeeds among the FBI and DOJ in cooking up this mess starting in the spring of 2016.
You guys are going to go off the deep end, long before the facts are ever even disclosed.
So let me get this straight. Our country is so far gone, that all of the convictions that have come from this so far and will come, are fake news, and there is no such thing as appeals or overturning false convictions in this country anymore ?
We'll see. Maybe Russia wasn't a force in the election, and maybe Trump didn't really try to make them a force in in the election. But if he did, that's treasonous behavior.
Even if Trump is right about Russia and that they should not be our ...
Patrick saysLol, the way that Democrats cannot admit there are easily distinguishable races both visually and genetically, or exactly two sexes like everyone's two parents, or that the two sexes have distinct thought patterns?
I don't personally know any democrats that question any of those things.
These are social issues being clumped in as scientific issues. Let us refrain from muddying the waters
Heck, as long as it is not racial or stupid ( read the wall)
Of all the stupid and "non-scientific" arguments Liberals make - claiming that building a better border wall would be ineffective (let alone racist) has to rank up there as the dumbest.
How about the Liberal belief that a 3rd trimester baby is nothing but "a clump of cells" and deserves no legal protections from being ripped limb from limb for the mother's convenience?
Not sure I agree with his prediction of extreme financial turmoil, but the rest seems pretty spot-on.