Comments 1 - 11 of 11 Search these comments
he cost of cellular should be lower in more densely populated areas such as Europe compared to the less densely populated continent of North America.
PeopleUnited sayshe cost of cellular should be lower in more densely populated areas such as Europe compared to the less densely populated continent of North America.
America has always subsidized the rest of the world in Technology and Medicine.
We pay out the ass for health care and technology so other countries and poor countries can get it dirt cheap.
When i was in Malaysia I got a chicklett phone for $20 it came with enough minutes I talked to my wife everyday for a week.
In Peru I got a desk phone with a sim card for $70 with enough minutes for an hour meeting everyday for 2 weeks.
people will stop using cellphones, stop radiating their brains, stop turning into tuned out zombies everytime their device interrupts them, and stop living in the FB/Instagram matrix.
It means even less competition in cellular, and even higher prices for you, the consumer.
From a logistics and economics standpoint, the cost of cellular should be lower in more densely populated areas such as Europe compared to the less densely populated continent of North America.
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/article223087025.html
Please contact the https://www.fcc.gov/ and let them know you would prefer actual free market competition like other countries have, and not just an even smaller oligopoly.