« prev   random   next »

3
0

Veteran MD Drops Bombshell About 5G Technology Dangers At 5G Hearing

By WillPowers following x   2019 Jan 9, 8:58pm 1,080 views   22 comments   watch   nsfw   quote     share    


Dr. Sharon Goldberg, an internal medicine physician & professor gives her testimony regarding 5g technology dangers specifically involving electromagnetic radiation. She says: "Wireless radiation has biological effects. Period."

She also links cases of diabetes to EMF radiation, but doesn't have time to go into all the effects of this hazardous technology, but urges congress to do more studies on 5G before approving of this, calling it "irresponsible".

Really worth a listen: (5 min)

1   FortWayneIndiana   ignore (4)   2019 Jan 9, 9:06pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

this is scary, should I be turning wifi off when I'm not using it?
2   Patrick   ignore (1)   2019 Jan 9, 9:16pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

You should be paranoid in proportion to the amount of money involved.

There is a metric shit ton of money involved in cellular approvals. You can be absolutely certain that "your" Congressmen represent cellular interests much more than they represent you. After all, how much did you spend on their latest re-election campaign?

Thus, you should be pretty paranoid about 5g.
3   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (38)   2019 Jan 9, 9:20pm   ↑ like (4)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

If your head bursts into flames while talking on your cell phone, consider ending the call and using a landline more often.
4   RC2006   ignore (0)   2019 Jan 9, 10:02pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

I use to do a lot of rf work and totally agree with her. There has also been studies some very old about rf causing damage to the blood brain barrier. Many studies on emf effecting all sorts of animals.
5   Ceffer   ignore (1)   2019 Jan 9, 11:06pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

It's a cool party trick to use your cell phone to flash shadows of your skeleton on the wall.
6   Blue   ignore (0)   2019 Jan 9, 11:20pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Cell signals are all over. Its not easy to avoid. Does anybody know if metallic coated outfit help avoid RF radiation or any other easy mechanism to minimize the RF effects.
7   Hugolas_Madurez   ignore (4)   2019 Jan 10, 11:14am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Blue says
Cell signals are all over. Its not easy to avoid. Does anybody know if metallic coated outfit help avoid RF radiation or any other easy mechanism to minimize the RF effects.


The "mechanism" you're looking for is called "Faraday cage". Look it up.
8   justme   ignore (0)   2019 Jan 10, 12:03pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Basic physics explains the greenhouse effect, yet shitloads of people refuse to believe in global warming.

Basic physics also explains that electromagnetic waves with frequencies below 100GHz are not ionizing (cannot knock electrons lose from an atom or molecule or break chemical bonds, which is what causes DNA changes and cancer). All they can do is heat up your skin by some small amount. 5G is in the 800MHz-2300MHz range, some plans for 4-5000MHz and maybe 27000 MHz (27GHz) for backhaul (already in use for radar and radio links, BTW). So 5G is just heat, not ionizing. Nothing to be afraid of. Yet millions of people believe that cellphones and celltowers are dangerous, and refuse to accept simple physics.

Sunshine is massively more dangerous than cellphones or cell towers of any sort (including 5G ones). It contains all kinds of nasty super-high frequencies. It will heat you, burn you, mutate your cells, and give you skin cancer.
9   HEYYOU   ignore (26)   2019 Jan 10, 12:22pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

At least there is no powution is the water we drink,air we breath,the food we eat.
10   komputodo   ignore (0)   2019 Jan 10, 12:37pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Ceffer says
It's a cool party trick to use your cell phone to flash shadows of your skeleton on the wall.

Will we finally be able to see fully dressed girls naked with the 5G technology?
11   MrMagic   ignore (11)   2019 Jan 10, 12:40pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

WillPowers says
She says: "Wireless radiation has biological effects. Period."


She's right.... Too much to their brains, and people start voting for Democrats.
12   Hugolas_Madurez   ignore (4)   2019 Jan 10, 12:42pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

komputodo says
Ceffer says
It's a cool party trick to use your cell phone to flash shadows of your skeleton on the wall.

Will we finally be able to see fully dressed girls naked with the 5G technology?


No need for 5G if you join TSA.
13   MrMagic   ignore (11)   2019 Jan 10, 12:44pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

justme says
Sunshine is massively more dangerous than cellphones or cell towers of any sort (including 5G ones). It contains all kinds of nasty super-high frequencies. It will heat you, burn you, mutate your cells, and give you skin cancer.


How many people are exposed to sunshine 24/7 like they are to their phones?

justme says
So 5G is just heat, not ionizing. Nothing to be afraid of. Yet millions of people believe that cellphones and celltowers are dangerous, and refuse to accept simple physics.


You mean like the simple physics that CO2 can't possibly heat up the planet?

Maybe that heat comes from the SUN you mentioned earlier??? What a concept!
14   Heraclitusstudent   ignore (2)   2019 Jan 10, 12:55pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

justme says
Basic physics also explains that electromagnetic waves with frequencies below 100GHz are not ionizing (cannot knock electrons lose from an atom or molecule or break chemical bonds, which is what causes DNA changes and cancer).

Are we simplifying slightly? maybe?
For example: what about photovoltaic effect? Knocking electrons with light frequencies?
Also when you say "just heat"... "Just heat" is enough to cook a steak. That's a chemical change involving a bunch of chemical bonds.
A microwave oven uses frequencies around 2,450 MHz and, like other heat sources, it DOES cause some chemical changes. That's why it works.
So it is a matter of power, but less power just means less changes statistically... A given molecule - like a DNA molecule - may happen to be hit the wrong way and change as a result.

Not saying 5G has an effect... but it doesn't appear to be an easy conclusion.
15   Quigley   ignore (0)   2019 Jan 10, 1:19pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Heraclitusstudent says
A microwave oven uses frequencies around 2,450 MHz and, like other heat sources, it DOES cause some chemical changes.


Actually the way it heats is that the microwaves cause a resonance in hydrogen covalent bonds, causing them to vibrate in and out of energy states which causes thermal energy gain.
That’s why hydrogen-rich items heat fastest in a microwave. Like soup. But if you try to heat a gallon of soup in a large bowl, only the outside inch or so of the soup gets hot and must then transmit that heat through convection to the cold interior of the soup.
Or try it with a big bowl of mashed potatoes.

This is why you can heat a steel container in the microwave for a long time without it gaining any heat. No hydrogen bonds to speak of in the steel!
16   theoakman   ignore (0)   2019 Jan 10, 2:04pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Well, the microwave transmits thermal energy to the steak which in turn, cooks the steak. The steak cooks from the thermal energy. It's not directly causing a chemical reaction. If you blasted the steak with individual microwave photons, there would be no chemical reaction.
17   justme   ignore (0)   2019 Jan 10, 2:18pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Heraclitusstudent says

>>what about photovoltaic effect? Knocking electrons with light frequencies?

I'll give you some homework,since I think you will appreciate the physics better if you go through the math yourself.

1. What is the frequency of UV light needed for the photoelectric effect? How much higher is the frequency of UV light than the frequency of cellphone signals? Do cellphones emit UV light? Does the sun emit UV light? Is it now clear why sunlight is dangerous and cellphone signals are not?

2. Heating: What temperature is needed to break chemical bonds? What steady-state temperature will be reached in 1 liter of water (10cm cube) at 20C ambient if the water is subjected to 100mW (milliWatt) of heat? What does the answer (temperature) tell you about whether cellphone can cause overheating of your head or body? What would you rather do, use a cellphone all day all week, or sit once in a Sauna for 10min?

Hopefully, when you have answered these questions, you will understand better.
18   rocketjoe79   ignore (0)   2019 Jan 10, 4:39pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

The new tech is apparently gong to track your phone position in real-time, and used phased arrays to send signals directly. This will require millions of antennae in cities. Will the signal strength be significant enough to be dangerous? I have radio waves (AM and FM) around me constantly, but I don't think they are detrimental.

So, no big deal. If it's just city folk getting brain cancer and going crazy, how will we know?
19   Heraclitusstudent   ignore (2)   2019 Jan 10, 4:44pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

justme says
1. What is the frequency of UV light needed for the photoelectric effect? How much higher is the frequency of UV light than the frequency of cellphone signals? Do cellphones emit UV light? Does the sun emit UV light? Is it now clear why sunlight is dangerous and cellphone signals are not?


yet visible light below UV is not ionizing radiation either. Yet does it not create a photovoltaic effect? Photons hitting atoms excite electrons to higher energy bands where some other effect happens. The point is it doesn't need to be ionizing radiation to even extract electrons.

justme says
2. Heating: What temperature is needed to break chemical bonds?

It depends on the chemical bond and possible reactions. Many chemical reactions just happen more slowly at lower temperatures.

justme says
What steady-state temperature will be reached in 1 liter of water

But we are not talking of heating up an entire body of matter. Some molecules may have resonance with specific frequencies. So while the overall temperature impact on the body is close to 0, the impact on 1 molecule could be higher, and maybe enough to alter it.
20   kt1652   ignore (1)   2019 Jan 10, 5:09pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

I am not too worried about all the EMF/waves around us...yet. But I still play it safe, put the phone far away from my brain when I sleep. I used to work with EE's that were convinced there is evidence of higher brain cancer rate amongst those working around high power EMF exposure.
So tin foil hatter were right afterall.
Magnetic fields too:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-railway-cancer-idUSHO97905220070529
21   Patrick   ignore (1)   2019 Jan 10, 5:56pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Heraclitusstudent says
Not saying 5G has an effect... but it doesn't appear to be an easy conclusion.


Exactly. There is a lot of circumstantial evidence that even non-ionizing radiation is somehow causing cancer:

https://thetruthaboutcancer.com/mobile-phone-radiation/
22   kt1652   ignore (1)   2019 Jan 10, 6:16pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Phone in the bra?
I will look into that.

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions