« prev   random   next »

0
2

DISNEY HEIRESS EXPLAINS TRUMP'S TAX CUT

By jazz_music following x   2019 Jan 16, 9:30pm 1,027 views   16 comments   watch   nsfw   quote     share    


Just keep shoveling every thing of value to the wealthy and

1) they might stop calling you a commie

2) Hyper male super heros will make you feel better about being a beta

3) there will be rainbows and unicorns but less time off work

Abigail Disney explains what the Trump Tax cuts mean for the 1 percent



1   CBOEtrader   ignore (5)   2019 Jan 16, 9:42pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

that wasnt insufferable at all
3   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (41)   2019 Jan 17, 6:22am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

BORING!

A real plutocrat would tell us to hurry up and FUCKING! DIE! the way poor people are supposed to.
4   theoakman   ignore (0)   2019 Jan 17, 6:37am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Clinton signed Nafta....more money for rich people...
5   Elgatouno   ignore (3)   2019 Jan 17, 6:58am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

theoakman says
Clinton signed Nafta....more money for rich people...


Trump signed NAFTA 2.0 which is really not much different than NAFTA
6   CBOEtrader   ignore (5)   2019 Jan 17, 7:16am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

theoakman says
Clinton signed Nafta....more money for rich people...


Removing glass-steegle was outright robbery
7   porkchopexpress   ignore (0)   2019 Jan 17, 7:25am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

marcus says
but isn't it their money?
8   6rdB   ignore (1)   2019 Jan 17, 8:24am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

I'd argue Clinton goal was to bang bimbos in oval office, which is admirable. Also, during Clinton time income inequality rose mightily. Perhaps his goal #2 was m ore money for rich people.
9   ThreeBays   ignore (0)   2019 Jan 17, 8:34am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

CBOEtrader says
that wasnt insufferable at all


Probably she needed to dumb it down a lot for Trumpists to understand.

10   Herdingcats   ignore (1)   2019 Jan 17, 8:38am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

d6rB says
I'd argue Clinton goal was to bang bimbos in oval office, which is admirable. Also, during Clinton time income inequality rose mightily. Perhaps his goal #2 was m ore money for rich people.


All the spikes two in the early 1900's and many in latter part of graph. Will we ever learn that letting too much wealth concentrate at the top leads to a massive crash? There was a crash in the 20's and 30's both can be seen in this graph.
11   6rdB   ignore (1)   2019 Jan 17, 8:44am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Herdingcats says
Will we ever learn that letting too much wealth concentrate at the top leads to a massive crash?

I think most (nearly all) of the policies that left implements "for equality" hit middle class. None of R or D policies hit the mega-rich, 0.01%-ers - they can buy any politician they want, and mega-rich, not upper middle class, are the cause of most problems. If they fail - we have a bipartisan effort to shovel taxpayer's money to them; in good times they have their taxes decreased; they can buy lawyers and tax accountants to stash money abroad, and so on. Even if they would be allowed to fail (GM, and banks should have failed in last recession), situation would be much better.
12   marcus   ignore (10)   2019 Jan 17, 10:38am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

d6rB says
during Clinton time income inequality rose mightily


The stock market going in to the millenium was in a near vertical rise.But it is sad that the surplus he attained ("surplusses as far as the eye can see") was spent on tax cuts to the rich, by GWB. Yes, of course, it was their money.
13   marcus   ignore (10)   2019 Jan 17, 10:40am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

These are the distractions, while the policies of making the rich richer are implemented.

14   MrMagic   ignore (11)   2019 Jan 17, 10:42am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

jazz_music says


Why is Marco Rubio featured in that pic?

I thought this was another TDS thread by the OP.
15   6rdB   ignore (1)   2019 Jan 17, 10:52am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

marcus says
tax cuts to the rich, by GWB. Yes, of course, it was their money.

GWB brought idiocy to stratospheric level with that. Tax cuts + war on credit card at the same time. Perhaps if US is at war, tax rates should go to 90% for anything over 20K. Then we will never be in war unless it is absolutely necessary.
In my mind, first decrease spending and then tax cuts should follow. Not tax cuts followed by increased spending which is how it happens nowadays.
16   6rdB   ignore (1)   2019 Jan 17, 10:53am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

marcus says
These are the distractions, while the policies of making the rich richer are implemented.

Or "Fucking White Males Suck", "Trump is literally Hitler" -- I'd say these are more common distractions.

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions