« prev   random   next »

3
0

If emergency declaration to be challenged in courts...

By Hugolas_Madurez following x   2019 Feb 15, 12:09pm 705 views   15 comments   watch   nsfw   quote     share    


... it will probably make it all the way to the SCOTUS. Which means donkeys will have to finally wheel out RBG's corpse for the whole world to see. Amirite?
1   Tenpoundbass   ignore (14)   2019 Feb 15, 12:40pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

They are safe with Roberts he's a Spoiler sent there to make sure Liberals always get their way.

This is why RGB corpse must be found where ever they are hiding her so Trump can replace her.

If She was at the Supreme Court today, the media coverage would have usurp Trump's EO.
2   SunnyvaleCA   ignore (0)   2019 Feb 15, 2:00pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

RBG should recuse herself, as she has already shown bias against Trump. When is she moving to New Zealand as she promised?
3   TrumpingTits   ignore (1)   2019 Feb 15, 5:40pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

If this gets thrown out by SCOTUS then ALL the other states of emergencies going all the way back to Carter can be challenged. That means their funding goes with it.

So much for the one declared for California's wildfires last year, eh?
4   TrumpingTits   ignore (1)   2019 Feb 15, 5:53pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

CURRENTLY ACTIVE NATIONAL EMERGENCIES
(BY DECLARING POTUS)

Carter
Clinton
Clinton
Clinton
Clinton
Clinton
Clinton
Bush
Bush
Bush
Bush
Bush
Bush
Bush
Bush
Bush
Bush
Bush
Obama
Obama
Obama
Obama
Obama
Obama
Obama
Obama
Obama
Obama
Trump
Trump
Trump: UNPRECEDENTED
5   HeadSet   ignore (1)   2019 Feb 15, 5:59pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TrumpingTits says
If this gets thrown out by SCOTUS then ALL the other states of emergencies going all the way back to Carter can be challenged. That means their funding goes with it.

So much for the one declared for California's wildfires last year, eh?


No, remember the tortured logic of the "Muslim Ban." That "ban" was unconstitutional not because the President was outside the scope of law, but because the judge looked into Trump's heart and declared Trump biased against Muslims. Look for same twist with something like "Earthquakes are emergencies, building a border wall to keep out "brown people" is not.
6   HEYYOU   ignore (26)   2019 Feb 15, 6:06pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

Impeach Trump! Immediately!
7   Ceffer   ignore (1)   2019 Feb 15, 6:13pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Trump said The Wall was to contain dangerous drug dealers, criminals and gangs. Does this mean he is also building a wall around the CIA and NSA?
8   TrumpingTits   ignore (1)   2019 Feb 16, 8:52pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Ceffer says
Trump said The Wall was to contain dangerous drug dealers, criminals and gangs


Like the wall Shrillary has surrounding her house? Beto's too?
9   HonkpilledMaster   ignore (4)   2019 Feb 16, 9:02pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

SCOTUS has been very, very hesitant to second guess Presidents on National Security.

But who knows what Roberts will do.
11   Tenpoundbass   ignore (14)   2019 Feb 17, 2:51pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Hugolas_Madurez says
... it will probably make it all the way to the SCOTUS. Which means donkeys will have to finally wheel out RBG's corpse for the whole world to see. Amirite?


She's giving Dissertations from home.
12   Quigley   ignore (0)   2019 Feb 17, 2:53pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

MisterLearnToCode says
But who knows what Roberts will do.


I’m guessing he will do whatever his oligarch masters decide.
13   SunnyvaleCA   ignore (0)   2019 Feb 18, 12:55pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

HeadSet says
"Muslim Ban." That "ban" was unconstitutional not because the President was outside the scope of law, but because the judge looked into Trump's heart and declared Trump biased against Muslims.

So, instead of looking at the prima facia plain language of the ban, the activist circuit judges became "thought police" and intuited a sinister motive. (Even though the ban applied to people in those countries of all religions and only encompassed something like 15% of all muslims worldwide.) Not surprisingly, much of that ruling was overturned by the SCOTUS.
14   HonkpilledMaster   ignore (4)   2019 Feb 18, 2:23pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

The ban on Anarchist and Communist immigration, and refusing entry to whole classes of people - such as Jimmuh Carter's ban on Iranians - has never been overturned by SCOTUS.

Islamism is simply another -ism the US can ban.

There is no right to visit/immigrate to the USA, whatever Leftists imagine and hope to make real.
15   d6rB   ignore (1)   2019 Feb 18, 2:45pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Obama Condemns Trump's 'Dangerous' Use Of Unilateral Executive Action

"Can you imagine if the president just ignored Congress all the time and used executive action to accomplish his agenda?" Obama remarked. "That would be incredibly bad for individual liberty and the separation of powers the founding fathers so wisely created."

https://babylonbee.com/news/obama-condemns-trumps-dangerous-use-of-unilateral-executive-action

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions