From the article: "Jill Abramson was fired from her job as executive editor of the New York Times"
Then in paragraph #2 we see that, as an executive editor, she wasn't maximizing the company's profits. Instead we have: "Abramson was committed to increasing women’s representation at the paper, and she got results." Maybe she could instead have been committed to increasing the number of skilled writers?
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,183,233 comments by 13,781 users - stfu online now