Comments 1 - 40 of 54 Next » Last » Search these comments
- Rear Admiral David Titley PhD, Chief Oceanographer, a former climate sketptic.
NASA scientists: consensus on climate change cause by humans.
"Global warming is a long-term rise in the average temperature of the Earth's climate system, an aspect of climate change shown by temperature measurements and by multiple effects of the warming."
Onvacation saysI will , when you can tell me the exact date of the Second Coming of Jesus Christ.So when is Manhattan flooding?
Deniers wanna know.
Anyone?
I will , when you can tell me the exact date of the Second Coming of Jesus Christ.It's a your talking point, unscientific question. No mention of timeframe, probability, frequency, severity, confidence level...can't predict when, huh?
Ah, sounds like you equate AGW with faith based religion. Can't say I blame you, as AGW believers are just disciples of the "consensus" Apostles. Science oriented folks would critically evaluate the method and stated conclusions of a hypothesis-experiment-observation approach. Also, one must wonder how anyone could make simplistic conclusions considering the complex fluid dynamics of the atmosphere and ocean, along with the thousands of other interacting factors.
It is rather silly
King tide" is a colloquial term for an especially high spring tide, such as a perigean spring tide. "King tide" is not a scientific term, nor is it used in a scientific context. Wikipedia
Dropping scientiic sounding words like gravitational pull is creative. When did earth's gravity changed recently. Nothing to see here...move along.
One can literally spend 15 minutes and goog ll e widespread evidence of sea level rising, and many other man created climate change
The question is so stupid, only to reveal yourself as a medieval zealot unschooled in the scientific process. I don't waste time to unlock closed minds.
Onvacation saysSo when is Manhattan flooding?
Deniers wanna know.
Anyone?
One can literally spend 15 minutes and goog ll e widespread evidence of sea level rising,
Parting words. Let's consider risk.
Risk = severity of consequences x likelihood (probability)
1. If environmental stewards are wrong, we will end up with this:
Generating energy that produces no greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels and reduces some types of air pollution. Diversifying energy supply and reducing dependence on imported fuels. Creating economic development and jobs in manufacturing, installation, and more.
2. If deniers are wrong, future generations are royally screwed.
As our world becomes warmer and warmer, our seas will continue to rise.
Global average sea level rose by around 0.17 m (1.7 mm/year) during the 20th century.
Back it up. When you state an opinion, like "the rise of sea level is not alarming", back it with sources.
Are you are climate scientist,
I am sure Miami being liberal controlled, j
kt1652 saysAre you are climate scientist,
Are you are?
I have been studying climate science since the last coming ice age.
Come back and debate me some more. You might learn something.
The oceans used to alp the foothills of the Sierra mountians and receded long before men walked the earth-LOLZ Liberals, liberlas!
The oceans aren't rising
Catastrophically.
The temperature isn't rising
Catastrophically.
The ice isn't melting
Catastrophically.
What is a catastrophe is what has happened to science.
That is why I have decided it is waste of time to debate, you can have the last word.
Cite some references.
Comments 1 - 40 of 54 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://climatism.blog/2019/02/22/japan-acknowledges-the-global-warming-pause-sanctions-35-new-coal-power-plants-added-to-the-100-currently-operational/