1
0

Price Out of the Housing Market - NAHB Sepcial Studies Priced-Out Estimates for 2019


 invite response                
2019 Feb 25, 2:16am   1,210 views  13 comments

by null   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

This article announces NAHB’s “priced out estimates” for 2019, showing how higher home prices and interest rates affect housing affordability. The 2019 U.S. estimates indicate that a $1,000 increase in the median new home price would price 127,560 U.S. households out of the market. In other words, 127,560 households would qualify for the new home mortgage before the change, but not afterwards. Similarly, 25 basis points added to the current mortgage rate would price out around 1 million households. The article also includes priced out estimates for individual states and more than 300 metropolitan areas.



The Priced Out Methodology and Data

The NAHB Priced Out model uses the ability to qualify a mortgage to measure housing affordability, because most home buyers finance their new home purchase with conventional loans, [1] and because convenient underwriting standards for these loans exist. The standard NAHB adopts for its priced-out estimates is that the sum of the mortgage payment (including the principal amount, loan interest, property tax, homeowners’ property and private mortgage insurance premiums (PITI), is no more than 28 percent of monthly gross household income.

As a result the number of households that qualify for mortgages for a certain priced home depends on the household income distribution in an area and the mortgage interest rate at that time. The most recent detailed household income distributions for all states and metro areas are from the 2017 American Community Survey (ACS). NAHB adjusts the income distributions to reflect the income and population changes that may happen from 2017 to 2019. The income distribution is adjusted for inflation using the 2018 median family income published by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for all states and metro areas, and then extrapolated it into 2019. The number of households in 2019 is projected by the growth rate of households from 2016 to 2017.

The assumptions of the priced out calculation include a 10% s down payment and a 30-year fixed rate mortgage, at an interest rate of 4.85%. For a loan with this down payment, private mortgage insurance is required by lenders and also included as part of PITI. The typical private mortgage insurance annual premium is 73 basis points[2], based on the standard assumption of national median credit score of 738[3] and 10% down payment and 30-year fixed mortgage rate. Effective local property tax rates are calculated using data from the 2017 American Community Survey (ACS) summary files. Homeowner’s insurance rates are constructed from the 2016 ACS Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS).[4] For the U.S. as a whole, the property tax is $12 per $1,000 of property value and the homeowner insurance is $4 per $1,000 property value.

Under these assumptions, 32.7 million of the 122.5 million U.S. households could afford to buy a new median priced home at $355,183 in 2019. A $1,000 home price increase thus would price 127,560 households out of the market for this home. These are the households that can qualify for a mortgage before a $1,000 increase but not afterwards, as shown in Table 1 below.



State and Local Estimates

The number of priced out households varies across both states and metropolitan areas, largely affected by the sizes of local population and the affordability of new homes. The 2019 priced-out estimates for all states and the District of Columbia are shown in Table 2 (available in the Additional Resources box), which presents the projected 2019 median new home price and the amount of income needed to qualify the mortgage, and the number of households could be priced out if price goes up by $1,000. Among all the states, Texas registered the largest number of households priced out of the market by a $1,000 increase in the median-priced home in the state (11,152), followed by California (9,897), and Ohio (7,341).

Table 3, which is available in the Additional Resources box, shows the 2019 priced-out estimates for 382 metropolitan statistical areas. The metropolitan area with the largest priced out effect, in terms of absolute numbers, is Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI, where 4,598 households are squeezed out of the market for a new median-priced home if price increases by $1,000. This is largely because Chicago is a populous metropolitan area with a large number of households; and, compared to the largest metropolitan areas on the East and West costs, the median priced home is more affordable to begin with. Around 26% of households there are capable of buying new median-priced homes. For similar reasons, Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX metro area, where nearly 32% of households can afford median-priced new homes.to begin with, registered the second largest number of priced out households (3,622). In New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA, 3,613 households are squeezed out of the housing market for a new median-priced home if price increases by $1,000. Compared to Chicago or Houston, the median-priced new home is affordable to a smaller share of the households in New York, but New York is the largest metro area by population size with over 7 million households.

Interest Rates

The NAHB 2019 priced-out estimates also present how interest rates affect the number of households would be priced out of the new home market. If the mortgage interest rate goes up, the monthly mortgage payments will increase as well and therefore higher household income thresholds to qualify a mortgage loan. Table 4 shows the number of households priced out of the market for a new median priced home at $355,183 by each 25 basis-point increase in interest rate from 2.85% to 10.85%. When interest rates goes up from 2.85% to 3.10%, around 1.26 million households could no longer afford buying median-priced new homes. An increase from 4.85% to 5.10% could price approximately one million households out of the market. However, about 423,000 households would be squeezed out of the market if interest rate goes up to 10.85% from 10.6%. This diminishing effects happen because only a few households at the thinner end of household income distribution will be affected. On the contrary, when interest rates are relatively low, 25 basis-point increase would affect a larger number of households at the thicker part of income distribution.



http://www.nahbclassic.org/generic.aspx?sectionID=734&genericContentID=265844&channelID=311

#Housing #Mortgage #Affordability

Comments 1 - 13 of 13        Search these comments

1   anonymous   2019 Mar 31, 4:43am  

Median-priced homes are out of reach for the average Joe in most markets - For average earners, these homes are unaffordable in nearly 75% of markets

A median-priced home too expensive for the average wage earner in 71% of U.S. counties, according to the latest report from ATTOM Data Solutions, highlighting a growing affordability problem that is plaguing the country as home prices continue to rise.

ATTOM’s report calculated the income needed to make monthly house payments on a median-priced home, assuming a 3% down payment and 28% front-end debt-to-income ratio.

The income required to meet these payments was compared against annualized average weekly wage data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Based on this calculation, it determined that median-priced homes are unaffordable for average wage earners in 335 of the 473 counties considered.

“We are seeing a housing market in flux across the United States, with a mix of tailwinds and headwinds that are pricing many people out of the housing market, but also are creating potentially better conditions for buyers,” said Todd Teta, ATTOM’s chief product officer.

“Continually rising home prices in many areas do remain a financial stretch – or simply unaffordable – for a majority of households,” Teta continued. “However, quarterly wage gains have been outpacing price increases for more than a year and mortgage rates are falling, which have helped make homes a bit more affordable now than they’ve been in a year.”

Here are lists of county data on affordability from the report:

Among the counties that were less affordable than the historical average are:

Los Angeles County, California
Harris County (Houston), Texas
Maricopa County (Phoenix), Arizona
San Diego County, California
Orange County, California.

Among those that were more affordable than they historically have been are:

Cook County (Chicago), Illinois
Miami-Dade County, Florida
Santa Clara (San Jose), California
Middlesex (Boston), Massachusetts
Suffolk County (New York), New York

Counties with the highest affordability were:

Warren County (Allentown), New Jersey
Mercer County (Trenton), New Jersey
Cumberland (Vineland), New Jersey
Onslow (Jacksonville), North Carolina
Litchfield (Torrington), Connecticut

Counties where the average earner spends the highest share of income on a median-priced home:

Kings County (Brooklyn), New York
New York County (Manhattan), New York
Santa Cruz County, California
Marin County, California in the San Francisco metro
Maui County, Hawaii

Counties where the average earner spends the lowest share of income on a median-priced home:

Bibb County (Macon), Georgia
Baltimore City, Maryland
Wayne County (Detroit), Michigan
Rock Island County (Quad Cities), Illinois
Montgomery County, Alabama

More: https://www.housingwire.com/articles/48654-median-priced-homes-are-out-of-reach-for-the-average-joe-in-most-markets
2   anonymous   2019 Mar 31, 4:45am  

Attom Data Solutions Full Report cited in comment #1 above.

Median-Priced Homes Not Affordable for Average Wage Earners in 71 Percent of U.S. Housing Markets

Home Prices Less Affordable Than Historic Average in 49 Percent of Local Markets; 65 Percent of Markets Less Affordable Than a Year Ago

https://www.attomdata.com/news/market-trends/attom-data-solutions-q1-2019-home-affordability-report/
3   clambo   2019 Mar 31, 8:52pm  

If you want to do an easy and fast look, just see median home price and median income for a place you are interested in.

If the median home price is 18 X the median annual income, that area is unaffordable to most of the people there.
4   AD   2019 Mar 31, 9:31pm  

clambo says
If you want to do an easy and fast look, just see median home price and median income for a place you are interested in.

If the median home price is 18 X the median annual income, that area is unaffordable to most of the people there.


Agree, what's the median salary in San Fran Bay Area, maybe $200,000? So the median house should cost no more than $800,000 in the San Fran Bay Area based on mortgage rate remaining low like between 3.5% and 4.25%.
5   rdm   2019 Mar 31, 9:40pm  

clambo says
If the median home price is 18 X the median annual income


This seems way off. Do the math
6   Ceffer   2019 Mar 31, 10:55pm  

Unlimited immigration will solve this problem. Toothless people with twenty kids who enjoy squatting under a tarp supported by sticks without running water don't mind any so-called housing crisis.
7   AD   2019 Apr 1, 8:45am  

Ceffer says
Unlimited immigration will solve this problem. Toothless people with twenty kids who enjoy squatting under a tarp supported by sticks without running water don't mind any so-called housing crisis.


I agree. Its all relative. And when you bring Central America to the USA, the USA becomes more like Central America. Its an aggregate calculation or analysis.
8   ForcedTQ   2019 Apr 1, 11:47am  

So basically, if you can afford to Refi into a 15 year fixed it might be the time right now. Given rates dropping recently, and valuations are most likely going to stall out or drop some in the near future. Get out of your monthly PMI payment and put it towards your principal NOW if your shitshack has better than 20% equity from recent appreciation!
9   anonymous   2019 Apr 1, 12:12pm  

Ceffer says
Unlimited immigration will solve this problem


So will continued wage/benefit suppression for the workers to keep those quarterly numbers as high as possible for Wall Street

Lets not bother to look at the people behind the curtain puling the strings and levers when there are disenfranchised poor people around to blame,
some of whom may be on the planet because abortions were not available in their region.
10   ForcedTQ   2019 Apr 1, 5:30pm  

Kakistocracy says
Ceffer says
Unlimited immigration will solve this problem


So will continued wage/benefit suppression for the workers to keep those quarterly numbers as high as possible for Wall Street

Lets not bother to look at the people behind the curtain puling the strings and levers when there are disenfranchised poor people around to blame,
some of whom may be on the planet because abortions were not available in their region.


Their parents couldn't resist the urge to FUCK. That's why they're here. NOT because abortions weren't available. Good grief, have some personal responsibility!
11   anonymous   2019 Apr 1, 6:04pm  

Zillow: California's expensive housing market even prices out the rich - Californians typically spend more than 30% of their income on housing

California’s housing market is so large that it now accounts for a third of the nation’s housing market value.

In fact, since February 2012, California’s housing value has climbed a whopping $3.7 trillion, ushering millions of homeowners into its rich market.

But as affordability concerns impact metros across the country, new data from Zillow suggests that not even high-income households can keep up with the Golden State’s outrageous home prices.

“Even if they were to theoretically put no money down to purchase the median-valued home, a homebuyer in 22 of the country’s 35 largest metro areas could still make their monthly mortgage payments without spending more than 30% of their income on housing. But not in California,” Zillow writes.

According to the company’s analysis, the cost of housing in most major California metros has risen so high that the median household cannot reasonably afford a median-priced house, even with a 20% down payment.

Furthermore, to make ends meet on their monthly mortgage, the average California household would either need to spend far more than 30% of their income on housing or exceed the standard 20%.

“Median annual household incomes in the pricey San Jose and San Francisco metros sit far above most areas: $124,300 and $107,600, respectively, compared to the national median of $63,300 per year,” Zillow writes. “But that extra income is not enough to compensate for incredibly high local home values – the median home in San Jose has a value of $1.25 million, and in San Francisco it’s worth $957,400.”

Zillow notes that even after a homebuyer puts 20% down, the $4,900 monthly payment in San Jose and $3,760 payment in San Francisco still ends up consuming more than 30% of the typical household’s income.

“To bring that monthly payment in San Jose down to $3,108 per month – within the 30% threshold – a homebuyer making the median income in the San Jose metro would need to make a ludicrous down payment of almost 50%, or $614,100, on the median-valued home,” Zillow writes. “To put that in perspective, the required down payment alone is more than the combined values of a high-priced home in Kansas City ($336,200) and Pittsburgh ($266,800) – to say nothing of the entry-level or even median home in those areas.”

Notably, even Silicon Valley homebuyers are priced out, as affording the typical entry-level home in San Jose is nearly out of reach for a median-earning household.

In fact, the largest loan Silicon Valley homebuyers could afford without crossing the 30% barrier would be $631,700, which is 80% of the typical entry level home value of $791,500, and still requires a substantial 20% down payment of $159,800 up front, according to Zillow.

https://www.housingwire.com/articles/48691-zillow-californias-expensive-housing-market-even-prices-out-the-rich
12   Onvacation   2019 Apr 1, 6:36pm  

Kakistocracy says
according to Zillow.

There are 167 houses for sale in Concord and 153 in preforeclosure.
In Vallejo the numbers are 228 for sale and 122 in trouble.
Over in Oakland 549 are for sale and 263 in trouble.

If we can believe Zillow these numbers are much improved from five years ago when Vallejo had 11 preforeclosures for every ONE house for sale. Vallejo is now touted as a bedroom community where you can jump on the high speed ferry to the city.

The City. San Francisco only has 152 preforeclosures and 787 for sale. There are also 1773 rentals available in SF.

It seems to me that a large underclass of renters is being squoze out of ever being able to own their own home in the bay area while a small class of rentiers own multiple properties and have bid up home values to unaffordable.

Squeeze the underclass enough and they will have nothing left to lose.
13   clambo   2019 Apr 1, 11:09pm  

rdm, I did some math.

The example I used was a difficult place; the median home price in Santa Cruz is an astounding $927,400

The median for Santa Cruz County is a little lower.

The median annual household income in Santa Cruz is $61,533 according to google, other data show lower.

So, it looks like Santa Cruz median homes are 15 X the median household income.

San Francisco looks like $1.62 million median home price, and $103,000 median household income. This ratio is a bit higher than Santa Cruz, 15.7 X median income.

This is astronomical compared to other locales, and doesn't even consider property taxes.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions