patrick.net

I think some information is not getting out to the public. Can anyone confirm under what circumstances a woman would be allowed to end the babies life after birth?

I am pro life btw.

WineHorror1 says

I think some information is not getting out to the public. Can anyone confirm under what circumstances a woman would be allowed to end the babies life after birth?

I am pro life btw.

Don't want it, because it will cause stress in her life.

Now of course what they do with the baby is only speculation from here but the options are endless for a Live human being that is off the record and officially never was.
Aborted fetuses don't even get a Birth Certificate. So a baby ripped out of the womb an hour before labor, will they kill it, or put it in a cage and treat it like a cash machine livestock for years to come?

Here's some homework for you. The Liberals are so worried about Coonman's remarks on it, the Internet has been sanitized and all traces of Coonman's WTOP interview where he said if a baby is born alive, we will leave it on the table while the Doctor discusses the options with the mother. Baby could be aborted minutes before birth, reasons even include emotional distress to the mother,(She simply doesn't want it because she's feels She's too young and her life would be ruined.)

Try to Google Virginia Gov. Northam late term abortion interview wtop transcript and check out the 2 minute spin all of the Liberal Deviant Freaks spin it and sanitize it.
But what you wont find is the original transcript or even a video of it now. They are all gone! Especially after he went all Amose and Andy on us.

Elgatouno says

Tenpoundbass says

Try to Google

Qanon.

You got the Transcript or are you just going to throw out Qanon, who I have never championed or promoted?

marcus says

The proper last frame quote should have been. "Abortions to protect the health of the mother have been legal for decades, and rightfully so. That does not mean that all late term abortions, including dilating or born alive, should be legal."

Did you know abortions are supposed to kill the fetus in the womb. They take scissors and kill and chop them up while they are still inside.
This bill was about those that survive that horrific assault should get medical care and not be snuffed out.

Inside it's a fetus, outside the womb it's a baby human being. No longer just a clump of cells.

Tenpoundbass says

This bill was about

A rallying cry for republicans, becasue they are in the awkward situation of defending the all time worst President.

HeadSet says

Abortions to protect the health of the mother have been legal for decades

Yes, it's 2019. It might lead one to wonder, why would prolife advocates be pushing complex special anti-abortion bills now ?

Is it possibly politics, so that for example TPB types can get on their high horse and say that the reason democrats fight some arcane law is becasue they are evil sellers of baby parts ?

This was called the Born Alive Bill, not the stop Roe Vs Wade bill.
To be clear this Bill was about a baby is out of the womb and is a live viable baby that can be saved.
Not let's quibble over what is viable baby. "Oh it has a crooked arm so it's not viable!" that shit doesn't cut it you Baby Killers.

HeadSet says

They spelled "God" wrong.

Tenpoundbass says

They spelled "God" wrong.

And they don't know anything about Noah story or bible to make such comments as they did too.

Democrats hate human race, they think we are hurting their precious planet by our existence. They want us gone, and that's part of the reason they love promoting abortion. I've seen that sentiment among many liberals. A fucking rat and a tree to them is worth more than a human life.

I honestly think in the near future when Democrats start to understand basic science, they will look back in horror at their support for abortion.

Just like we look back in horror at Democrats who supported Slavery, Jim Crow and Segregation.