« prev   random   next »


QAnon Bizarre rightwing Conspiracy Theories with 4chan and 8chan ties

By jazz_music following x   2019 Mar 8, 6:44pm 332 views   4 comments   watch   nsfw   quote     share    

What is QAnon? Explaining the bizarre rightwing conspiracy theory
Do people treat you rudely? Do they try to get away?

The sprawling internet theory, beloved by Trump supporters, has ensnared everyone from Tom Hanks to Hillary Clinton

If you happened to be watching YouTube videos on Monday morning and were struck by an urge to check in on one of Americas most beloved movie stars, you were likely in for a nasty surprise.

Sarah Ruth Ashcraft says Tom Hanks is a pedophile, read the title of the top video search result for the actors name. Tom Hanks Alleged Sex Slave Speaks Out, read another top search result.

Indeed, the top five results and eight out of the top 14 were variations on the pedophilia theme, interspersed with the hashtags #QAnon, #Pizzagate and #Pedogate.

These bizarre results, first spotted by the NBC reporter Ben Collins, are not the result of the latest #MeToo era investigation reporting. Instead, they are the entirely unsubstantiated manifestation of a sprawling rightwing conspiracy theory known as QAnon.

Heres our best effort at explaining what you do and dont need to know about QAnon.

Meet Q

On 28 October 2017, Q emerged from the primordial swamp of the internet on the message board 4chan. In a thread called Calm Before the Storm, and in subsequent posts, Q established his legend as a government insider with top security clearance who knew the truth about a secret struggle for power involving Donald Trump, the deep state, Robert Mueller, the Clintons, pedophile rings, and other stuff.

Since then, Q has continued to drop breadcrumbs on 4chan and 8chan, fostering a QAnon community devoted to decoding Qs messages and understanding the real truth about, well, everything.

What do followers of QAnon believe?

Its hard to say. The conspiracy theory is generally pro-Trump and anti-deep state, but it is not exactly coherent, and like many conspiracy theories is flexible enough to adapt to any new developments that might disprove it.

New York magazine and the Daily Beast have written articles explaining more of the basic beliefs of QAnon, but chances are that the more you read about it, the more confused you will be. Imagine a volatile mix of Pizzagate, InfoWars and the Satanic Panic of the 1980s, multiplied by the power of the internet and with an extra boost from a handful of conservative celebrities.

Wait, celebrities believe in QAnon?

Before she was fired from her own sitcom for her racist tweet about Valerie Jarrett, Roseanne Barr raised eyebrows with a series of tweets that invoked QAnon. Barrs tweets focused on the supposed existence of hundreds of pedophile rings, including in Hollywood, that Trump is personally breaking up.

Another high-profile QAnon is Curt Schilling, the former Major League Baseball pitcher who now hosts a podcast for Breitbart.

Does anyone else believe in QAnon?

Yes, but its not clear how popular it actually is. Joseph Uscinski, a University of Miami professor who studies conspiracy theories, said by phone that QAnon remains a fringe belief held by a very small number of people. Dont confuse the popularity of this with the popularity of Kennedy assassination theories, he said.

Most QAnon followers are Trump supporting evangelicals, Uscinski said, who are predisposed to believe a pro-Trump, anti-liberal narrative. Uscinski also cautioned against treating QAnon followers as any more gullible than other people.

Roseanne Barr has raised eyebrows with tweets that evoked QAnon. Photograph: Julie Jacobson/AP
People believe all sorts of crazy stuff, he said. We shouldnt come at this from the standpoint that most people believe sane stuff and this is just crazy … Like all conspiracy theories, this has a foot in reality.
The idea that the deep state is working to take down Trump might be far-fetched, he said, but chances are there were many government bureaucrats who did not welcome his presidency. As for accusing beloved stars like Hanks of being pedophiles:
Bill Cosby was Americas dad, Uscinski pointed out. Now it turns out hes a serial rapist. So how much should we be blaming people for thinking Hey, maybe theres something beneath the surface?
Does any of this really matter?

Sort of. Not because its true, but because people who believe its true might act on that belief.
People respond very strongly to the threat of sexual violence against children. In 2016, a Washington DC pizza restaurant became collateral damage in the #Pizzagate conspiracy theory. The fear of satanic sex abuse rings in the late 1980s led to many criminal convictions, with some of the accused only being exonerated after serving years in prison.
Indeed, there have already been some incidents where QAnon followers have taken their search for pedophiles into the real world.
We need to be really careful, because we have a history of witch-hunts, said Uscinski.
Can we get back to the part about YouTube?

Sure. Heres the part about YouTube.
For years now, YouTube has been a quagmire of conspiracy theories, the more outrageous and thinly-sourced, the better. Under pressure from the mainstream media for the platforms tendency to promote inflammatory and false information in the aftermath of mass shootings and other breaking news events, YouTube has introduced reforms that it claims will promote more authoritative news sources.
A YouTube spokesperson provided a statement that did not directly address the Guardians questions about the Hanks videos, but noted that the companys work to better surface and promote news and authoritative sources is still in its early stages.
By Monday afternoon, hours after the Guardian first queried YouTube, the search results for Tom Hanks had reverted to videos of the actors appearances on various talk shows. Search for Tom Hanks pedophile, however, and youre back in the world of QAnon.


1   MrMagic   ignore (11)   2019 Mar 8, 7:05pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

jazz_music says
These bizarre results,

Serious question, are you drinking heavily again tonight? What's going on?
4   anonymous   ignore (null)   2019 Apr 9, 3:07am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

8chan owner releases statement on New Zealand mosque shooting

Minutes before the Christchurch, New Zealand, shooting attack that left 49 people killed and 40 injured, a violent and hateful manifesto appeared on 8chan along with a link to a Facebook livestream that would show the shootings. A YouTube video posted 10 days later shows 8chan owner Jim Watkins refuting that the forum or other social media platforms should be held responsible or censored in the wake of the shooting.

Watkins owns 8chan, 2channel (the Japanese board 2channel that inspired 4chan and 8chan), and NT Technologies, which according to BuzzFeed News “manages several web properties.”

In the video, which was uploaded March 25 and as of the time of writing has 396 views, Watkins rebukes calls for heavier policing of hate speech on 8chan, Facebook, and other social media platforms. He asserts that New Zealand police could not have known about the shooter’s posts in advance “without resorting to Orwellian police tactics.”

“All they had to find him was a solitary post on a bulletin board with a link to a Facebook livestream moments before his terrifying and gruesome act of senseless violence,” Watkins says. “This is not the fault of NT Technology for providing the medium to announce his livestream. This is not the fault of Facebook to allow for allowing his live-action footage to stream as it happened. These are just tools that millions of people use daily.”

Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and other social media sites were heavily criticized in the wake of the shooting, with many calling for the platforms to take more firm action against hate speech. Reddit banned two forums containing hateful rhetoric after the attack.

At the same time that Watkins advocated for free speech—the core tenet of 8chan, which is known for hosting gruesome, violent content—he acknowledged that “you are responsible for the consequences of what you say.”

“An announcement of an upcoming murder, giving a time and a place, or maybe even a target, is criminal, is not protected speech,” Watkins says. “Anyone who utters such things should expect to be arrested.”

Watkins said “NT Technology is cooperating fully with enforcement,” then warned “vicious trolls” that “their speech is not protected by law—or me.”


about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions