follow tovarichpeter following
follow tovarichpeter 2019 May 23, 10:31am
600 views 13 comments
The demise of a California housing measure shows how progressives abandon progressive values in their own backyards. ...The basic problem is the steady collapse of livability. Across my home state, traffic and transportation is a developing-world nightmare. Child care and education seem impossible for all but the wealthiest. The problems of affordable housing and homelessness have surpassed all superlatives — what was a crisis is now an emergency that feels like a dystopian showcase of American inequality. ...At every level of government, our representatives, nearly all of them Democrats, prove inadequate and unresponsive to the challenges at hand. Witness last week’s embarrassment, when California lawmakers used a sketchy parliamentary maneuver to knife Senate Bill 50, an ambitious effort to undo restrictive local zoning rules and increase the supply of housing.It was another chapter in a dismal saga of Nimbyist urban mismanagement that is crushing American cities. Not-in-my-backyardism is a bipartisan sentiment, but because the largest American cities are populated and run by Democrats — many in states under complete Democratic control — this sort of nakedly exclusionary urban restrictionism is a particular shame of the left. ...Yet where progressives argue for openness and inclusion as a cudgel against President Trump, they abandon it on Nob Hill and in Beverly Hills. This explains the opposition to SB 50, which aimed to address the housing shortage in a very straightforward way: by building more housing. The bill would have erased single-family zoning in populous areas near transit locations. Areas zoned for homes housing a handful of people could have been redeveloped to include duplexes and apartment buildings that housed hundreds.The bill had garnered support from a diverse coalition of business and advocacy groups, and its sponsor, State Senator Scott Wiener, had negotiated a series of compromises with some of its fiercest opponents. Polls showed the measure to be widely popular. For the first time, something extraordinary looked possible: California’s wealthy homeowners would abandon their restrictionist attitudes and let us build some new housing.Nope. Instead, Anthony Portantino, a Democratic state senator whose district includes the posh city of La Cañada Flintridge and who heads the appropriations committee, announced that he’d be shelving the bill until next year. In an interview with The Los Angeles Times, he worried that the law would spur lots of people to move near residential bus routes, which he suggested would alter the character of enclaves like his.And? Why is that so bad? ...“We’re saying we welcome immigration, we welcome refugees, we welcome outsiders — but you’ve got to have a $2 million entrance fee to live here, otherwise you can use this part of a sidewalk for a tent,” said Brian Hanlon, president of the pro-density group California Yimby. “That to me is not being very welcoming. It’s not being very neighborly.”
At every level of government, our representatives, nearly all of them Democrats, prove inadequate and unresponsive to the challenges at hand
metropolises are good for the psyche and the soul
Blame wealthy liberals.
tovarichpeter saysBlame wealthy liberals.Can't be. Left-wing activists are living in their parent's basements, and 1/3 is unemployed, Goran tells us.
“We’re saying we welcome immigration, we welcome refugees, we welcome outsiders ....” said Brian Hanlon, president of the pro-density group California Yimby.
The article doesn't blame these useful idiots but rather Democrat establishment.
Hugolas_Madurez saysThe article doesn't blame these useful idiots but rather Democrat establishment.You mean the Democrat establishment actively tries to screw its constituency?
prove inadequate and unresponsive to the challenges at hand