Comments 1 - 9 of 9        Search these comments

2   🎂 Tenpoundbass   2019 Jun 13, 3:15pm  

The Closer to truth Trump gets... uh huh..
The Further Dems fall. In one step closer.
The Establishment will fall.
CNN's rating are falling faster, with no time to stall.
The closer Trump gets. The Further the Establishment falls.
3   marcus   2019 Jun 13, 3:39pm  

IF I was going to be really cynical I would suggest:

Biden's recent declaration that he wants to cure cancer, is his way of letting big pharma know that they better be ready to back him just as much as they are backing Trump.

So who does everyone think is behind this raising of the borders in cancer research ? I didn't hear any mention or speculation of how this possibly makes sense.

Is it possible that for some reason, the U.S. doesn't want the world to know how to cure cancer ?
4   Ceffer   2019 Jun 13, 3:53pm  

Trump found AGAIN kicking out the plugs in a premature infant incubator ward. IMPEACH TRUMP!
5   HeadSet   2019 Jun 14, 10:43am  

his way of letting big pharma know that they better be ready to back him just as much as they are backing Trump.

Big Pharma backs Dems more than Repubs.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/key-democrat-leaders-have-pocketed-millions-from-pharma
6   Bd6r   2019 Jun 14, 11:18am  

HeadSet says
Big Pharma backs Dems more than Repubs.


Nope, with exception of 2008 and 2010 they support R's more, but not by much.
https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?ind=h04

It also appears that our congresswhores are surprisingly affordable:
https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/recips.php?cycle=2018&ind=h04

However, Big Pharma gave nearly zero to Trump, while supporting People's Choice candidate Hillary, who was supposed to usher era of caring for the Common Person. Even Progressive Socialist Sanders got two to three orders of magnitude more donations than Trump. EXPLAIN THAT LIBRULS!!!!!! If Big Pharma loves socialized medicine, then someone other must be screwed when it is introduced...presumably US taxpayer and/or sick persons.
https://www.cnn.com/2016/02/11/health/big-pharma-presidential-politics/index.html
7   Bd6r   2019 Jun 14, 11:26am  

marcus says
Is it possible that for some reason, the U.S. doesn't want the world to know how to cure cancer ?

You might be right about that, but with some caveats. I may be wrong, but in next 10-20 years many if not most common cancers will probably be curable with immunotherapies which already work on a substantial numbers of melanoma and kidney cancers. However, developing these therapies is extremely expensive (in hundreds of millions per one drug which will work on one cancer). it is also well-known that Chinese will steal any intellectual property that is not nailed down thus shifting profits from US to Chinese drug companies while the development costs (both initial fundamental science and regulatory) stay here in US. So, drug company calls up their congresswhore and result is what we can read about in OP.
9   Shaman   2019 Jun 14, 12:17pm  

From the article in OP:
“A month after resigning, she left her husband and two kids in the U.S. and took a job as dean of a school of public health in Shanghai.”

Wu got her reward from China, to whom she has always held loyalty. This is how spies retire.

I don’t see the push by the FBI being about cancer research so much as about all research. Chinese immigrants are Chinese first, sending their kids to Chinese school to learn to speak and write Chinese, as well as cultural indoctrination. It’s very important to most Chinese immigrants to preserve their cultural identity, of which they feel proud. If they can help the Motherland by simple exchange of information, that is what they will do, and they’re rewarded for that. It’s a spy game they’ve been being allowed to win for decades.

Trump says no more.

I say Good! Do your own research, China!
Stop stealing from us and then sneering at stupid round eye capitalist peegs!

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions