1
0

New York Times Wants Ban on ‘Sexist’ Air Conditioning


 invite response                
2019 Jul 9, 4:35pm   607 views  1 comment

by WillPowers   ➕follow (3)   💰tip   ignore  

Air conditioning is a sexist and unnecessary luxury that’s killing the planet, according to the New York Times.

You see, per the pro-science New York Times, were we to rid ourselves of air conditioning, over time we would not miss it, we wouldn’t even notice it’s gone because we are pampered Americans who have become acclimated:

The pro-science New York Times, claims air conditioning is sexist:

Come summer, Twitter invariably lights up with charges that air-conditioning is sexist, an engine of the patriarchy, in threads that in turn fire up conservative commentators eager to prove the daftness of the opposition.

SEE: https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2019/07/09/nolte-new-york-times-wants-ban-on-sexist-air-conditioning/

Comments 1 - 1 of 1        Search these comments

1   Patrick   2023 May 6, 10:03am  

https://www.humanprogress.org/the-global-war-on-air-conditioning/


Quality of life is also positively impacted by air conditioning. Learning improves substantially when classrooms are air-conditioned on hot days. Similarly, air-conditioning in the workplace enhances productivity. ...

Globally, the potential benefits could be an order of magnitude greater than those experienced in America, especially considering the nearly 10-fold larger populations living where summers are more intense than in most of the United States but where air-conditioned homes and buildings remain the exception. Lee Kuan Yew, widely considered to be the founder of modern Singapore—one of the relatively few fully tropical nations where air conditioning is common—cited air conditioning as the single largest contributor to its success relative to other countries that have to contend with comparably high temperatures and humidity.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions