patrick.net

Onvacation says

Can anyone tell me how this fits into the climate change narrative?

Easy: "record temps are WEATHER, not CLIMATE, you uneducated racist bigoted KKK nazi pig!"

I wonder if anyone has tried this experiment:

Put plants into a greenhouse environment where you can control the level of CO2 in the air. When the CO2 level is increased, do the plants grow faster? Do plants increase their use of CO2 when more is available? Since CO2 is a trace element in Earth's atmosphere anyway, are plants limited in growth by the relative scarcity of that CO2?

HeadSet says

I wonder if anyone has tried this experiment:

You can't put co2 in a greenhouse. That would cause the double greenhouse effect and your plants would burst into flames.

HeadSet says

I wonder if anyone has tried this experiment:

Put plants into a greenhouse environment where you can control the level of CO2 in the air. When the CO2 level is increased, do the plants grow faster? Do plants increase their use of CO2 when more is available? Since CO2 is a trace element in Earth's atmosphere anyway, are plants limited in growth by the relative scarcity of that CO2?

https://fifthseasongardening.com/regulating-carbon-dioxide

RC2006 says

HeadSet says

I wonder if anyone has tried this experiment:

Put plants into a greenhouse environment where you can control the level of CO2 in the air. When the CO2 level is increased, do the plants grow faster? Do plants increase their use of CO2 when more is available? Since CO2 is a trace element in Earth's atmosphere anyway, are plants limited in growth by the relative scarcity of that CO2?

https://fifthseasongardening.com/regulating-carbon-dioxide

Very interesting article. Since plants have the ability to take advantage of a higher level of CO2 by growing faster, that would seem to have an equalizing effect on increased CO2 production. Still only going from a trace element to a slightly higher trace element.

Onvacation says

Alabama 112 °F / 44 °C September 6, 1925

That was caused by the music of that year.

HeadSet says

Still only going from a trace element to a slightly higher trace element.

Water is well known as a greenhouse gas much more potent than co2.

HeadSet says

I wonder if anyone has tried this experiment:

It's settled science at this point. In fact, you can buy CO2 generators specifically designed for your greenhouse...
https://www.cropking.com/catalog/co2-generators-environmental-controls/co2-generator

From the advertisement: "With little to no outside air exchange, plants can use up all of the generated CO2 gas to achieve maximum growth rates. The Johnson Gas CO2 Generator can easily be installed in any greenhouse with no expensive ductwork and the CO2 is diffused evenly through the greenhouse."

SunnyvaleCA says

HeadSet says

I wonder if anyone has tried this experiment:

It's settled science at this point. In fact, you can buy CO2 generators specifically designed for your greenhouse...
https://www.cropking.com/catalog/co2-generators-environmental-controls/co2-generator

From the advertisement: "With little to no outside air exchange, plants can use up all of the generated CO2 gas to achieve maximum growth rates. The Johnson Gas CO2 Generator can easily be installed in any greenhouse with no expensive ductwork and the CO2 is diffused evenly through the greenhouse."

Sooo, efforts to reduce CO2 in the athmosphere is a GENOCIDE, because it decreases food supply which leads to people in poor countries starving to death.

Hugolas_Madurez says

SunnyvaleCA says

HeadSet says

I wonder if anyone has tried this experiment:

It's settled science at this point. In fact, you can buy CO2 generators specifically designed for your greenhouse...
https://www.cropking.com/catalog/co2-generators-environmental-controls/co2-generator

From the advertisement: "With little to no outside air exchange, plants can use up all of the generated CO2 gas to achieve maximum growth rates. The Johnson Gas CO2 Generator can easily be installed in any greenhouse with no expensive ductwork and the CO2 is diffused evenly through the greenhouse."

Sooo, efforts to reduce CO2 in the athmosphere is a GENOCIDE, because it decreases food supply which leads to people in poor countries starving to death.

Would you really be surprised if that was the actual intent?

CovfefeButDeadly says

Would you really be surprised if that was the actual intent?

Nope.

HEYYOU says

The ignorance of some deniers is a pity.

Keep reading. We will try to educate you. Though 27 have already gave up.

This has been known in Aquariums for a long time. Without injecting CO2 into your aquarium, it's impossible to keep any but a handful of the most hardy plants for any time, and they don't flourish. Takashi Amano ain't in it. Of course, if you bubble CO2 into your aquarium, then you've got to offset the acidification... and a great spiral of water management begins. Not a big problem when dealing with Atmospheric CO2.

It's hard to believe that incredibly miniscule changes in CO2 of a hundreth of 1% is going to cause a global catastrophe, and environmentalists are good at excluding feedback from their models (for example, more rain = more rock weathering = more CO2 sequestration)

HonkpilledMaster says

It's hard to believe that incredibly miniscule changes in CO2 of a hundreth of 1% is going to cause a global catastrophe

Or that 1.5 degree rise in average global temperature by 2100 (or a dozen years from NOW depending on your sources. ) will be the end of humanity.