1
0

I thought I was being ‘blacklisted’ by university colleagues, so I demanded to see their emails


 invite response                
2019 Jul 27, 11:21am   966 views  11 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (55)   💰tip   ignore  

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/university-blacklist-academic-phd-a9016186.html

Blacklisting at work has been illegal in the UK since 2010, but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. It just happens informally. I know, because it happened to me.

I was a recent PhD graduate at the time, and as far as I can tell, academic ‘blacklisting’ plays out in similar ways to the regular kind. When it happens, you generally know something is wrong, although you probably won’t know what, at least to start with. You will apply for hundreds of jobs, but rarely, if ever, be shortlisted. You will account for some of this by blaming bad luck. You’ll tell yourself it’s a numbers game, or the economy is bad, or there are too many applicants chasing too few jobs. ...

Blacklisting has terrible consequences for those affected by it.

I couldn’t stop thinking about what had been happening. I suppose I’m just one of those people that likes picking scabs.

There are new EU-wide data regulations, known as the GDPR, that were introduced in 2018. These regulations allow people to make a data request, called a Subject Access Request, to any institution that holds any data on them. The definition of data is pretty broad, and I was able to ask my PhD college, and several other institutions, to see all emails in which my name appeared in either the subject line or the body of the email.

In amongst the mostly innocuous material that my request generated, there were two interesting finds. Firstly, my eminent and influential PhD supervisor had let it be widely known that they thought I was an unpleasant person, impossible to work with, fundamentally stupid, and that I definitely shouldn’t be doing a doctorate.

They complained vigorously about having such an awful student, but never mentioned the two hour-long interviews they conducted with me before agreeing to take me on. After that, one of my PhD examiners had been asked about me off the record, and had advised against me. They repeatedly used insults and demeaning adjectives to block me from several employment positions and speaking engagements. ...

As far as blacklisting goes, it is a sad, career-destroying fact that a lie is half way round the world before the truth has got its shoes on, and a good official reference is no match for insider gossip. If these senior academics were making these damaging, unprofessional, ad hominem remarks about their student in emails, what were they saying on the phone, or over coffee?


This happens all the time in the US, especially for anyone who dares to question The Narrative. But unfortunately, we do not have a GDPR law, yet. We should.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Data_Protection_Regulation

Comments 1 - 11 of 11        Search these comments

1   Bd6r   2019 Jul 27, 2:39pm  

@Patrick,

this case does not seem to be political. Rather, it is expression of academic culture of current day. Thirty years ago you could write in recommendation letter (which is among the most important documents in applying for job in academia) that "only good qualities possessed by this applicant is her boobs" or that "John is a nice guy, but he is clueless, lazy, and not punctual in anything other than chasing ass". Nowadays, if you do not get hired, you can sue and see recommendation letters even if you have signed release saying that they are confidential. Same goes for tenure evaluation letters. Due to so-called sunshine laws, tenure evaluation letters are becoming more and more positive, thus destroying the whole idea of writing critical letters. Less competent people are getting tenure, you would be stupid to write a negative letter, especially if applicant is a womyn or minority - it will become public and you will lose your own tenured job as a sexist racist who does not understand struggles of oppressed groups. So, very often these days people write a positive letter and then call the hiring organization and say that this applicant is not suitable, which was probably the case for the person in OP.

Solution is to make recommendations truly anonymous for anyone other than people involved in hiring/applications. I usually refuse to write letters in cases I would need to be negative.
2   Ceffer   2019 Jul 28, 12:17am  

I thought blacklisting was a form of equal opportunity. It's whitelisting that is diabolically evil.
3   Y   2019 Jul 28, 5:07am  

the whole recommendation system needs to be eliminated.
SAT lite should be given to every job applicant as well as extensive physical and mental examinations.
Once completed, the complete 250k expenditure should mirror the college 30 year loan process, with a point deducted off prime interest rate for auto-pay enabled accounts.
4   Bd6r   2019 Jul 28, 12:00pm  

BlueSardine says
the whole recommendation system needs to be eliminated.
SAT lite should be given to every job applicant as well as extensive physical and mental examinations.

Will never be implemented, and will never work for academic positions/higher level industrial positions. What would be the point of my students applying for PhD level research/engineering positions at Big Oil to take SAT tests? They are hired to solve problems and develop new technologies, not to solve multiple choice tests. What would be the point for a Caltech assistant prof candidate to take SAT?
5   everything   2019 Jul 29, 8:26pm  

We have open record laws, great, great swathes of government data is public information. And, now it's digitized and readily accessible. NOT.
They'll charge a pretty penny for the records requests.

But, yeah, at workplace, it happens all the time, I just call it the popularity contest, and many people are happy to not be in the club.

Sometimes too, I see it playing out where managers will never hire people that are smarter then them, the ranks get pretty diluted, we see it in government pretty often.

In the melting pots of University, same deal I'm sure.
6   Ceffer   2019 Jul 29, 8:39pm  



JPL. Hmm, where's the diversity memo when huge government projects with millions/billions of dollars and scientific expertise are on the line? Do I see a strange trend toward Asians and Caucasians?
7   RC2006   2019 Jul 29, 8:45pm  

Go to JPL open house it's one of the few events that are free and mostly whites and Asians show up.
8   Patrick   2019 Jul 29, 8:52pm  

I was just there. True, mostly whites and Asians. They are the ones more into science.
9   Ceffer   2019 Jul 29, 9:45pm  

Could this be a selective conspiracy of the Great Socialist Paradise? Did Netflix lie to me? I'm shattered, shattered I say.
10   Patrick   2019 Jul 29, 9:49pm  

Sit down son.

Those black women who were "essential" to the space program? Well, pretty much anyone could have done their jobs, and they really didn't do all that much.

Sorry to break it to you so bluntly, but it's the truth.

https://gulfcoastcommentary.blogspot.com/2017/06/the-movie-hidden-figures-is-fake-history.html
11   Ceffer   2019 Jul 29, 9:55pm  

Patrick says
Sorry to break it to you so bluntly, but it's the truth.


Son, the Great Socialist Paradise Mythology boundary lines are over there. Please return and stay between the lines, or you might need an ice pick with a sweep into the roof of your eye socket for your own protection.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions