4
0

"California Should Be Embarrassed" - State Passes Law Banning Trump From Ballot Unless Tax Returns Released


 invite response                
2019 Jul 30, 4:08pm   2,063 views  18 comments

by WillPowers   ➕follow (3)   💰tip   ignore  

I predicted when this bill passed California's assembly, Newsom would sign it and now he has:

On Tuesday, Calif. Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill requiring President Trump to either release his tax returns or he won't appear on the ballot in the state.

Newsom argued that, as the largest economic engine within the US, California has a "responsibility" to demand this additional information (for the record: the Constitution doesn't say anything about candidates releasing tax returns - though the federal income tax didn't exist back on).

"As one of the largest economies in the world and home to one in nine Americans eligible to vote, California has a special responsibility to require this information of presidential and gubernatorial candidates," Newsom said.

"These are extraordinary times and states have a legal and moral duty to do everything in their power to ensure leaders seeking the highest offices meet minimal standards, and to restore public confidence. The disclosure required by this bill will shed light on conflicts of interest, self-dealing, or influence from domestic and foreign business interest."

A Trump campaign spokesman called the new law "unconstitutional," and insisted that there was a good reason why California's last governor, Jerry Brown, refused to sign the legislation.

In a statement, Trump campaign spokesman Tim Murtaugh called the move "unconstitutional."

"There are very good reasons why the very liberal Gov. Jerry Brown vetoed this bill two years ago - it's unconstitutional and it opens up the possibility for states to load up more requirements on candidates in future elections. What's next, five years of health records?" he said.

Murtaugh said states cannot add requirements to presidential candidates' qualifications for running.

"The Constitution is clear on the qualifications for someone to serve as president and states cannot add additional requirements on their own," he said. "The bill also violates the 1st Amendment right of association since California can't tell political parties which candidates their members can or cannot vote for in a primary election."

SEE: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-30/california-should-be-embarrassed-state-passes-law-banning-trump-ballot-unless-tax

As Breitbart reports, this legislation will certainly be challenged in the courts and be struck down. However, the news outlet added, this is a win for Newsom as it will bring him national attention and embolden other states to do likewise.

Comments 1 - 18 of 18        Search these comments

1   RC2006   2019 Jul 30, 5:10pm  

Awesome win win for Trump dems are such stupid fucks. California should have its ballots trashed and not counted or now Trump has an even bigger excuse for not wining popular vote and why we need electoral college. It will be struck down and CA liberals look even more crazy to the rest of the country.
2   Ceffer   2019 Jul 30, 5:51pm  

I think the last time California was embarrassed was 1932. Since then, it has been pure audacious flaunt. That has now morphed into routine, idiotic audacious flaunt.

Generalissimo Gavin of the Banana Republic of California.
3   Jimbo in SF   2019 Jul 31, 7:15pm  

Could this invalidate the entire CA election results for being unconstitutional and exclude it from being counted along with other states?
4   SunnyvaleCA   2019 Jul 31, 7:23pm  

That'll get shot down in federal court. Net result... I, as a California taxpayer, will pay for California lawyers to fight with federal lawyers, which I'll also pay for. Well, at least some California politicians can virtue-signal! Thanks California!
5   HeadSet   2019 Jul 31, 8:06pm  

If it were not the tax returns, they would have found another excuse to try and thwart the actual election of a President they do not want.
6   SunnyvaleCA   2019 Aug 1, 5:19pm  

OccasionalCortex says
SunnyvaleCA says
That'll get shot down in federal court.

Why?

Well, try this on for size:
"federal law keeps tax returns confidential, and California cannot force a candidate to waive his or her rights under that law"
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/can-a-california-law-requiring-trump-to-disclose-his-tax-returns-survive-legal-challenges/ar-AAF94FA

Honestly, I think it would help Trump in the re-election if California won and was able to exclude him from the ballot. Trump is surely not going to win California, so it won't hurt him directly. Indirectly, it might gin up additional support in other states that would vote for Trump just to spite California.
7   Ceffer   2019 Aug 1, 5:32pm  

California has had it clear in the most arrogant and direct manner that it does not feel constrained to follow Federal Law AT ALL. Only the rainbow-hair-with-secretary-glasses Ninth Circuit if it happens to agree with them already.
9   Shaman   2019 Aug 2, 9:22am  

I just re-registered to vote in California as a Democrat instead of a Republican.
It’s the only rational choice left to me, since it only matters for Presidential primaries, and I won’t be able to vote Trump on the primary thanks to rigged Democrat legislation.
I would encourage every other California Republican to re-register as a Democrat also, so you can express your feelings about the Democrat candidates. Maybe we can all decide to vote for the perfect spoiler candidate and really mess up California’s primary process!
Anyone else all in?
10   SunnyvaleCA   2019 Aug 2, 2:08pm  

OccasionalCortex says
That only applies to the elections for federal offices itself (general elections). They are not imposing this for access to the general ballot.

California cannot deny citizens their constitutional rights (even though they try to in many cases). So, this argument holds: "federal law keeps tax returns confidential, and California cannot force a candidate to waive his or her rights under that law"
11   HeadSet   2019 Aug 2, 2:16pm  

Maybe we can all decide to vote for the perfect spoiler candidate and really mess up California’s primary process!

Do the Dems still have that "super-delegate" system to make sure the approved candidate wins?
12   MisdemeanorRebel   2019 Aug 2, 2:30pm  

HeadSet says
Do the Dems still have that "super-delegate" system to make sure the approved candidate wins?


Tee hee!

The Old Guard and the Neoliberals are very happy about it... just wait until the dumbass base "rediscovers" it.

Lefties have VERY short memories.
13   Booger   2019 Aug 2, 3:12pm  

Presumably California Democrats believe that Trump will win in California, or they would not be doing this.
14   Shaman   2019 Aug 2, 3:49pm  

OccasionalCortex says
If Maryanne Psychic Wacko is still in the race, I think she should be the one we all vote for. Barring that, Bernie for sure!


I think the best idea is to vote for whoever is the worst candidate but also has a shot at the nomination. So out of Biden and Kamala, vote Kamala. If it’s down to Bernie and Warren, vote Bernie. If a few million California Republicans switch parties for the primary, it will be a simple matter to sway the election and the state’s massive number of delegates toward the most left-leaning and crazy candidate.
15   MisdemeanorRebel   2019 Aug 2, 5:08pm  

OccasionalCortex says
So the supers still exist...but just don't vote UNLESS nobody wins the first round of voting. So if the first round of voting is all messed up because of all these candidates with delegates here and there do not produce a winner, THEN the supers get to vote starting on the 2nd round and all those after that.


I got a feeling it will be a 3,4,5 way race going into Super Tuesday and there won't be clear winners.

Because there will be no "50+1" candidate in most state primaries, the Superdelegates will shift for the "insider" candidate, and the other candidate's supporters will howl.

It'll be a huge crack in the Democratic Party...
17   HeadSet   2019 Aug 3, 1:03pm  

Show me where it is written in the Constitution that there is a right to keep tax returns confidential

4th Amendment:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

"Papers" is key here. No gov has a right to seize documents without probable cause of a crime.
18   FortWayneAsNancyPelosiHaircut   2019 Aug 3, 3:28pm  

CA has gone over to total leftist mindset, there is no shame, just politicians and their media telling people what to think around here.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions