« prev   random   next »

0
0

What the second amendment actually says

By tovarichpeter following x   2019 Aug 11, 7:18am 199 views   10 comments   watch   nsfw   quote     share    


1   Tenpoundbass   ignore (14)   2019 Aug 11, 7:52am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Libsplaining, because Socialism isn't going to vote for its self.
2   marcus   ignore (10)   2019 Aug 11, 8:12am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Tenpoundbass says
Socialism isn't going to vote for its self


What kind of moron thinks that the guns that citizens are allowed to have is going to have anything to do with how much "socialism" we end up with ?
3   HonkpilledMaster   ignore (5)   2019 Aug 11, 8:24am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Right to keep (own), and bear (possess on your person, not at a gun club)... arms.

Nowhere in the English language does "Bear" mean "Locked up 5 miles away at the National Guard Armory"
4   Quigley   ignore (0)   2019 Aug 11, 8:40am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

So we’ve had a few bad Chief justices. What’s your point?
5   Reality   ignore (5)   2019 Aug 11, 9:31am   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

marcus says
What kind of moron thinks that the guns that citizens are allowed to have is going to have anything to do with how much "socialism" we end up with ?


Citizens are allowed and often required to bear arms. Slaves, serfs and Helots are not allowed to bear arms. Socialism is essentially an ideology of turning the general public into Helots: state-owned slaves; i.e. slaves that are not owned by any individual as property therefore not cared for by anyone. The difference between a Slave vs. a Helot is analogous to your own car (which you take good care of) vs. a rental car (which you don't take good care of), and your own house vs. rental housing. Socialist bureaucrats have much less incentive in taking good care of the helots under their charge than a private slave owner would have in taking care of his own property.
6   Tenpoundbass   ignore (14)   2019 Aug 11, 9:34am   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

marcus says
What kind of moron thinks that the guns that citizens are allowed to have is going to have anything to do with how much "socialism" we end up with ?


It's Man thing Marcus, don't worry about it. It's above your "T" grade.
7   HEYYOU   ignore (31)   2019 Aug 11, 10:28am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Guns are good! Easiest tool to kill Rep/Cons & they are in favor of guns which can be used to kill their loved ones. They will continue to die.
Stupid fucks voted for Trump background checks. If Rep/Cons didn't want gun control they would arm themselves & march on Washington,NOW!
How long before Trump confiscates guns?
8   HEYYOU   ignore (31)   2019 Aug 11, 10:44am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

I think this is what it says

"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

It's an Amendment! The only way to change it is another Amendment.
No where does it say any State can add infringements,fees, require any personal history or restrict where or how Americans can carry their arms.
Red State Rep/Cons have already started the destruction of the 2nd with all their unconstitutional State gun laws.
Now their shit leader wants to infringe on the 2nd with unconstitutional nationwide background checks.
What can one expect from America hating Rep/Cons? The worst!
When Rep/Cons destroy America they will say,"DOH! What happened?
9   Iranian_Oil_Burse   ignore (5)   2019 Aug 12, 5:26pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

SCOTUS disagrees with that guy. Read DC vs Heller decision.
10   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (41)   2019 Aug 12, 6:19pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

The constitution is perfectly clear:

OPEN! FIRE!

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions