« prev   random   next »

3
0

Politifact and Snopes are not reliable they missed 96 percent of the Russiagate Witch hunt hoax due to their partisan bias.

By Tenpoundbass following x   2019 Aug 13, 5:52am 107 views   4 comments   watch   nsfw   quote     share    


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/08/fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-politifact-and-snopes-flagged-only-4-of-fake-news-stories-from-mueller-witch-hunt-missed-96-of-the-fake-news/

Fact-Checking the Fact-Checkers: Politifact and Snopes Flagged ONLY 4% of Fake News Stories from Mueller Witch Hunt — MISSED 96% OF THE FAKE NEWS

We are told the Trump-Russia Collusion hoax was the greatest political scandal in US history.
Several officials with knowledge of the Deep State spying on the Trump campaign and Trump administration tell us “you can’t believe what’s coming out.”

It is also clear at this point that around 90% of the mainstream liberal media outlets bought into the hoax and sold it to the American public.
And now there is proof that even the far left “fact-checkers” bought into the deep state lies.
They were all wrong.

Remember this next time you hear the liberal media quote one of these two far left publishers.
1   marcus   ignore (10)   2019 Aug 13, 1:14pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

:
If this were not bullshit, you would think they would give a few examples. When someone writes an opinion piece about Trumps possible involvement possibly extendning beyond his public request of Russia to hack Hillary's emails, or hypotheses about Trump's sons meeting with Russians, it's known that those are speculation to any competant reader.

The Mueller report was tasked with investigating Russian attempts to influence the 2016 election. There are plenty of facts that were a justification for the investigation.

I don't recall facts that implicated Trump that were later proved to be fake news.

That gateway pundit nonsense is nothing more than a stupid attempt to discredit the investigation. Otherwise they would easily cite some juicy lies that were reported as facts. That political didn't catch. Not a single example.

You know, the kind of stuff that Trump and his supporters do every day.
2   SunnyvaleCA   ignore (0)   2019 Aug 13, 3:34pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

marcus says
If this were not bullshit, you would think they would give a few examples.

The article gives a link to this well-document list of clear mistakes: https://sharylattkisson.com/2019/01/50-media-mistakes-in-the-trump-era-the-definitive-list/
Better now?
3   marcus   ignore (10)   2019 Aug 13, 3:59pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

:
Brilliant, you did a google search on media mistakes (alleged) on Trump. But you were too lazy to find a single simple significant example of a fact that was reported about Trump collusion or obstruction related to Mueller investigation that fact checkers should have caught as being incorrect.

I won't be holding my breath.
4   HEYYOU   ignore (31)   2019 Aug 13, 5:17pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

marcus says
a single simple significant example of a fact


We've be having none of that on patnet! ;-)

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions