« prev   random   next »
1   HeadSet   ignore (2)   2019 Sep 8, 6:52pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

a bill now making its way to the desk of Gov. Gavin Newsom that would prohibit public and charter schools in California from expelling, or even suspending, students who disrupt the learning process or defy the authority of teachers, administrators and other school officials.

Why do you keep electing these people?
2   TrumpingTits   ignore (2)   2019 Sep 8, 7:44pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

I am surprised this is making it past the powerful teacher's union lobby.

This is rank moronity:

The goal of the bill — which is sponsored by Sen. Nancy Skinner, D-Berkeley, and the Alliance for Boys and Men of Color — is to protect kids from excessive discipline in schools. The alliance is counting on the assumption that reducing discipline will result in “an increase in positive outcomes for students and the communities in which they live.”


And I just love how this article blames it on the GOP.
3   WineHorror1   ignore (1)   2019 Sep 8, 7:54pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

If you have school aged children in California...MOVE NOW!!!
4   CovfefeButDeadly   ignore (5)   2019 Sep 8, 8:09pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

HeadSet says
a bill now making its way to the desk of Gov. Gavin Newsom that would prohibit public and charter schools in California from expelling, or even suspending, students who disrupt the learning process or defy the authority of teachers, administrators and other school officials.

Why do you keep electing these people?


I don't, but Marcus does.
5   CovfefeButDeadly   ignore (5)   2019 Sep 8, 8:10pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TrumpingTits says
I am surprised this is making it past the powerful teacher's union lobby.

This is rank moronity:

The goal of the bill — which is sponsored by Sen. Nancy Skinner, D-Berkeley, and the Alliance for Boys and Men of Color — is to protect kids from excessive discipline in schools. The alliance is counting on the assumption that reducing discipline will result in “an increase in positive outcomes for students and the communities in which they live.”


And I just love how this article blames it on the GOP.


How in the universe can you blame Republicans for ANY of California's woes? They haven't held significant state office in over a decade, and havent controlled the largest school boards in at least 30-40 years, if not a half century.
6   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (43)   2019 Sep 8, 8:12pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

HEAD! SHOT!s FOR! TARDS!
7   RC2006   ignore (4)   2019 Sep 8, 8:18pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Race to the bottom, in this case ghetto thugs.
9   Fortwaynemobile   ignore (2)   2019 Sep 8, 8:26pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Might not be bad at the end. Ca needs to relearn the reasons for conservative culture they are trying so hard to destroy.
10   Ceffer   ignore (3)   2019 Sep 9, 5:27pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

California schools with some exceptions are now nothing more than an elaborate political patronage and welfare system. It only makes pretenses to teach, and I doubt the teachers in many areas are much smarter than the students. A lot of the schools are violent, chaotic baby sitting arenas spewing socialist agitprop, until the girls get old enough to get knocked up and collect their first welfare checks.

If you can't remove the disruptive elements from the learning situation, there will be no learning plain and simple. You can bet your bottom dollar that the LibbFuck Royalty send their kids to schools, usually private, where there is discipline and recognizance.
11   Fortwaynemobile   ignore (2)   2019 Sep 9, 5:47pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Ceffer says
California schools with some exceptions are now nothing more than an elaborate political patronage and welfare system. It only makes pretenses to teach, and I doubt the teachers in many areas are much smarter than the students. A lot of the schools are violent, chaotic baby sitting arenas spewing socialist agitprop, until the girls get old enough to get knocked up and collect their first welfare checks.

If you can't remove the disruptive elements from the learning situation, there will be no learning plain and simple. You can bet your bottom dollar that the LibbFuck Royalty send their kids to schools, usually private, where there is discipline and recognizance.


In celebrity schools teachers are afraid of students too. Parents are too ducking spoiled and spend so much that they feel entitled.

Some schools are good, but that’s not the norm, good schools are an outlier.
12   Ceffer   ignore (3)   2019 Sep 9, 6:09pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Fortwaynemobile says
In celebrity schools teachers are afraid of students too

Probably, when the parents are rich and powerful enough to crumple and throw any old person into oblivion and poverty. That's why they call them 'Royalty'. However, even the rich and powerful know that their children need to stay still and pay attention in order to learn, and there needs to be a system in place to assure that.

My high school had a Vietnam memorial to fallen students. Beverly Hills High had a 'Rehab and Overdose' memorial to the spoiled rich kids who bit the dust from precocious life in the fast lane, and there weren't just a few of them.

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions