0
0

Can't refinance under water


 invite response                
2007 May 3, 4:35am   23,983 views  283 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (55)   💰tip   ignore  

underwater houses

During the boom, if borrowers asked about the adjustable rates on their mortgages, they were told "oh, you can just refinance and start over".

But no one told them you can't refinance if your house is under water, that is, if the loan amount is more than the value of the house. Banks won't go for that, even in the continuing lax lending environment.

So their rates will adjust upward, and they won't be able to pay the mortgage, or refinance, or sell for what they paid.

Interesting times ahead.

Patrick

#housing

Comments 1 - 40 of 283       Last »     Search these comments

1   HARM   2007 May 3, 4:40am  

Nice graphic!

2   Peter P   2007 May 3, 4:44am  

Usually when I brought this fact up, they would respond with the "cannot go down in value" crap.

3   HARM   2007 May 3, 4:48am  

Technically, there is another possiblity: the banks could voluntarily, or not-so-voluntarily (new MA law), do a work-out with the FB to avoid foreclosure. They could offer a fixed-rate loan with a below-market rate --say 4.5%. Or, they could "forgive" a good chunk of the principal and write off the loss.

4   sfbubblebuyer   2007 May 3, 4:53am  

We should have "Mortgage Amnesty Month"

Mail your keys in that month, and you get no credit hit.

Take THAT you fatcat bankers! :D

5   Peter P   2007 May 3, 4:53am  

It is becoming apparent that the housing bubble is teaching a lesson: it does not pay to be responsible. Misbehaviors committed by sheeple will be heftily rewarded.

6   diwakarc   2007 May 3, 4:54am  

May be it won't go down after all. Instead we may run into hyper-inflation.

7   Peter P   2007 May 3, 4:55am  

Anyway, bailing out borrowers with punishing new regulations is a good thing for bubbleheads. It will greatly disincentivize future irresponsible lending and credit will dry up quickly.

8   cb   2007 May 3, 4:56am  

A lot people even when they refinance don't know that they are re-amortizing the loan, so even if the rates are lower, it might not make sense. But then again, a lot of FB's just try to extract cash and look at monthly payments. The government should mandate the commercials or ads to say something like "over the course of xxx years, you would have paid xxx dollars more."

9   Peter P   2007 May 3, 4:56am  

Instead we may run into hyper-inflation.

More like hyper-stagflation.

10   diwakarc   2007 May 3, 4:59am  

Hyper-stagflation is possible.

11   Peter P   2007 May 3, 5:00am  

A lot people even when they refinance don’t know that they are re-amortizing the loan

A lot of people do not even care if they are amortizing the loan.

12   HARM   2007 May 3, 5:04am  

Bloomberg just borrowed a Patrick.net favorite term (coined by Peter P, as I recall):

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&refer=columnist_gilbert&sid=ajV.07kGzMOE

Ninja Loans

You might have expected renewed caution among lenders after the willingness of some U.S. mortgage companies to grant so- called Ninja loans -- No Income, No Job or Assets -- triggered the collapse of the U.S. subprime mortgage market and helped sink an armada of companies.

Peter P,

Did you trademark this term? Should you ask for royalties? ;-)

13   Peter P   2007 May 3, 5:05am  

HARM, I did not coin the term. It pre-existed my comments. :)

14   HARM   2007 May 3, 5:06am  

A lot of people do not even care if they are amortizing the loan

A lot of GBFs (greedy Boomer f*cks) would just pass their debts onto their children and grandchildren if the law allowed them to.

15   Peter P   2007 May 3, 5:08am  

A lot of GBFs (greedy Boomer f*cks) would just pass their debts onto their children and grandchildren if the law allowed them to.

The motto is: live rich and die broke.

16   diwakarc   2007 May 3, 5:13am  

A lot of people do not even care if they are amortizing the loan.

A lot of people don't know what is amortization.

I know individuals who just care about the low monthly payments and not about how much of the loan they are actually repaying.

17   Peter P   2007 May 3, 5:14am  

I know individuals who just care about the low monthly payments and not about how much of the loan they are actually repaying.

And not even about how much the monthly payments will be in the future.

18   e   2007 May 3, 5:44am  

A lot of GBFs (greedy Boomer f*cks) would just pass their debts onto their children and grandchildren if the law allowed them to.

They're half way there already with Prop 13 and Social Security.

It's too bad young people are too busy working to vote. They'll always be screwed.

19   DinOR   2007 May 3, 5:44am  

Well shiver me timbers! Are those barnacles I see forming on your gutters, matey!

Pffftt. Anyone got a snorkle extenstion? Wait, that'll be the next Mortgage Broker advertising ploy!

Hello there Mr. and Mrs. FB! I'm Diver Dan, the under water re-financin' man! (gurgle, gurgle) If you're underwater on your home loans WE CAN HELP! Just tie a message to a tuna and we'll come a' paddling! :)

20   Jimbo   2007 May 3, 5:46am  

The motto is: live rich and die broke.

I don't see anything wrong with this, if you can pull if off. I don't feel like I have any great obligation to give my children a life of trust funded luxury. If I raise them to adulthood and pay for their college education, I will have done more for them than my parents did for me.

It is a problem if you outlive your assets and expect your children to take care of you afterwards, though.

21   astrid   2007 May 3, 5:50am  

I want to live rich and die heavily indebt.

I guess I would feel differently if I was optimistic enough to have children...

22   astrid   2007 May 3, 5:53am  

I suppose that's another justification for spending more money now. There might not be many snow capped mountains and polar bear sanctuaries in another twenty years.

Peter P,

I read about some dire predictions of total fisheries collapse in less than 40 years. Eat NOW!!!

23   dp337   2007 May 3, 5:54am  

"There's too much liquidity in the system,''

US Government - let's print more money to finance our growth. Oh Yeah, let's not collect M3 data as well. We want to make sure we can hide everything under the rug"

24   Allah   2007 May 3, 5:55am  

Hyper-stagflation is possible.

Hyper-stagflation is the most logical possibility and that will be like adding a turbo-charger to the housing crash.

Pay more for food and have less left over to pay the mortgage. Being that so many are so heavily leveraged, this will REALLY kill the market.

25   Allah   2007 May 3, 5:56am  

I want to live rich and die heavily indebt. :lol:

Doctor: You have 3 months to live.

Patient: Do you know a good mortgage broker?

26   Peter P   2007 May 3, 6:00am  

I read about some dire predictions of total fisheries collapse in less than 40 years. Eat NOW!!!

I will eat now.

But such predictions are no better than the one for 'global warming.' :)

27   Randy H   2007 May 3, 6:00am  

Whether you can refi whilst underwater depends a lot upon how far underwater (which itself depends upon how much you put down), and how good of credit risk you are.

Hyper inflation is all but impossible in the US. I've covered this many times before. I think when most people say "hyper inflation" they mean "uncomfortably high inflation", ala the 70s.

Hyper inflation has a specific definition which, among other things, means inflation of 1% per day, which is over an order of magnitude per year.

It has never occurred within a modern nation state that wields credible military power. Many examples of building-to-hyper inflation scenarios have been averted by this same mechanism, as in Russia in the 90s.

When presented with the option of (a) make crippling payments to foreign owners of debt at great and perilous cost to your own citizens, culture and system of government, or (b) default and tell everyone to deal with it; every single power with a credible military has chosen (b).

28   Peter P   2007 May 3, 6:01am  

Hyper-inflation = Peter P going hyper, jumping up and down, screaming at the skyrocketing sushi prices.

29   DinOR   2007 May 3, 6:03am  

DP,

My understanding was that they "would no longer publish" M-3? They're probably still tracking it (in horror) but they are no longer making it available (I mean being all old and outdated and such).

30   Glen   2007 May 3, 6:32am  

We have the advantage that our foreign debt is denominated in our own currency. Thus, even if the dollar collapses, there is no Argentina scenario on the horizon for the US.

Most likely, we will allow the dollar to slowly depreciate as a way of easing the pain of repayment and avoiding an outright default (though some would argue that depreciation of the currency is equivalent to a partial default from the perspective of the foreign creditor).

I agree that hyperinflation is very unlikely. Even generalized inflation shouldn't be a problem because wages will not rise very fast in light of the global labor arbitrage. To anyone who thinks we will have generalized inflation, I will believe it when I start seeing my salary hyperinflate.

But we will probably continue to see a decline in purchasing power of the dollar, with respect to imported goods and commodity products.

I suppose one argument for "living for the moment" is that a trip to Europe would have been about 30% cheaper, in dollar terms, a couple of years ago. And you will probably never again get the kinds of deals we are getting now on imported consumer goods like computers, televisions, furniture, etc., etc.. Inflation could really take hold if the dollar decline continues (and esp. as China moves away from its dollar peg).

31   Glen   2007 May 3, 6:45am  

I read an article about short sales recently (sorry, don't have a link). They said that due to the slicing and dicing of MBS's, there are a lot of new restrictions on lenders' ability to modify loan terms. And there are so many parties to any potential agreement, that individual "workouts" will be less feasible.

This market is just going to seize up and stop working, IMO.

For instance, suppose the borrower's mortgage has been securitized, then subdivided into tranches, then sold off to 12 different hedge funds, pension plans, etc... Even if the servicing department of the originating bank is able and willing to throw a rope to the borrower by offering modified terms (eg: extending the adjustment date out a couple of years), it isn't going to happen. The covenants in the securitizing instrument would prevent such an arrangement unless the bank makes the MBS holders whole by absorbing 100% of the loss. Banks won't be able to afford it.

By the same token, if the bank forecloses on tons of properties, then they will have a tougher time selling MBSs in the future, since they will get a bad reputation for originating crappy loans.

I would imagine that a bailout (really more of a global "workout") is a possibility. Similar to LTCM, only bigger. All the big financial institutions took a whack as a result of LTCM, but it was survivable. The Fed may want to orchestrate another effort to spread the pain in order to save banks and MBS investors. FBs will be on their own.

32   Randy H   2007 May 3, 6:53am  

There are some very powerful arguments in favor of (I'm not making this up):

the present value of consumption.

As Glen just described, if the dollar is in a secular purchasing power decline, then consumption of certain things now is more valuable than saving, because the future value of savings will be less than the future costs of the same consumption.

Traveling to Europe is a great example.

Of course, this all depends upon believing in a long-run decline of the dollar's purchasing power. I'm not sold on that yet, though it does look possible. Let me rephrase. It's not so much that I thin the dollar is good. It is terrible. Horrible. Crap. But it's better than everything else. I'm definitely *not* sold on the Euro. That could be undermined much more immediately and with much less perturbation than the dollar at any time.

33   Steveoh   2007 May 3, 6:58am  

During the boom, if borrowers asked about the adjustable rates on their mortgages, they were told “oh, you can just refinance and start over”.

Yep. I heard arguments questioning "why would anyone these days want a fixed rate, 30 year mortgage when you have more control over your money with an Option ARM? You're just going to refi in a couple of years anyway."

I knew something was amiss when the broker I talked to was offering me interest rates before even vetting a loan app or checking my credit. Can you say "Yield Spread Premium"

34   astrid   2007 May 3, 7:05am  

GC,

Calmness will come in time. I'm still living in a country where Bush gets about 30% support.

35   dp337   2007 May 3, 7:22am  

DinOR

"My understanding was that they “would no longer publish” M-3?" Yep

Not publishing means they are definitely hiding something. I think some Investment Companies are trying to recreate the "equation" to track this data privately. Might be interesting to see the "horror".

36   DinOR   2007 May 3, 7:29am  

DP,

I can easily visualize firms trying to "reverse engineer" their way through this thing. The justification for doing away with it was flimsy at best.

37   Malcolm   2007 May 3, 8:41am  

Patrick, nice graphic, good thread to revisit. Like I've said before it is silly to try to predict the future, and timing but with that said I sense most agree that the scenario for the bubble burst starts with a maximization of prices due to more creative ways of keeping the payment the same and then people just buying for pure speculation. After prices can't appreciate, foreclosures depress prices because they break the stalemate from reluctant sellers, and patient buyers. This scenario is now UNDISPUTABLE, and we can laugh at how simple it is but any of us who were doing this 2 years ago have first hand stories of being ridiculed for even floating an opinion of a real price correction.

38   Malcolm   2007 May 3, 8:44am  

I have read two of your recent links. The normal foreclosure rate is 1 per 1000 historically. In Detroit, and La Vegas that number is now 1 in 56, and 1 in 52. The cheerleaders keep trying to say we are at the bottom, and we have been saying this is just the beginning. I don't know how people can have the arrogance after being proved so conclusively wrong to then continue this denial that the obvious fundamentals suggest prices will very likely fall 50% in some hot areas, and will revert to a normal trendline in the less frothy areas.

39   Glen   2007 May 3, 8:53am  

It's official. The bubble is national. Check out this cruddy looking new construction in Little Rock AR for nearly $700K. Apparently someone in Bubba country didn't get the memo that the bubble is over.

http://littlerock.craigslist.org/rfs/318617669.html

40   Malcolm   2007 May 3, 8:56am  

You gotta be kidding me.

Comments 1 - 40 of 283       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions