patrick.net

 
  forgot password?   register

#housing #investing #politics more»
10,868 registered users, 1 online now: rpanic01
public post private group chat

PatNet Improvement Suggestions

By Dan8267   Jan 28, 1:48pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (2)   148 links   14,867 views   129 comments   watch (1)   quote     share

Thread for idea submission for PatNet improvements

#patnet

« First     « Previous     Comments 90-129 of 129     Last »

90   FortWayne   210/212 = 99% civil   private mesage   Jan 31, 8:45am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

Personal biases get in a way, deleting people's posts seems like it's just a decision on who gets the final say in what is ok to say. Both good and bad.

91   Dan8267   2019/2042 = 98% civil   private mesage   Jan 31, 8:47am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

Well, there is a way to eliminate personal biases, but it would take considerable effort. One could write an A.I. to determine the trolliness of posts and of users and purge comments appropriately. However, this is a very non-trivial project. It's the kind of problem that is interesting to work on, but requires considerable free time if it's not your job.

This is exactly the kind of thing you'd expect Google labs to work on. It would really leverage their crawling technology.

92   FP   171/171 = 100% civil   private mesage   Jan 31, 8:55am  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

errc says

Why do you so strongly support personal attacks,

What? Where did you get this from? If you check my interactions on PatNet, you'll see that I tend to pull off from discussion once insults begin to fly. I also rarely insult. Compare my comments with yours in this thread.

Noting that people have let a troll get into their heads is not the same as supporting trolling.

My point here, if it still not clear, is that I do not think that deleting comments is the best way to deal with personal attacks. I have been dealing with them by simply not giving shit and ignoring the comments of the offenders. Just like I'll do with you now.

93   Tenpoundbass   792/793 = 99% civil   private mesage   Jan 31, 9:00am  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

Patrick says

I want to find some set of self-service rules that lets readers get what they want without my being the judge of content.

I think ignore works like a champ. I've only had to use it on a few people, and it works.
I can even temporarily ignore someone that may have posted a recent not work friendly picture on the main page, until that post has left the main page.

94   Tenpoundbass   792/793 = 99% civil   private mesage   Jan 31, 9:02am  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

iwog says

Let me just say it would have been nice to publicize my conference without Piggy coming out with "YEW FUCK 14 YEAR OLDS!!!" for the 80th time like he was the most clever piggy in the pen.

The people that follow me around just to post "You Suck!" and say nothing else are the only candidates that I put on ignore.
You should try it. It works!

95   jazz music   412/412 = 100% civil   private mesage   Jan 31, 11:50am  ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

I might be the most high profile advocate of the ignore feature which it feels like has earned me a position of high value target to the trolls. Some have taken names specifically to taunt me.

landtof, Allah the devil, (Strategist) I grope u, Ironman, (CIC) DickheadBill, Ranina ranina, Strategist, blowmeironvagina, DrunkJazz, (CIC) JazztheDrunk (CIC)

Notice the overarching troll agenda: they want to punish non-conforming speech AND prove that trolls rule and enjoy ultimate control of discussion here.

So the ignore feature is essentially defeated by troll patrols when they know you have them on ignore they alert other trolls to relay their trolling though the trolls that you don't ignore.

Notice the incidence of friending is high among the trolls here. Few non trolls maintain patnet friend relationships here so that feature must be key to trolling tactics. They must be using "following" and "friending" to both relay their comments and also alert to swarm on an enemy to make troll attacks more overwhelming to strengthen their ad hominem until the discussion is ended.

The trolls do seem to have close relationships and in effect they enjoy a sport of hunting in groups to punish commenters who reject alt-right propaganda with their relentless ad hominem. Also no left-leaning sources are allowed without the source or the commenter becoming the subject.

The relay is one tactic and so is swarming to attack a user such as myself in a cooperative trolling group.

Most often I experience Strategist relaying CIC's attacks of me. They are the 2 principal trolls.

FortWayne, Tenpoundbass, indigenous may not be hard core trolls but they say amazingly inane things almost all the time so I sometimes ignore them. I really have nothing to say to them.

96   jazz music   412/412 = 100% civil   private mesage   Jan 31, 11:56am  ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

Also since Trump's victory this forum has taken on a new vindictive feel and I have pulled back for a few reasons not just the insufferable nature of so many discussions.

97   justme   93/93 = 100% civil   private mesage   Feb 3, 10:12am  ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

I would like to give kudos to Patrick for going back to having a thread number in all the URLs. The only thing that would be better would be to have the starting DATE (YYYY-MM-DD or similar) in there, too ;)

Current example:

https://patrick.net/1302130/patnet-improvement-suggestions
https://patrick.net/?p=1302130&c=1375150#comment-1375150

Earlier year 2016 example:

http://patrick.net/Corporate+buybacks+are+99%25+of+NET+stock+purchases+in+2016+so+far
which is now
https://patrick.net/1289861/corporate-buybacks-are-99-of-net-stock-purchases-in-2016-so-far
and under the hood has URLs like this for the comment section:
https://patrick.net/?p=1289861&c=1271301#comment-1271301

I realize that the numeric thread ID always existed under the hood--just want to laud that its now always visible together with the thread title. Thanks, Patrick. It is just the better way to do it. Having a thread with just a Title to identify it seems not so robust when trying to refer to or find old threads one might have saved. What if two have the same title, for example,

98   Lashkar_i_Trumpi   868/868 = 100% civil   private mesage   Feb 3, 1:42pm  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

A Preview Button for posts!

99   HEY YOU   387/387 = 100% civil   private mesage   Feb 3, 2:46pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

Is there a way to dislike & ignore everyone with one click?
Post HEY YOU next to all his dislikes & ignores.
It nice to let people know what one thinks of them.

100   FP   171/171 = 100% civil   private mesage   Feb 3, 3:08pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

HEY YOU says

It nice to let people know what one thinks of them.

When people dislike they usually comment. Not so much when they like/agree.

I remember clicking "dislike" only twice. One of them by mistake, which I neutralized with a "like."

101   Dan8267   2019/2042 = 98% civil   private mesage   Feb 3, 3:17pm  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

HEY YOU says

Is there a way to dislike & ignore everyone with one click?

Yes, delete your PatNet bookmark.

102   Patrick   1456/1456 = 100% civil   private mesage   Feb 3, 6:29pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

justme says

What if two have the same title, for example,

Can't happen, because title is a unique field in the table.

justme says

The only thing that would be better would be to have the starting DATE (YYYY-MM-DD or similar) in there, too ;)

Could do that, but then urls get longer. Maybe that's ok. In fact, it would be easily to put the date in the "slug" title like this:

https://patrick.net/1302399/2017-02-2-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-amazon

@justme Good enough?

103   justme   93/93 = 100% civil   private mesage   Feb 3, 8:36pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

>>https://patrick.net/1302399/2017-02-2-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-amazon

@patrick, sure, that will work although I hope you mean always DD and not just D (probably just a typo). Leading 0s are a must for easy sorting!

104   Patrick   1456/1456 = 100% civil   private mesage   Feb 3, 8:38pm  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

That was just a typo. How about https://patrick.net/1302399/2017-feb-02-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-amazon

If you sort the URLs it will still be sorted by creation date since the post_ID comes first.

105   Lashkar_i_Trumpi   868/868 = 100% civil   private mesage   Feb 3, 8:39pm  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

justme says

@patrick, sure, that will work although I hope you mean always DD and not just D (probably just a typo). Leading 0s are a must for easy sorting!

Yeah, DDs are better than Ds for sure.

Although some say more than a handful... I ain't one of them.

106   Patrick   1456/1456 = 100% civil   private mesage   Feb 3, 8:40pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

Lol, I can totally get by with firm well-formed C's.

107   Patrick   1456/1456 = 100% civil   private mesage   Feb 4, 2:00am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

justme says

The only thing that would be better would be to have the starting DATE (YYYY-MM-DD or similar) in there, too ;)

@justme your wish has been granted.

Post slugs now start with YYYY-MM-DD.

108   iwog   954/955 = 99% civil   private mesage   Feb 14, 4:59pm  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   share  

Nooooooooooooooo. What did you do? WHAT DID YOU DO???

109   Patrick   1456/1456 = 100% civil   private mesage   Feb 14, 5:01pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

iwog says

Nooooooooooooooo. What did you do? WHAT DID YOU DO???

This suggestion by Rew:

"Each section should have its own top trending posts. Each few top trending post should be viewable on the home page."

from https://patrick.net/1302953/2017-02-14-how-to-make-patrick-net-home-page-capture-new-users?c=1380579#comment-1380579

110   iwog   954/955 = 99% civil   private mesage   Feb 14, 5:41pm  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   share  

I think Rew made an error.

Most of us kind of skip around and don't dwell on any particular topic. We just like going where the action is.

111   justme   93/93 = 100% civil   private mesage   Feb 14, 5:41pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

I still think that having all the changing aliases of all the usual suspects on their "home page" would be useful.

112   landtof   36/36 = 100% civil   private mesage   Feb 14, 6:03pm  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

iwog says

Most of us kind of skip around and don't dwell on any particular topic. We just like going where the action is.

yeah, turn it back.

patrick - simple is clean and elegant. follow the fundamentals. the body should be threads of any topic, with the most recent on top. that is universal. there's not enough breadth of material here to warrant classes or sub-groups, and that's a good thing. whatever the topic, users should feel obliged to freely speak their minds. the menu bar is of most use to new users when they can learn the purpose of the site, learn the lingo (e.g. IHL), learn about the history of the site (housing), and get a quick hit to the top threads & comments of the month, week, day, or all time. thread bodies should not be paginated, but rather dynamically presented based on user preference - if they want to see the whole thing in a long scroll, or just the most recent of the day, for example.

113   errc   341/348 = 97% civil   private mesage   Feb 14, 6:09pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

Agree. I'd much rather the homepage be most recent posts.

114   justme   93/93 = 100% civil   private mesage   Feb 14, 6:09pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

@Patrick, the problem with categories is that they depend on hasthags and there isn't even a high-priority category for #news. I tried putting #news into my Lake Oroville thread, and i still have to go to "all threads" (?) to see it. Categories are not good, I agree with iwog and landtof. People who want categories should search for them themselves. My interest in a thread does not depend on some semi-arbitrary category designation. It depends one the quality of the content, and the (potential) impact it has for educating me or others.

And, given that half the posters cannot even write a descriptive headline, how can one expect them to assign a proper hashtag or categpory? One man's science is another man's "politics" (climate warming being a good example).

115   Patrick   1456/1456 = 100% civil   private mesage   Feb 14, 6:10pm  ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

justme says

Categories are not good, I agree with iwog and landtof. People who want categories should search for them themselves.

You're all right. Didn't feel good.

Reverted!

Let me know if any problems linger.

116   Patrick   1456/1456 = 100% civil   private mesage   Feb 17, 1:56pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

OK, ad hominem comments will no longer be deleted right away, but instead will go to ad hominem comment jail where they can be viewed by everyone and edited by the comment owner.

If a comment in jail is edited, I'll get notified and look at it again, perhaps removing it from jail.

The ad hominem comment jail link is now also in the footer.

117   Dan8267   2019/2042 = 98% civil   private mesage   Feb 18, 3:07pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

So what's the difference between "active" and "comments" on the front page?

118   Patrick   1456/1456 = 100% civil   private mesage   Feb 18, 3:17pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

"active" is all posts ever, sorted the most recent creation time or last comment time.

"comments" is posts created in the last day, sorted by the most comments.

119   Patrick   1456/1456 = 100% civil   private mesage   Mar 3, 5:45pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

You can now follow specific topics, for example #housing

You'll get an email of each new post in housing. But you won't get duplicates if you're already following the author.

Not tested yet, might not really work.

Let me know if problems.

120   Patrick   1456/1456 = 100% civil   private mesage   Mar 7, 8:32pm  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

I've done away with the 2k comment limit @Dan8267 and hopefully simplified making comments and posts.

Let me know if problems!

121   Dan8267   2019/2042 = 98% civil   private mesage   Mar 20, 12:25pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

@Patrick, the ignore link is gone. Please bring it back before the trolls start taking advantage of it. I, for one, will ad hom any troll doing any post on my thread while the ignore/ban function is disabled.

122   Patrick   1456/1456 = 100% civil   private mesage   Mar 20, 1:07pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

Hmm, don't know where that ignore link went. Will put it back.

123   Patrick   1456/1456 = 100% civil   private mesage   Mar 20, 1:54pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

Dan8267 says

ignore link is gone. Please bring it back

@Dan8267 OK, it's back now. Was a typo.

124   Patrick   1456/1456 = 100% civil   private mesage   Mar 20, 3:29pm  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

If people would just stick to arguing the point rather than hating on the person personally, the forum would be a lot easier to run.

But I guess that's true of life as well.

125   Fucking White Male   153/154 = 99% civil   private mesage   Mar 20, 5:37pm  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

Patrick says

I've done away with the 2k comment limit @Dan8267 and hopefully simplified making comments and posts.

Let me know if problems!

Oh god Patrick, I don't think you know what you've done.....

126   Dan8267   2019/2042 = 98% civil   private mesage   Apr 1, 11:23am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   share  

@Patrick, the new login via emailed link feature is broken. Worst still, the old login mechanism no longer exists.

On a system where somehow the cookie got deleted, I tried to log in via the new mechanism. I never receive the link in email, and there is no fallback mechanism.

More importantly, the new system has no value. At best it could be an alternative mechanism, but certainly there is no up side to using it as a replacement for providing a username and password, even if the user name is a person's email and his display name is something else.

By forcing a user to login with an email link, you are taking something that is extremely easy and making it difficult and much more likely to fail. Now in order to log in a user, PatNet is dependent upon that person's email provider working, not filtering the link you send, your site sending the mail properly, and the link mechanism working. Even if done right, it actually opens a window for hacking because anyone who gains access to a person's email account now automatically has access to PatNet.

In the very least, PatNet should authenticate users directly using a username/password combination.

« First     « Previous     Comments 90-129 of 129     Last »

users   about   suggestions   contact  
topics   random post   best comments   comment jail  
patrick's 40 proposals  
10 reasons it's a terrible time to buy  
8 groups who lie about the housing market  
37 bogus arguments about housing  
get a free bumper sticker:

top   bottom   home