patrick.net

 
register or log in

#housing #investing #politics
10,852 registered users, 1 online now: PCGyver
public post private group chat

Do White People Have a Right to Exist?

By Patrick   Feb 15, 6:50pm   ↑ like (5)   ↓ dislike (1)   4 links   1,337 views   46 comments   watch (2)   share   quote  

If you say yes, you're racist.

If you say no, you're racist.

#racism

« First     « Previous     Comments 7-46 of 46     Last »

7   Ceffer   219/219 = 100% civil   Feb 15, 11:08pm  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Well, yes, if they pay lots of extra taxes for being white, pay huge amounts of reparations for every crime and injustice ever committed in history, stop thinking and publishing anything, submit to every vague or imaginary guilt trip foisted on them with grace, and act like everybody is politically correct geniuses and wonderful people without regard to race, color, religion or creed.

What the fuck is a creed, anyway?

Whoops, there I go, being all white again.

8   Fucking White Male   93/94 = 98% civil   Feb 16, 5:44am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

FYI 50 years is pretty close to a lifetime.

9   BlueSardine   199/201 = 99% civil   Feb 16, 5:48am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

If we are, will 'little ltaly' be the executor???
Rew says

Are we on about the impending White gennoacide again?

10   BlueSardine   199/201 = 99% civil   Feb 16, 5:54am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Obligatory.

Ceffer says

What the fuck is a creed, anyway?

11   PCGyver   152/152 = 100% civil   Feb 16, 7:21am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

IDK

12   WaPoIsHitler Lipsovitch   354/354 = 100% civil   Feb 16, 9:14am  ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Rew says

If "white people" are going to claim persecution and a new call to arms for civil liberties for themselves, they better do a better job justifying the actual need for that out of the gate. "White people" don't have the 60s, or the backdrop of slavery, in their favor in their racism claims. This is why, "White people have the right to exist" or "White lives matter" seems ridiculous.

You mean White Civilization ended slavery, worldwide, in a moral crusade. No other civilization in the world did so, nor ever had an anti-slavery movement based on moral / religious philosophy.
Everybody who had slave ancestors should sent a thank you letter to No.10 Downing Street.

No to mention formulating human rights and democratic republics.

13   Patrick   1043/1043 = 100% civil   Feb 16, 10:41am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Rew says

Patrick says

Try claiming the right to exist. Put up posters saying "White people have the right to exist."

See what happens to you.

Do you really mean "White lives matter"? I fully understand the backlash that would occur there.

"White people have the right to exist" seems like nonsense to me. "Air has the right to exist".

If "white people" are going to claim persecution and a new call to arms for civil liberties for themselves, they better do a better job justifying the actual need for that out of the gate. "White people" don't have the 60s, or the backdrop of slavery, in their favor in their racism claims. This is why, "White people have the right to exist" or "White lives matter" seems ridiculous.

Please check the facts.

The deliberate outsourcing of jobs from the middle of America is plausibly an attempt by the coastal elites to eliminate white people themselves, at least the poorer ones.

White people have suffered much more than any other group in the last few decades.

14   PockyClipsNow   28/28 = 100% civil   Feb 16, 10:51am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

The globalist plan by the mega corps are to make whites a tiny minority in thier own country.

All non white or non asian countries are totally easy to control because the brown people always vote for welfare/free shit and are corrupt and easy to bribe. You don't see very many people trying to enforce laws and fairness (like Jame O'keefe) down in mexico - because they kill you if you do that.

If a person like Trump ran for president of mexico it would mean an actual shooting war, and if he were killed, no one would go to jail. Mexico is a corrupt state/totalitarian oligarchy. Paradise for the global corporations basically, no enforcement of any laws if you are rich or connected (this is called corruption). (thus they want the factories there, to pollute and no lawsuits of any kind).

Open Borders is white genocide. genocide is not just killing but drowining out the native population.per UN definition

Whites did this to the native americans and now the large globalist corps are doing it to us. It seems to be mostly billionaire Jews behind it too.

Has anyone else been shocked at how the crooked lying media is dominated by jews when they are only 2% of our population? I never cared before they tried to steal the election from Trump and are now actively trying to get us to keep open borders and on top of that, import hundreds of thousands of somali,libyan,syrians and put them ALL on welfare that I have to pay for. Meanwhile I live in los angeles where there are a few hundred thousand homeless american citizens, but we pay for fucking Somails entire families apartments and most of them will never work.

The mask is off, fucking explain this shit!!! I want the liberals here to admit they want America to be exactly like Brazil and Mexico demograhically and culturally.

15   Patrick   1043/1043 = 100% civil   Feb 16, 10:55am  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

PockyClipsNow says

Whites did this to the native americans

Whites did drown out the the Indians with sheer numbers, but that was after 90%+ of the Indians had already died from diseases. Not anyone's fault, just biology. The smallpox-blankets story is false.

16   PockyClipsNow   28/28 = 100% civil   Feb 16, 10:57am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Yes there werent' many natives, and they were literally stone age people technologically.

How the fuck can this happen to the US when we have the best tech in the world and invented nukes, the internet, etc? Its all a con by the rich people basically.

I know liberals that never once visited mexico, and they support open borders. MEXICO IS HELL ON EARTH.

If the federal government failed, and everyone lived 'on yer own good luck' - we would be just like mexico. They are our future once the federal reverse fiat game is over and we have a currency collapse. People with no kid with starve to death on the sidewalk begging (like mexico). Landlords with no kids will also, the brown people will not pay you rent, and the cops will not work for free.

17   Patrick   1043/1043 = 100% civil   Feb 16, 10:58am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

PockyClipsNow says

It seems to be mostly billionaire Jews behind it too.

Has anyone else been shocked at how the crooked lying media is dominated by jews when they are only 2% of our population?

Rich Jews do tend to be part of the coastal elites, but let's not degenerate into plain anti-semitism.

There is a wide variety of opinions among Jews. It's not a monolith.

18   PockyClipsNow   28/28 = 100% civil   Feb 16, 11:00am  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Yes I know conservative jews. Also poor ones. But its like HOLY SHIT EVERYONE BASHING TRUMP ON TV IS A JEW OR NON WHITE. Its shocking.

Not all muslims are terrorists but we sure dont trust them do we?

19   Patrick   1043/1043 = 100% civil   Feb 16, 11:01am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Lots of white women bash Trump too.

It's more of a coalition against straight white men, especially those with a Christian background or personal belief.

20   PockyClipsNow   28/28 = 100% civil   Feb 16, 11:02am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

My white gf loves trump, says he makes her feel safe.

Shes a conservative christian.

21   PockyClipsNow   28/28 = 100% civil   Feb 16, 11:04am  ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

I basically see anyone who is anti trump as a buffoon who wants to destroy america.

The corporate democrats want to ship as many jobs overseas as possible while at same time importing as many non whites as possible to 'do jobs' that are not here.

This leaves massive welfare state and eventual collapse of society via unemployment and/or socialism. Socialism always fails. always.

22   Patrick   1043/1043 = 100% civil   Feb 16, 11:05am  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

I saw an interesting idea on Heartiste about how to fight this heterophobia, racism, sexism, and Christianophobia:

Make a fake black feminist twatter account and tell White feminists about their White privilege , how White women voted for Trump and how the future is black, so they need to shut up and get with the program. Be sassy, but not aggressive.

Make a fake moderate Muslim account and remind SJW Christians that Islam is the future, so they might as well start learning the Koran. And/or tell feminists that they should buy a headscarf and learn to share a husband with 3 other women. Don't go too over the top. Just be straight-faced and say it in an "is what it is" manner.

23   PockyClipsNow   28/28 = 100% civil   Feb 16, 11:12am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Theres already millions of fake twitter accounts.

Most of them are corporate controlled bot or sock puppets already. Companies like Correct The Record and ShareBlue are experts in astroturfing the internet and have HUGE Budgets. Good luck figthing a firehose of fake corporate puppett accounts on twitter, where mostly only trolls go.

Remember only 5% or so of voters will switch party. Trump got at least this many dems to vote for him HE DID USE TWITTER so there is hope for our democracy,

24   YesYNot   189/190 = 99% civil   Feb 16, 11:44am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Patrick says

Try claiming the right to exist. Put up posters saying "White people have the right to exist."

See what happens to you.

I suggest you try this. My bet is that nobody will hassle you at all. You might get laughed at.

Not only do you have a right to exist, but you have the right to pursue happiness and the right to free speech. It's kind of great, isn't it?

25   BlueSardine   199/201 = 99% civil   Feb 16, 11:47am  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

How can one infer a right unto themselves unless the species as a whole agrees?
Without complete agreement, rights are just local ordinances...

YesYNot says

Not only do you have a right to exist, but you have the right to pursue happiness and the right to free speech.

26   PockyClipsNow   28/28 = 100% civil   Feb 16, 12:16pm  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

THIS ALREADY HAPPENED.

People put up the posters 'we have a right to exist' with picture of whites.

They called the police and wrote an article about how awful whites are. If caught on camera putting these up, you will go to jail for vandalism (even if the posters are on the community poster board!!!!!!!!!)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/grade-point/wp/2016/12/14/we-have-a-right-to-exist-white-supremacist-fliers-reported-at-the-university-of-maryland/

27   Patrick   1043/1043 = 100% civil   Feb 16, 1:43pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

PockyClipsNow says

Remember only 5% or so of voters will switch party. Trump got at least this many dems to vote for him HE DID USE TWITTER so there is hope for our democracy,

Yes, in spite of Twitter's apparent mandate to suppress any threat to the anti-white narrative, they did see that it was clearly in their financial interest to let Trump use Twitter.

28   georgeliberte   38/38 = 100% civil   Feb 16, 3:34pm  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

29   Dan   9/9 = 100% civil   Feb 16, 6:12pm  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Per oftwominds (2017.1.5): I have long held that America's Deep State--the unelected National Security State often referred to as the Shadow Government--is not a unified monolith but a deeply divided ecosystem in which the dominant Neocon-Neoliberal Oligarchy is being challenged by elements which view the Neocon-Neoliberal agenda as a threat to national security and the interests of the United States.
I call these anti-Neocon-Neoliberal elements the progressive Deep State. If you want a working definition of the Neocon-Neoliberal Deep State, Hillary Clinton's quip--we came, we saw, he died--is a good summary: a bullying, arrogance-soaked state-within-a-state pursuing an agenda of ceaseless intervention while operating a global Murder, Inc., supremely confident that no one in the elected government can touch them.
Until Trump unexpectedly wrenched the presidency from the Neocon's candidate. The Neocon Deep State's response was to manufacture a mass-media hysteria that Russia had wrongfully deprived the Neocon's candidate (Hillary Clinton) of what was rightfully hers: the presidency. (The Neocons operate their own version of the divine right of Political Nobility.)
The Neocon-Neoliberals' strategy was to delegitimize Trump's victory by ascribing it to "Russian Hacking," a claim that remains entirely unsubstantiated. Now that this grasping-at-straws Hail Mary coup attempt by a politicized C.I.A. and its corporate media mouthpiece has failed, the Neocon Deep State is about to find out the Progressive Deep State finally has a president who is willing and able to cut the Neocon-Neoliberals off at the knees.

30   Rew   190/190 = 100% civil   Feb 16, 7:10pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Patrick says

Please check the facts.

Life expectancy for Whites still higher than Black or Native Americans. The increase in mortality rate doesn't close the gap in how these populations lag.

Also, that's not systemic persecution or racism against Whites that appears to be causing that uptick. There is no preparation of genocide, as you have postulated in other threads.

Specifically here, there is no-one attacking Whites "rights to exist".

Patrick says

The smallpox-blankets story is false.

The siege of Fort Pitt is false?

PockyClipsNow says

People put up the posters 'we have a right to exist' with picture of whites.

Not "people". Be specific. It was The American Vanguard who put up the posters.
White supremacy in the nation has been emboldened by the populist nativist talk of Trump. Very unfortunate.

They were posting these yesterday:
http://college.usatoday.com/2017/02/15/muslim-free-america-posters-turn-up-on-multiple-college-campuses/

WaPoIsHitler Lipsovitch says

You mean White Civilization ended slavery, worldwide, in a moral crusade.

Today, Russia is estimated to have about 1 million people in indentured/exploitive modern day slavery (trafficking, etc.) Are they considered a part of whatever "white civilization" is supposed to mean?

31   Patrick   1043/1043 = 100% civil   Feb 16, 7:45pm  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Rew says

The siege of Fort Pitt is false?

Seems like it's just part of the same pattern of accepting stories which support a particular narrative:

http://quod.lib.umich.edu/p/plag/5240451.0001.009/--did-the-us-army-distribute-smallpox-blankets-to-indians?rgn=main;view=fulltext

A couple of points argue against it. The germ theory of disease certainly did not exist in 1763. Secondly, smallpox is extremely contagious, and any Indians who may have gotten it from the British no doubt were about to get it anyway. Third, it was a war where both sides were perfectly willing to kill in any way they could.

Some of Guyasuta's forces were likely infected even before Trent and Ecuyer sent out the blankets with Turtle's Heart and Mamaltee. While the fate of Mamaltee is unknown, Turtle's Heart survived the war and was present at future treaty negotiations several years later, despite being a hypothetical Patient Zero. Ecuyer and Trent may have made a bad situation worse if their blankets had "the desired effect," but they didn't create an epidemic on their own.

https://www.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/2a82wk/the_straight_dope_smallpox_and_what_really/

32   RealEstateIsBetterThanStocks   145/145 = 100% civil   Feb 16, 9:41pm  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

PockyClipsNow says

It seems to be mostly billionaire Jews behind it too.

Jews wants a "rainbow" America with a lot of troubled minority groups so they'll be left alone to suck everyone dry.

and yes it is true they have been the most nasty towards Trump.

33   MMR   152/152 = 100% civil   Feb 16, 9:59pm  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Rew says

Life expectancy for Whites still higher than Black or Native Americans.

Since education is the strongest predictor of life expectancy, surely you support busing the children of disadvantaged families into your children's school district

34   WaPoIsHitler Lipsovitch   354/354 = 100% civil   Feb 17, 12:33am  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Rew says

White supremacy in the nation has been emboldened by the populist nativist talk of Trump. Very unfortunate.

White supremacy is the expected pushback from endless Identity Politics concluding that it is always "White People's" Fault.

You do realize that the Media and Academia is heavily SJW, and commitment to it is an elite social marker. They've done more for Daily Stormer and the Liquor Store than DeviantArt and Starbucks does from Wannabe Artists - two sides of the faked disability SSDI check.

35   WaPoIsHitler Lipsovitch   354/354 = 100% civil   Feb 17, 12:33am  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

RealEstateIsBetterThanStocks says

and yes it is true they have been the most nasty towards Trump.

David Horowitz? Michael Cohen? Michael Savage? Jared Kushner? Bibi? Sheldon Adelsen? Milo Yannipoulos? Carl Icahn? Stephen Feinberg? Stephen Mnuchin? Stephen Miller? 3 Stephens... Lewis Eisenberg? Michael Glassner? David Friedman?

What's actually happening is since the "Pussy-Grabbing" "Anti-Women" attacks aren't working, they're going to anti-semitism now. Apparently they finally swallowed the pill that married women voted for Trump by a slim majority.

Don't let the SJWs and the Media fuck with your head. They're trying to create a race-war as a byproduct of signalling their virtue, and divide public sentiment.

36   alice   2/2 = 100% civil   Feb 17, 5:43am  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

We already tried not having a Wall for decades in our Southern border, how is that working for you? Not good at all, we have the worse of the worse from everywhere coming in without vetting. The good ones come in the front door, the bad ones break your door down. Time to try something else: THE IMPENETRABLE WALL.. It's time for fingerprint election voting, only an illegitimate voter is against FINGERPRINTING VOTING

37   MrEd   46/46 = 100% civil   Feb 17, 6:10am  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

This is excellent. To validate this method and disarm the opposition it has to be set up in conjunction with "roaming vote collectors" who will go to your home, fingerprint you, and then turn their heads as you cast your votes and drop into the mobile ballot box.
No more excuses about "disenfranchising the voter because they can't make it down to whereever to get an ID card "...

alice says

It's time for fingerprint election voting, only an illegitimate voter is against FINGERPRINTING VOTING

38   mmmarvel   18/18 = 100% civil   Feb 17, 7:00am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Patrick says

If you say yes, you're racist.

If you say no, you're racist.

Guilty - I'm a racist because I chose one of those two options. Choices seemed a bit limited, but I'm a racist so what do I know.

39   Patrick   1043/1043 = 100% civil   Feb 17, 7:41am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

mmmarvel says

Guilty - I'm a racist because I chose one of those two options. Choices seemed a bit limited, but I'm a racist so what do I know.

If you're white (or Asian American), you pay! You can pay in terms of direct tax payments which will be effectively given to non-white people, you can pay in terms of more limited opportunities for your children relative to non-whites, such as university quotas which favor others, effectively excluding your kind. Or you can pay with your job, which will be exported to somewhere without bad white people like you.

It's all about blaming you so that things can be taken from you.

If you're black or Hispanic, don't worry about being racist. It's perfectly understandable after all your people have been through.

40   just any guy   86/86 = 100% civil   Feb 17, 7:50am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Patrick says

If you're white (or Asian American), you pay! You can pay in terms of direct tax payments which will be effectively given to non-white people, you can pay in terms of more limited opportunities for your children relative to non-whites, such as university quotas which favor others, effectively excluding your kind. Or you can pay with your job, which will be exported to somewhere without bad white people like you.

It's all about blaming you so that things can be taken from you.

If you're black or Hispanic, don't worry about being racist. It's perfectly understandable after all your people have been through.

There may be an obvious reason for that. You wanted free speech, correct? Many would argue that it's the white/asian's obligation to support the rest.

41   Patrick   1043/1043 = 100% civil   Feb 17, 7:57am  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

just any guy says

You wanted free speech, correct?

Yes, correct.

I totally want free speech, no matter how politically incorrect.

42   FortWayne   121/123 = 98% civil   Feb 17, 8:43am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Ask BLM people, they'll tell you all about the direction liberal democrats have gone into.

43   Quigley   174/176 = 98% civil   Feb 17, 11:48am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

just any guy says

There may be an obvious reason for that. You wanted free speech, correct? Many would argue that it's the white/asian's obligation to support the rest.

Even assuming that white people were fine with supporting every non white in the world, there aren't enough of us to do the job. White people only represent 18% of the world's population, and that's counting the 30% or so who can't work because they're children or disabled.
Since white people actually CANT support the rest of the world, anyone arguing that they should is actually pushing for the end of civilization, which would occur shortly after all resources were equally distributed.
Check with Zimbabwe on how well it works to take land and resources from productive white people and give them to lazy blacks.

All Peoples have to make their own way in this world. Those of us who have traveled further due to hard work, applied science, and fair governments can only assist in tangential ways.
Technology has been shared across the world to an incredible degree. The Chinese didn't invent the automobile, but they drive more of them than are driven in its birthplace the United States. The polio vaccine wasn't developed by Eastern Europeans, but they vaccinate their children and avoid that debilitating disease.
White people have been responsible for the grand majority of worldwide progress, so to assert that we aren't doing our part is pathetically false.

44   alice   2/2 = 100% civil   Feb 17, 12:23pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

If I'm only attracted to white skin Cauc+Asian am I a racist?

45   Patrick   1043/1043 = 100% civil   Feb 17, 10:15pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Interesting quote from the NY Times about a very similar phenomenon in Germany:

“The definition we have right now of tolerance in the German political landscape is self-deprecating to a degree that it’s actually self-destructive,” Mr. Wälder said. “Everything will be tolerated except for being a German.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/17/world/europe/germany-far-right-politics-afd.html

Simply being German in Germany is considered "far right" now.

46   just any guy   86/86 = 100% civil   Feb 18, 12:29pm  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

It's a media-driven Jedi mind trick that so many Leftists are falling for. I liken it unto religious brainwashing.

« First     « Previous     Comments 7-46 of 46     Last »

home   top   users   about   suggestions   contact  
topics   random post   best comments   comment jail  
patrick's 40 proposals  
10 reasons it's a terrible time to buy  
8 groups who lie about the housing market  
37 bogus arguments about housing  
get a free bumper sticker: