patrick.net

 
register or log in

#housing #investing #politics
10,826 registered users, 6 online now: epitaph, FortWayne, Ironman, MMR, Strategic Renter, Strategist
public post private group chat

You can be tracked down via your Google searches

By Patrick   Mar 20, 10:45am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   3 links   524 views   24 comments   watch (0)   share   quote  

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/mar/20/us-judge-asks-google-to-name-people-who-searched-for-victim

Google has been served with a search warrant by a Minnesota judge which requires the firm to hand over personally identifiable information on anyone who has searched for a particular name.

The warrant, published by public records researcher Tony Webster, requires Google to provide a wealth of information on any internet user who was found to have searched for one of four variations of a fraud victim’s name.

Comments 1-24 of 24     Last »

1   Herb   5/5 = 100% civil   Mar 20, 11:00am  ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Why could not this judge, with equal logic, just issue a general warrant for the police to be able to go door to door at all locations in the suspect town and search the browser histories of all devices found therein? (yes, I realize it's less efficient than just serving an order on Google, and that people can erase or disable their search history).

Wouldn't this amount to more-or-less the same thing as the Google order? Yet people would be enraged if this were done.

How do the police know the 'perp' didn't do this search on tor? Or thru an overseas proxy site? Or on openvpn with SSL or something? (not sure if all of this is technically correct)

This order is clearly nothing more than a fishing expedition lacking either legality or reasonable justification, and is an abuse of the court discretion.

2   lostand confused   85/85 = 100% civil   Mar 20, 11:17am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

That is scary-the robed imams strike again.

3   errc   155/155 = 100% civil   Mar 20, 11:27am  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

It's all Trumps fault!

4   Dan8267   1020/1038 = 98% civil   Mar 20, 12:34pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Patrick says

Google has been served with a search warrant by a Minnesota judge which requires the firm to hand over personally identifiable information on anyone who has searched for a particular name.

Google, and other search engines, are required by law to not store such information beyond a few days. Politicians don't want their searches to be discoverable. It would be impossible for Google to comply with this warrant if it is complying with the law and more than a few days passed.

5   Dan8267   1020/1038 = 98% civil   Mar 20, 12:37pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

The real answer to fraud is secure banking. Right now banking is so fucked up so that the rich can do illegal things like tax evasion, that it leaves open many doors for fraud. Eliminate the security wholes in banking and no one will be able to commit wire fraud.

6   APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE   369/369 = 100% civil   Mar 20, 12:42pm  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Double-click Search is a crime against humanity.

Why Schmidt, Page and Brin aren't wearing wedding dresses and chained to pipes in the shower at Allenwood is the wonder of our age.

7   HEY YOU   56/56 = 100% civil   Mar 20, 1:04pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

FAKE NEWS! ALTERNATIVE FACTS!
D & R voters have never allowed this invasion of privacy.
GREAT AMERICAN PATRIOTS who love THE CONSTITUTION!

8   PeopleUnited   61/61 = 100% civil   Mar 20, 1:38pm  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

This is disconcerting but it should not be a shock. If you have seen the movies about actual special operations such as Captain Phillips, Zero Dark Thirty, or even the fictional Enemy of the State, you know what the powers that be are capable of knowing anything (and doing anything). Is it legal? Is it constitutional? We can debate it all we want, but does that matter when the people don't have the means to defend themselves against the Deep State? It would seem that not even the President can stop them.

9   Patrick   987/987 = 100% civil   Mar 20, 2:04pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE says

Why Schmidt, Page and Brin aren't wearing wedding dresses and chained to pipes in the shower at Allenwood is the wonder of our age.

Had to look it up:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Penitentiary,_Allenwood

10   bob2356   181/182 = 99% civil   Mar 20, 2:13pm  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Vocabulary word of the day. Proxy. Don't log on without it.

11   Patrick   987/987 = 100% civil   Mar 20, 2:17pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Whose proxy though?

Are there any free open proxies anymore?

12   Strategist   467/468 = 99% civil   Mar 20, 2:22pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Patrick says

Every Muslim, and every apologist for Islam should be constantly watched. It's the best way of preventing terrorism.

13   APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE   369/369 = 100% civil   Mar 20, 2:34pm  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Patrick says

Had to look it up:

Yeah, hard to think of a banker that doesn't belong in Allenwood, in a wedding dress, changed to pipes by arms and legs.

14   bob2356   181/182 = 99% civil   Mar 20, 3:31pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Patrick says

Whose proxy though?

Are there any free open proxies anymore?

I use a commercial service with encryption between me and the proxy.

15   Patrick   987/987 = 100% civil   Mar 20, 3:34pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

But then they can simply demand logs from the commercial proxy service.

There was a famous free anonymous proxy in Finland that was pretty good, until one day their government raided it, took the logs, and shut it down.

16   PeopleUnited   61/61 = 100% civil   Mar 20, 5:16pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Exactly. Is there really anything resembling anonymity anymore? If someone wants to know you, they can probably put together enough information from "secure" servers to tell you things about yourself that you don't even know (or at least remember).

17   bob2356   181/182 = 99% civil   Mar 20, 8:36pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Patrick says

But then they can simply demand logs from the commercial proxy service.

Who is they? I bounce servers each time I connect, at least once a day. Sometimes more since some sites, especially google, banks, travel agencies, and oddly enough craigsliist are fussy about connecting to a known proxy. I have to bounce servers, usually only once but sometimes more, till I get one that doesn't offend them. I frequently use one of the offshore servers anyway. Be an awful lot of work for someone to get the logs from hundreds of servers many offshore, especially when the logs don't show content anyway.

18   jvolstad   85/85 = 100% civil   Mar 20, 8:49pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

I blame the special snowflakes.

19   BlueSardine   179/181 = 98% civil   Mar 20, 8:49pm  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Well the russians are watching the libbies, so at least that segment is covered...

Strategist says

and every apologist for Islam should be constantly watched.

20   BlueSardine   179/181 = 98% civil   Mar 20, 8:50pm  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

And how do you know the proxy is not some nsa front company?
-1.
bob2356 says

I use a commercial service with encryption between me and the proxy.

21   NuttBoxer   167/169 = 98% civil   1:31pm today  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

I use Duck Duck Go, not sure that would be enough though. VPN would help a little. Tor better. Tails best.

22   Patrick   987/987 = 100% civil   1:47pm today  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Thanks, had not heard about Tails:

https://tails.boum.org/

Tails is a live operating system that you can start on almost any computer from a DVD, USB stick, or SD card.

It aims at preserving your privacy and anonymity, and helps you to:

use the Internet anonymously and circumvent censorship;
all connections to the Internet are forced to go through the Tor network;
leave no trace on the computer you are using unless you ask it explicitly;
use state-of-the-art cryptographic tools to encrypt your files, emails and instant messaging.

23   bob2356   181/182 = 99% civil   2:54pm today  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

BlueSardine says

And how do you know the proxy is not some nsa front company?

-1.

bob2356 says

I use a commercial service with encryption between me and the proxy.

How do you know the NSA isn't watching your every move from your microwave right now?

24   BlueSardine   179/181 = 98% civil   8:05pm today  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

I don't.
Get it now?

bob2356 says

How do you know the NSA isn't watching your every move from your microwave right now?

Comments 1-24 of 24     Last »

home   top   users   about   suggestions   contact  
topics   random post   best comments   comment jail  
patrick's 40 proposals  
10 reasons it's a terrible time to buy  
8 groups who lie about the housing market  
37 bogus arguments about housing  
get a free bumper sticker: