patrick.net

 
  forgot password?   register

#housing #investing #politics more»
10,866 registered users, 5 online now: Blurtman, HEY YOU, iwog, PCGyver, Strategist
public post private group chat

Should we focus on criminal release of information or what information was released?

By YesYNot   Mar 20, 1:07pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike   1 link   194 views   4 comments   watch (0)   quote     share

During the campaign, Trump and supporters didn't care where the Wikileaks information came from. They just wanted us to focus on the content that was leaked. Now, the Trump administration (and apparently the Republicans who were questioning Comey today) wants us to focus on the crime of people leaking classified information. They now want us to ignore the content of what was leaked (potential connections and collusion between Trump campaign and Russia). You have to love the consistency.

#politics

Comments 1-4 of 4     Last »

1   Ironman   1673/1732 = 96% civil   private mesage   Mar 20, 1:20pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Wait, where is the WaPo or NYT link?

YesYNot says

didn't care where the Wikileaks information came from. They just wanted us to focus on the content that was leaked.

Leaking Podesta's TRUE emails were "classified" information?

YesYNot says

wants us to focus on the crime of people leaking classified information.

Is that a felony or not??
YesYNot says

They now want us to ignore the content of what was leaked (potential connections and collusion between Trump campaign and Russia).

I'm glad you said "POTENTIAL", since there hasn't been any verifiable proof yet.

YesYNot says

You have to love the consistency.

We would if your stories and links were consistent, oh wait they are, consistently FAKE news.... Got it...

2   YesYNot   696/697 = 99% civil   private mesage   Mar 20, 1:44pm  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Ironman says

I'm glad you said "POTENTIAL", since there hasn't been any verifiable proof yet.

The WaPo reported that there was an investigation into possible collusion between Trump campaign people and Russian operatives. Trumpkins claimed that this was fake news. Now what? Do you admit that you were wrong, or just keep pointing your crooked finger and shouting: FAKE NEWS at the highest output that your strained and tired vocal cords can muster?

Are you tired of winning yet?

3   Straw Man   234/234 = 100% civil   private mesage   Mar 20, 2:18pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Both.

4   Ironman   1673/1732 = 96% civil   private mesage   Mar 20, 3:14pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

YesYNot says

The WaPo reported that there was an investigation into possible collusion

There you go again... "The WaPo reported"....

Ha ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha ha ha ha

Do you have any idea how many "investigations" go absolutely nowhere... It's been how many months now, has there been ANY pieces of verifiable evidence showing collusion??

ANY???????? ANY????

Bueller?? Bueller??

Do we need another year of "investigations"????

YesYNot says

Are you tired of winning yet?

Are you tired of lying yet and posting "news" from FAKE sources??

Comments 1-4 of 4     Last »

home   top   users   about   suggestions   contact  
topics   random post   best comments   comment jail  
patrick's 40 proposals  
10 reasons it's a terrible time to buy  
8 groups who lie about the housing market  
37 bogus arguments about housing  
get a free bumper sticker: