6
0

Communist for Congress


 invite response                
2021 Jul 6, 7:20pm   995 views  11 comments

by clambo   ➕follow (2)   💰tip   ignore  


It's of course a dimwit from the hood who thinks the rich don't pay their "fair share."

Comments 1 - 11 of 11        Search these comments

1   RC2006   2021 Jul 6, 7:30pm  

Why a thousand, a free phone is usually enough.
2   Ceffer   2021 Jul 6, 8:08pm  

Free shit 'carrot on a stick' still works, and there is absolutely no obligation to keep the promises. Why give that much to the dogs when you can keep it in corrupt payoffs.

RC2006 is right. Obama promised to pay off their mortgages, but only gave them free phones so they could whur, pimp, and deal.
3   Bd6r   2021 Jul 6, 9:44pm  

RC2006 says
Why a thousand, a free phone is usually enough.

why not a million? or a billion for everyone?
4   Onvacation   2021 Jul 6, 10:02pm  

Ceffer says
there is absolutely no obligation to keep the promises.

"But uh, you know,", he lowered his voice to a whisper, "they are going to get checks in the mail that are consequential, this week, for child care."
5   clambo   2021 Jul 7, 7:00am  

The problem is later candidates will say “that hoe promised a thousand bucks and didn’t deliver, but I will deliver.”

It will be an issue in debates; “Ms Hoe says $1000/person, do you agree with that number, or should it be $2000?”

If you guys are not Roth IRA bucks up, I suggest you get moving before this shit hits the fan.

The blacks know that the only way to fuck over whites for their money is through the government.
6   Shaman   2021 Jul 7, 7:52am  

Democracy breaks down into a mess when the people realize they can just vote themselves more money. Then money loses its value and people stop producing and it’s a spiral down to breadlines and Yugos.
7   rocketjoe79   2021 Jul 7, 8:07am  

As Maggie Thatcher said: "The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money."
8   clambo   2021 Jul 7, 8:10am  

Cicero said all democracies will destroy themselves when the people can vote themselves money from the treasury.
9   Misc   2021 Jul 7, 12:40pm  

For the last 35 years or so, the rich have been constantly voting people into office to give them further tax breaks.

Of course, the poor are going to return that favor.
10   clambo   2021 Jul 7, 1:30pm  

If the rich are not a majority in the USA (by definition they are the minority), how did they vote in anyone?

If anyone is poor here, it’s his own fault.
11   Patrick   2021 Jul 11, 4:21pm  

clambo says
If the rich are not a majority in the USA (by definition they are the minority), how did they vote in anyone?


They don't have to. They just have to limit your options in the primaries to candidates that they find acceptable.

That was their problem with Trump. He didn't have permission from the elite to run for president.

https://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/mgilens/files/gilens_and_page_2014_-testing_theories_of_american_politics.doc.pdf

Multivariate analysis indicates that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial
independent impacts on U.S. government policy, while average citizens and mass-based interest groups have little or no
independent influence. The results provide substantial support for theories of Economic-Elite Domination and for theories of
Biased Pluralism, but not for theories of Majoritarian Electoral Democracy or Majoritarian Pluralism.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions