patrick.net

Agreed. There is no need to kill off many, population growth has been slowing already. But it's will exacerbate infertility and kill of a few right away and a few later. And on top guarantees profits for meds needed to treat the agent side effects. For the thousands of children maimed and killed it's still genocide.

richwicks says

decided to wipe out a large portion of the population

And what is the point of killing off a large portion of population?

Sloppiness, arrogance, and unintended consequences. Disastrous unintended consequences always follow centralized psychopathic control, if you pay attention to history. As long as the ultimate perpetrators remain unidentified and unpunished, then they are like punch drunks in a crystal shop.

The original plan was to foist the fake virus with fake tests for the fake plandemic over several years of shutdowns and human rights removal. The vaccines weren't supposed to come until later, and were to be introduced at first in a low key way to acclimate the populations to the notion that the government could inject anything into your body that they pleased as often as they pleased for whatever purpose that they pleased. The democides, genocides and mass sterilizations were supposed to follow only after this destruction of human rights and cattle-like inurement to biologic manipulations.

The timelines were compressed, nominally by forcing the vaccines into production. So, the activities had to be accelerated as well: thus the sloppy mess of totalitarianism and medical terror we now are in. The lunatics were so eager to test their gene therapies and control mechanisms, they went ahead with the toxic jabs in full view, with full arrogant confidence that the captive propaganda medium and corrupted governments would protect them. The niagra falls of fiat money keeps it all afloat.

I think we are just witnessing the usual usual of unintended consequences of insane totalitarians pursuing their dreams of absolute control with science fiction fantasies they have been intoxicated with. Since the goals are entire subversion of the planet and the human race, they are suffering premature exposure instead of remaining behind the scenes as they were historically. The standard ploys of disguising mass murder and control with nominal altruism is going off the rails.

I also think that punting the world order psychopaths into their unintended consequences on a non-optimal time schedule is also to force the population to see what they are doing for a change.

The population is pretty dense, so who knows how successful this 'education by fire' is going to be.

Bd6r says

richwicks says

decided to wipe out a large portion of the population

And what is the point of killing off a large portion of population?

To "save the planet".

Save it for certain people, that is.

Patrick says

To "save the planet".

Save it for certain people, that is.

I don't believe it.

That decreases PROFIT! which drives everythingg.

besides, then they should start with 3rd world populations which are still increasing.

Bd6r says

That decreases PROFIT! which drives everythingg.

The Federal Reserve can create as much money as they wish.

THEY determine which corporations are profitable. They can dump as much money as they please into Google for example, or Facebook. The first one has become useless to me because of censorship (and I am an engineer), and Facebook has NEVER been useful for me. Yet, these are the titans of Silly Con Valley. They are hemorrhaging users, Facebook is now regarded as a site "for old people", Youtube has the same problem - because frankly they are kicked off - but their stock price continues to climb.

The reason there's no connection to profit and future earnings is that people aren't driving up the stock prices, even investment banks and hedge funds aren't - the Fed is directly purchasing the stock.

Money is just digits created on a computer by a corporation that isn't audited.

The 2nd tier people worry about "money". First tier creates as much as they goddamned want to create. This is why municipalities don't care about businesses going under. NYC will get enough "money" to continue to operate even if every business, ever corporation, leaves.

People just don't understand our monetary system. Profit only matters in a free market capitalistic system where the medium of exchange has some actual value. We're not in that system. This is a mixture of communism and fascism. Capitalism only matters for the little people that haven't figured out that isn't the main system.

Money is not equal to profit here as profit can not be generated by 0 and 1's.
Also, it still does not explain why "they" would need to decrease amount of humans.

Moderna stock price

Jan 1 2020: $20.51

COVID19 Pandemic!

Sept 1 2021: $430.14

Patrick says

But if it gets too obvious, they will definitely have to deal with the relatives of the millions they killed.

yeah, imagine having to read all of those strongly worded emails.

What happens to their stock price if 30% of their clients croak?

Misc says

What happens to their stock price if 30% of their clients croak?

Federal Reserve prints up a trillion dollars and "invests" it in their stock.

People really don't understand our economic system. It's so fucking crooked, that even when it's obviously crooked, and easy to see how crooked it is, they can't believe it.

"The nation's Central Bank wouldn't do something so underhanded and evil!!!" Of course they would.

Bd6r says

Also, it still does not explain why "they" would need to decrease amount of humans.

Like I said, I don't believe that the vaxx is a deliberate plan to kill people. It's just that the Pfizer-government complex doesn't care who dies from it, as long as they rake in the profits and have no liability for the deaths.

But otoh: there are many quotes from billionaires specifically stating that they wish the world population were far lower than it is, eg:

Let’s look at one more member of the famous 2009 meeting of oligarchs in Manhattan—Ted Turner. The founder of CNN has been concerned about overpopulation for decades. In 1996, he told Audubon magazine, “We’re all 5 billion of us on this little earth swimming around in space, and there’s too many of us,” he said. “If we had a much smaller population . . . we could cut back to 250 million—350 million people.”

http://dean-w-arnold.com/articles-blogs/bill-gates-gathers-billionaires

Patrick says

But otoh: there are many quotes from billionaires specifically stating that they wish the world population were far lower than it is, eg:

Ted Turner isn't wrong in all honesty. The vast majority of humans on this planet are dead weight. They produce and provide little to nothing. Almost 50% of the US doesn't even pay Federal taxes. We pay for them to live. Factor in 3rd world countries and you could argue 60-70% of the worlds population is useless. We build shit hole cities that trash the planet, yet those are the people bitching about the environment.

This is why I've been saying go rural. Get out of cities or suburbs. Not predicting a collapse, but when it does eventually come, cities will be the worst place to be near. Turner owned a fuck ton of rural Montana. When a crisis comes people will flee cities as the looting and crime goes through the roof. It's already slowly happening in most metros across the country.

IMHO, the "resource limit" propaganda is a cover. Every "resource" we consume on a daily basis (aside from air, which has no price as it is economically abundant) is the fruit of someone else' labor; larger population (not artificially supported by welfare programs) create wealth and resources through trade and division of labor, so "overpopulation" / "resource-limit" is a lie. If you are a sheep farmer, you want your flock to be as large as possible. Yet, as every winter arrives you would slaughter many of them . . . for the meat.

The purpose for "seasonal" population reduction is very simple: take their assets. Hitler came to power in 1933, but Krystalnacht didn't take place until 1938, why? the racist ideology was used as tool for facilitating an economic goal: robbing the Jews of their assets, just like Anschluss (unification with Austria) and invasion of Czechslovakia took place around the same time robbing Austria and Czechia, followed by invasion of Poland for the same reason. A centrally planned economy like the Nazi's couldn't sustain itself. It ran into severe economic problem after 5 years of "Nazi economic miracle" cooking GNP numbers.

Today, just like in early 20th century, around 1800, early 1700's, early 1600's, most large institutions of the world, from governments to banks, are essentially ponzi scams after unnaturally low interest rate making profitable investment of savings and pensions impossible. They need the creditors to die so the ponzi scams are not quickly exposed. Printing money can only plug numbers but can not create real goods/services, so would drive prices sky-high if a large number of existing creditors are not stopped from spending (and potentially endangering their monetary system harvesting machine itself).

Historically mass population reduction through strange wars (like putting Hitler an Austrian in power to accomplish unification with Austria, putting Napoleon born a Corsican Italian in power to quickly drive through northern Italy and put an end to the debt books of the Venetian Republic, which had existed for a thousands years as the Most Serene Republic) and mass medical malpractice (like systematic Asprin overdose called "the 1918 Spanish Flu" and bloodletting fad in the 1790's) worked because on average people had savings . . . and when they died, the banks and governments kept the money (and the dead governments' debts went poof on the creditors too). Today, people have little savings, so it's a game about annulling pension funds and grabbing assets. The key reality is that the ponzi scammers have already spent the money; whatever money the savers think they have is not there.

Bd6r says

And what is the point of killing off a large portion of population?

Reality says

IMHO, the "resource limit" propaganda is a cover

Yeah, This always didn't sound quite right with me.

Powerful individuals LOVE large populations scrabbling over scarce resources and working for peanuts. That's why they are in favor of mass, unrestrained, hyper immigration.

And large groups of impoverished people are found WITH Absolute Tyranny: Egyptian Pharaohs, Chinese Emperors, Babylon, etc.

Small groups of well off people are more closely identified with more freedom loving regimes: Britain 1500-, Greek City States, Colonial America, etc.

It could be this is just a Rich Fuck Class Indicator, that they are being "Moral" and "Guiding" humanity a la Georgia Guidestones, so they're acting against self-interest.

Or, it's the CCP. Look at Chinese History, they have a long record of dealing with Foreign Barbarians by Bribing them. It's definitely happening, and I think they control Corporate America by dangling carrots. This is why revolving door bureaucrat-executives are afraid of antagonizing China in the slightest. Look at Miley's recent behavior, or Fauci's. Or any regulator.

On the other side of the equation, the CCP uses NGOs, Non-Profits, and Academia by generous donations from their $800B/year in cash thanks to Walmart exports.

WookieMan says

Almost 50% of the US doesn't even pay Federal taxes.

In the beginning, it was 90% that didn't pay income taxes. Income taxes were meant for the very well off and wealthy, not for Francis Farmer or Freddie Factory or Arnie Accountant, but for Winslow Hugh-Smythe IV.

The "Broaden the Tax Base" is a GOPe bullshit story. The real issue is the SIZE and SPENDING of the Federal Government.

Patrick says

Like I said, I don't believe that the vaxx is a deliberate plan to kill people. It's just that the Pfizer-government complex doesn't care who dies from it, as long as they rake in the profits and have no liability for the deaths.

If it was population control, the two groups they'd love to depopulate fatest: Right Wing Whites and Ghetto Trash are the most vaccine "hesitant", whereas their Soyboy/Fat Bureaucrat Bitch (FBB) 10% Outer Party were the most likely to get it.

Reality says

Today, people have little savings, so it's a game about annulling pension funds and grabbing assets.

This makes sense to me. The USA monetary system is in serious trouble. And since it’s the world reserve currency, that means the world has the same problem. We owe too much to too many people. The majority of them are pensions and old people. Release a virus that targets old people, then a vaxx that sets most people up with a seriously damaged immune system, and then the counter punch is a truly dangerous virus with decent lethality that’s immediately widely spread… you’ll wipe out tens of millions in weeks. Perhaps more. And they’ll be systematically older adults with more money/assets and also be creditors of the USA. After all, the National Debt isn’t owed as much to foreigners as it is owed to ourselves.
Mix in a healthy dose of inflation and it’s a recipe for balancing our books on the cheap. Not only that, but you’ll remove nearly all the “useless eaters” and frivolous consumers of excess healthcare. Hell, with most of the doctors and nurses vaxxed, you’ll remove most of the medical system itself!
And without a medical system, the spending on federal and state entitlements drops like a stone.

Also… anyone else remember what they did with the death tax recently? It’s at like 40% for wealth over $11.7 million. Knock off 20 or 30 million of your wealthiest citizens and the state could stand to “inherit” trillions.
For an example, let’s say 1 million of the people who die have 22 million dollars in wealth. The government would stand to make 20 trillion times 0.4 = 8 trillion in inheritance taxes just from those fat little sheep.

Very good point on their deliberate attempt to paralyze the medical industry to speed up the killings. Be wary about "our books" though, there is no "our books": when we put money in a bank, we think we have an asset whereas the bank has a liability. Balancing it to "zero" means clearing us out like in this Southpark clip:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DT7bX-B1Mg

Likewise for government pension liabilities and what people (especially government employees) think they have.

There are only about 3 million people in the US with net-worth over a million dollars. People with significantly more than $10mil are likely to have the assets in family trust funds that do not die; that's the problem Bernie Madoff eventually faced: his clients were not natural persons and did not die. A few far more likely scenarios where the banks and governments can make off big when people die (through the vast larger number of cases):

1. husbands hiding money from their wives for side flings; when the husbands die, the wives don't know; according to statistics, nearly 90% of married couples are not happily married.

2. single estranged elderly, especially elderly women who have no kids of their own but were "successful" in their careers and saved up some money after selling themselves to the corporations and government jobs;

These two types already have their money in the bank, and "it's gone" so their deaths remove the liabilities for the banks.

3. elderly people who live in their own houses. A few months after deaths, there would be either estate sale or tax lien sales by the cities/towns. Kids are either too lazy, to desperate or too much conflict among the siblings to seek the best price. That's when the governments and the banks/private-equity would have a chance at buying a house at much lower than normal market prices. Didn't the money managers just complain about not having enough houses to buy? The fund-manager "cash buyers" borrowing from the FED window at near-zero interest rate can then flip to home buyers on mortgage or renters, pocketing the difference in between. The city/town also gets to raise property tax much higher than whatever the elderly owner may have qualified.

Reality says

There are only about 3 million people in the US with net-worth over a million dollars.

https://www.ramseysolutions.com/retirement/how-many-millionaires-in-us

How Many Millionaires Are in the U.S.?
Do you know how many millionaires are in the U.S. today? The answer is there are about 12 million millionaire households, according to Spectrem Group’s Market Insights Report 2020.1 And that number is growing.



https://www.thekickassentrepreneur.com/millionaires-in-america/

The number of millionaires in the US is 20.27 million.

Currently, there are over 4,473,836 or 4.4 million households in the United States of America that have $4 million or more in wealth.

the number of households that have $5 million or more in wealth is estimated at around 3,592,054 or 3.59 million.

"Household worth more than a million" is counting the sum of all members of the household. A husband and a wife each with good jobs and retirement funds with combined wealth of $1.5mil may not have a single millionaire in that household. You are correct though in pointing out the real number is likely higher than the 3mil estimate I gave, but the inheritance tax kick in at a higher threshold so still may not catch that many people; not that I support inheritance tax or anything. The sources of death windfall for banks and governments are far more likely to be the middle class: the elderly home-owners etc. that I mentioned above.

Also, by mid-2019, there were about 650k reverse-mortgages outstanding. If an average house in reverse mortgage is $300k, killing even half of those 650k reverse-mortgage homeowners would net the lenders $100 Billion!